₦airaland Forum

cococandy:
Dude she was suspended for 12 hours before she became active again. And of course her verification was removed so she can’t be monetized while it’s off.
He’s punishing her for speaking against him. How’s that not anti free speech?

And…..Laura Loomer is but one person. He’s been doing this since he bought the platform. Suspending accounts of journalists who speak out against him.

How does the bottom of his shoe taste Mintus?

Are you by any chance married to Obrigardo?
All the issues you have about Musk are figment of your imagination 😂

cococandy:
Elon musk is suspending twitter accounts of people who have any negative to say about his involvement in American politics.

Educate me please. Is that anti free speech or not?

That's a lie on top of a lie. So continue with the sky is falling. Your tears amuse some folks here

cococandy:
This is so off point. Focus pls

I’m not talking about his obvious arrogant meddling. He can do that like you’ve correctly stated. Even when there’s obvious conflict of interest. But I digress. See what you made me do?

Anyway, I’m talking about his silencing of those who are speaking up against the meddling. He bought twitter because he wanted to liberate Americans and give us “free speech”. Why is he suspending accounts and demonetizing the people speaking about it? Isn’t that oppression of free speech? The same thing he claimed to be against?

Find and give us a defense for his actions. Quick.

none of the crap you posted that I responded to has to do with free speech

cococandy:
Oh he’s very much meddling.

Where’s Vance anyway?

He seems to have scuttled into obscurity. I hope people hold him to the same standards they held Kamala to.

Expecting her to make presidential decisions while a VP. Time will expose the ever obvious hypocrisy and double standards.

You are only complaining because it's from the right, trump and not the party you blindly support.

Just as anyone, Elon can speak, trump and other can choose to follow it or not.

Embarrassing

cococandy:
Elon Musk and free speech.

As long as you’re not questioning why he (a non-elected non-govt official) is meddling so deeply in American politics. And why he’s speaking to officials of other countries at his own behest, you’re fine.

The lesson is not ours to learn. Unfortunately we’ll all bear the consequences.

But he is not meddling with anything. You can voice your opinion but you cannot force anyone to take it.

budaatum:
So, are you now claiming Tony Blair was the "architect of multiculturalism in Britain" that you are now claiming he "did not start the multiculturalism"?

Would you also claim that God, whom some refer to as the Great Architect did start the universe by creating the universe too, but just accelerated the creation of the universe?

An architect is a person who plans, designs, and oversees the construction of buildings things.

Multiculturalism is distinct from mass migration.
Your deflection tactics as usual.

The wrong word is being used here.

budaatum:
Please don't forget to add that your Tommy Robinson is now serving at her majesty's pleasure because buda single handedly decided he must.

Contempt of Court is not false claim.
Some court hearing does not allow reporters or camera in. Doing so would be comtempt of court but not false claims.

After the stabbing of those children, the government hid the truth. I am sure some truth reported by some may have been labeled as misinformation, false claims and lies.

budaatum:
You are an insignificant stupid ignorant idiot and a complete waste of time and space.

Your logic, there parents decided so it is okay. The ignorant one is you.
Add all the crap you want. Your statement still applies to it. Parents decides if their kids are skinned. Whether it hurts the kids in the present or future does not matter.
You trying reframe what I said only shows your dishonesty.

ono:
I think buda knows what's right. He knows this is wrong on all levels! But you know, he does not want to sound like he's against his leftist groups - they have to stay "together" - even when their actions, views and opinions are all wrecking humanity!

Shame!!

And where are all the women/ladies in this place? Are they all in on this too?

@cococandy

budaatum:
So, buda is deciding for you that its okay for parent you to rape your own kids because you are their parent?

Go on. Send me your address so Buda can show you what happens to stupid, ignorant parents like you who rape their own kids.

I dare you.

My post does not include the raping of kids. But your stance, parents decided so its okay stinks. You said this about children reading explicit books, you said this about castrating children.

budaatum:
Is it not up to you to decide if your children are groomed by strangers or not?

Would you like stranger me to decide for you if your children are groomed or not?

Walking contradiction. Same you that said it's the parents who don't like their kids being groomed putting the books in the school to make them look bad.

budaatum:
Parents who don't like it and lost the vote can organise to win next election or enrol their children in other schools or homeschool, though I'd hope parents would have sufficiently educated their children not to just accept what they read in a book.

The bold is you supporting grooming and saying it's okay and Parents who have problems with it should move their kids but the school should go on grooming other kids whose parents don't have issues with it.

budaatum:
So, you want buda to decide for you if you can rape your own children?

Fair enough. Please send me your address so buda can decide for you so you can see what buda decides.

It will make you clearly understand why you are a very stupid ignorant idiot!

Its your logic, parents decided to it's okay. That logic stinks

basilico:
Gbam

Like I said before, Tommy Robinson exposed what the government was hiding. It was called Muslim hate and Tommy was attacked more than the people he was exposing. Now budaatum is spreading this as Muslim hate again.

Sweden, Germany, etc. We see a pattern. Someone calling it out is not Muslim hate. Tommy Robinson had no history of calling out Muslims till he started investigating the grooming gangs in the UK.

Budaatum is saying it's up to the parents to decide if their kids are groomed by strangers. Does that sound like someone who cares about protecting kids? Recently they talked about gay men who raped their adopted children. Based on his logic, that should be acceptable since the parents decided to do that to the kids.

LordAdam16:
Please share the link to that exchange.

-Lord

https://www.nairaland.com/4508641/american-politics-thread-trump-president-elect/4307#131434378


You see what he posted?
The girl was willing to have sex. Any kid would have sex with an adult of they have been groomed.

@cococandy basilico posted this, you can also refer to the image below.

basilico:
Good morning Budaatum.
This is from a Gender Queer ,a high school level book maga has banned in many school districts.The images are suitable for high school kids, I see no reason for the bot banning me.

Yet left-leaning school boards and districts are fighting to keep the book in their schools. In Maine, school board members voted 5-3 to keep the book in the Leavitt High School Library. In Illinois, a high school librarian was making videos on TikTok about how the book can be found in the Lanphier High School Library. Another school board in Chicago voted unanimously to keep the book on school shelves. The Chicago Sun-Times ran the headline “Suburban Chicago School Board Keeps, ‘Gender Queer’ Book That Conservative Parents, Proud Boys Want Banned,” thus associating the idea of banning the book as only being proposed by conservatives and those the Left labels “extremists” and “hate groups.”

budaatum:
You lie so much that I'd check for myself if you told me the sky was not green, so please provide a link so I can verify for myself where it is from if you don't mind.

That said, there was a vote in a school in democratic America, the America that spends billions shooting it's form of democracy down the throats of any nation that would accept it's dollars or bullets, so they can hardly be blamed for practising what they preach.

Parents who don't like it and lost the vote can organise to win next election or enrol their children in other schools or homeschool, though I'd hope parents would have sufficiently educated their children not to just accept what they read in a book.

Which makes me think of your sort. Good morning basilico. Bible believer, that is. You believe what you read in a book, and think others believe what they read or watch like you do and therefore will practice it.

Below is one for you to consider. She did not think she was a boy, she thought she was dead.

I add the third image for you to consider the consequences of not giving children the tools to survive this harsh uncaring world.

basilico:
Hahaha You can't pinpoint one blatant lie from me. Not a single one. Out of 9000 plus posts.

That said , that image is from the book Gender Queer that leftists badly want easily available to high school students.

About bible believing, do you find it odd that those who pray to Satan don't believe there is a God?

I quoted from this page. Has a short description of the book . Writer talking about masturbating with a sock in her pants, another page admiring gooey from her vagina.. Typical stuff that should kids should be reading?
https://capitalresearch.org/article/the-nea-recommends-the-book-gender-queer-so-i-read-it/

Now look at this last post from a guy who accused parents of sneaking in those books to make the school look bad.

budaatum:
Its entirely up to the parents what their children read, as I feel you ought to know.

cococandy:
Well are the parents doing that or not? A few of my older church ladies are fond of running around with online videos of pedophilic books in schools without any form of verification.

Lol, how are the parents bringing in books with explicit contents and putting them in the schools? Are you people ok?

basilico:
Didn't start yesterday. Clouding other matters to support grooming gangs.

@cococandy, this was budaatum lying from his teeth. No one knew Tommy Robinson or accused him of hating Muslims till he started exposing what the British government has been hiding.

The recent stabbing of children is another example of the government covering up for bad actors then vilify those who notice the pattern as far right thugs.

LordAdam16:
My take on this, particularly the part in bold is that you should have that stuck in a folder or note app for easy reference.
Your accusation is weighty.
If you're going to malign a character, have incontrovertible proof to back up your assertions.

To add, it is possible to make a comment about statutory rape that might on the surface look bad but isn't.
The age cut-off for statutory rape is not uniform across the West.
Budaatum is in the UK. Age of consent there is 16. It's 16 in Canada as well.
In New Zealand, it's 16. But anyone under 20 is legally a minor. So sexual relations with a 19 year old can be described as sex with a minor which is just bleh 🤮.
Heck, in the US. It's 16 in 31 states. 17 in 7, including NY.
In the military, it's 16. Because they recruit 17 year-olds and you would have a statutory rape caseload higher than the Empire State if you set it at 18.
In fact, while federal law in the US pegs it at 18, it doesn't supersede state statues. And in federal law, the age of consent for US nationals who engage in sexual relations outside the US is 16.

I'm not going to reference mainland Europe. It's a madhouse over there. I know it's the law, but really, 14 in Germany is like, "Guys, hold up".

So you see why there might be an issue. Say the right thing in the wrong way and you've got a problem.
You can't just brand a person a pedo without sharing the offending comment they made.

-Lord

In the UK, an adult had sex with a 13 years old based on what his imams taught him. I said the guy raped the girl, budaatum said it is not rape because he did not pin her down before he did it.

He also tried to say because the judge did not charge the guy with rape that means it did not happen.
I didn't just woke up and start saying he supports these things. He has been taking stance or people grooming kids which often leads to rape against such kids by an adult.

cococandy:
And like I was saying, seems like you were intentionally obfuscating issues.

It’s obvious that when people who don’t support LGBTQ rights don’t have anything else to say, they resort to trying to paint the whole group as pedophiles. Actively ignoring all the millions of incidents where straight people sexually assaulted kids. It’s almost like I already pointed out that you guys use faux concern for kids to push your agenda. So of course it’s not just you.

I really thought you had real examples of their support for rapists to show me. But instead it’s just another unfounded conclusion drawn from faulty premises. Pls be serious and don’t dilute the meaning of pedophilia.

What kind of right you will support that makes you say parents sneak in books with explicit content in them to make schools look bad?
Schools put books that promote having sex with older people. The books are for kids under the age of 18 but have the content of a kid having sex with an adult and describing how good it was.

If you make excuses for those who put such books in the hands of kids while attacking those complaining then you are making excuses for groomers and pedos.

basilico:
As per my post I equate proponents of child transitioning to potential paedos or brainwashed liberals.

@cococandy, it's not just me who thinks Budaatum is a pedo. The guy has taken a lot of disturbing stances when it comes to adults grooming children.

basilico:
We also have no problem with people cutting off their body parts. Difference between me and you on this -

If you are above 21, paying you our own medical Go ahead and turn yourself into the opposite sex. There are only two end results of gender change. You start claiming to be either Male or female.

you support toddlers to teens getting mutilated, You support them being confused by library books on how it's natural to be say a girl in a boys body.....OR be a boy in a girls body.
That's why we was thinking You could be a paedo or maybe the idea of 2nd graders reading books on masturbation etc seems to stir your loins

basilico:
A child who needs an ID to buy a beer is mature enough to undergo surgical mutilation, block puberty onset and change gender?
If one can change his gender then they can also change their age . An adult can claim to be a child and sleep with children.
My opinion, many of those who insist on gender changes are perverts and latent paedophiles . They are sexualizing kids before their formative stage in life. A kid should grow up normally without undue influences and free from perverted influencers. A boy who transitions to a girl will obviously be extremely pleased attracting the attention of males , will be proud to revel in their personal changes .Meaning his chances of engaging in sexual activity are much higher than the kids going through normal growth phases.
I liken transitioners to body builders ,there is nothing more pleasing to them than praising their biceps, puffed out chests and their abs.
There are societies that circumcise boys at very early ages , some on the eighth day for religious reasons. I have never heard anyone complain of being circumcised, it does no harm in life.
When it comes to trans , many are just faking it, want to go to women jails ,participate in their sports and use female restrooms.
A gay man who is the "she he" or rather the recipient obviously wants to look sexy and has no qualms taking hormones to acquire the feminine looks and body features.

I've got a close friend who says she was born that way , she lives a miserable life of heartbreaks and searching for like minded girls at every opportunity anywhere. She's just a confused late twenties girl,says she has never slept with a man, ironically has an impressive toys collection. She uses that collection to entice girls. To me it's ensnaring.
Budaatum [b]flows with the flow. Takes liberal positions all the time, but will change stance when it's convenient.[/b]

https://www.nairaland.com/4508641/american-politics-thread-trump-president-elect/3730#122174515

This is Budaatum saying how evil should be confronted from one side of his mouth; from the other side of his mouth, it's hands off. Do what you may because you are the parent of the child who may grow up and realize his or her parents made a decision that is detrimental to their future.

Parents cannot decide to give their kids alcohol but they can decide to castrate them.

cococandy:
Yes that’s the one I’m talking about. downplayed in the same way I said statutory rape is not the same as aggravated sexual assault. Both of which are bad, illegal and will land the perp on the list. However one might get the perp a longer jail sentence because of the violent nature. I feel you purposely misconstrued that. I still stand to be corrected. As you’ve sent me to do my own digging. Okay.

I’ll let you know when I find out because as of now I saw nothing except that post I was referring to earlier.


Okay but Let’s not digress pls. As far I know republicans want parents to make the final decision on that issue. And buda has said they’re personally not for it but will let the parents in the situation make the call. Am I reading this wrong? Where’s the support you speak of? It’s clear as day.

There is no point in downplaying it. No one was arguing otherwise.

cococandy:
I am willing to retract my statement and apologize if you show me the post that buda supported rapists. This is a huge deal breaker for me. It doesn’t matter who it is. I will disown family members over such behavior. So don’t think I’ll be biased because we’ve agreed on different topics in the past.

The post I saw where you said buda supported child molester was something similar to the post I made above where I said there’s a difference between aggravated sexual assault and what Matt Gaetz did. I’m obviously disgusted by both but I’m remaining objective enough to say that it’s not the same. At least for the purpose of definition and application of the law, we need to be clear about that. Doesn’t mean I’ll ever tolerate or excuse such behavior. If someone were looking to have a gotcha moment at me, they could easily misinterpret that part of my post and start saying all over the forum that I support child abusers.
That’s what I saw you doing and that’s why said you were being mischievous.

Now if there’s a post where buda frankly or candidly supported child abusers, show it to me and I’ll retract my statement and apologize.

What the guy did was statutory rape, budaatum downplayed it. I called it rape, he said it is not rape.

It is not new, he has a track record of supporting groomers. Kids that are groomed end up having sex with adults.

I don't have time to dig up the past but if you can do your research you will find posts where he is supporting groomers.

Another thing, budaatum is like a snake, he flip-flops all the time.
Recently you would think he does not hold a stance of supporting the castration of minors, the wind has blow the other way so he is sounding like he is against it.

But see this post below
https://www.nairaland.com/4508641/american-politics-thread-trump-president-elect/3730#122174515

basilico:
Budaatum.
How did this pass me? The Rwandese teenager who stabbed little children and sparked anti immigrant riots across UK.
Turned out that he had ricin poison and an Al Qaeda manual.
Your govt The British govt went to great lengths to lie to the public that it wasn't a terror atrack inspired by jihadists.The media memory holed it too.
Did you defend him too? The search function here is unreliable.

Budaatum will only critique or voice his concern if it was a Christian.

budaatum:
As you might have noticed, I don't bother much with the stupid idiot. Unlike some, he doesn't need to ask me to keep out of his posts because his posts are usually not worth getting into except to occasionally remind him what one thinks of him.

You defend rapists and groomers. You are known for that. I don't expect cococandy to take a neutral stand on this. She is going to take your side. What you posted is there for all to see. On many occasions, you have supported groomers, attack the messengers or make excuses for groomers or rapists. And this extends to other threads.

budaatum:
It frustrates me that many don't see this, but Christ always reminds me to forgive everyone for they know not what they do.

I can't forgive the resident stupid idiot though, for he definitely does know the evil he does, and that is just not forgivable despite the fact my not forgiving him makes it certain that I will indeed burn in the hottest part of hell.

Trust me bemeruca, when I am burning in hell, my only delight and joy is you will be feeling the hell fire more than I would because of your surprise at ending up in hell right there with me, because there is absolutely no way any god would let your evil lying stupid ignorant idiot sort in its peaceful beautiful heaven so you can catch your useless trolling cruise and dabaru the entire heaven as you dabaru here.

Say all you want, I am still gonna call out your degenerate tendencies so defend and support rapists and groomers.

budaatum:
As in, if your boys were raped and abused by any religion, I would attack those who abuse them instead of joining you in cutting off their abusing diqs and kicking their asses straight to hell?

Would I also be attacking those who expose the abuse of my own children instead and then make excuses for the criminals too, or is it your opinion that I don't care about your own children's welfare as much as I do care about my own children's because I am a stupid idiot like you are?

All the references of you defending rapists and groomers are on Nairaland. My opinion has nothing to do with it.

budaatum:
I think I don't call you a stupid idiot because I believe that you are at least capable of determining if the above is as true as you make it out to be and that you can admit it, unlike the resident stupid idiot who most definitely is brain dead.

I am sure if it was from a certain religion of peace you would have attacked those who exposed it instead and then make excuses for the criminals.

We know you are always fast to defend rapists

PDPGuy:
T - 30 days to inauguration day

Make way for the bad guy

budaatum:
I must give people grace, even when they do know how they come across. Its like turning the other cheek. I find they either get tired of slapping and we grow together or my cheeks get stronger.

Besides, I can't exactly be Human Rights and then go about being an ass now can I, except to the resident stupid idiot of course. Now that piece of what comes out of a rear end is a different category all together.

The only people you give grace are the ones that groom and rape children as you have shown to always defend them.

You ran away from Twitter because you are easily triggered. Leave it like that; we know you are always the first to throw a stone in a glass house, then play victim when you get pricked.

Animegirl:
I have a burning passion to become a wealthy and successful woman, but I'm worried that getting married and having children might force me to put my dreams on hold. I'm concerned that I won't be able to balance family life with my personal ambitions. Furthermore, the societal pressures in Nigeria, combined with the constraints of time and age, are making me feel like I'm already at a disadvantage. My desire for success is strong, but I'm fearful that having a family might mean sacrificing my dreams.

I'm really scared.

You cannot cheat biology.
Some married women are successful; you just have to give it more time and allow the market to decide.

You marry, and you take a 4 to 5-year hit because of your kids; after that, the sky is your limit. You would probably have house help; your husband is probably doing well, so aside from your greedy, ambitious view of success, you can't cheat biology.