₦airaland Forum

bemeruca:
IjeBos or dahighlife should by now think men can menstruate because some professors says so.

Using triangulation, you can get a sense where someone may be using cell towers. And these days, smart phones log many useful data to the network they connect to.

budaatum:
No covfefe? Dude believes what lies he's told.

LordReed:
What nonsense is this? Who the Bleep gives their interest rate like this? Why are you trying to gaslight yourself?

Lemme ask you, what is the formula for simple interest?

LordReed:
Either you are a stubborn dumbo or you are deliberately being obtuse. Simple interst calculation are not that hard and daily interest increases can easily be found. The daily accruement you screenshot are 9% factored per day but you persist in this nonsense to spread your lies.

LordReed:
You do spread lies until you are stopped. 25% interest rate was not a prediction, you deliberately falsified the information.

DaHighLife:
Color me shocked that you are diving headfirst into yet another right-wing conspiracy theory without comprehending the evidence or allowing due process to unfold.
While I haven't been around for long, I wouldn't be surprised if you were a proponent of past conspiracies such as Election Fraud, the Kraken, 2000 Mules, and Biden's alleged 10 million Burisma Bribe. If indeed you were, how did those pan out for you?

From two professors:
1.) An electrical and computer engineering professor from Georgia Tech, and
2.) A criminal law professor from Emory

https://www.ajc.com/politics/breaking-cellphone-data-raise-questions-about-start-of-willis-wade-relationship/SFVMYPTD2RD3HMZYOH3377CNNE/#

LordReed:
All of that and more. Basilico is a prolific and serial liar. Debunk one and you'll see him bring 10 more tomorrow.

LordReed:
At least you've agreed that you lied.

You should offer your legal services to Trump so he can win in a higher court.

LordReed:
You are a dumdum. The interest was charged for YEARS at 9% per annum. You calculating the accrued sum and saying that is the interest rate shows you failed primary school simple interest calculations.

"We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore

"I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard."

JessicaRabbit:
Red herring fallacy. Why do you always have a hard time staying on topic? Pay attention to the discussion! What does Obama, Hillary, or the birther movement have to do with the question of whether Trump committed fraud by misrepresenting the value of his properties? As for the IRS, there could be other reasons why they are not complaining, such as lack of resources, political pressure, or legal obstacles. We can't tell for certain, but trying to imply that either the IRS is complaining or there is no fraud is a classic example of a false dichotomy, ignoring other plausible options without justification. Moreover, the IRS is not the only authority that can investigate and prosecute fraud, as Letitia's case demonstrates.

JessicaRabbit:
What a load of rubbish. The number of women Trump has slept with, or claims to have slept with, has no bearing on the credibility of Carroll's allegation. And the fact that Trump owned a beauty pageant franchise, a casino, and hosted parties does not automatically imply that he had consensual sex with thousands of women, let alone that he can't remember them all. Your point here is not just a non sequitur fallacy (a conclusion that does not follow from the premises), it is yet another straw man fallacy. I did not accuse Trump of being immoral, I accused him of lying about his encounter with Carroll. Again, pay attention!

DaHighLife:
I am not going to revisit the Fani Lewis matter. Rational individuals will observe the dearth of evidence you have presented, peruse the transcripts of her testimony and understand you are making it up. It's not up to individuals to disprove allegations that you invent out of whole cloth.

But, I must confess, upon reading your post, a sense of sadness enveloped me. You have taken a made up allegation, transformed it into a certainty, constructed a conspiracy around it, and then tied in other conspiracies (involving Trump, Act Blue). Reading your words is akin to watching an episode of the X-Files. May I ask a personal question? Has anyone in your close circle ever recommended that you seek assistance from a mental health professional?

Obrigardo:
Is it wrong to want industries to go back to America. - Dumbo, American manufacturing is at its HIGHEST PEAK EVER. That's why the stock market is in overdrive. You are still so low bro. Do you have any idea how many manufacturing companies have stationed their headquarters back from abroad under President Biden? You are still living in 2016 delusion.

to frack baby frack - Another stupid and idiotic willful ignorance. Fracking and American oil production is at an all time high, higher than criminal trump's admin. You are still so slow. frack baby frack crack your empty skull there, mumu.

to control illegal immigration - Maga idiot. President Biden and bipartisan senate came together with the strongest border deal in decades, but your criminal trump and maga insurrectionists in congress don't want to pass it so they can keep on campaigning on open borders because they got nothing to win votes. A dull man like you won't even know criminal trump didn't even finish the wall he was shouting all for, Mexico didn't pay for anything - heck, even President Biden made Mexico pledge money to strengthen their side of the border. Do you even know Bannon is going on trial this may for We build the wall scam where he and his goons stole money from maga donors who thought they were raising funds for the wall criminal trump didn't build? You are toooo slooooow.

nominate conservative justices - How many conservative justices do you want again idiot? Tell me the reason why you need them. The abortion ban and IVF restriction is not enough for you? You want to masturbate on the handmaid's tale scenario? You dumb maga piece of shit!

help veterans - Silly maga cultist doesn't even know the track record of maga gop voting against veteran benefits in Congress. What a dull man. If only you knew current news, you won't be writing this shit. Mugu. And when your criminal overlord derides John McCain and calls fallen soldiers suckers and losers. The criminal who deferred from serving in the Army FIVE TIMES. Please just roll away into your trash pile. Idiot!

stop the wars and bring the boys back home - As stupid as this sound, this is the maga cultist salivating on the prospect of killer putin invading europe and starting an all out third world war. You have never advocated for more aid to Ukraine so we can shut killer putin up for good. You have made arguments for why the killer invaded Ukraine and why he must steal territories to build his new Soviet Union.

SO MR DUMB MAGA CHUCKLEFUCK, SHUT THE HELL UP! YOU ARE JUST TOO SLOW MAN

bemeruca:
DaHighLife or DaHighLiar is playing dumb by not giving the full context of what is going on.
Fani willis:

1

2


she clearly said earlier that she KEPT money left over from her first campaign...but her later testimony contradicts that statement when she then says she LOST that money and was broke ..so which is it??...did she keep some of that money or did she lose it on the campaign.

she should be investigated for campaign finance violations. She is a fraud. funny enough, she said she does not have receipts for all this nonsense.




She said she took the money and put it into her campaign, she talked about losing that money, but somehow still kept a large amount of that money she lost.

JessicaRabbit:
When will it seep through to your fragile brain that Engoron based his ruling on the Martin Act, which does not require proof of intent or reliance, only that the defendants made false or misleading statements in connection with the offer or sale of securities? Letitia James sued Trump and his companies under the Martin Act, a law that gives her broad authority to investigate and prosecute securities fraud in New York.
Engoron did not fine Trump for the profit he made on the DC hotel. That's just a complete misinterpretation of the case. He ordered him to disgorge the profit he made from the fraud, which was the difference between the amount of money he borrowed and the amount of money he would have been able to borrow if he had told the truth about
his assets. The disgorgement order was not based on the type of loan (recourse or non-recourse), but on the amount of money that the defendants obtained by fraud.

The Martin Act is not meant to protect the consumer or the lender, as you falsely claim. It is meant to protect the public and the integrity of the securities market from fraud and deception. It is not a partisan or political tool, but a powerful and effective weapon against white-collar crime, and the case against Trump and his companies was driven by overwhelming evidence and compelling arguments. Of course you have not read the judgment, because you are all too comfortable making up specious suggestions that cater to your own narratives.

bemeruca:
i am sure she was just in a photo not like he was taking a photo with her.

DaHighLife:
Ah, you are that type. I am not going to engage in semantic debates with you. I have more productive uses for my time.

This was the post upon which this argument hinged.


Please provide evidence supporting your claim that she 'admitted fraud' and took 'a significant amount of money from her campaign'.

It appears you may have struggled to comprehend the quotation you referenced. Allow me to offer clarification:



Imagine transforming a somewhat inarticulate verbal retort into an elaborate illegal campaign fraud scheme. Alternatively, contemplate the notion of permitting an online influencer [probably a right wing one] to persuade you into believing she committed an illegal campaign conspiracy based on 1 somewhat inarticulate phrase. Imagine an individual who engages in such actions, thereby squandering everyone's time due to an inability to concede their error. Does this behavior align with the behavior of a rational, educated person?

Obrigardo:
But you find it appropriate that this sexual assaulter and rapist become president of the most powerful country on Earth, again. You never revealed this side of your awareness when you always told us that the Criminal did nothing wrong.

This is a drastic change in your maga ideology, and bruh, it's gonna get worse for you. You never sounded like this years, even months back.

This was the exact path that happened to me until I realized christo fascism conspiracy theories were damaging my health and mental well being.

You've always held the Criminal to a higher standard that even now you think he is more righteous than the Catholic President Biden who's been with one woman for decades after his first wife passed on.

You on the path to enlightenment, just keep your thinking hat on, not the tin-foil.

JessicaRabbit:
This is a loaded question proceeding from a simplistic characterization of Letitia's investigation. She did not use tax assessment to evaluate the value of Trump properties, she used it to compare the value of Trump properties with the value of similar properties in the same area. She did this to show that there was a significant discrepancy between the values that Trump reported to the tax authorities and the values that he reported to the banks. This discrepancy suggests that he either inflated or deflated the value of his properties depending on his interests, which could amount to fraud. You're also ignoring the fact that Letitia did not rely solely on tax assessment, she also used other sources of information, such as appraisals, financial statements, loan documents, and expert opinions to corroborate and cross-check the data and provide a more comprehensive picture of the value of Trump properties.

DaHighLife:
She retained a portion of the funds withdrawn from her personal bank account, which she had utilized for her campaign. Do you think she should face incarceration for retaining her own funds? What's the rationale behind expending bandwidth to disseminate easily verifiable falsehoods like this?
There is a persistent flow of misinformation in this thread perpetuated by the same bad actors.

DaHighLife:
Valid points indeed, but I'd exercise caution regarding the claims made by the Trump team regarding the 'cell phone data.' They have previously asserted claims in signed affidavits, such as the assertion that Fanni was residing with Wade, which ultimately proved to be false. The specifics of the cell phone data remain unclear; we lack information on what data they possess, or whether it was obtained legally.

The manner in which they purportedly obtained personal cell phone information from not only an individual but also the prosecutor handling their case, without a court-approved subpoena and without the individual's knowledge, is striking. And to have it all done in less than 2 weeks is even more striking.

Furthermore, the timing of the filing on a Friday seems calculated to influence a potential jury pool, while placing the prosecutor in a disadvantaged position to respond promptly. Additionally, the subsequent amendment to the filing—from initially stating 12,000 texts to now referring to 12,000 interactions—raises more suspicions.

This filing raises red flags.

JessicaRabbit:
You fail to acknowledge the difference in context, consent, and relevance when comparing Trump's photos with women to Carroll's photo with him. This is another false equivocation fallacy you've committed here. Trump denied ever meeting Carroll, and so her photo with him was intended to at least prove that she knew Trump personally, and that he had access to her. You should be crafting fiction, not debating facts. Even a soggy tissue offers more resistance than your current position. Perhaps when you finally grow the balls to answer these questions in good faith.....

.....you'll finally come to the realization that you have been on a wild goose chase as far as this topic is concerned.

Obrigardo:
You are exceptionally shallow.

How does that stop her from prosecuting Criminal trump and his goons for trying to steal the election in Georgia and for disenfranchising millions of dark skin voters.

Let's say the Judge removes her from the case, will a different prosecutor not take the reins and March on?

What the fúck are you arguing about? That the case should be dismissed because Fani was fúcking her co-worker?

Are you this stupid, bruhhh?

JessicaRabbit:
Stop deflecting. You can't dodge a bullet by shooting at others. You think calling Wade and Willis liars, cheaters, or democrats will make Trump look innocent? That's like saying a bank robber is not guilty because the victim was rude, or the security guard was lazy. If it weren't for your selective memory, you would realize that the case against Trump for election interference in Georgia is drastically different from the one against Carroll for defamation in New York, with different standards of proof, given that they are separate legal matters. Yes, Carroll accused Trump of raping her in the 1990s, but she has provided corroborating evidence, such as a dress with his DNA, two witnesses who heard her story at the time, and a photograph of them together. You are just a joke -- and a dry one, no less.

bemeruca:
You still haven't gotten your head checked. Sigh.
You are ignorant to say the least.

LordReed:
You are a dumdum. The interest was charged for YEARS at 9% per annum. You calculating the accrued sum and saying that is the interest rate shows you failed primary school simple interest calculations.

JessicaRabbit:
I'm impressed by your ability to write so much without saying anything at all. Did you forget the "evidence" chapter in your handbook on righteous indignation? The cellphone data showing that Wade visited Willis' home 35 times in 2021, does not prove that they lied about when their affair started or that it affected their professional judgment. It's still within the realm of speculation, as far as legal processes are concerned. You really don't have any idea how this shit works, do you? You also mentioned that they profited from the prosecution, without evidence no less! You just shamelessly speculated that Willis reimbursed Wade in cash for his business expenses, which were allegedly used to fund their personal trips and gifts. However, this is not a solid basis for accusing them of fraud or corruption. Also, you ignore the fact that Wade's fees were approved by the state attorney general's office and that he has submitted detailed invoices and receipts for his work. Let's hold off on the jail sentences for Willis and Wade until we have something more substantial than feelings to go on, shall we?

The couple has already admitted to their affair and have apologized for it, but have denied that it influenced their decision to pursue the case against Trump. That's as far as we know. If you are going to suggest any sort of foul play, then the burden is on you to present the conclusive evidence. For now, your objections have just been a complete and utter waste of time and effort. So you can keep crying about the case until the cows come home, the fact remains that there is no evidence of any improper influence or interference from the federal government or any other party.

JessicaRabbit:
It's unfortunate that you weren't paying attention. Casually name-dropping irrelevant and misleading terms that the article used like recourse, non-recourse, and disgorgement, serve no further purpose than wilful obfuscation. Stop trying to be clever by half. Recourse and non-recourse are types of loans that differ in how the lender can recover the debt from the borrower in case of default. Disgorgement is a legal remedy that requires the wrongdoer to return the profits obtained from illegal or unethical conduct. These terms have NOTHING to do with Judge Engoron's ruling, which was based on the New York Martin Act, a law that prohibits fraud and deception in the offer and sale of securities. Trump's recourse loans were not based on his actual risk, but on his false representations of his wealth and creditworthiness. This is just another cheap and misleading rhetoric from you.

JessicaRabbit:
@basilico



Surely you didn't think I'll let you forget.