IjeBos: And you two, who live in Nigeria know better than the Republican Governor of Ohio who basically says that it is all Bullshit. You can commence the, "he's a RINO" now.
Yeah, he is a trump fan. The thing to watch is how republicans or conservatives are very accepting to other opinions. Dems/liberals on the other hand 😭😭 driven by hatred
Video has 22 million views. The lefties worst enemy is Elon Musk.
Rebekah Faidia: My father immigrated from Haiti to the United States in the late ’60s as a teenager. And I want to talk about these recent comments about the Haitians in Springfield, Ohio. I also want to say my father and I are now estranged, but I did know him in my very, very young years. And when he immigrated, he was one person, and they weren’t sending thousands of Haitians in one area. He wasn’t eating people’s pets and he didn’t practice voodoo. But he did say that most of the island, the majority of the island, does practice voodoo.
The reason they eat cats is for two reasons. Number one is survival. This is the poorest country in the Western hemisphere. You can’t just go to a food bank like you can here or just go to McDonald’s and get some free or cheap food. Unless, of course, there’s a Christian missionary there. People in the United States have a really hard time imagining that type of thing, but it is true. Second, they do do animal sacrifices for their religion, voodoo. They make these animal sacrifices to these gods for different reasons. You can do your own research on this. Do I think voodoo is a demonic religion? Yes, I do. That doesn’t mean… Obviously, that doesn’t mean that you hate these people. These people need prayer. But you can’t just take over all these people from another country and expect it to work. Not to mention, it doesn’t fix the problems of that country. And there’s more people left in Haiti that we can bring over.
It’s not racist to acknowledge that this is a problem. It’s not racist to talk about these things that are happening. This is not just white Americans saying this is Black Americans. You can look at the people in Springfield, Ohio, saying that this is happening. You all just want to joke about Trump and say that he’s crazy for saying that this is happening instead of actually checking at all to see if this is happening. You want to make jokes about these things. Well, what if it were happening to you and your community? And no, it’s beyond eating their pets, even though that is bad enough
I don't know whether it's true. I don't rely on TikTok videos I know most Haitians practice voodoo and that the animal sacrifices to their God are carefully selected and groomed because they give up their life for the god. Lwa or something like that. cc lordreed
Its their culture. I believe they are eating animals illegally in Ohio
basilico: Company that makes the audio enabled earrings has responded. Following the presidential debate on Tuesday, social media users theorized that Vice President Kamala Harris wore audio earrings on stage. The Germany-based company that sells the earrings said on Wednesday that the resemblance between Harris' earrings and their audio earrings "is striking."
On Tuesday night, Harris wore what appeared to be gold and pearl earrings while debating former President Donald Trump. Social media users compared the earrings to NOVA H1 Audio Earrings, which are wireless earphones. Media outlets and other social media users examined the earrings, coming to the conclusion that Harris' earrings are from Tiffany & Co., not NOVA products.
Just the News requested comment from Icebach Sound, the Munich-based company that sells the earrings.
"We do not know whether Mrs. Harris wore one of our products. The resemblance is striking and while our product was not specifically developed for the use at presidential debates, it is nonetheless suited for it," Malte Iversen, managing director at Icebach Sound, told Just the News on Wednesday. "To ensure a level playing field for both candidates, we are currently developing a male version and will soon be able to offer it to the Trump campaign.
I doubt he would say Kamala wore their product, I wonder why he said they are coming up with a male version suitable for Trump . IOW big chance that the Kamunist cheated @ the debate.
IjeBos: It's also seems Canada already denied your asylum case and you've been booted back to Canada. If you were still in Surrey (which is equivalent to US West Coast time), it would have been 4am when you wrote this post.
🤣🤣🤣🤣 What's the point of the US denying it when they know I can just go through Mexico again 😂
IjeBos: So, if you don't like reality, just invent a new one? It's not surprising that black people that support a Racist white person in a country they've never been to are all mentally ill.
LordAdam16: China is arguably America's #1 adversary in 2024.
How many questions did the moderators ask Kamala the sitting VP about China?
A BIG FAT ZERO!
They just allowed her to lie without fact-checking. And even the pressing questions Americans needed answers to, they didn't have the decency to press her when she spurned the questions.
Worse, they pressed Trump on the border bill when Kamala brought it up. They fact-checked him. But when Trump asked her to state her position on third trimester abortion, they insisted on moving on. I don't think we can even call this an assist. This was a coordination.
-Lord
This is what they did:
This clip
This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate.
There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span.
may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate.
There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span.
This is not “bias."
It’s much worse.
This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of “fact checkers" the inference is that the absence of a “fact check” confers validity to the non-fact-checked information.
When one side is repeatedly “fact checked,” while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is.
The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed.
In this clip:
1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamala’s behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesn’t acknowledging the validity of Trump’s statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her “answer" he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange.
2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check.
3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trump’s “peacefully and patriotically” comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check.
4) Kamala says that “some" police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check.
5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville “Fine People” hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check.
6) Kamala recites the “stand back and stand by” hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a “militia” to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check.
7) Kamala recites the “bloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check.
To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators:
"They did exactly what their bosses wanted." -western
IjeBos: You are obsessed with my g/f and my life. It's what drives most of your posts. And worse, you are measuring my life with the poverty of yours. It's odd. Everything you write, that you are incredulous about, is common amongst my friends, but seems foreign to you.
Get your money up so you won't be yarning nonsense.
IjeBos: You're both siding this. Imagine sitting in front of a fire hydrant/hose and trying to drink from it. That is tantamount to what any debate with Trump is like. It's a torrent of lies, BS and teenage insults. In that environment it is impossible to have a thorough debate on substance. It doesn't work when one party can lie every time he opens up his mouth. Go back and look at the past debates with say Obama and Romney. What has changed recently that's made the debates less policy driven.. Trump. The tell is that half the country supports a man that still doesn't have a health care policy 9 years later and thinks tariffs could take over tax revenue, that hospitals kill babies post birth and that immigrants eat dogs and cats.
And, honestly, you are making this argument with the belief that only if people did things perfectly will things be perfect. Biden could have made all the right economic decisions, that doesn't mean everything would be perfect esp. after Covid. There is inflation in Canada, they are blaming Trudeau. What you should do instead is look at the alternative policies and see if they would have made things better. What policies have Trump or the GOP proposed that would reduce inflation? None. Tax Cuts, inflationary. Tariffs, inflationary. Lower interest rates, inflationary. It's voodoo economics. That is the reason the Economy tends to fair better under Dems. They are comfortable letting the science(Economics) work. That is the reason an evil company like Goldman would endorse a Dem like Kamala.
Kamala told more lies than he did even lying she is a gun owner who won't take people's guns away.
The question is: have you ever have a thought on your own?
LordAdam16: I respectfully disagree. There should be another. Kamala proposed it. Trump should go for it. But only when at least one moderator is a centrist.
-Lord
She bombed this one, she only wanted one. He shouldn't be giving her what she wants since she won't do the same. They should focus on other stuff like making sure asylum seekers like me don't vote. IjeBos will agree with this.
LordAdam16: Even Jake Tapper in his segment was like, "What was that"?
And Trump needs to prepare for the next one. When she has another empty word salad filled with platitudes and buzzwords; simply ask, how does that answer the question.
How can you be asked if things are better today and your answer is that you'll create an opportunity economy. Like by all means avoid questions if you want. That's the staple of being a politician. But the moderator should press on it. Let it be apparent that she wants to skate past the big issues that affect Americans.
-Lord
There shouldn't be a next one. She lost, trump gained
LordAdam16: He should agree to more debates. Let Kamala pick one from MSNBC or wherever and let him pick one. Her response to the economy question is proof she'll have dropped a word salad or tripped up if a moderator had pressed her to answer questions and fact checked her lies. Someone should have told her. Charlottesville: That's a lie. It's been debunked. Project 2025: That's a lie. 800K jobs. That's a lie. The economy: You didn't answer the question. Afghanistan withdrawal: You didn't answer the question.
I've had time to let the hoopla die down and review and reflect on the debate. I was way too hard on Trump. He did better than ok. The moderators were wrong with the most glaring fact-checks. Ten US states allow abortion up to birth (they do not have a gestational ceiling). This is huge. I had to research this. And ABC f*cking reported on it. But then during the debate, they straight up lied just to taint Trump. Even the immigrant geese and pet thing was a fair characterization. Immigrants have killed geese, cats, and dogs in America. Like that's factual.
I'm still waiting for a news conference and hardball interview from her. Her last with Dana Bush was a preview of how a proper debate would have gone. Dana pressed her several times. That was where the "my values haven't changed" blooper dropped. Shake the tree and fruits will drop. All the times Trump took her to task, he landed real chops and she was stumped. Go to Biden and get him to close the border. Are you okay with abortion in the 7th, 8th, 9th month. Her running mate signed one such law. In Minnesota, babies who survive abortion are allowed to die.
Trump should insist on fair moderation. Since the moderator is the arbiter of truth. He needs to have one playing for his team. I actually think he should agree to two more debates, but with fair moderation. Two moderators. They pick one each. Let's have a 2 v 2 fair fight since that's the game they want to play.
Once you fact-check her Project 2025 and abortion up to birth is legal in blue states, she's done. Then pile on with more fact-checks about inflation, Afghanistan, her records. Like list all the things she changed her opinion on. He can still flip this into ABC carried water for her. In a fair debate, she gets whacked. It goes without saying that he should not take her bait. Punt that back to her if she tries it again. And f*cking listen to your advisors!
-Lord
She will create an opportunity economy for libs 😂😂😂
What they hell is that she didn't explain. She just uses buzzwords to make it sound good.
Trump. Should not be agreeing to these bs leftwing networks. They only have one goal and he should avoid it. If there should be a debate, it will be in a town hall settings, bring in Sean Hannity or Megyn Kelly and Jake Tapper to moderate the debate
IjeBos: You capitalized Harvard this time. Your grammar is getting better. Well done.
Yay, 😂😂😂
So tell us how your girlfriend is living in a 5star apartment with cooks, security personnel, butlers etc. Yet you choose to sleep on your boy's couch to save money from cheap hotels in Lagos?
Why not book the cheap hotel you stayed previously that is filled with hookers?
How about all the properties you said your dad owns in Lagos, your so called rich cousins, don't they have homes?
A40: Lol. When the 'moderator' is tying you to white supremacist talk just a month prior, you already know what the business is
Let's ask ourselves a honest question. Who do you think those 'moderators' are gonna vote for? Your guess is as good as mine.
Do I think Trump could have done better? Yes but I will always respect a candidate that pulls up at the opps and gives his authentic takes than a shielded industry plant like Kamala who is stealing ideas from everyone including her opponents.
Where have you seen a candidate ever carefully curate appearances, no primaries, handpicked interviews, even the so-called debate no push backs. If that's not industry plant I don't know what is
There is no guessing here. The guy's coverage of Trump is 95% negative for Trump and 100% positive for Harris. The lady is Kamel la's sorority sister; they are close pals. They did their best to cheat and it has backfired. Instead of Kamel la, they are the ones trending, and independent saw right through their BS. Trump came out the winner; hence, Kamel la asked for a second debate.
IjeBos: He said We must ensure only Americans vote in American elections. Lol. There is no We here. You are not American. You have never been to the US, no matter how much you lie about it.
Harvard graduate he said but fails everytime to comprehend.
Ibime, the loser is calling for a 2nd Debate. remember trump wanted 3 she said 1 thinking her friends at ABC will help her destroy Trump. they failed now she is begging Trump for a 2nd debate.
@mowers: Reuters had 60% of voters who said that they moved to Trump after watching the debate. The reason they gave was that Kamala was evasive on the economy.
Independent leans towards trump after the debate
Wow. This independent voter completely tore Kamala Harris apart.
This is brilliant.
She was hoping Kamala would actually give her some answers, but Kamala left her with more doubts and concerns.
“What is an opportunity economy? What does that mean? Who's paying for the tax… pic.twitter.com/qlZ5nWKZRA
ijebosb: Yes, bullshit about sleeping on someone's couch. So, tell me where I said I slept on his couch. This was part of a larger post about you making fun of Ivy League grads calling them stupid. But, this post seems to have really hurt your feelings. But you are right on one point, it did save me some small change. Not staying at the hotel I was at for 10 days and staying with him for 3 nights probably saved me a minimum 1.2 million naira.
dude shut up. it is all your words.
IjeBos: My girl is a baller in Naij. 5[b] star apartment, cleaner, laundry person, cook, driver, security all in an upscale part of Lagos.[/b] Wtf does you wife/girlfriend have? What does she do? Are they in the fields covered in chicken Sh*t too?
you are almost 50, your life is 'my imaginary GF, and friends have this and that. What do your friends or wife have'?
ijebosb: Don't you get tired of this? Making up bullshit, lying about bullshit? Just the generalized bullshit you're about?
this bullshit you said?
IjeBos: Food for thought. I stayed at my boy's house on Banana for a few days while I was in Lagos. My boy went to Yale, wife Stanford. They spent 2 full days editing their daughters Yale, Harvard and MIT applications/essays. My boy in his office upstairs, wife downstairs with 2 other people. It was impressive the advantages the daughter has(legacies, top US boarding schools etc..) Yet her parents still invested this amount of time in their applications.
swaggerific: Not sure what your point is but California is a huge state and the AG is a statewide position that requires campaigning and winning an election.
So, is she the front-runner for president because California voted for her? have you checked your previous reply to my post?
CNBC's Rick Santelli GOES OFF on ABC's debate moderators over their failure to press Kamala on any of her economic "promises" — or how her policies drove prices sky-high in the first place.
armyofone: "In Springfield they are eating the dogs, the people that came in, they're eating the cats. They're eating the pets of the people that live there," Trump said during Tuesday's presidential debate.
I thought he wanted to add they are eating the owners of the dogs and cats too
I laughed so hard yesterday night
Haiti people have suffered
trump should have said they are making 404 with pets
Ibime: When the excuses start coming out (moderators, earrings etc) and when even Elon Musk accepts Kamala took the debate, just know the debate was lost. Trump had no right losing that debate when all the key stats are on his side.
Ibime, if someone cannot get to the office because of an accident and they tell you why, it is an excuse. If Trump had an excuse and the moderators were the reason Harris seemed to perform well or they made him look bad while making her look good that is a good excuse because you are here saying she won. She was poor. this happens in football. recently rice was sent off and the game ended in a draw because the ref might have made an error giving Rice a 2nd yellow card and it affected the outcome of the game. Eze scored a goal but the ref blew and disallowed the goal. palace lost that match and saying they did because of the ref is a good excuse because it is true and the ref's action affected Palace negatively. so what you are saying does not make sense if that is the case.
This clip
This clip may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate.
There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span.
may be the most egregious example of ABC debate moderators' direct actions/inactions to affect viewers’ perceptions of the information presented at the debate.
There are at least seven instances of this within a two-minute span.
This is not “bias."
It’s much worse.
This is direct, planned interference in the debate outcome. When moderators take on the role of “fact checkers" the inference is that the absence of a “fact check” confers validity to the non-fact-checked information.
When one side is repeatedly “fact checked,” while the other is not, that is a signal to the viewer that one side is not reliable and truthful, while the other side is.
The ABC moderators had their orders, and here you see those orders executed.
In this clip:
1) Trump says Pelosi is responsible for security at the Capitol. True. Muir intervenes on Kamala’s behalf by cutting him off with snarky retort, doesn’t acknowledging the validity of Trump’s statement, and immediately redirects to Kamala to set up her “answer" he knows is coming. This is direct action by Muir to affect the outcome of this exchange.
2) Kamala says she was at the Capitol on J6. She was there in the morning, but left to go to DNC HQ prior to the riot. Critical information is omitted. No fact-check.
3) Kamala says Trump incited a mob to attack the Capitol. False. Trump’s “peacefully and patriotically” comments are ignored. Trump is not charged with inciting violence. No fact check.
4) Kamala says that “some" police officers died on January 6. False. No fact check.
5) Kamala recites the Charlottesville “Fine People” hoax. This has been thoroughly and repeatedly debunked. No fact check.
6) Kamala recites the “stand back and stand by” hoax. This is designed to infer that Trump was ordering a “militia” to act on later orders, when he was clearly asking for a cooling of tensions. No fact check.
7) Kamala recites the “bloodbath" hoax. Trump was talking about the automobile industry, not violence. No fact check.
To quote Megyn Kelly on the ABC moderators:
"They did exactly what their bosses wanted." -western
ijebosb: He brings up my mates, gets embarrassed and then says stop talking about my mates. 😂😂
A guy who just built a house in Banana would invite me to stay with him and put me on a couch? Lol. The jealousy rotted your mind. Lol. 😂 😂 😂 😂
gets embarrassed that you have nothing while your mate whose couch you were sleeping on since you cannot afford to spend cash in a hotel is sending his daughter to uni as you are older and almost 50 with no kids or anything to show for?
ijebosb: Repeat that. My mates(one, who was just here) are sending their kids who are legacies to IVY Leagues schools and paying in Dollars from Lagos. Now ask yourself, how many of your mates are sending their kids who are legacies to Ivy Leagues schools in the US and can afford to pay $90,000 a year in Dollars from Nigeria. Let me help you with that, 0. It would be 0. Because, like attracts like. And you're a BUM.
I think you missed the headline.
100, 2000, you may never know. Stop talking about your mates, talk about you.
You are almost 50, yet all you do is to talk about your ex(s) and your imaginary girlfriend in Nigeria who has butlers and cook yet you spend nights sleeping at your boys couch sending his daughter to uni because you want to save little change 😂
ijebosb: Yes, you and your besties, Bemeruca and Basilico have confirmed me to be a dunce. Well said. Repeat that to yourself. I am the dunce with two degrees from schools you nor your children will ever sniff. Show me your friends and I'll show you who you are.
raumdeuter: You have been confirmed to be a dunce multiple times
Ivy League degree indeed. I will expect anyone with such to write better than a 3rd grader
His mates with Ivy League degrees are sending their kids to Ivy League schools from Lagos. Yet he is here bragging about his boy sending his kid away while he has nothing. This guy is almost 50 years old
ijebosb: I did read it and I did understand it. I was asking if you did. Because it sounds like a pretty stupid list of pretty debatable issues. You clearly seem not understand what a fact check is. Stop outsourcing your thought to random propagandists.
Harvard guys. How is it debatable? Those are debunked lies the ABC hosts refused to fact check. How are you even disagreeing with this?
The bold is what happens when you watch the debate on leftist tweets instead of the actual debate.