MentalCase98: A few exceptions? LMAO. Typical IjeBos. Never admits when he’s been proven wrong. Just keeps doubling down on his flawed opinions.
You asked me to consult google. Well I did and it looks like the VAST majority of articles when you search “does a college degree equate intelligence” agree with me and not you. Are you going to tell me how Google isn’t a reliable data source now? Lol.
I will say it again. A college degree proves nothing more than you had the time, money and dedication to earn it. Nothing about your natural intelligence or IQ. Many stupid people skate through college.
You are right. But a huge factor in this is the course or instructor. These days like budaatum would agree, that getting the right answers to a maths problem or showing your work is akin to WHITE SUPREMACY, in other words, the standards of maths are kinda racist.
Lecturers are supposed to challenge students and any student who cannot adapt should not pass.
If that's always the standard, then many college degrees should prove intelligence but the left these guys subscribe to are saying failing students is a form of oppression.
MentalCase98: Did you study political science in college? If no then are you implying you do not fully comprehend all this politics you keep talking here? Lol. Mr. confusion.
A college degree proves that you have the patience, and maybe the discipline, to sit through lectures for 3-4 years and regurgitate what you are told at regular intervals, that’s it!
It in no way proves your level of intelligence or ability to comprehend any subject matter. To further prove my standpoint consider these 3 facts;
1. Some of the stupidest people I know have college degrees.
2. I know many intelligent and highly successful entrepreneurs who either never attended or didn’t complete college.
3. I know many people who are successful in a field that is completely unrelated to what they studied in college.
Can you argue with any of the above stated facts?
The fact that he is rubbing minds with Obrigardo and never challenged his drivel shows IjeBos or dahighlife his new moniker is full of sheet.
A guy who is sleeping with a white gay man is telling another man not to trust white women
No be Gej regime wey ministers dey wear golden bra and dem dey budget 2 billion for prayers and cleansing? Na Jona regime wey snake swallow money for jamb oohh. Na Jona share dollars for Yoruba Obas during election oohh.
Dey play.
You saying remove Jonathan's name is just part of the corruption in itself.
We are not ready in this country.
The mantra remains support your thief let me support my thief.
During jonathan no dollar scarcity, no naira scarcity, companies dey enter the country. Various venture capital projects, startups. How much be gas? Fuel?
Because one idiot stole money in jamb office therefore it's jonathan?
Get sense.
No politician is a saint but Jonathan no deteriorate una country like new apc idiots una vouch for to save una from jonathan. Enjoy the hunger
raumdeuter: Republicans are scoring some own goals towards the election like this IVF ruling they could have held back on that till after election
Biden today is at 38% approval rating. The lowest of any incumbent since 1980
I saw on the news today
Reagan and Clinton were over 50% George W and Obama were 49%
Trump was 43% George HW was 42% And they both lost relection Biden is 38%
This should have been a straight loss for Biden in many cycles
Yeah, sometimes their timing is questionable. It's a shame. Biden still has the media and many other things running for him.
We all have to admit the last elections raises a lot of questions. Well, the way elections are conducted in this country is lacking compared to many western countries. Be would think they should be on the same level but it's not the case.
DaHighLife: This is Trump attorney Ashley Merchant, who now asserts that Wade is unqualified to serve as a Special Prosecutor, when she was campaigning for his candidacy as a judge.
Bradley should have already learned to be cautious of white women.
First of all, she is not representing trump. Secondly, someone who is ethical today can be unethical tomorrow. There is always a first. Also, Fani ran on not sleeping with the office and also anti-corruption but she is sleeping with the office and obviously corrupt. Finally, she investigated Wade and learnt he was full of sheet and she did not think he was the person she was campaigning for.
At the bold shows you are a racist. Why haven't you asked Fani why her lawyer was white? Or why you went on a dinner with a white gay man?
raumdeuter: What is your projection towards the General election
Biden vs Trump.
Personally I was hoping it would have been DeSantis but at this point its what it is
I think Biden still wins and hope Republicans take control of the Senate and retain the house
I am more interested in down ballot races now. How Republican can win the Senate. In my State I trust that Ted Cruz will beat Collin Allred like a drum
It can swing anywhere except trump plays dirty. Ballot harvesting, mail-in ballots etc. Everything or means should be used but loudmouth trump is asking supporters to avoid mail-in ballots
DaHighLife: It's abundantly clear that you lack comprehension of the material you're reading and persist in posting.
Even if the defense manages to gather 1000 affidavits claiming they have a witness who heard Bradley mention Wade and Willis's relationship, it holds no weight. Bradley himself testified that it was mere speculation. Therefore, all these individuals would essentially be attesting to is hearing rumors/speculation. And rumors/speculation cannot be considered as evidence. The fact that the defense is resorting to such measures to rehabilitate their witness indicates their desperation, revealing the weakness of their case.
The United States justice system adheres strictly to what it deems as evidence (as outlined in the Rules of Evidence). This strictness exists to ensure that when evidence is presented, it's done so on legitimate grounds, not based on hearsay, insinuation, or speculation.
I am confident that I possess a more comprehensive understanding of the case than you, including the factual record, pertinent case law, the burden of proof required (which the defense has failed to meet), and the legal standards necessary.
And/or listen to the Prosecutor's closing argument. Pay attention not to his style of speaking but to what he is discussing, especially how he is addressing the questions posed by the Judge.
You've preconceived what will unfold in your mind/heart. And due to your limited grasp of the law or often the subject matter at hand, whenever events do or don't transpire as you anticipate, you consistently resort to conspiracy theories to rationalize it instead of acknowledging a lack of comprehension of the topic.
I've had my fill with this discussion with you.
The one who argues that since the Supreme Court concluded abortion matter should be for states to decide is contradictory to their ruling states can not remove a candidate from their ballots (baseless insurrection claim) is saying someone has comprehension issues 😂
You are trying your best to stick with the copium. Testifying does not mean the judge must believe you. Other testimonies matched with what is in the text exchange between Bradley and the defense. Some people can testify he is lying. He is denying his own words which does not appear to be speculative.
So using your analogy against Nikki against you. So why did Trump also not leave quietly when he lost?
Why was he shouting the election was rigged all over when it wasn't
You see Trump too is emotional
It's not the same thing oga. Desantis yielded and endorsed Trump asap, likewise Vivek... She on the other hand has been fighting a losing battle. It's not a good look for her.
"Nikki Haley to Exit Race,Will not Endorse Trump today " CNN
in politics things can get dirty. I don't know what she was expecting but when the other guys exited, they didn't take it personal. Women can be emotional 🙂
basilico: Dying to defend a worthless prosecutor. Who the hell appoints a divorce lawyer who has never prosecuted a single felony case or a RICO case to be the lead prosecutor of such a huge case? When it comes to her you need solid unshakeable evidence, but for others a rumor is enough.
DaHighLife: The witness will not be testifying that "Wade begun their affair long before what they swore to under oath".
The witness would testify that starting from August 2023, Bradley informed her that Willis and Wade had a romantic relationship in 2019. It's worth noting that the same Bradley previously testified under oath he was speculating and lacked concrete evidence regarding the start of the romantic relationship in 2019.
Therefore, she would testify that Bradley, who testified under oath to speculating and lacking evidence regarding the start of their romantic relationship, told her in August 2024 that "Wade and Willis had a romantic relationship."
The judge made an error in the way he handled this situation. By permitting such proceedings, he has given Trump a platform to generate misleading headlines aimed at influencing the jury pool through these endless filings.
You know more than the judge? Even budaatum is not killing himself to defend her. You on the other hand is working overtime.
MentalCase98: You’re sounding conflicted again. So do you believe the decision was right or not?
Forget whether you expected it or not, was the supreme supreme right to rule the way it did on this case? A simple yes or no will do.
He is comparing this case to the abortion case thinking it is the same thing. It's says it's a contradiction because they ruled the states to decide their abortion laws while this they ruled its congress to decide which is in the 14th amendment.
MentalCase98: Any liberal on this platform who tells you they expected a unanimous decision in favour of Trump is a big liar who should never be taken seriously.
What they expected in a worse case scenario was a split decision where all the conservative judges sided with Trump and the liberal judges sided with Colorado. This unanimous decision is a shock to them all. Any one of them sayin go otherwise is just spewing 100% copium.
You can see the conflict in his tone. Even the Colorado all liberal judges did not get unanimous decision.
The partisan courts in DC, newyork and other liberal states are destroying this country.
DaHighLife: I thought the words in the Constitution are clear regarding insurrections. I believe the question should have been about the mechanism of disqualification. The states believed they were the mechanism, and from what I have heard, the Supreme Court believed the House is the mechanism. Again, I think it would be hard for a nonpartisan, unbiased person to say Trump didn't commit an insurrection.
Your posts always seem so emotional, and your arguments and writing are impacted by that emotion. I can even barely understand your posts at times. In my humble opinion, if you were more dispassionate, I'm sure you would make better rational arguments and could have more fulsome discussions with people.
DaHighLife: It was an expected ruling. Every honest person who watched what transpired should have thought it was a coup attempt. But with the revelations of the secret Twitter account that was revealed last week, that one of Trump's attorneys lied to prosecutors about having, it should have been clear to anyone on the fence that the plan was to fraudulently put Trump in office.
I don't fault the state courts for doing what they did. But I understand the Supreme Court's aversion to allowing states to decide this. However, I also disagree with the conservative majority creating new "law" by allowing the House to decide this. It's a fundamental flaw given that the House is no longer representative of the US because of things like gerrymandering.
Have you ever faulted anything against trump?
You expected this which is a lie. Look at what you wrote. It's you in conflict trying to remain rational and unbiased.
Its the left that wanted to pack the court. The right don't critic the court like the left. But the fact they critic this activist courts that is making ridiculous judgement against trump is rational. This supreme Court decision is the receipt.
MentalCase98: You’re arguing with someone who’s political knowledge is so limited that he thinks Trump losing DC is a big deal. One of the most liberal districts in America didn’t vote for Trump. I’m shocked! Lol.
Btw he also didn’t win DC in 2016. In fact he came a distant third behind Marco Rubio and John Kasich but remind me who won the primary and general election that year??
Has done justice to the coverage. I can't get the full transcript of Harry MacDougald . He was brutal, Fani is not escaping this one. violating her professional ethics as a lawyer in at least six different ways....... abused her position, to threaten her boyfriend’s wife with criminal prosecution .......10 prosecutors in her office sided with her....speech at the black church.....the DA’s office is serving the personal interests of the DA and Mr. Wade in carrying out further concealment and cover up of their relationship and not the cause of justice.
he killed it. meanwhile, fani's lawyer was all over the place
Foreign Affairs › Re: American Politics Thread: 2026 Midterm Elections Live! by bemeruca: 1:28am On Mar 08, 2024
