₦airaland Forum

LordReed:
The interest is 9%. Tomorrow you'll start claiming you never lie, I have caught you in a lie korokoro.

You are mathematically challenged. The fine was 360m . 25% of that is 90m approximately making it the 450m figure starting point.
I used rough figures you idiot.

This is a judgement that should never stand. No victims.
The law used to prosecute the case is meant to protect consumers from big institutions, Letitia applied it upside down. The consumers apparently hurt are big banks and insurance companies.
Everything about the case stinks to high heavens

DaHighLife:
The contention that you lack the capacity to comprehend the material you read, or you are incapable of drawing accurate conclusions from said material, or you rely on erroneous sources, does not present a betterer argument in your favor.

Furthermore, your argument does not alter the fact that, in my humble opinion, that you are among the foremost disseminators of misinformation within this thread.

Claiming that you are "never wrong" would in fact be a Lie. I have already delineated just several instances of the many I have found where you have been clearly wrong just within the limited posts of yours that I have read. I can envision that number increasing exponentially with a more thorough review of your posts

https://thefederalist.com/2024/02/23/judge-engorons-inflation-of-trumps-ill-gotten-gains-is-a-financial-crime-in-itself/

This is a well explained article relying on Judge Engoron ruling.
Pay close attention to recourse, non recourse and disgorgement explanations.
The article should clear your biases.

Applies to Jessicarabbit too.
Judge Engoron seems likely to have wanted to fine Trump's parents for siring him.

Trump team filed motion in Georgia detailing geolocation data of Fani Willis boyfriend Nathan Wade cellphone.
Both said under oath they begun the affair long after she appointed him as the lead Inquisitor. Wade claimed to have visited her home 10 times only.
A wiitness testified she was sure they had a thing going back 2019.

Cellphone data shows he visited her at least 35 times in 2021. Some visits were booty calls, where he spent the night.
In 2021, they texted 12000 times and exchanged 2000 calls.

Conclusion. Both lied under oath. Have to be removed from the case.They need to be disbarred and jailed yesterday.

In 2021 Fani Willis said she would fire staff members having interoffice affairs. She promised to restore integrity to the office
Another charge. Did she profit from payments she personally approved ? She claims to have reimbursed Wade in cash. In her other cash reimbursements she used an app CashApp which has a money trail. With Wade she used cash.Wade has no records where he banked the cash to offset the business expenses he incurred taking Fani to cruises, shopping, buying dinners and flowers etc. These were business deductible expenses.😄😄😄😄
She got laid, he got paid.
With that kind of cash this brother should have been dating hot girls, not some divorcee with control of his income. I could kick him if I met him.


Trump has those call records, I bet there are calls to White House, DOJ and Jack Smith who are coordinating the Trump take down efforts.

dahighlife and Jessicarabbit Spin this development.
I think if this case was with the FBI they would indict the witness for telling lies and close down the Telco operator who provided the data while declaring the data inadmissible.

feedthenation:
---Uncle, I guessed you are waiting for the news to be distorted from the MAGA news channel---anyway Trump is officially owing $454,156,783.05, the New York County clerk has officially just entered the judgment signed by Justice Engoron in the Trump organization case---

Yes, this is a first. They want him to forfeit at least one property before the appeal begins. They are charging 25% interest before the process Which has to be deposited within 30 days
In this case with no victims, the end game is to bankrupt a Presidential candidate.

Obrigardo:
Was McAfee a judge when he donated to Fani, and how much was it?
Was it a one time thing or consistent over the years? Provide a robust back story, no innuendos, just the truth.

And tell me how it's similar to Clearance Thomas and Christofascist alitos corruption.

https://dailycaller.com/2024/02/21/scott-mcafee-fani-willis-donation-trump/

He donated $120 in 2020 to Fani among others.
He was appointed Judge in 2023.

Daily Caller again offers a balanced point of view.
With Clarence you think he should recuse because he is friends to someone. Really rich for that matter

Obrigardo:
I guess you were just chuckling like Frankenstein when you wrote this. Are you this silly?

Mention one lie I disseminate knowingly. Making my conclusion is being wrong and it's not lying.
I would be lying if I said Melania Trump is ugly. I'll be lying if I said Obama was more pro Israeli than Trump.

Why is it that you people can never show where I lied?
Why can't you people dare name your factual credible sources?

Obrigardo:
When you make countless conspiracy theories and lies, you tend to lose track.

I don't think I have the time to dig up your trashy posts but you've been caught in lies after lies after lies. So it tracks.

I never lie. I'm very consistent because I usually delve into less than 10 topics of which I have never changed my opinion. .I may be wrong in analysis, but I don't lie which is different from saying George Soros is a good man to emulate.
As for you , I can't call you liar because you usually mimic what the leftie media is saying. Quite different from manufacturing Harvard degrees and 4.0 GPAs. I think you know what I mean.
If you claim that a certain religion is full of nothing but peace I'll consider you a liar if you really know what you are saying Else I'll consider you as jut being misinformed.

.

Obrigardo:
Seems rich for basilico loco to call out months old President Biden's gaffe but look away when demented fraudster and Insurrectionist Criminal trump lose his marbles.

The stubborn maga cultist doesn't want to agree that Criminal trump is far gone because he is in a cult.

What the fùck was this 😂

He is sane enough to face multiple charges across various Kangaroo courts.
The Chief Inquisitor is mentally incompetent to face trial.Cant remember the year his son died

feedthenation:
---Trump and his lawyers trying to commit fraud by changing 6 of Trump business addresses from New York to Florida---

Not seen that. The same judge has refused to delay by 30 days an enforcement of penalties teling him to go appeal at higher court.
Translation:
Deposit $360m within 30 days of my judgement announcement or else I'll go after you. Letitia said they will go after the properties.
You are also barred from business in NYC so you can't sign a bond with a NYS insurance company.
( I don't know whether NYS would accept a bond from another state based Co.).

LordReed:
If you know it is a gotcha why are you referring me to anything? You talking pointwas already blown out of the water stop trying to save face.

What point and by who ? I've read nothing sensible enough to retract anything I've put down.

This pleased Joe Biden supporters on X.
The judge hearing Fanni Willis case over her affair with Nathan Wade.
She was his boss within the Fulton court system at one time.
Tax filings shows he donated to her electoral campaign for Fulton DA

Over to Obrigardo and Ijebos who regaled us with reasons why Clarence should retire as a justice for being friends with some rich dude who had no case at the Supreme Court.

The judge might be the rare honest one so disgusted by the filthy actions of Fani that he sets the ball rolling to have her disbarred and jailed for life.
***Just my wishful thinking****

LordReed:
LoLz! You fold as easily as wet tissue paper. All it takes is one incisive question to destroy your talking points.

I refer you to Wikipedia. Sometimes learn to do some background checks before dropping gotcha queries.

JessicaRabbit:
Just a heads up -- some, actually most of them, might require actual thinking.



I prefer to call it "nuanced understanding".

Y

Flawed analogy. Trump's property that he sold in 2008 was a mansion on a beachfront lot, while Mar-a-Lago is a club resort on a larger inland lot. The demand and supply for these properties are not the same, and neither are the factors that affect their values. For example, beachfront properties are more scarce and desirable than inland properties, and club resorts have different income and expense streams than residential properties. Therefore, the value of one property cannot be inferred from the value of another property, unless they are very similar and comparable.



Maybe it isn't, but it seems to be beyond your current grasp of the situation.



Valuation isn't exactly rocket science, but if you're struggling, I'm sure you can find places online to point you towards some beginner resources.



Oh really? And what about accessibility, land use, physical attributes, location, market conditions etc, hmm? Can you see how evident your lack of knowledge on this topic is?

Well, I'm not surprised that you can NOT provide any evidence or data to support the claim that recent sales of other properties in the vicinity have increased the value of Mar-a-Lago. You can only offer mere assertions without proof.

And you expect reasonable people here to take you seriously? LOL.



Perhaps you're just not used to encountering well-written content. Don't worry, it's a rare find these days, I've observed personally.

Be adviced that land values depend highly on recent sales of nearby pieces/tracts of land.Try and figure out why. All those factors you mentioned determine why any land sale within the general area took place. If someone bought some land that had oil, then it affects every other sale nearby for instance.Just common sense.

A land valuer/ property agent can clarify that for you.



Jackson, chief property appraiser for Palm Beach County, told Newsweek that its assessments were "based on assessments for tax purposes only and not for financing or...for a lending institution."
He said that Mar-a-Lago was among nine clubs in the county that were appraised on their net operating income. "We look at their memberships—the number of members—their annual membership dues, the expenses that it costs to run the facility, and then we trade a capitalization rate, which includes the tax rate for that jurisdiction," Jackson explained.

"We don't look at that property any differently than we do any properties here in Palm Beach County; they're all assessed equitably and fairly...regardless of who's name is on the property," he added.

Jackson declined to comment on the reaction of Trump and his family to the assessment but said: "Everyone has an opinion. We have an opinion, and our values are set on January 1 of each calendar year and it's only for assessment purposes—not for reappraisals or private appraisals that someone would want to determine what their property is 5


How much would be Michael Jordan's sneakers tax be, were they displayed in their own museum? How much loan would a bank extend to this museum? Same amount as the tax valuation, no?
You really tie yourself up in knots.

LordReed:
How much did he buy the property?

Does it matter?

JessicaRabbit:
You're drowning in a puddle of ignorance, and I'm tired of playing the teacher and throwing you lifelines. Why must we always hold a kindergarten lesson in your favor, and allow you come to predictable conclusions before you can join a simple conversation? You're a lost cause and a bore.

I'm still waiting for answers to these questions.

I'll come to those questions.
Later. Let's go on with your fuzzy logic in valuations.
In 2008 Trump sold a property 6.2 acres for $95m MAL is on 17 acres.
Later that property was demolished, subdivided into 3 pieces that in total sold for $108m in 2016.

I posed this question some year ago. If a university was to build a campus next to your village plot, the plots value would rise. If you are to build hostels on your plot, you'd apply for a larger amount of loan than a similar undeveloped property. But you would not use that value for paying land rates.

Its not rocket science. You want to teach me valuation seriously.
Are you aware that land value is very much based on recent sales of other properties within the vicinity.

By the way are you using chatgpt as your source? The other day I wondered whether you are writing love letters. The kind of sweet responses from Generative AI.

JessicaRabbit:
Normally, I'd be explaining to you how valuations were based on its annual net operating income as a club and not on its resale value as a home or its reconstruction cost, but as history has shown repeatedly on this thread, it wouldn't matter to a dumbo with the IQ of a shoelace. If truly you're honest with yourself, or had the tiniest molecule of self-awareness, you'd have subtly noticed how your irrelevant link does absolutely nothing to dispute the fact that Trump DID inflate the value of his resort. So before we get lost in the Bermuda Triangle of tangents you keep constructing, let's circle back to those pesky questions you've been tap-dancing around like a mime lost in a disco:

You are shameless. Since when do prime real estate properties lose value over time? Especially after massive uplifts.
How did he inflate Mar a Lago. If he was to list it now how much would he get, Mr Ignorant.

Obrigardo:
When I say maga cultists are the dumbest people on Earth, it is not an Insult but a fact.

For example, we were all witnesses to basilico loco's rampage against the covid vaccine because chip implants and freedumb!

But this same basilico dude is eerily silent about elon dusk's neurallink - a real chip implants to the spine and brain which gives elon full tracking control of the idiots who wear his trash.

Stop lying. I've never said vaccines contain any chips or traceable compounds. I was against the vax because of the lies behind it, forcing people to have it. Preventing cheap drugs like Ivermectin from prescription. Big pharma made billions which would not been possible had other drugs now approved been rejected then.
Elon Musk with his neural link . That's his own problem. If anyone wants an implant let them get it, I'm totally against neural implants.

JessicaRabbit:
Answer the questions, or shut your trap forever. I've indulged your diversions enough.



You're carefully avoiding these questions because you know answering them honestly will utterly destroy your inane propaganda, and prejudiced narratives.

Get lost.

A certain prime property listed 42 years ago at $20m is now worth $18-27m.

https://www.nytimes.com/1981/07/16/garden/post-home-for-sale-for-20.html

Shove your propaganda sources where the sun don't shine.


Mar a Lago.

JessicaRabbit:
You refused to answer my questions, and now you want me to oblige you? It seems you've forgotten how this discussion started and which party has the burden of proof here? You're not a serious debater.

I get my info from a lot of sources..Where do you get yours. You are the one whose blatant lies I keep pointing out.
The worst you can get on is misunderstanding. Unlike you it's usually totally made up fake lies.

Put down your credible sources so we can compare notes. I most of the time provide links.

Obrigardo:
This same David Weiss who just indicted this Smirnov guy. Did you read the scathing indictment at all?

Yes David Weiss was appointed by AG Bill Bar to investigate the criminal family.

Jessicarabbit and dahighlife. While I'm waiting for your credible sources Is this a credible source of Biden corruption?

https://dailycaller.com/2024/02/21/james-biden-story-china-deal/

NB
Dailycaller co-founded by Tucker Carlson

JessicaRabbit:
I'm not asking for proof, I'm asking for logic. I recommend that you look up the difference because you seem to have a hard time distinguishing between the two. You can provide neither proof nor logic to support your claims, and that's why you easily resort to cheap strawmen attacks, like responding to my post as if I ever claimed that a supreme court female judge can define a woman, when I never did.

Intellectual dishonesty is a cancer on productive discourse, and you have made yourself its' willing carrier.

I use logic to determine my conclusions.
I also need one credible source according to you .Or better still One credible journalist from any media house.

DaHighLife:
Do I truly need to do this again? These instances are merely a couple of examples gleaned from the limited number of your posts that I've read.

Initially, there was a discussion about Juries wherein the comprehension of their function and the distinct standards of proof requisite for different types of juries seemed lacking. This confusion between a grand jury and a civil trial jury highlights your fundamental misunderstanding of the workings of the US court system.

Furthermore, your assertions in the post I commented on appear to be contradicted by the very article you provided. It was not Judge Engeron who structured the case, but rather the prosecutors. Consequently, he was obligated to abide by the laws set forth. The prosecutors sought an "equitable remedy", aiming to recover what they perceived as the fraudulent gains Trump acquired. This determination, by law, fell under the purview of the judge, not a jury. Thus, your interpretation of the article appears flawed.

Based on what I have observed here, engaging in a back and forth with you wouldn't be fruitful nor productive. And with regard to your persistent reliance on 'common sense,' it's important to acknowledge that while common sense indeed has significant value, it can't replace expertise, particularly in evaluating complex sunjects. I urge you to familiarize yourself with the 'common sense' fallacy and to read Judge Engeron's ruling for a more informed perspective. I would assume you would also believe constructive discussion is best approached from a foundation of knowledge. Cheerio.

All boils down to sources..I usually try and quote my sourcesFor future reference.
I only need one answer from you.
Name one or two credible sources .
Or just one that you deem credible.
I won't laugh you out of town.

JessicaRabbit:
@basilico

I didn't fail to notice that you carefully avoided these questions. But perhaps I should give you the benefit of the doubt, and assume that you truly and honestly missed them. In any case, here they are again:

You ask for proof as if I'm an investigator.
I know Mitchell Obama is a woman despite me not having seen her genitals.
A supreme court female judge can't define a woman because she is not a biologist.

DaHighLife:
You ought to consider researching the topics you select to post about before doing so. It appears that you have a substantial amount of time at your disposal to dedicate to such. The majority of the posts I have encountered from you are either factually inaccurate or lack coherence, such as this one. In my humble opinion, your posts sound nonsensical and bear resemblance to something one might expect from a paid shill.

Any one thing factually incorrect? It appears you blindly believe every anti Trump action.
Well I don't. I can carefully see the BS by Biden, DOJ and fellow leftists to know
it's a well coordinated farce.
There are countless examples of massive deception esp since Trump won 2016. Gaslighting is the order of the day, what you see didn't happen. Like CNN reporter saying it's a mostly peaceful protest whike a building burns in the background. Like Jan 6 was worse than Pearl Harbor and 9/11. The Russians helped Trump win. Asking Zelensky to investigate Burisma is election interference worthy of impeachment. The border is most secure. A border wall will interfere with butterflies migration .No evidence of Biden corruption. Trump removed a bust of Churchill from the oval office. Ivermectin is a horse paste.Men can get pregnant and they can produce breast milk.COVID is zoonotic. You will not contract COVID if you are vaccinated ISIS is a JV team that wrenched territory the size of England.
I use this place to preserve links I find interesting lest you forget. I'm not zombified.

DEI. State Department guidance on words to use.
Budaatum loves such directives.
Another he loves is Breast milk from men is as good as from the mother.

Obrigardo:
Let me cut through that your bullshit question because i don't like repeating myself to a stubborn maga cultist who should know better.

But you asking about the covering up of Smirnov's allegations is rich. Why don't you explain what allegation was that because I remember Bill Barr was the one who started the inquiry into Hunter Biden because of the Info Smirnov provided, the info we now know came from russian intelligence and the info you've been spamming all of us with on this forum.

Bill Barr. Yes he had David Weiss investigate Hunter but Weiss will be remembered for absolving the Bidens.
Plea deal failure, now he indicts a whistleblower.
I believe that whistleblower. He said Hunter and Pedo Pete each received $ 5 million in a transaction that would take forever to unravel.
I just broke down how Hunter got his $5m.
Pedo Pete's $5m will also be exposed one day I believe. I think it had to do something with him buying a beach house in cash but the details will be out in full one day. Or proceeds from a book that noone bought.

Infact to pause this matter of the Whistleblower. He was told by the burisma exec that he had 17 recordings 15 with Hunter and 2 with Joe.
The FBI has not denied the existence of these recordings. Have they? Do they exist or not? Time will tell.

budaatum:
Kraken on 2000 mules.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.167064/gov.uscourts.nvd.167064.15.0.pdf

Burisma paid Hunter $83333 monthly.
83333*12= 999,996. $1m annually.
Hunter left Burisma board in.2019.
Explains $5m from 2014 -2019 at $1m annually.
Rocket science? Or just plain genius?

JessicaRabbit:
I'm sorry, I can't hear your miserable waffle over the sound of cold reality. The judge ordered Trump to pay nearly $355 million in damages, plus interest, for his fraudulent business practices. The victims of Trump's fraud include the banks that lent him money based on his inflated net worth statements, such as Deutsche Bank, which lost millions of dollars in interest and fees when Trump defaulted on his loans. The insurers that relied on his deflated valuations of his assets to set his premiums, such as Aon, which paid more than $20 million to settle a related investigation by the New York Department of Financial Services. And the taxpayers who were deprived of revenue when Trump claimed tax deductions and credits based on his manipulated financial information.

As for the disclaimer that Trump claims to have in every application, it does NOT absolve him of responsibility or liability for his intentional misrepresentations. The disclaimer, states that the statements are not audited, that they may contain estimates and assumptions, and that others might reach different conclusions about Trump's financial position if they had more information. However, the disclaimer does not give Trump or the Trump Organization license to submit fraudulent and misleading asset valuations to their accountants, lenders, insurers, and tax authorities, as the New York Attorney General's Office argued in its complaint. Moreover, the disclaimer does not negate the fact that Trump signed the statements under penalty of perjury, and that he personally guaranteed some of the loans that he obtained using the statements!



Perhaps you're confusing my honesty with your own selective memory.



Let me remind you that Trump himself lied about Mar-a-Lago when he bought it in 1985. He claimed that it was worth $200 million, when it was actually worth only $25 million. He also lied about his plans to use it as a private residence, when he actually turned it into a club that charged $200,000 in initiation fees.



Soros is a well-known philanthropist and supporter of progressive causes, who has donated to many Democratic candidates and organizations. You have no proof that there is anything illegal or unethical about his contributions to James' campaign, apart from assumptions and speculations. That's the only way you know how to argue. You build up your points based on suggestions and implications as opposed to actual facts that have been confirmed. Moreover, James is not the only one who has pursued legal action against Trump. The Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus Vance Jr., has also indicted Trump and his company on criminal tax fraud charges. Are you going to claim that Vance is also Soros funded? Or are you going to admit that Trump is facing serious legal troubles because of his own wrongdoing, not because of some conspiracy?



Is modesty getting the best of you today, basilico? Don't be shy, share your hidden gems of insight! 🤡

Now here is a piece that looks at the case from different perceptive.

https://townhall.com/columnists/byronyork/2024/02/21/judge-engorons-retribution-n2635501

Salient points.
Judge structured the case for him to be sole arbiter and retributor.
Judge acknowledge all loans were repaid accordingly.
Judge said they were not remorseful at all hence the hefty fines.


By all means , this case is avery unusual and rarely if ever prosecuted. It is an application of a law to find a way to punish Trump, other business owners in NY 'should not be worried.'
The striking thing was that Engoron suggested that the overvaluations -- the heart of the case -- weren't really a serious offense; it was Trump's refusal to confess error that led Engoron to impose such a draconian penalty
...........
This is a venial sin, not a mortal sin. Defendants did not commit murder or arson. They did not rob a bank at gunpoint. Donald Trump is not Bernard Madoff. Yet, defendants are incapable of admitting the error of their ways. Instead, they adopt a 'See no evil, hear.

The article goes on to list what Soros DA said during her campaign.
If you cease being a democrat mouthpiece the article should be an eye opener.Let there be light.

When it comes to Soros and his globalist ambitions , Trump is his greatest enemy. A minion to take him out permanently is a worthy investment to him.A black one especially who bragged About women like her and jean Carroll get stuff done.

Obrigardo:
I wonder how these two dumb maga cultists basilico loco and fake pastor olaadegbu are feeling right now!

This guy Smirnov reported his allegations to FBI in 2020. They buried it. It's taken threat of impeachment to disprove his statement and indict him 4 years later.
Did FBI ever confirm Anthony Weiner laptop had 600K emails from Hillary to Clinton, many of which would have been classified and were accessible to Weiner who has no security clearance? Someone claimed that the laptop had photos of child sacrifice, but the FBI will never confirm or deny it.

JessicaRabbit:
I'm sorry, I can't hear your miserable waffle over the sound of cold reality. The judge ordered Trump to pay nearly $355 million in damages, plus interest, for his fraudulent business practices. The victims of Trump's fraud include the banks that lent him money based on his inflated net worth statements, such as Deutsche Bank, which lost millions of dollars in interest and fees when Trump defaulted on his loans. The insurers that relied on his deflated valuations of his assets to set his premiums, such as Aon, which paid more than $20 million to settle a related investigation by the New York Department of Financial Services. And the taxpayers who were deprived of revenue when Trump claimed tax deductions and credits based on his manipulated financial information.

As for the disclaimer that Trump claims to have in every application, it does NOT absolve him of responsibility or liability for his intentional misrepresentations. The disclaimer, states that the statements are not audited, that they may contain estimates and assumptions, and that others might reach different conclusions about Trump's financial position if they had more information. However, the disclaimer does not give Trump or the Trump Organization license to submit fraudulent and misleading asset valuations to their accountants, lenders, insurers, and tax authorities, as the New York Attorney General's Office argued in its complaint. Moreover, the disclaimer does not negate the fact that Trump signed the statements under penalty of perjury, and that he personally guaranteed some of the loans that he obtained using the statements!



Perhaps you're confusing my honesty with your own selective memory.



Let me remind you that Trump himself lied about Mar-a-Lago when he bought it in 1985. He claimed that it was worth $200 million, when it was actually worth only $25 million. He also lied about his plans to use it as a private residence, when he actually turned it into a club that charged $200,000 in initiation fees.



Soros is a well-known philanthropist and supporter of progressive causes, who has donated to many Democratic candidates and organizations. You have no proof that there is anything illegal or unethical about his contributions to James' campaign, apart from assumptions and speculations. That's the only way you know how to argue. You build up your points based on suggestions and implications as opposed to actual facts that have been confirmed. Moreover, James is not the only one who has pursued legal action against Trump. The Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus Vance Jr., has also indicted Trump and his company on criminal tax fraud charges. Are you going to claim that Vance is also Soros funded? Or are you going to admit that Trump is facing serious legal troubles because of his own wrongdoing, not because of some conspiracy?



Is modesty getting the best of you today, basilico? Don't be shy, share your hidden gems of insight! 🤡

A Deutsche Bank employee testified that it's normal to see overvalued properties in loan request forms. He was involved in personally approving at least one loan to Trump. Which was paid back with interest , called him a high value client. An they wanted to do more business.
Show me the testimony of any witness who was defeauded by one *false filing* Not an auditor or data analyst going through the records. One witness in court who relied on Trump statements of account and lod money.
Soros if he is your type of cake, I have no further comments save for wondering where on earth you get your news from. If you said so in some quarters they would teach you to bungee without a rope
I have seen something about his foundation which he used to promote himself by doing a fundraising for veterans. As he put it the foundation had minimal expenses .Compare to the Clinton Global thing with administrative expenses figures. Which was allegedly used to finance Rodham's weddings.

I can surmise your brief here is to whitewash democrats, injecting plain lies doesn't seem odd to you.

Any state body collecting taxes has its own assessor. Every insurance and bank had it's own assessors.
The most intensive medical I underwent was paid for by a life insurance company. They underlying tests were to determine how long I'm likely to live based on my internal and external health status. I could have gone to my doctors, obtained a medical and presented it to them , but no, they have their own medical staff who direct you to their radiologists, labs and so on
I think you see my point. Insurances are in the business of making money and they are way more thorough .
Get a proper life policy today an see what it entails.

Somebody who did not do his job to evaluate Trump taxes should be in jail.
In all every current Trump case is a witch-hunt meant to block his oval office bid.
You can never convince me otherwise. Never.