₦airaland Forum

[quote author=E_monkey]I don't understand how this is a benefit. . .[/quote]it is... Ever heard of free will?[quote author=E_monkey]I didn't say anybody is asking me to be anything or that I want to force anything on others, what is with the defensive attitude?
Besides how can you say no one is asking me to be a Christian? Isn't one of your duties as a Christian to bring unbelievers to the light? How will I become a Christian if I don't know what I stand to gain?[/quote]you dnt want to, so dnt.

CrazyMan: I'm not in the mood to begin a debating session beteeen christianity and islam.

Matthew 16:24. Then Jesus said to his disciples, "Whoever wants to be my disciple must deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me.

I you're not fully convinced on why you should become a christian, then remain where you are...christianity is mainly about service and sacrifice.

Therefore, if you're going into it for benefits, I'm afraid to tell you that you'll be disappointed.

I can't speak much on islam...maybe the islam brethren in the house can enlighten you more on the benefits of islam.

bles u! The thread was just for argument purpose

The holy spirit speaks to the heart nt doesnt appear physicaly. Can a human being give boldnes to people facing persecution? Only personal ministration can give such boldnes. Till today, christains here from the Holy spirit showing dat the comforter is nt a physical being.

holyvirgin: onukwu what ar u blesin her 4? U guy's claim u knw d scriptures bt u argue blindly. catholics worshp God and hm alone would we serve. Foolish ppl, u reverre, honour and respect ur earthly parents bt stil nt regard d mother of christ bt treat her lyk trash.

anu ohia. She is dead! She cnt hear u!

Thank You Jesus.

No one is asking u to be a christian. U can do whatever u like jus dont force it on others,

[quote author=Abd'Hafeez]Exodus 21:10 says
"If he takes ANOTHER wife,he shall not diminish her food,her clothings,and her marriage rights.[/quote]are you this dull? Pls read from verse 7.

[quote author=jamil!]Ma'am let we look at it this way as a role model what do you expect from your fellowers if they fail to emulate you? As the matter of fact Jesus should be first to marry and however the others should have joined the suit. I read your input above telling me that he attended wedding that is why you are seeing it as a good thing although he condem it not, but remember as a leader whatever you put into practice others will accept it as a good thing, while the stuff in which you supported but you have never practise it has a question on it. So why Jesus was never marry?[/quote]according to some people he died at thirty three. He was young. Perhaps thats the reason. But let me tell u this you can neva be exactly like ur role model

[quote author=Bélla3]@ MACDADDY
I asked u a question on another thread, bt u ran away. Am asking again.
Assuming Sir. Isaac Newton was working on a project everyone knew about. Bt died two weeks before completion (what is left is to compiling). Mac daddy helps to compile it. Does that make it mac daddy's work?[/quote]

MacDaddy01: Ode, you are now remixing the meaning of "catholic"?


Catholic and roman catholic are the same. No difference. See how you people lie to distance yourself from the horrors of the catholic church?

Liars and frauds!

you still didnt answer the question:-)

[quote author=jamil!]Bros, remember Jesus was never marry in his life time to me the issue of polygamy is not what we suppose to centred our arguement on but why Xtians aren't copy from him and live up to that? If xtians are truly and believe on Jesus they shouldn't have been married and lives without it. As the reverse in the case muslims could marry up to 4 wives because it was booked on their holy book which is quite good for them. Kindly accept this as my view please don't see it as insult to Xtianity. Peace![/quote]Jesus attend a wedding ceremony and performed a miracle, if he didnt like marriages, he would neva have attended. Do muslims recieve revelations frm allah? Afteral mohd did.
Jesus on why divorce is not encouraged, which means marriage is also endorsed by HIM.

Therefore shall A man leave his father and mother and cleave unto his wife and they shall become one flesh.- gen 2:24.
A man and his wife nt wives

Any one who had the patience to read al that, should ples explain to me.

Omo Alata: John 14:6

Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me

Bless you!

LagosShia: I wasn't the one who is using a personal issue and topic with Mac to attack Islam.if you have problem with a muslim,spare Islam of your raging hormones or brain deficit.

Maclatunji isn't my mod because I didn't choose him to be a mod.he was made a mod by the owner of the forum.I actually didn't want to comment on this thread.

I am not a fan of Mac and I also don't sympathize with the likes of 'nakash' or 'MacDaddy'.in the Islam section you're not allowed to use vulgar expressions by insulting the holy Prophet (sa) or provoking Muslims.your participation in the Islam section should be to engage Muslims in discussion and reason with them.ofcourse many people think they're here to change the religion or beliefs of others and so when the decent way doesn't work and their ideas are rejected they go verbally violent.for instance,MacDaddy have a way of transforming the same topic already discussed either recent or some time back into another thread.that is spamming the board.people don't have patience to go over the topic again,the second time.what I would advice Maclatunji is to be locking threads and leaving them for everyone to see instead of deleting them.the reason should be given by him in a post before locking the thread.for instance if the topic was already discussed or created by someone like MacDaddy,provide the link to the old thread in the new thread and lock it.if MacDaddy wants to add anything further,he should go to the old thread.

As for nakash,he is just a freak copying from anti-islam websites and pasting in the Islam section.also those materials found in those websites are offensive because of the rudeness they display.rudeness shouldn't be justified under free speech.you can ask if someone is gay for instance.but for you to be calling someone gay without being able to back your claim is childish and rude.so the excuse that the religion forum is a jungle where anything goes and Jesus (as) is called names,is no standard of moderating and shouldn't be used as yardstick for the Islam section.

Maclatunji is human and can make mistake,abuse power or act on impulse or his own beliefs.but the weak points of Maclatunji shouldn't be used by jobless people like MacDaddy and freaks and haters like nakash to justify their actions.Maclatunji can become more transparent in his actions and those anti-islam posters obsessed with muslims should learn to be civil and observe respect for others by using decent and not vulgar language.

but you're allowed to provoke christains and even atheists?
.
Isnt God good?

frosbel:

Wow !!

you dnt agree?

Enigma: Correct! It was not the Roman catholic Church that gave us either the doctrine of The Trinity or that "compiled" the Bible; rather it was the catholic (i.e. the universal) Church or the Christian Church.

This is what is being discussed on the thread in following link (and some other threads too).

https://www.nairaland.com/1039359/canon-bible-roman-catholic-church

pls try to explain to macdaddy.

@ MACDADDY
according to history, al christains were catholics which meant 'universal'. catholic nt Roman catholic.
I asked u a question on another thread, bt u ran away. Am asking again.
Assuming Sir. Isaac Newton was working on a project everyone knew about. Bt died two weeks before completion (what is left is to compiling). Mac daddy helps to compile it. Does that make it mac daddy's work?

Evil Brain: MacDaddy01 Wins.

FATALITY!!!

EYAA..

MacDaddy01: lolololololololol.......See how Vedaxcool covertly admits that Maclatunji is a dictator?


Seun made the laws no doubt but why is it only maclatunji that uses them for dictatorial purposes? Jesoul and Manmustchopgarri dont use those laws anyhow.

[/color]

MacDaddy01: lolololololololol.......See how Vedaxcool covertly admits that Maclatunji is a dictator?


Seun made the laws no doubt but why is it only maclatunji that uses them for dictatorial purposes? Jesoul and Manmustchopgarri dont use those laws anyhow.

YOU HAVE BEEN BANNED FOR SEVEN DAYS FOR USING THE WORD 'GARRI'

MacDaddy01: I see a troll peeping upon an open thread.

Relax jor, God is in control.
Anyways i was refering both you and vexdacool, you guys need to settle.
Blessed are the peacemakers!

I see salt pouring down on open wounds

MacDaddy01: "cun.t" has two meanings. Guess which one you are?

uhm... Its your call! Take a pick, choose the one dat wil make u glad!

Evil Brain: Meet the trolls!

why the anger? Dnt you knw 'gay' has two meanings?

Quincy37: :oBella3 you shocked me with your response to me post! So Christianity now have a different defination from the one known generally! Check your dictionary very well and see if there is any word like muslim-christian which refers to a group of persons or one person!
When next you see a post and you have no opinion or idea, just shutup!! Who is a church goer? Who is christian? Even the so called church goers may be holier than the self acclaimed christians, that, You and I don't know for we are not God that we should judge!!
I posted what that which I noticed, instead of you to respond accordingly, you started blabbing. That bros that responded to your reply I give cudos to for being a reasonable nairalander, Guy you too much jorri!

yet another escapee. God help us!

Meet the gays!

Eyaa.. See al the mis cake

Delafruita: perhaps you can help out.who is a christian?does a christian go to church?
perhaps i dont understand what "church-goer" means.are some christians "mosque-goers" or "temple-goers"?
all christians are church-goers.this attempt at making a distinction between "christians and church-goers" is pathetic to say the least.whenever a professed christian falls short,they'd say he's not a true christian,he's just a "church-goer".pathetic bunch

you've made your conclusion, you dnt need an answer.
.
Op who are you refering as a 'christain.

Delafruita: it wasnt an "article".tobechi sometimes gets ahead of himself but in this case,the crux of his post was clear.he simply highlighted the intolerance of christians towards the irreligious.
the "errors" you saw arent visible to me despite my lenses been as powerful as the hubble.or perhaps i should blame it on my poor education

it might be an 'article' to the poster. Btw perphaps your 'poor' education should be blamed!