₦airaland Forum

bemeruca:
i am sure she was just in a photo not like he was taking a photo with her.

DaHighLife:
Ah, you are that type. I am not going to engage in semantic debates with you. I have more productive uses for my time.

This was the post upon which this argument hinged.


Please provide evidence supporting your claim that she 'admitted fraud' and took 'a significant amount of money from her campaign'.

It appears you may have struggled to comprehend the quotation you referenced. Allow me to offer clarification:



Imagine transforming a somewhat inarticulate verbal retort into an elaborate illegal campaign fraud scheme. Alternatively, contemplate the notion of permitting an online influencer [probably a right wing one] to persuade you into believing she committed an illegal campaign conspiracy based on 1 somewhat inarticulate phrase. Imagine an individual who engages in such actions, thereby squandering everyone's time due to an inability to concede their error. Does this behavior align with the behavior of a rational, educated person?

Obrigardo:
But you find it appropriate that this sexual assaulter and rapist become president of the most powerful country on Earth, again. You never revealed this side of your awareness when you always told us that the Criminal did nothing wrong.

This is a drastic change in your maga ideology, and bruh, it's gonna get worse for you. You never sounded like this years, even months back.

This was the exact path that happened to me until I realized christo fascism conspiracy theories were damaging my health and mental well being.

You've always held the Criminal to a higher standard that even now you think he is more righteous than the Catholic President Biden who's been with one woman for decades after his first wife passed on.

You on the path to enlightenment, just keep your thinking hat on, not the tin-foil.

JessicaRabbit:
This is a loaded question proceeding from a simplistic characterization of Letitia's investigation. She did not use tax assessment to evaluate the value of Trump properties, she used it to compare the value of Trump properties with the value of similar properties in the same area. She did this to show that there was a significant discrepancy between the values that Trump reported to the tax authorities and the values that he reported to the banks. This discrepancy suggests that he either inflated or deflated the value of his properties depending on his interests, which could amount to fraud. You're also ignoring the fact that Letitia did not rely solely on tax assessment, she also used other sources of information, such as appraisals, financial statements, loan documents, and expert opinions to corroborate and cross-check the data and provide a more comprehensive picture of the value of Trump properties.

DaHighLife:
She retained a portion of the funds withdrawn from her personal bank account, which she had utilized for her campaign. Do you think she should face incarceration for retaining her own funds? What's the rationale behind expending bandwidth to disseminate easily verifiable falsehoods like this?
There is a persistent flow of misinformation in this thread perpetuated by the same bad actors.

DaHighLife:
Valid points indeed, but I'd exercise caution regarding the claims made by the Trump team regarding the 'cell phone data.' They have previously asserted claims in signed affidavits, such as the assertion that Fanni was residing with Wade, which ultimately proved to be false. The specifics of the cell phone data remain unclear; we lack information on what data they possess, or whether it was obtained legally.

The manner in which they purportedly obtained personal cell phone information from not only an individual but also the prosecutor handling their case, without a court-approved subpoena and without the individual's knowledge, is striking. And to have it all done in less than 2 weeks is even more striking.

Furthermore, the timing of the filing on a Friday seems calculated to influence a potential jury pool, while placing the prosecutor in a disadvantaged position to respond promptly. Additionally, the subsequent amendment to the filing—from initially stating 12,000 texts to now referring to 12,000 interactions—raises more suspicions.

This filing raises red flags.

JessicaRabbit:
You fail to acknowledge the difference in context, consent, and relevance when comparing Trump's photos with women to Carroll's photo with him. This is another false equivocation fallacy you've committed here. Trump denied ever meeting Carroll, and so her photo with him was intended to at least prove that she knew Trump personally, and that he had access to her. You should be crafting fiction, not debating facts. Even a soggy tissue offers more resistance than your current position. Perhaps when you finally grow the balls to answer these questions in good faith.....

.....you'll finally come to the realization that you have been on a wild goose chase as far as this topic is concerned.

Obrigardo:
You are exceptionally shallow.

How does that stop her from prosecuting Criminal trump and his goons for trying to steal the election in Georgia and for disenfranchising millions of dark skin voters.

Let's say the Judge removes her from the case, will a different prosecutor not take the reins and March on?

What the fúck are you arguing about? That the case should be dismissed because Fani was fúcking her co-worker?

Are you this stupid, bruhhh?

JessicaRabbit:
Stop deflecting. You can't dodge a bullet by shooting at others. You think calling Wade and Willis liars, cheaters, or democrats will make Trump look innocent? That's like saying a bank robber is not guilty because the victim was rude, or the security guard was lazy. If it weren't for your selective memory, you would realize that the case against Trump for election interference in Georgia is drastically different from the one against Carroll for defamation in New York, with different standards of proof, given that they are separate legal matters. Yes, Carroll accused Trump of raping her in the 1990s, but she has provided corroborating evidence, such as a dress with his DNA, two witnesses who heard her story at the time, and a photograph of them together. You are just a joke -- and a dry one, no less.

bemeruca:
You still haven't gotten your head checked. Sigh.
You are ignorant to say the least.

LordReed:
You are a dumdum. The interest was charged for YEARS at 9% per annum. You calculating the accrued sum and saying that is the interest rate shows you failed primary school simple interest calculations.

JessicaRabbit:
I'm impressed by your ability to write so much without saying anything at all. Did you forget the "evidence" chapter in your handbook on righteous indignation? The cellphone data showing that Wade visited Willis' home 35 times in 2021, does not prove that they lied about when their affair started or that it affected their professional judgment. It's still within the realm of speculation, as far as legal processes are concerned. You really don't have any idea how this shit works, do you? You also mentioned that they profited from the prosecution, without evidence no less! You just shamelessly speculated that Willis reimbursed Wade in cash for his business expenses, which were allegedly used to fund their personal trips and gifts. However, this is not a solid basis for accusing them of fraud or corruption. Also, you ignore the fact that Wade's fees were approved by the state attorney general's office and that he has submitted detailed invoices and receipts for his work. Let's hold off on the jail sentences for Willis and Wade until we have something more substantial than feelings to go on, shall we?

The couple has already admitted to their affair and have apologized for it, but have denied that it influenced their decision to pursue the case against Trump. That's as far as we know. If you are going to suggest any sort of foul play, then the burden is on you to present the conclusive evidence. For now, your objections have just been a complete and utter waste of time and effort. So you can keep crying about the case until the cows come home, the fact remains that there is no evidence of any improper influence or interference from the federal government or any other party.

JessicaRabbit:
It's unfortunate that you weren't paying attention. Casually name-dropping irrelevant and misleading terms that the article used like recourse, non-recourse, and disgorgement, serve no further purpose than wilful obfuscation. Stop trying to be clever by half. Recourse and non-recourse are types of loans that differ in how the lender can recover the debt from the borrower in case of default. Disgorgement is a legal remedy that requires the wrongdoer to return the profits obtained from illegal or unethical conduct. These terms have NOTHING to do with Judge Engoron's ruling, which was based on the New York Martin Act, a law that prohibits fraud and deception in the offer and sale of securities. Trump's recourse loans were not based on his actual risk, but on his false representations of his wealth and creditworthiness. This is just another cheap and misleading rhetoric from you.

JessicaRabbit:
@basilico



Surely you didn't think I'll let you forget.

LordReed:
The interest is 9%. Tomorrow you'll start claiming you never lie, I have caught you in a lie korokoro.

DaHighLife:
The contention that you lack the capacity to comprehend the material you read, or you are incapable of drawing accurate conclusions from said material, or you rely on erroneous sources, does not present a betterer argument in your favor.

Furthermore, your argument does not alter the fact that, in my humble opinion, that you are among the foremost disseminators of misinformation within this thread.

Claiming that you are "never wrong" would in fact be a Lie. I have already delineated just several instances of the many I have found where you have been clearly wrong just within the limited posts of yours that I have read. I can envision that number increasing exponentially with a more thorough review of your posts

feedthenation:
---Uncle, I guessed you are waiting for the news to be distorted from the MAGA news channel---anyway Trump is officially owing $454,156,783.05, the New York County clerk has officially just entered the judgment signed by Justice Engoron in the Trump organization case---

Obrigardo:
Was McAfee a judge when he donated to Fani, and how much was it?
Was it a one time thing or consistent over the years? Provide a robust back story, no innuendos, just the truth.

And tell me how it's similar to Clearance Thomas and Christofascist alitos corruption.

Obrigardo:
I guess you were just chuckling like Frankenstein when you wrote this. Are you this silly?

Obrigardo:
When you make countless conspiracy theories and lies, you tend to lose track.

I don't think I have the time to dig up your trashy posts but you've been caught in lies after lies after lies. So it tracks.

Obrigardo:
Seems rich for basilico loco to call out months old President Biden's gaffe but look away when demented fraudster and Insurrectionist Criminal trump lose his marbles.

The stubborn maga cultist doesn't want to agree that Criminal trump is far gone because he is in a cult.

What the fùck was this 😂

feedthenation:
---Trump and his lawyers trying to commit fraud by changing 6 of Trump business addresses from New York to Florida---

LordReed:
If you know it is a gotcha why are you referring me to anything? You talking pointwas already blown out of the water stop trying to save face.

LordReed:
LoLz! You fold as easily as wet tissue paper. All it takes is one incisive question to destroy your talking points.

JessicaRabbit:
Just a heads up -- some, actually most of them, might require actual thinking.



I prefer to call it "nuanced understanding".

Y

Flawed analogy. Trump's property that he sold in 2008 was a mansion on a beachfront lot, while Mar-a-Lago is a club resort on a larger inland lot. The demand and supply for these properties are not the same, and neither are the factors that affect their values. For example, beachfront properties are more scarce and desirable than inland properties, and club resorts have different income and expense streams than residential properties. Therefore, the value of one property cannot be inferred from the value of another property, unless they are very similar and comparable.



Maybe it isn't, but it seems to be beyond your current grasp of the situation.



Valuation isn't exactly rocket science, but if you're struggling, I'm sure you can find places online to point you towards some beginner resources.



Oh really? And what about accessibility, land use, physical attributes, location, market conditions etc, hmm? Can you see how evident your lack of knowledge on this topic is?

Well, I'm not surprised that you can NOT provide any evidence or data to support the claim that recent sales of other properties in the vicinity have increased the value of Mar-a-Lago. You can only offer mere assertions without proof.

And you expect reasonable people here to take you seriously? LOL.



Perhaps you're just not used to encountering well-written content. Don't worry, it's a rare find these days, I've observed personally.

LordReed:
How much did he buy the property?

JessicaRabbit:
You're drowning in a puddle of ignorance, and I'm tired of playing the teacher and throwing you lifelines. Why must we always hold a kindergarten lesson in your favor, and allow you come to predictable conclusions before you can join a simple conversation? You're a lost cause and a bore.

I'm still waiting for answers to these questions.

JessicaRabbit:
Normally, I'd be explaining to you how valuations were based on its annual net operating income as a club and not on its resale value as a home or its reconstruction cost, but as history has shown repeatedly on this thread, it wouldn't matter to a dumbo with the IQ of a shoelace. If truly you're honest with yourself, or had the tiniest molecule of self-awareness, you'd have subtly noticed how your irrelevant link does absolutely nothing to dispute the fact that Trump DID inflate the value of his resort. So before we get lost in the Bermuda Triangle of tangents you keep constructing, let's circle back to those pesky questions you've been tap-dancing around like a mime lost in a disco:

Obrigardo:
When I say maga cultists are the dumbest people on Earth, it is not an Insult but a fact.

For example, we were all witnesses to basilico loco's rampage against the covid vaccine because chip implants and freedumb!

But this same basilico dude is eerily silent about elon dusk's neurallink - a real chip implants to the spine and brain which gives elon full tracking control of the idiots who wear his trash.