₦airaland Forum

Senator Rand Paul has quit YouTube and moved to rumble. Any word he says is checked by some leftist fact checkers who know zilch.

An entire generation of young people, who use these platforms exclusively for their news, will never read or hear of opinions or ideas that challenge the Big Government / Big Tech orthodoxy,” the Senator urged.

“When I gave a speech on the Senate floor asking whether Eric Ciaramella, the Vindman brothers, and Adam Schiff’s legal team conspired while working at the White House to impeach the president, YouTube chose to censor and delete the


https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/senator-rand-paul-quits-youtube-over-despicable-censorship-moves-permanently-rumble

Rand Paul is really talking about Mass Formation Psychosis where Followers can be hypnotized and be led anywhere, regardless of data proving otherwise. A key aspect of the phenomena is that the people they identify as the leaders – the one’s that can solve the problem or issue alone – they will follow that leader(s) regardless of any new information or data


Trump media group is working with rumble.
As soon as truth.social is launched, expect all his followers to switch to the new social media.

gambojimeta:
Witi ya empty skull. Rupert Murdoch (owner ofu Fox), DeVos (Trumpolini secetary ofu education) , Mattis (trumpolini defences secretary), Shultz republican forma secatary ofu state, kissinggers, andi manies big republikkans ah gife da money ta start up theranos

This Isa means she Isa republikkans

Ya apprentice donkey Isa dulllsss

Kikikikikiki

She had republican donors on her board. Who does not want to make money.
Joe Biden visited her factory n praised her
She held a fundraiser with Chelsea Clinton, a function that was originally slated to be held at Theranos offices

ono:
Lie told long enough (by the Lamestream, Big Lie Media - including Tweeter), that helped her to rake in almost a billion dollar. Guess what, she's blaming her "misfortune" on "male dominance" of the market, "abuses" by her male manager and lastly, she gave birth in the midst of all these!

She kinda believed she was the next Steve Jobbs . Her ambition and ruthlessness took over her mind.She lowered her voice to make her believable, in private her tone was different.Such gall.
She believed in her utopia.

Another democrat convicted of fraud
Elizabeth Holmes founder of Theranos found guilty of wire fraud. Her "machine" invention could do 200 blood tests at very little cost using just one drop of blood.
Media fawned over her.Worth 4b she duped investors.
She duped people with wrong diagnosis.

ADOLF HITLER: “IF YOU TELL A BIG ENOUGH LIE AND TELL IT FREQUENTLY ENOUGH, IT WILL BE BELIEVED.

With all her misinformation n fraud, the gatekeeper of truth , Twitter has not deplatformed her.
Yet people are banned for saying things like Ivermectin works.

sanpipita:
Greg Abbott has been able to swallow his pride and call for Federal help, while Death Santis is still toying with human lives, it was few months back they came with nonsense of Florida handling covid better, my response to them was clear enough, anyone still arguing with these guys on covid 19 loves wasting their time, they have refused to learn anything.

https://eu.jacksonville.com/story/news/2022/01/03/covid-florida-omicron-list-states-virus-spreading-fastest/9076265002/

We can then conclude that the bartender AOC frolicking in Florida instead of New York had something to do with it, No?

CDC open vaers - Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.

https://openvaers.com/

Konkoja:
. You, sir, are a very unwell person!

Mass formation physcosis. This term is trending because Dr Malone spoke about it.
Google removed the video from youtube, twitter banned Malone forever, instagram and Facebook deleted him

Incase you dont know.Dr Malone invented the mRNA vaccine that is now the building block for covid vaccines, boosters and triple boosters.

Search for mass formation psychosis and google shows a negative article about him at the very top.

Use duckduckgo and search for that term, the first one is the most relevant.

This shows how google manipulates you. I have posted here severally about the leftist google and Big tech unholy alliance to push a narrative that simpletons swallow hook line and sinker.

Tell me Im unwell. I cant get the most relevant truth from google because thats not the narrative the leftists are driving.
.

Its 2022. Don't be a victim of mass formation psychosis. Spread your sources remember CNN is a proven liar. Actually what the leftist media and democrats tout is the exact opposite of the truth in many cases.

Konkoja:
Basilico, it is a new year! Please make use of your brain to think and make YOUR OWN JUDGEMENT instead of garbage in, garbage out you hitherto major in.

From what you posted, did you not notice those descriptions perfectly fit you and your Trumpist mates? Even till today you are yet to accept Trump lost an election fairly? Why? Because your leader said it was stolen! Despite no proofs to support that.
Anybody who disagree with leaders narrative is attacked - no wonder they attacked the Capitol last year!

Trump did not lose fairly. I have provided numerous articles showing fraud.
Unfortunately that term mass formation physchosis applies to you perfectly well.
The democrat and PR machine has declared Joe Biden won.
And so Followers can be hypnotized and be led anywhere, regardless of data proving otherwise. A key aspect of the phenomena is that the people they identify as the leaders – the one’s that can solve the problem or issue alone – they will follow that leader(s) regardless of any new information or data

You have been hypnotized to believe Biden won despite all the new information out.

Lets take another case.Russia. Media hypnotized you and I guess you still think Putin helped Trump in 2016 despite evidence that Clinton campaign cooked up stories in conjunction with Glen Simpson to spread the lie.

Another case debunked that you still believe as a result of mass formation physchosis? That Trump built cages to house illegal aliens which we all know were built by Obama.

Hunter Biden laptop was a Russian disinformation? You still believe that?

ISIS was also a JV team? You still believe that?

Virginia Giuffre agreed not to sue anyone connected to Jeffrey Epstein who could be described as a "potential defendant", a 2009 damages settlement against the sex offender shows.

The document, disclosed by a New York court, reveals the financier paid her $500,000 (£371,000) to end her claim.
Ms Giuffre is suing the Duke of York in a civil case for allegedly sexually assaulting her 20 years ago when she was a teenager.
He has consistently denied the claims.

The document was released ahead of a critical hearing on Tuesday in the civil case involving Prince Andrew - and the interpretation of the settlement will form a central plank of the argument between the two sides. Ms Giuffre alleges she was trafficked to the prince by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.

Although the settlement does not mention the prince by name, his lawyers say this 2009 deal means she cannot sue him - because she agreed to end all legal action against anyone connected to the offender who could be described as a "potential defendant".

A source in Prince Andrew's legal team said "Giuffre referred to 'royalty' in her 2009 claim [against Jeffrey Epstein] and that means Prince Andrew was covered by the deal".

Epstein died in prison in 2019, while Maxwell was last week convicted of recruiting and trafficking young girls to be abused by the late financier.
But Ms Giuffre's legal team say the terms of the Florida settlement are irrelevant to her case against the Prince - which alleges sexual abuse by the royal in New York, London and the US Virgin Islands.

In her 2009 claim against Epstein, lawyers for Ms Giuffre said she was lured into a world of sexual abuse at his Florida home when she was a teenager.
They added: "In addition to being continually exploited to satisfy defendant's [Epstein] every sexual whim, [Ms Giuffre] was also required to be sexually exploited by defendant's adult male peers, including royalty, politicians, academicians, businessmen and or other professional and personal acquaintances."

That case never went to trial because on 17 November 2009 Jeffrey Epstein agreed to pay her $500,000 to stop it in its tracks. That deal was confidential until now - but has been made public because of its potential importance to the Prince Andrew case.

In the document, Ms Giuffre, also referred to by her unmarried name Roberts, agreed to "release, acquit, satisfy, and forever discharge" Epstein and "any other person or entity who could have been included as a potential defendant".

The settlement's wording says she discharges "potential defendants" from any US legal action, including damages claims dating "from the beginning of the world".

The precise meaning of that wording is expected to be the subject of intense legal arguments in New York on Tuesday.
In filings to the New York court last month, Andrew B. Brettler, the duke's lead lawyer, said the Epstein settlement's plain language would be clear once it was released to the public.

"Epstein negotiated for this broad release, insisting that it cover any and all persons who Giuffre identified as potential targets of future lawsuits, regardless of the merit— or lack thereof —to any such claims," he said.

"Giuffre's baseless claims against Prince Andrew ... must be dismissed at this stage."

In a statement to Reuters, one of Ms Giuffre's lawyers, David Boies, said the settlement was not relevant to her claim and "does not mention Prince Andrew". "He did not even know about it," he said.

In a previous court filing her lawyers said that the Epstein deal was "outside the four corners" of her action against Prince Andrew because it does not cover her claims against him.

Lisa Bloom, a lawyer for alleged victims of Jeffrey Epstein, described the settlement as "one of the most bizarre" she had ever seen, telling BBC News she thought it was "incomprehensibly vague".

"We want contracts to clearly specify who is released from a lawsuit and who is not," she said, adding that she could not see a judge releasing Prince Andrew from a lawsuit because he was not named specifically.

Ibime:
You need to go for data classes. If unvaxxed trend action was due to low sample size, the graph will be oscillating up and down in a patternless formation due to wild variances, not following the general trend. There is more than sufficient numbers of unvaxxed in USA to keep the trend stable

Why dont you fix your own random data but with increasing vaccination numbers. Then work it out the same way they did?
Better still why not get real life world data spanning several months .

Pychosis is when people lose some contact with reality. Mass formation psychosis is when a large part of a society focuses its attention to a leader(s) or a series of events and their attention focuses on one small point or issue. Followers can be hypnotized and be led anywhere, regardless of data proving otherwise. A key aspect of the phenomena is that the people they identify as the leaders – the one’s that can solve the problem or issue alone – they will follow that leader(s) regardless of any new information or data. Furthermore, anybody who questions the leader’s narrative are attacked and disregarded

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/mass-formation-psychosis?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web

Lots here who have been manipulated .May
2022 be the year scales from their eyes.

zendi:
There's a certain famous bartender turned lawmaker with ambitions to rule her woketocratic country.
Now its fast turning out ex-bartender lawmaker has yet to get over thinking that every drunken sailor grabbing at her wants to drag her right away to bed.

It gets worse. She was spotted indoors without a mask.

https://mobile.twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1477788957865742337

Covid Mass layoffs and mandates

Premier league has seen several matches postponed after positive cases.Many sports across the world featuring boosted players affected too
Big name Messi is also positive .
Black Sec Defense got coof while proudly adorning the booster shot.
Israel becomes first to mandate secind booster shots.
And so on. All those are vaccinated mostly fully cases.
Every vaxxed person who gets the coof says his symptoms are mild due to the vaccine.
Another lie I think, because S. Africa study says Omicron has mild symptoms and almost zero mortality for vaxxed and unvaxxed.


What is the vaccine preventing?
Why are people being fired if they can get the coof and transmit it too?
Why is media censoring and mislabeling covid misinformation?

What's use is the vaccine If more people died in 2021 than in 2020?

budaatum:
I hope you watching India.

Not really. Last I heard about India was Delhi covid cases rising and mRNA inventor making some claims about a deal between India and Joe Biden.
Twitter banned him before his interview which went viral.
Google joined in the slander which aint working well.

We are witnessing Google’s real-time censorship of the term “mass formation psychosis” as mentioned by @RWMaloneMD on @joerogan podcast. Don’t let them get away with it! Listen to the episode for yourself. pic.twitter.com/wvvmN6X3Uw

— Zach Herbert 🇺🇸 (@zherbert) January 2, 2022

Ibime:
Absolute rubbish. You held Denominator variable while numerator constant. Both are variable, and what they plotted is the actuals.

Assume 50 vaccinations every month.
Assume 20 dying per month ,10 each every group. Following month vaxed be less 10 dead but have increased by 50 vaxxed netting 40 plus while unvaxxed will be less 10 dead and less 50 vaxxed, net decrease 60.
Is just a Sample calculation. Where is the data they used? I will do a quick calculation to show that their method in tabling the data will always result in showing more dead unvaxed than vaxxed.
As long as the vax rate is increasing, the the number unvaxed decreases.
Let them table by day/month the number of dead for both groups.
This is really very simple arithmetic.
I mean if it so apparent that the unvaccinated are dying more, why not list a day by day side by comparion without resulting to linear/logarithmic graphs.
Maybe the data will show a lot of vaxxed people dying in same numbers as the unvaxxed.Else show me the numbers , I can also analyse.

Ibime:
This is the stüpidest thing I ever read

Why should the same number of people die every month when the sample size is increasing for Vaxxed and reducing for unvaxxed.

If there is no difference between being vaxxed and unvaxxed, they should die proportional to the sample size

I used same number of deaths for both groups to illustrate how as the unvaxxed sample population decreases in number the methodology used by that website is heavily skewed to one conclusion.
As more people are vaxxed the number of unvaxxed decreases. Common sense
Illustrates how they play with figures to conceal the actual numbers of deaths of vaxxed vs unvaxxed.
How their methods supposedly proves vaccines work. Which I dont dispute , my grouse is with them showing unvaxxed are at much higher risk. Clearly they are not at that risk, I dont buy the pandemic of the unvaccinated crap when they have to sexx up figures using linear and logarithmic graphs

Ibime:
You need to go for data classes. If unvaxxed trend action was due to low sample size, the graph will be oscillating up and down in a patternless formation due to wild variances, not following the general trend. There is more than sufficient numbers of unvaxxed in USA to keep the trend stable

To be generous , take a sample size of 1000 people. Assume half are vaccinated.
Assume 20 die of coof , 10 vaxxed and 10 unvaxxed every month .50 people get vaxxed every month.

VN Number of vaccinated
UVN Number of unvaccinatd
VNf fraction dead/number for Vaxxed group
UVNf fraction Dead/Number for unvaxxed


Month. VN UVN. VNf. UVNf
1. 500. 500. 0.,02 0..02

2. 530 440 0,018 0,022

3. 570 380 0.017. 0.026

4. 610. 320. 0.016. 0.031

5. 650. 280 0.015. 0.035


You see the rise iin unvaxxed figures as more of the 1000 people are vaxxed.
Plot those to understand how you been fooled

Most important thing. From their graphs provided, you cannot get the exact numbers in a particular day of casualties for both categories.The purpose of the graphs without absolute figures is to show unvaxxed are several more times likely to die.l

Ibime:
Nope, that's simply when the Delta outbreak hit, putting the unvaxxed at even greater risk.

Factor in that unvaxxed are likely to have younger demographic with better general health, while vaxxed group contains a lot of old people on their last legs, this is a trouncing

Unvaxxed are getting fewer. Probably it was almost zero unvaxxed dying, but since they are becoming less in pop .Say 10 dying everyday the unvaxxed curve keeps going up.

Ibime:
Must she type like Obahiagbon to communicate her points?

You cant even wish me Happy belated new year?

I have seen better written essays from IGCSE year 13s than that of Mrs Obama, JD, Ivy League.Did you read it, the Brits are very particular.

Ibime:
That's the only way to look at a data, on a per capita basis

You've been shouting "X amount of people died in so country with 98% vaccination rate" like an ignoramus since.

I dont read Chomsky. I am not an academic to delve deeply into political or social theories.

Hold on about figures, let me break it down.

Back to those covid vax vs unvaxxed rate , the reason they are not using absolute figures is simple.
More people are vaxxed. Divide vaxxed deaths with vaxxed figures results in a smaller linear or fraction.
The same argument they use in reverse. Example
100 people , 80 vaxxed.20 unvaxxed.
10 die of which 5 are vaxed and 5 are not.

Fraction linear vaxxed dead is 5/80 =0.0625
Fraction linear unvaxxed is 5/20 = 0.25

Plot that nicely on a linear graph and unvaxxed are 4 times likely to die. ie 0,25/0,0625=4

Notice gap is small with lower vax rates in April, . As tlhe vax rate increases the linear figure for the unvaxxed becomes larger than for the vaxxed.Notice in Oct the unvaxxed figure drops. Meaning almost no unvaxxed person is dying, while the vaxxed dead are rising .
They really had you fooled.

budaatum:
Some of his ideas are tangential to mine too, but you'd need to at least read one book of his to understand his ideas. If you claim Michelle's thesis is a hard read you have no chance with Chomsky and will be limited to forming your opinion from headlines, which brings the word 'ignorance' to mind.

Mitchell Obama grammar in her thesis not upto Ivy League standard. Hard read, I was being ironic.

budaatum:
You don't know because you don't want to know so you pluck out your eyes so you see not. Or perhaps the information is far beyond your capacity to comprehend?

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/united-states-rates-of-covid-19-deaths-by-vaccination-status?time=earliest..2021-10-09&country=~All+ages

Thank you so much. I had not come across this.
Though its based on fractional basis, Ill study it with a critical eye.

That site only has data for 4 countries. America, Switzerland,UK and Chile ( Well I thought every country should have this data but will work with that all the same

wirinet:
For the umpteenth time, vaccines do not stop you from getting the virus. It only reduces its impact, in other words It only reduces hospitalisation and fatality.

How many unvaxxed people vs vaxxed people have died the year 2029 or even last month?
You dont know because that data is not being released.
At what level of vaccination will covid be almost wiped out?
Portugal is 89% fully vaccinated. They reported their highest cases ever 28k yesterday and 27k previous day.
You cannot claim vaccine is reducing deaths or hospitalizations while we all know better care, preventative measures, natural immunity, better medical understanding, experienced health care workers might be the greatest factors reducing deaths n hospitalizations.
CDC stopped the PCR test from yesterday because false positives.
America also had over 450k cases yesterday the highest ever I think in 2020.

Two thirds of the 25 staff based in Belgium's Princess Elisabeth Polar Station in the Antarctic have caught Covid

All 25 researchers were fully vaccinated and one had a booster shot. Before leaving for the station, they underwent a PCR test in Belgium two hours before flying to South Africa.

In South Africa, they quarantined for 10 days and took another PCR test. A further test was needed when leaving Cape Town for Antarctica and a final one five days after that.

One person tested positive seven days after arriving at the station on December 14. The person was isolated but tests revealed two others had caught the virus. The three were evacuated on December 23 but the virus has continued to spread.

It is thought to be the Omicron variant because that is responsible for 99 per cent of infections in South Africa.

There are two emergency doctors at the station, which will not allow any new arrivals until the virus dissipates.

Belgium's Polar Secretariat has decided the research season will be shortened and staff will stay there until at least until January 12, when new expeditions will arrive.


How's that possible. Did they get a vaccine or a quackcine?

budaatum:
Noah wrote books, right? I'd be delighted to discuss Chomsky with you after you let me know which you've read.

Budaatum

Noam is a leftist, his ideas on terrorism snd capitalism are tangential to mine.

Hey, why dont you read Mitchell Obama Princeton thesis?
https://www.politico.com/pdf/080222_MOPrincetonThesis_1-251.pdf

A very hard read, too complex for simple minds you would expect. Nah. I've seen better written compositions from IGCSE students.

budaatum:
He is a long term professor and has been so from long before you were born so I guess he must be somewhat clever, don't you think?

He has been very clever. Who cannot see his wisdom? .

budaatum:
Same way you were over India, disregarding hospitalisation and deaths due to lack of care.

UK has just reported record number of new Covid infections. Thankfully, the vaccine has reduced hospitalsations and deaths, and you should be delighted you were not too ignorant to refuse the jab.

The omicron variant is not deadly as media hyped it. Majority of people with it are vaccinated. Unvaccinated and vaccinated deaths from this variant is almost zero, vaccines dont seem to be doing anything.

There is a new promising drug predicted to cost 0.01% of those pfizer wonder drugs.Expect milk to be banned too

https://www.wnd.com/2021/12/scientist-surprised-discovery-99-effective-cheap-covid-treatment/

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/10/11/1514/htm


Happy New Year.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BI5E8z89c9U

budaatum:
https://jacobinmag.com/2021/12/noam-chomsky-aoc-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-conversation

What a clever person this terrorist lover is.

MGT makes fun of AOC . She flees mandates in new york to spread corona in Florida

South Africa says its past COVID-19 peak. Curfew removed and clubs reopened.
CDC reduces isolation period from 10 to 5 days for positive patients.

Dr Faucci says it all. The COVID-19 numbers in children are inflated

https://twitter.com/i/status/1476697908045135872

Covid today. 96% of new cases in a
German hospital were all vaccinated. There has been reference to pandemic of the unvaxxed. Some vaxxed people go to the extent of accusing unvaxxed of being terrorists.
Once vaxxed out of free will, boosted and even triple boosted, you should not have to worry 'bout the unvaxxed. Just wear your masks, social distance, sanitize your hands, work remotely, dont have Christmas parties, dont Leave your house, home school your children etc.
Leave the unvaxxed alone to die