₦airaland Forum

Lamasta:
Go and watch the video so you won't be defending what is wrong

Nobody saw what happened, we her only hearing stories from both sides and I refused to take their stories at face value.

I said the girl should be disciplined but the man overstepped as well causing the reaction he got.

Lamasta:
I can't defend myself from a lecturer in a university environment considering the circumstance that will make him seize my phone in this instance all I can do is to probably apologize and move on

No one has the right to seize your phone only they are the authority. Even police need to have propable cause to seize your phone.

Again, the is not about apologizing as well. He wanted her to delete something she owns and she refused.

Even if she does not apologize, he has not right to seize her phone.

imagrg:
The girl is a moral mistake.

That not withstanding, the lecturer has no right to her phone. He obviously went out of his way.

A lot of idiots here don't want to understand the lecturer is at fault as well.

If you put them in the same situation, they won't hand the lecturer their phone as well.

Lamasta:
From what attack pls cos no where in the video dod the said lecturer lay hands on her other than for her to delete the video which she refused

When someone tries to collect your property, you can defend yourself.

Lamasta:
Some of you needs your brain removed and implanted with sense before you can type something meaningful in public, imagine even with the simple illustration the lecturer explained in the video you still have time to type this comments of yours Haba manna you mist be related to the wayward and mannerless girl

That's if you take his words at face value. People lie and in situations like this they tell a story to make themselves look good. This is something you do as well.

How is it that he tapped her to move she moved for him to pass only for her to then insult her.

I find that questionable. Her own story about that part seem more plausible.

Treasure17:
It's a citadel of learning and she should learn how to apply decorum in such a setting. Go and try it in covenant.

I am not supporting her. But you leaving out the older person here, the man and a lecturer.

The first issue here is his thought of power. He has power but he does not know how and when to use it.

Let's say YOU are recording something and your lecturer came and ask you to delete it. Are you going to just delete it? You are recording yourself oh. Okay when you refuse to delete it and he tries to taks your phone from you. Are you going to give him the phone?

You are an adult and should not be treated like a 10 years old.

Fiscus105:
You also think u can turn university environment to national museum? You also think the way you control your parents at home is normal for the society?

Even outside university, if it's market place, why would you put my image in ur tiktok without giving you authorisation?


Many of you always thinking life ended on campus, imagine urself flying in the sky, until you graduate, and get to know that, you are nothing. I mean nothing.

Do you know what the word public is? When you are outside you don't have the right to privacy.

Gandrova:
But the student has the right to bite him?
Let us all assumed that the lecturer may have asked her out probably before which we are not sure?
Does it gives her the right to embarrassed him?

She didnt just go up to him and bite him. She was defending herself. And that's not to say her character or what happened is right on her part. Both of them are wrong and the lecturer is the one who started this

ndidibabe:
Exactly, why take the phone off her?

He said he needed her to delete it. Why would she delete the video. If she refuse why take the phone off of her? Why not report the matter to the senate and let them cook?

She was not even inside his class, he could ban her in his class or ask her to leave but she was not in a class.

bixton:
I guess this is the version of the lecturer......

The girl in questioned was dancing on the corridor and she was at the same time doing a self video.........self video and dancing ...

There was someone (I wonder who that person is) on the other side of the corridor or thereabout and the lecturer chose to excuse himself via the section the girl was dancing and he needed to tap her probably on her shoulder......
We can't tell hard the tapping would have been to make the girl to have exclaimed!!!!
Maybe the force applied was beyond minimal.

The lecturer had actually excused himself, passed and heard her remarks and he returned to ascertain what exactly!!!!!!!!

Well, all is history....
A lot of things still not adding up.

Her story on this side makes more sense. He might have used Forced and she complains. Him saying he tapped her she moved then after he passed she insulted him does not make much sense to me.

So we don't know which is which but the man no get right to collect her phone. That's my own. She too has her own issues but lecturer thinks he is a god handling a jss 1 student, the girl is stubborn.

sonsomegrigbo:
Another upbringing error

You are just blindly taking the man's words. There is no error here. I went through uni and I saw abuses from lecturers. I don't think he would peacefully tapped her to move out of the way, she moved only for her to then insult him.

Both of them are trying to make themselves look good but whatever their stories are, the lecturer has no right to take her phone.

These lecturers often think they can discipline anyone like teacher use to do in jss1 she insulted you, but taking her phone from her gives her the right to fight to keep her property. Now she is not right, she is a crazy person. She should face the consequences of her actions but no one should be surprised he got what he got as well.

People in Uni are not kids anymore.

If you play with fire you get burned:
BREAKING: U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi just dropped the hammer.

The DOJ has filed charges against NY, Gov. Kathy Hochul, AG Letitia James, and DMV Commissioner Mark Schroeder.

“New York chose illegal aliens over American citizens. It stops—it stops TODAY."

The Biden-era free pass is OFFICIALLY OVER.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOWFE1rqHNA

Democrats are not using stupid judges so they can say there is a constitutional crisis.

How can a judge deside what the federal government puts on their website, what they can remove and cannot remove?

They are paying twice the rate to hotels to house illegals

LordAdam16:
TULSI confirmed.

*grin*

-Lord

Trump is unstoppable.

Lmao, does he even know what the acronym is?

basilico:
Both Republican and Democrats are key recipients of suspect funds

https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/1889172190282821690


DataRepublican (small r)
@DataRepublican
🧵THE UNIPARTY UNMASKED – They Believe They Are “Democracy”

The seven NGOs in the chart below, in my view, represent the Uniparty. Each of these organizations receives substantial financial support from USAID or the Department of State.

Around 2019, the phrase “democracy in danger” began to dominate public discourse, amplified by the media. This was odd—after all, the U.S. is a democracy (or more precisely, a constitutional republic). But as I traced the influence of these NGOs, a pattern emerged: they are controlled by establishment politicians, they play a major role in shaping political narratives worldwide, and their core mission is always framed as “protecting democracy.”

Originally, these NGOs were created to support U.S. democratic efforts abroad—many of them emerging during the Cold War to combat the spread of communism. But with the fall of the Soviet Union, their original purpose faded. Instead of dissolving, they redefined their mission. Now, they have positioned themselves as the guardians of democracy itself.

This shift explains why Trump’s re-election was framed as a "threat to democracy." To these NGOs, “democracy” means themselves. Their survival depends on maintaining that role, and any challenge to their authority is perceived as a direct attack on democracy itself.

Lol using UML diagram to connect the dots 😂

SpaceX:
Al jazeera is the one spreading this message about Gaza of Mozambique, they can't be trusted from my perspective.

He said if it went to Mozambique instead of Gaza it is still bad.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rd0o4UHteQg

basilico:
Foolish . Where was it debunked about 50 million for condoms to Gaza. Condoms that Hamas attached bombs to and sent them floating to Israel hoping Israeli kids will pick them.
You are beneath a mad man
It was the WH spox who said that could you give his whole statement .

Its a gaza in Mozambique not gaza in Palestine

IjeBos:
Piffle?
You mean like this post?
What does it even mean? It's almost like reading the Jabberwocky


This whole quote shows a fundamental misunderstanding of US laws and Supreme Court rulings.
You are basically asking him to give you precedence for POTUS following the Law (I guess it may seem odd given Trump).
You also don't seem to understand what the Supreme Court found illegal about Biden's Student Loan plan yet here you are arguing something about it.
Honestly, I can't even make heads or tales of what you are trying to say.

you still haven't answered the question. this is why you don't have Children or anyone meaningful in your life. you are never straightforward forward even at 52 years old

PDPGuy:
A whistleblower is now alleging that the $2 billion B-2 stealth bomber actually costs $150 million per plane.
That means $1.85 billion, per plane has been lost to corruption 🙆🏽‍♂️🙆🏽‍♂️

😂😂😂

What about the train in California?

IjeBos:
Musk says "Some of the things I say will be incorrect".

How many people in this thread spread this 50 million dollars for Condoms in Gaza?
The US is going to have to tackle the misinformation that is being spread at a dizzying pace.

Mumu, the point is 50 million for condoms, no one cares about the location. They got the wrong gaza but they don't want millions of dols going to anywhere for condoms.

You are too stupid to understand simple things

Ibime:
What was USAID budget in 2015 Vs 2016 that made Trump wreck Obamas improving deficits

Dunno, they were not blowing billions

Ibime:
USAID budget is $40 bln, immaterial

Obama didn't have Pentagon?

40billion of unnecessary expenditures added to the defit.

During Obama's time the wastage was modest. Today they are flinging the money like a monkey throwing poop

Ibime:
Oh shut up you dunderhead!

What crisis did Trump face from 2016 to 2019 that had him raising deficits like a drunk man after inheriting a stable and constantly improving position?

USAID and pentagon. Trillions down the drain

Ibime:
Like I said, you are a neophyte who arrived in politics with Trump and doesn't know anything about politics before Trump. Have you never heard of the Great Recession of 2008 to 2011 caused by the subprime mortgage crisis? I literally posted this last night. Those are the cost of all your bank bailouts and stimulus to revive the economy, similar to Covid. I will soon start charging you for education.

So they spend cash to fix things which adds to the deficit?
Okay.

So what I said stands abi?

Unnecessary spending and funding crap. Half a trillion disappears every year. That's your deficit

Ibime:
Will you shut your illiterate state school ass up and read..Typical MAGAt changing the topic to inanities anytime they are caught pants down

You said Trump doesnt even know what they're spending yet Obama with the same tools had shaved that deficit down every year all the way to $440bln while Trump ballooned it to $1 trln before Covid. A bad workman blames his tools

So you ignore the part Obama took it to 1.4 without USAID 😂
You and you asinine post here.

Ibime:
Funny how the deficit had been reducing year on year for 4 years before Trump entered office. Obama had got it down to $440bln but Trump ballooned it back to nearly $1 trln before Covid

You lie too much. Obama that takes money from kamala harris for support.

basilico:
JD Vance speech at Macron/Modi AI summit in France.
Nations and big brother want to control AI .


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnKsxnP2IVk

On this Trump admin is on point although....Elon Musk, Peter Thiel plus the crypto czar are AI entrepreneurs.

Europe and all these stupid countries like the UK with no spine always tend to cripple themselves and then rely on China that does not follow their stupid restrictions.

happney65:

Propaganda.

Ibime:
Go and check 2018 and 2019 deficit and the growth from 2017

Yeah, the Deficit may go up that time because even Trump does not understand how these idiots are spending money. USAID aided his impeachment. That's how crazy things are.

You did economics. tell me, Do tax cuts alone increase the deficit or it is always spending?
your government is taxing everything to feed illegals because more and more spending needs to happen to fill the stomachs