₦airaland Forum

raumdeuter:
Is it the EU that cannot defend itself against Russia and needs US help and dollars or a different EU. All those weak countries that depend on the US for their defence. Talking about invasion, Its more likely France would be invaded than them invading anyone

They are already invaded

raumdeuter:
So when are the left canceling Facebook, Instagram, Whatsapp and all Zuckerberg platforms

Budaatum old man not ashamed to announce he left Twitter for safe space bluesky will definitely leave Facebook because mofreespeech.

IMAliyu2:
He's been a fairly consistent principled leftist.
There's an ideological difference between leftists and liberals.

Also his point is about ending the exploitation of H1b visas by the capital class. Not anti-immigration.

Isn't that musk and vivek's stance?

budaatum:
Message to President Musk.

BYD has a 1.1% share in Europe, and I have yet to see one in the wild here in the US. This kind of post shows how you are driven by hate.

Apple sees a decrease in sales, and Samsung, all companies with a huge market share, cannot always increase their market share. Expect dips at some point.

90% of their cars are sold in china
No one with a brain will buy those crap. Most of which are in junkyard

basilico:
Wow This well referenced thread follows Joe Biden lies about having no involvement in Hunter Biden businesses.
Monster thread has enough screenshots of how media deliberately coordinated in misreporting and outright lying
on behalf of the criminal Biden family.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1873867604236145016.html

SMH Someone should go to jail

Democrat Main stream Media is such a disgrace.

Straight to my vault.
obrigardo what's your opinion?

From all that has been happening and us stating the obvious and called conspiracy theorists, I say more dirt is about to be revealed.

it is sad how people here still think it is a good idea to trust the mainstream media.

basilico:
Bemeruca, Looks like Trump DOJ might go after Kamala. She was also paying social media influencers to endorse her.
Her staffers also became millionaires.
That was definitely laundering campaign money
But he shoots his mouth a lot . A judge might rule against him for poisoning the jury pool.

They should go after those criminals

basilico:
Thanks. Her removed her Blue Tick though,

She did that herself

basilico:
He banned Loomer because it was also getting personal . You don't tell someone that he bought the presidency 5 minutes after an assassination attempt.

He didn't ban her. She doxxed someone. That's against x terms of use

cococandy:
Right. Because my name is Laura Loomer. And I’m the one going on podcasts talking about how I’m being suppressed on twitter by my former overlord who I used to lick his boots.

I know reasoning is not easy but try it sometimes. Maybe you’ll be able to understand when someone is mocking you vs crying.

This cut and paste response shows you don’t use your thinking faculty very often.

Loomer is not being suppressed, she doxxed someone and got suspended, then she deactivated her own subscription.

It's only hatred coupled with sore loser syndrome would take you this length.

Stop crying and pray for a better life here as we see the new admin enter the white house instead of praying for the demise of this country.

Control your emotions, any guy that will break up with you no go rest o 🤣🤣🤣

All this because of hatred. Liberals 😂

cococandy:
Lame and embarrassing for you.

You are the one crying

cococandy:
Dude she was suspended for 12 hours before she became active again. And of course her verification was removed so she can’t be monetized while it’s off.
He’s punishing her for speaking against him. How’s that not anti free speech?

And…..Laura Loomer is but one person. He’s been doing this since he bought the platform. Suspending accounts of journalists who speak out against him.

How does the bottom of his shoe taste Mintus?

She was not suspended. Joe Biden is not senile for 4 years the weirdos who told you he is fine and sharpest are now lying to you.

cococandy:
1) Haven’t you noticed that telling others lame stuff like “cry” “tears” “emotions” etc are ineffective words when you’re trying to squirm your way away from an embarrassing position facing you? Silence can be golden sometimes. The doubling down is shameful. Don’t you feel shame?

2) Taking the side of who? Pls don’t digress. I’m asking Elon to stand on his free speech absolutist stance. He would walk the talk that he used to gain republican support. Promising everyone freedom to say whatever they wanted. Well until you said something he doesn’t like. 🤣🤣🤣.

3) Republicans are the party of racists. Just like Laura , they don’t want legal immigrants either. We tried to tell y’all but you refused to learn. You think Laura is the only republican against legal immigration? oh you guys didn’t have the foresight and social experience to understand the clues around you. Clues that screamed they didn’t like migrants legal or not. Or you thought you’d be the exception?

Cry, dear; complaining is crying. Elon or Trump breathes you complain. They are doing their thing in reality while you live in your imagination.

Why you are emotional I can call it out, when you cry I can call it out too. Regardless of whether, according to your imagination, it is working or not. I am only describing your state.

Loomer is still on Twitter posting, she was never silenced so you are spreading lies she is spreading.

Keep crying

cococandy:
Weak responses.

You know sometimes when someone you believe in so much is embarrassing you, it’s okay to be quiet and take the L in peace. You wiggle too much in their defense you start to look like wiggly worms.

Of course basilico. Those journalists he suspended for writing about him were bots. Even though they had names, faces and companies they worked for. Maybe you’re a bot too.

Indeed bemeruca. It’s only in my imagination that Elon claimed he’s a free speech absolutist.All that never happened and earth doesn’t revolve around the sun.

No wonder nobody in their right minds will take anything any of you say at face value. If you have no shame about the way you lie, it makes sense that anything either of you say has to be quadruple checked. 😩

You are here taking the side of someone who wants the legal migration program to be axed. Then she starts making baseless claims she was silent with no evidence.

You can cry but no one cares.

cococandy:
Dude she was suspended for 12 hours before she became active again. And of course her verification was removed so she can’t be monetized while it’s off.
He’s punishing her for speaking against him. How’s that not anti free speech?

And…..Laura Loomer is but one person. He’s been doing this since he bought the platform. Suspending accounts of journalists who speak out against him.

How does the bottom of his shoe taste Mintus?

Are you by any chance married to Obrigardo?
All the issues you have about Musk are figment of your imagination 😂

cococandy:
Elon musk is suspending twitter accounts of people who have any negative to say about his involvement in American politics.

Educate me please. Is that anti free speech or not?

That's a lie on top of a lie. So continue with the sky is falling. Your tears amuse some folks here

cococandy:
This is so off point. Focus pls

I’m not talking about his obvious arrogant meddling. He can do that like you’ve correctly stated. Even when there’s obvious conflict of interest. But I digress. See what you made me do?

Anyway, I’m talking about his silencing of those who are speaking up against the meddling. He bought twitter because he wanted to liberate Americans and give us “free speech”. Why is he suspending accounts and demonetizing the people speaking about it? Isn’t that oppression of free speech? The same thing he claimed to be against?

Find and give us a defense for his actions. Quick.

none of the crap you posted that I responded to has to do with free speech

cococandy:
Oh he’s very much meddling.

Where’s Vance anyway?

He seems to have scuttled into obscurity. I hope people hold him to the same standards they held Kamala to.

Expecting her to make presidential decisions while a VP. Time will expose the ever obvious hypocrisy and double standards.

You are only complaining because it's from the right, trump and not the party you blindly support.

Just as anyone, Elon can speak, trump and other can choose to follow it or not.

Embarrassing

cococandy:
Elon Musk and free speech.

As long as you’re not questioning why he (a non-elected non-govt official) is meddling so deeply in American politics. And why he’s speaking to officials of other countries at his own behest, you’re fine.

The lesson is not ours to learn. Unfortunately we’ll all bear the consequences.

But he is not meddling with anything. You can voice your opinion but you cannot force anyone to take it.

budaatum:
So, are you now claiming Tony Blair was the "architect of multiculturalism in Britain" that you are now claiming he "did not start the multiculturalism"?

Would you also claim that God, whom some refer to as the Great Architect did start the universe by creating the universe too, but just accelerated the creation of the universe?

An architect is a person who plans, designs, and oversees the construction of buildings things.

Multiculturalism is distinct from mass migration.
Your deflection tactics as usual.

The wrong word is being used here.

budaatum:
Please don't forget to add that your Tommy Robinson is now serving at her majesty's pleasure because buda single handedly decided he must.

Contempt of Court is not false claim.
Some court hearing does not allow reporters or camera in. Doing so would be comtempt of court but not false claims.

After the stabbing of those children, the government hid the truth. I am sure some truth reported by some may have been labeled as misinformation, false claims and lies.

budaatum:
You are an insignificant stupid ignorant idiot and a complete waste of time and space.

Your logic, there parents decided so it is okay. The ignorant one is you.
Add all the crap you want. Your statement still applies to it. Parents decides if their kids are skinned. Whether it hurts the kids in the present or future does not matter.
You trying reframe what I said only shows your dishonesty.

ono:
I think buda knows what's right. He knows this is wrong on all levels! But you know, he does not want to sound like he's against his leftist groups - they have to stay "together" - even when their actions, views and opinions are all wrecking humanity!

Shame!!

And where are all the women/ladies in this place? Are they all in on this too?

@cococandy

budaatum:
So, buda is deciding for you that its okay for parent you to rape your own kids because you are their parent?

Go on. Send me your address so Buda can show you what happens to stupid, ignorant parents like you who rape their own kids.

I dare you.

My post does not include the raping of kids. But your stance, parents decided so its okay stinks. You said this about children reading explicit books, you said this about castrating children.

budaatum:
Is it not up to you to decide if your children are groomed by strangers or not?

Would you like stranger me to decide for you if your children are groomed or not?

Walking contradiction. Same you that said it's the parents who don't like their kids being groomed putting the books in the school to make them look bad.

budaatum:
Parents who don't like it and lost the vote can organise to win next election or enrol their children in other schools or homeschool, though I'd hope parents would have sufficiently educated their children not to just accept what they read in a book.

The bold is you supporting grooming and saying it's okay and Parents who have problems with it should move their kids but the school should go on grooming other kids whose parents don't have issues with it.

budaatum:
So, you want buda to decide for you if you can rape your own children?

Fair enough. Please send me your address so buda can decide for you so you can see what buda decides.

It will make you clearly understand why you are a very stupid ignorant idiot!

Its your logic, parents decided to it's okay. That logic stinks

basilico:
Gbam

Like I said before, Tommy Robinson exposed what the government was hiding. It was called Muslim hate and Tommy was attacked more than the people he was exposing. Now budaatum is spreading this as Muslim hate again.

Sweden, Germany, etc. We see a pattern. Someone calling it out is not Muslim hate. Tommy Robinson had no history of calling out Muslims till he started investigating the grooming gangs in the UK.

Budaatum is saying it's up to the parents to decide if their kids are groomed by strangers. Does that sound like someone who cares about protecting kids? Recently they talked about gay men who raped their adopted children. Based on his logic, that should be acceptable since the parents decided to do that to the kids.

LordAdam16:
Please share the link to that exchange.

-Lord

https://www.nairaland.com/4508641/american-politics-thread-trump-president-elect/4307#131434378


You see what he posted?
The girl was willing to have sex. Any kid would have sex with an adult of they have been groomed.

@cococandy basilico posted this, you can also refer to the image below.

basilico:
Good morning Budaatum.
This is from a Gender Queer ,a high school level book maga has banned in many school districts.The images are suitable for high school kids, I see no reason for the bot banning me.

Yet left-leaning school boards and districts are fighting to keep the book in their schools. In Maine, school board members voted 5-3 to keep the book in the Leavitt High School Library. In Illinois, a high school librarian was making videos on TikTok about how the book can be found in the Lanphier High School Library. Another school board in Chicago voted unanimously to keep the book on school shelves. The Chicago Sun-Times ran the headline “Suburban Chicago School Board Keeps, ‘Gender Queer’ Book That Conservative Parents, Proud Boys Want Banned,” thus associating the idea of banning the book as only being proposed by conservatives and those the Left labels “extremists” and “hate groups.”

budaatum:
You lie so much that I'd check for myself if you told me the sky was not green, so please provide a link so I can verify for myself where it is from if you don't mind.

That said, there was a vote in a school in democratic America, the America that spends billions shooting it's form of democracy down the throats of any nation that would accept it's dollars or bullets, so they can hardly be blamed for practising what they preach.

Parents who don't like it and lost the vote can organise to win next election or enrol their children in other schools or homeschool, though I'd hope parents would have sufficiently educated their children not to just accept what they read in a book.

Which makes me think of your sort. Good morning basilico. Bible believer, that is. You believe what you read in a book, and think others believe what they read or watch like you do and therefore will practice it.

Below is one for you to consider. She did not think she was a boy, she thought she was dead.

I add the third image for you to consider the consequences of not giving children the tools to survive this harsh uncaring world.

basilico:
Hahaha You can't pinpoint one blatant lie from me. Not a single one. Out of 9000 plus posts.

That said , that image is from the book Gender Queer that leftists badly want easily available to high school students.

About bible believing, do you find it odd that those who pray to Satan don't believe there is a God?

I quoted from this page. Has a short description of the book . Writer talking about masturbating with a sock in her pants, another page admiring gooey from her vagina.. Typical stuff that should kids should be reading?
https://capitalresearch.org/article/the-nea-recommends-the-book-gender-queer-so-i-read-it/

Now look at this last post from a guy who accused parents of sneaking in those books to make the school look bad.

budaatum:
Its entirely up to the parents what their children read, as I feel you ought to know.

cococandy:
Well are the parents doing that or not? A few of my older church ladies are fond of running around with online videos of pedophilic books in schools without any form of verification.

Lol, how are the parents bringing in books with explicit contents and putting them in the schools? Are you people ok?

basilico:
Didn't start yesterday. Clouding other matters to support grooming gangs.

@cococandy, this was budaatum lying from his teeth. No one knew Tommy Robinson or accused him of hating Muslims till he started exposing what the British government has been hiding.

The recent stabbing of children is another example of the government covering up for bad actors then vilify those who notice the pattern as far right thugs.

LordAdam16:
My take on this, particularly the part in bold is that you should have that stuck in a folder or note app for easy reference.
Your accusation is weighty.
If you're going to malign a character, have incontrovertible proof to back up your assertions.

To add, it is possible to make a comment about statutory rape that might on the surface look bad but isn't.
The age cut-off for statutory rape is not uniform across the West.
Budaatum is in the UK. Age of consent there is 16. It's 16 in Canada as well.
In New Zealand, it's 16. But anyone under 20 is legally a minor. So sexual relations with a 19 year old can be described as sex with a minor which is just bleh 🤮.
Heck, in the US. It's 16 in 31 states. 17 in 7, including NY.
In the military, it's 16. Because they recruit 17 year-olds and you would have a statutory rape caseload higher than the Empire State if you set it at 18.
In fact, while federal law in the US pegs it at 18, it doesn't supersede state statues. And in federal law, the age of consent for US nationals who engage in sexual relations outside the US is 16.

I'm not going to reference mainland Europe. It's a madhouse over there. I know it's the law, but really, 14 in Germany is like, "Guys, hold up".

So you see why there might be an issue. Say the right thing in the wrong way and you've got a problem.
You can't just brand a person a pedo without sharing the offending comment they made.

-Lord

In the UK, an adult had sex with a 13 years old based on what his imams taught him. I said the guy raped the girl, budaatum said it is not rape because he did not pin her down before he did it.

He also tried to say because the judge did not charge the guy with rape that means it did not happen.
I didn't just woke up and start saying he supports these things. He has been taking stance or people grooming kids which often leads to rape against such kids by an adult.