₦airaland Forum

bemeruca:
@mentalcase98 your boy is now dahighlife 🤣🤣🤣

He said he dedicated his life to debunk conspiracy theories on this thread 🤣

budaatum:
No.

JessicaRabbit:
Take a second look at the post you quoted and read your response again. Are you losing it? What does this reply have to do with what I posted? You just can't help yourself, can you? Honest question, and with no offense, but I'm genuinely curious: do you suffer from A.D.H.D?

budaatum:
Your so called "think" is unjust, if I must me, and your "targeting" always misses it's mark.

JessicaRabbit:
Look at you flailing about, spouting irrelevant rubbish. Like I said, you're losing yourself in this argument. You have no more ammo. Carroll's lawyers have sought Trump's DNA for three years to compare it with stains found on the dress Carroll wore the day she says Trump raped her in a department store dressing room. Analysis of DNA on the dress concluded it did contain traces of an unknown man's DNA. Trump refused to provide a DNA sample until a federal judge ordered him to do so in 2020. What was Trump running from for three freaking years? I'd like to know, please. And how can you claim that DNA can be planted and that Carroll's backers and financiers are influential people, including the Department of Justice? Who are these mysterious backers and financiers? How did they plant DNA on Carroll's dress without her knowing? Why would the DOJ, which was under Trump's control for most of his presidency, be involved in a plot to frame him? You are making wild accusations without any proof, just like Trump himself. As for the photo, I've already told you that the one Carroll has is not proof of rape. It is proof that Trump knew her, contrary to his claim that he never met her.

I see you brought back the reality show conspiracy theory again. You really have no tangible objections to the case ruling, do you? LOL.

JessicaRabbit:
Please, let's not pretend like you have any interest in the truth, because you clearly don't. You are the one repeating the same baseless accusations and ad hominem attacks that have been debunked by the court and the media. Judge Engoron ordered Trump to disgorge the profit he made from the sale of the Old Post Office in Washington, D.C., which he had converted into a hotel, because he had inflated its value by a humongous amount in his financial statements. I admit I probably should have clarified that the amount was not directly related to the amount of money he borrowed, but to the amount of money he gained from his fraud, but then again, that's still beyond the point here -- that Trump fraudulently inflated the values of his assets. As for Deutsche Bank, they sued Trump for defaulting on the loan and Trump countersued them and alleged that they caused the 2008 financial crisis. How is that a proud relationship?

The simple reason you brought up the Buzzfeed article is because you were actually hoping to distract me from the main issue. But your pathetic attempt backfired, because you failed to address the substance of the evidence that shows Trump's fraudulent behavior. Instead, you resorted to ad hominem attacks and conspiracy theories, accusing the media of being part of a coordinated effort to smear Trump and his cronies. Your attempt to cast doubt on the credibility of the sources I cited by calling them "far left ragtag bunch of liars" is dead on arrival, because those sources are some of the most respected and reputable news outlets in the world, with a long history of journalistic excellence and integrity. They have won numerous awards and accolades for their reporting, including Pulitzer Prizes, Peabody Awards, and National Magazine Awards, and they have also exposed countless cases of corruption, abuse of power, and human rights violations, both at home and abroad, often at great risk to their own safety and reputation. How very stupid of you to suggest they are propaganda websites because they dare to question the actions of your divine overlord Trump. Like I said, you have no regard for the truth or the facts, you just blindly follow the cult of personality that is Trump and his enablers.

Moving on to the latest gaffe in your series of misfortunes in this debate, you decided to quote Ben Rhodes admitting to wilfully deceiving the media, thinking that this somehow proves your point, but it actually does the opposite. Since you're pathologically dishonest, you decided to leave out the context in which he made his statement, and twist it to suit your foolish narrative. But don't worry, I've taken the liberty to highlight his full quote, as you'll see in the screenshot below from a New York Times article. I had to read that article from start to finish. Rhodes was talking about foreign policy, not general media strategy. He was not directing the media how to report on everything, but rather providing them with information and access to experts who could explain the rationale and benefits of the deal, making a persuasive case for a diplomatic solution to a complex and contentious problem. Furthermore, Rhodes was not the only one who supported the Iran deal. The deal was endorsed by many other countries, including the UK, France, Germany, Russia, and China, as well as the UN Security Council and the International Atomic Energy Agency. It was also backed by a majority of Americans, according to polls, and by many former and current officials, diplomats, and experts, from both parties, who saw it as the best option to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

His quote acknowledged the reality of the changing media landscape, where many outlets have reduced their foreign coverage and rely on Washington-based reporters who may not have the expertise or experience to cover complex global issues. When he says that they "literally know nothing", he is suggesting that they may not have the depth or breadth of knowledge that previous generations of reporters had, and so he and his team try to provide them with the resources and contacts they needed.

You must one of those people who think that the media is a monolithic entity that is controlled by a shadowy cabal of leftists, globalists, and deep staters, who are hell-bent on destroying Trump and America. How quaint, and utterly delusional. You have no clue how journalism works, how diverse and competitive the media landscape is, how many checks and balances there are to ensure accuracy and accountability, and how many brave and dedicated reporters there are who risk their lives and reputations to expose the truth, no matter who is in power. You have no clue how to evaluate sources, how to verify facts, how to distinguish between opinion and analysis, and how to think critically and independently.

You and I both know you are quickly running out of ammo in this debate, and that's why you're flinging shit desperately at the wall, and hoping it sticks. You know that your position on this thread will tumble down if you address the facts directly instead of deflecting with irrelevant talking points and frivolous criticisms. You're a fraud, and you don't want to admit it.

budaatum:
Flynn's case was not determined in court and bears no relationship to Fanni Willis, whom if guilty should be punished.

Point is, I do condemn Democrats when I disapprove of what they do, unlike you who's head is so up dump's ass you stinks of his poo and even new arrivals smell you are a waste of time.

budaatum:
Yes I do. And I don't make up false conspiracies when I don't approve of what they do.

Poor stupid Fanni Willis!

bemeruca:
The professors he is referencing may be living in the 80s.

bemeruca:
IjeBos or dahighlife should by now think men can menstruate because some professors says so.

Using triangulation, you can get a sense where someone may be using cell towers. And these days, smart phones log many useful data to the network they connect to.

budaatum:
No covfefe? Dude believes what lies he's told.

LordReed:
What nonsense is this? Who the Bleep gives their interest rate like this? Why are you trying to gaslight yourself?

Lemme ask you, what is the formula for simple interest?

LordReed:
Either you are a stubborn dumbo or you are deliberately being obtuse. Simple interst calculation are not that hard and daily interest increases can easily be found. The daily accruement you screenshot are 9% factored per day but you persist in this nonsense to spread your lies.

LordReed:
You do spread lies until you are stopped. 25% interest rate was not a prediction, you deliberately falsified the information.

DaHighLife:
Color me shocked that you are diving headfirst into yet another right-wing conspiracy theory without comprehending the evidence or allowing due process to unfold.
While I haven't been around for long, I wouldn't be surprised if you were a proponent of past conspiracies such as Election Fraud, the Kraken, 2000 Mules, and Biden's alleged 10 million Burisma Bribe. If indeed you were, how did those pan out for you?

From two professors:
1.) An electrical and computer engineering professor from Georgia Tech, and
2.) A criminal law professor from Emory

https://www.ajc.com/politics/breaking-cellphone-data-raise-questions-about-start-of-willis-wade-relationship/SFVMYPTD2RD3HMZYOH3377CNNE/#

LordReed:
All of that and more. Basilico is a prolific and serial liar. Debunk one and you'll see him bring 10 more tomorrow.

LordReed:
At least you've agreed that you lied.

You should offer your legal services to Trump so he can win in a higher court.

LordReed:
You are a dumdum. The interest was charged for YEARS at 9% per annum. You calculating the accrued sum and saying that is the interest rate shows you failed primary school simple interest calculations.

"We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore

"I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard."

JessicaRabbit:
Red herring fallacy. Why do you always have a hard time staying on topic? Pay attention to the discussion! What does Obama, Hillary, or the birther movement have to do with the question of whether Trump committed fraud by misrepresenting the value of his properties? As for the IRS, there could be other reasons why they are not complaining, such as lack of resources, political pressure, or legal obstacles. We can't tell for certain, but trying to imply that either the IRS is complaining or there is no fraud is a classic example of a false dichotomy, ignoring other plausible options without justification. Moreover, the IRS is not the only authority that can investigate and prosecute fraud, as Letitia's case demonstrates.

JessicaRabbit:
What a load of rubbish. The number of women Trump has slept with, or claims to have slept with, has no bearing on the credibility of Carroll's allegation. And the fact that Trump owned a beauty pageant franchise, a casino, and hosted parties does not automatically imply that he had consensual sex with thousands of women, let alone that he can't remember them all. Your point here is not just a non sequitur fallacy (a conclusion that does not follow from the premises), it is yet another straw man fallacy. I did not accuse Trump of being immoral, I accused him of lying about his encounter with Carroll. Again, pay attention!

DaHighLife:
I am not going to revisit the Fani Lewis matter. Rational individuals will observe the dearth of evidence you have presented, peruse the transcripts of her testimony and understand you are making it up. It's not up to individuals to disprove allegations that you invent out of whole cloth.

But, I must confess, upon reading your post, a sense of sadness enveloped me. You have taken a made up allegation, transformed it into a certainty, constructed a conspiracy around it, and then tied in other conspiracies (involving Trump, Act Blue). Reading your words is akin to watching an episode of the X-Files. May I ask a personal question? Has anyone in your close circle ever recommended that you seek assistance from a mental health professional?

Obrigardo:
Is it wrong to want industries to go back to America. - Dumbo, American manufacturing is at its HIGHEST PEAK EVER. That's why the stock market is in overdrive. You are still so low bro. Do you have any idea how many manufacturing companies have stationed their headquarters back from abroad under President Biden? You are still living in 2016 delusion.

to frack baby frack - Another stupid and idiotic willful ignorance. Fracking and American oil production is at an all time high, higher than criminal trump's admin. You are still so slow. frack baby frack crack your empty skull there, mumu.

to control illegal immigration - Maga idiot. President Biden and bipartisan senate came together with the strongest border deal in decades, but your criminal trump and maga insurrectionists in congress don't want to pass it so they can keep on campaigning on open borders because they got nothing to win votes. A dull man like you won't even know criminal trump didn't even finish the wall he was shouting all for, Mexico didn't pay for anything - heck, even President Biden made Mexico pledge money to strengthen their side of the border. Do you even know Bannon is going on trial this may for We build the wall scam where he and his goons stole money from maga donors who thought they were raising funds for the wall criminal trump didn't build? You are toooo slooooow.

nominate conservative justices - How many conservative justices do you want again idiot? Tell me the reason why you need them. The abortion ban and IVF restriction is not enough for you? You want to masturbate on the handmaid's tale scenario? You dumb maga piece of shit!

help veterans - Silly maga cultist doesn't even know the track record of maga gop voting against veteran benefits in Congress. What a dull man. If only you knew current news, you won't be writing this shit. Mugu. And when your criminal overlord derides John McCain and calls fallen soldiers suckers and losers. The criminal who deferred from serving in the Army FIVE TIMES. Please just roll away into your trash pile. Idiot!

stop the wars and bring the boys back home - As stupid as this sound, this is the maga cultist salivating on the prospect of killer putin invading europe and starting an all out third world war. You have never advocated for more aid to Ukraine so we can shut killer putin up for good. You have made arguments for why the killer invaded Ukraine and why he must steal territories to build his new Soviet Union.

SO MR DUMB MAGA CHUCKLEFUCK, SHUT THE HELL UP! YOU ARE JUST TOO SLOW MAN

bemeruca:
DaHighLife or DaHighLiar is playing dumb by not giving the full context of what is going on.
Fani willis:

1

2


she clearly said earlier that she KEPT money left over from her first campaign...but her later testimony contradicts that statement when she then says she LOST that money and was broke ..so which is it??...did she keep some of that money or did she lose it on the campaign.

she should be investigated for campaign finance violations. She is a fraud. funny enough, she said she does not have receipts for all this nonsense.




She said she took the money and put it into her campaign, she talked about losing that money, but somehow still kept a large amount of that money she lost.

JessicaRabbit:
When will it seep through to your fragile brain that Engoron based his ruling on the Martin Act, which does not require proof of intent or reliance, only that the defendants made false or misleading statements in connection with the offer or sale of securities? Letitia James sued Trump and his companies under the Martin Act, a law that gives her broad authority to investigate and prosecute securities fraud in New York.
Engoron did not fine Trump for the profit he made on the DC hotel. That's just a complete misinterpretation of the case. He ordered him to disgorge the profit he made from the fraud, which was the difference between the amount of money he borrowed and the amount of money he would have been able to borrow if he had told the truth about
his assets. The disgorgement order was not based on the type of loan (recourse or non-recourse), but on the amount of money that the defendants obtained by fraud.

The Martin Act is not meant to protect the consumer or the lender, as you falsely claim. It is meant to protect the public and the integrity of the securities market from fraud and deception. It is not a partisan or political tool, but a powerful and effective weapon against white-collar crime, and the case against Trump and his companies was driven by overwhelming evidence and compelling arguments. Of course you have not read the judgment, because you are all too comfortable making up specious suggestions that cater to your own narratives.