₦airaland Forum

Bots censored this. And these days they censor screenshots.

So seun tell us if this is right?

LordReed:
People got Hitler wrong.
Senator Lindsay Graham

Still wondering if you water carriers are supporting Nazis? It still isn't clear enough for you louts?

You left out the context and just quoted him like that, and then accused him of supporting Nazis. I am sure that if both of you were compared, you would most likely lean more towards Hitler than he would.

He was saying that people were wrong about Hitler as he argued for stronger actions against Iran.

“Nobody believed Hitler wanted to kill all the Jews and create a master race. They were wrong to miscalculate Hitler. People have miscalculated the Ayatollah and this regime for a very long time.”

“So, all of those who don’t believe that [Iran would use nuclear weapons], you’re stew peed. You’re a F 0 0 1. And I 8 to be so harsh – people got Hitler wrong.”

He immediately followed it with:
“Donald Trump is the right man at the right time.”

All you people know how to do is come here and start lying.

Seun really broke this website with his bots.
Maybe he should consult a data analyst to give him a breakdown on active users after these AI bots were introduced.

How can someone make a post free from insults or abuse and still get censored?

ijebosb:
Read the sentence in Red, can anyone argue that it's not AI?
If you need AI to write your posts, maybe it's a hint you shouldn't be writing said posts.

Wow.

Well, if that's AI, then I feel sorry for you 😂😂

When is your boyfriend returning

They should focus on Ukraine that is destroying them left and right. They can't even fly their planes near Ukraine.

bayelsaowei:
Did the Iranians complain about being democratically led? The Shah came back after his masters (the US and UK) toppled the Iranian government, which then paved the way his return. He then became a tyrant and authoritarian the US/UK performed their wonders through.

The Iranians revolted and from then on have continued to resist any western influence on their lives. And in forging that path, the Islamic republic was firmly established. The Ayatollahs came.

You see the linear connection ?

It’s a cause and effect. US/UK amebo and greed led to the shattering of a democratic Iranian government, which then brought about the puppet dictator, and then the revolution and then Iran of today.

He controls the army, but he fled because he was scared. The Prime Minister sought to strip his powers to control the army. The PM wants the army to be under the authority of the elected government, not the Shah. The PM believes the Monarch was outdated. So he was elected, then he tried to overthrow the Monarch, causing the Shah to flee.

The PM then nationalized BP, seizing control from the British Empire. The British Empire then decided to overthrow the Prime Minister, seeking to overthrow the Monarch to take back control of the oil. The US joined because of the Cold War with Russia.

So again, the UK or the US did not install anyone. The King was there; he ran away and came back.

You can say their actions played a role - no one has hindsight then. Something to think about.

Any time IjeBos' boyfriend travels we will start seeing something like this 😁

Ijebosc:


I'm not sure what new 419 Bemeruca is trying to run, but it sounds like it involves him sounding like a knowledgeable American.
Seems like he's enlisted ChatGPT to help.

"Seems" it seems 😁

ijebosb:
You know you have been going back and forth with ChatGPT.
He has not written most of his posts.

You got enraged and blocked me on your other account, when I made your blood boil. Again, you will do the needful on this account 😁

But let me help you for once.

bayelsaowei:
You’re not a serious person..

Who helped install the Shah? What happened in 1953?

You’re a dancer.. so let’s dance.

Your last words are typical of you.

The Shah is a monarch, he was a hereditary monarch who took over from his father just like King Charles took over from his mother.

He ran a way when a democratic prime minister tried to reduced his power and influence. He only returned after the successful coup. So he was not installed, he is the king.

The only one dancing here is you.

He ruled as a monarch, not as an elected official.

His leaving Iran in 1953 and return is tied to the political crisis involving prime minister Mohammad Mossadegh who was democratically elected.

After the 1953 coup (supported by the CIA and MI6), the Shah returned and consolidated authoritarian power

So what's your point? Regardless of US actions, the islamist would have done their thing.

My last words are playing out in Nigeria, and other African nations. It played out in Afghanistan, Yemen, Etc.

You can choose to bury your head in the sand but facts are facts

bayelsaowei:
It’s costing the US presently about a billion dollars per day to sustain this war. That number sounds cheap to you? With the present admin requesting for an additional half a trillion dollars on its defense budget?

But you still haven’t answered my question. Who will pay for it?

Whose pocket is it coming from.? And then relate your answer to welfare programs and health insurance that are being cut off by war mongers.

The Navy and Air Force cost over a billion dollars per day without a war.

They are able to survive a war with Iran for 20 years if that should be the case.

bayelsaowei:
You are struggling with history.. I can’t help you. History is there for you to read. If you decide to dance around it, it’s not my problem.

The US and the UK scattered a democratic Iran led government, and the aftermath is all you see today.

If history doesn’t fit your agenda, you’ll say what I’m saying is wrong without offering what you believe is right. The Shah, who was there, fled when his power was challenged by the prime minister. the UK, who was on the receiving end because of what the PM did to their oil profit collaburated with the CIA (So MI6 and CIA) to attempt a first coup, which failed, and those involved were arrested. They tried again, and they were successful. The shah, who was afraid of losing influence and power, returned to his post. This time, he was pro-Western and did away with the experimental democratic system that was introduced in 1906.

So Islam was brewing in the background. And they took over. The US did not install the Ayatollah as you claimed earlier. Even if the US was not involved, they would have tried to take over in the way Boko Harambe are trying to take over.

bayelsaowei:
He is not wasting his time.

I see you and others shout your throats out when monies are kept aside for social upkeep of needy citizens of the US.

Funds for Medicaid and health insurance have been gutted simply because many like you assume it is not the governments responsibility to cater for such ones. You ask who is gonna pay for it.

So I ask you. Who is going to pay for this avoidable and needless war? Who? From whose pockets?

The US was in Afghanistan and Iraq for decades, but it is Iran that will drain them out? Even Russia, with a weak economy, is doing fine replenishing its weapons.

Today, with the advancement of drones, it costs even less to fight a war.

bayelsaowei:
The disruption of a democratic Iran, led to the uprising of the Ayatollahs. To resist the imposed despotic Shah and America’s constant interference in their governance, led to the Ayatollahs.

America and the UK, set iran on that path right up to this point.

It is simple cause and effect.

The actions the US and Isreal are taking today, will surely have consequences in the future..

Bro, there has always been disruption. not necessary because of the US, but there were many parties involved. This is Russia (Russia was not directly involved as a supporter of the Ayatollah, the Communist party was just another faction - The original Ayatollah, who I believe was born in Kuwait and the UK. The US only entered later. But the same Ideology you are seeing Boko Harambe push for Nigeria, which is no link to Western ways of things, is the same ideology the Ayatollah wants. After the revolution, the Islamic Republic purged leftists, including pro‑Soviet groups.

This is why I said you have suicidal empathy. You think you are being nice to people who have patterns of subjugating people when they have the upper hand, but all you are doing is being careless.

We saw the same struggle in Korea. The Battle between communism and capitalism. I believe it was the same struggle in Vietnam. If it is not Russia spreading communism, it is the Chinese. and the are going against the US. So the rise of the Ayatollah is a result of communism and Islamism, which ousted the Pro-western/America Shah.

In many Western countries today, like the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, the Netherlands, and Sweden, there seems to be a collaboration between communists and Islamists aimed at undermining existing systems. They often criticize capitalism, try to silence dissenting voices, and portray Christianity as harmful. They present their actions as morally justified, claiming the moral high ground, yet at times celebrate the killing of those who simply wish to engage in civil discussion. They target billionaires, demanding their wealth be redistributed without effort on their part.

the Russians were also in Afghanistan. The U.S. supported the Taliban in driving them out, but later found itself unable to control those same Islamists, leading to the attacks on the World Trade Center.

basilico:
The same place it came from in WW2.
America fought on two fronts , How many armies can afford that?

You are wasting your time with that guy.

nateevs:
A year? In terms of Iran's capability, that's a war of attrition. You guys don't pay attention to news from the other side. You are only paying attention to the bombings.

The US and Israel cannot sustain a war of attrition against Iran. It will become economically crippling for the US and Israel.

The US is already burning through $1bn a day executing this war on behalf of Israel. The economic cost to Israel alone is already estimated at $2.9bn in only 7 days. It is estimated to go upwards of $3bn a week, if current red restrictions continue. This is data from Israel's own Finance Ministry.

The US lacks an industrial base and supply chain to replenish munitions and advanced weapons systems quickly. You can thank decades of capitalism for that.

Unfortunately for the US, Iran does, and cheaply.


You guys have spent the last decade encouraging gaslighting, outright lying and "alternative facts" for political gain. The consequences are slow-rolling in a political hemisphere. The problem is that you lot are extending this tactic to war. In war, the cookies crumble very immediately.

I lice would have made a better argument

basilico:
The Iranians themselves are to blame. Plus the French
When Khomeini returned in 1st Feb 1979 , they received him like their Jesus.
On March 31st 1979 they voted 98% in a referendum to be run by Sharia.
Khomeini obliged , implemented Sharia as per their wishes.
Sharia has two forms of punishment. Hudud and Qisas.
Khomeini gave them exactly that .

As an aside the people of Raqqa welcomed ISIS who promised to install Sharia instead of Assad laws. ISIS gave them exactly what's in their books. ISIS didn't invent any laws, they implemented what their books say.

Bayelsaowei does not understand the history of Iran and how the Ayatollahs took over. It is thinking it is the US that put the Ayatollahs in power when in reality, the Ayatollahs removed the shah the United States install through a coup. Islamist and communist were behind the Iranian revolution that removed the shah because of strong ties with the west.

So it is not the US that installed the Ayatollahs

budaatum:
Are you asking me where the evidence the prosecution presented before a jury and that a jury saw and that he himself admitted he was guilty of and that the judge agreed with him and sentenced him, is, or is it that you do not think spreading lies against a person because they are different and worship a different god is a crime of hate. Or perhaps you think a jury's decision is the opinion of budaatum?

Tommy Robinson jailed for 18 months after admitting contempt of court
Far-right activist sentenced over false claims about refugee and ordered to pay costs of £80,350.82
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/oct/28/tommy-robinson-admits-contempt-of-court-over-false-claims-about-refugee

Where are the charges for hate? You cannot tweet in peace in the UK.

bayelsaowei:
you have willfully chosen to ignore history as to how Iran got to this point. Saying it is baseless only makes you sound shallow. You can keep basking in your ignorance.

I will address this another time because i don't think you understand the History

bayelsaowei:
Meanwhile, Your pre-judgement of Iran not being capable of having nuclear weapons simply because of her religion is bigotry. Your thinking is not only warped but also childish.

This is one of the most asinine things you have said. The screams woke, using words like bigotry. Why haven't you thought about giving Boko Harambe nukes? Their ideology is the same as the ayatollahs. I prejudge Boko, and I think you do as well. I will not call you a bigot because that is the sensible thing to do. But this is woke nonetheless.

bayelsaowei:
How you think this way, but then worship Bibi that kills women and children for a living is religious hypocrisy. You think your zionist friends are any better than a Muslim?

I don't think My zionist friends are better than Muslims, there is only one Jewish Nation in this world, and I am happy to be a zionist. If you don't want that self-determination of the Jewish people, then you should reflect on your views of the Jewish people and why. For centuries, they have been on the receiving end of everyone, and I am shocked you are part of those who are accusing them of killing Jesus, then tying the events to Bibi to justify your hatred for him.

No matter who the prime minister of Israel is, they are still going to be fighting with the Palestinians, who want to wipe them out. Before Bibi, there were others.

I don't worship anyone on earth; you use this word loosely. If you hate someone and that person is supported, it is called worship. The same way you think I am worshipping Bibi is the same way you have been worshipping HAMAS and the Ayatollahs. This is your logic coming back to bite you.

Women and Children died in a WAR in the space of 2 years in the thousands, you screamed Genocide. At a far greater rate died in the space of weeks, not a War but a protest. You were silent, did not care about the women who were taking bullets in the face, the wounded hunted down and killed at the hospital, No Genocide shouts from you. But it is Bibi who is killing women and children, and the Ayatollah is a saint; he has never gotten any scrutiny to the level that you give Bibi.

I am a Zionist, only HAMAS and radical Islamists are not zionists: Zionism is the belief in the Jewish people’s right to self-determination in our ancestral homeland of Israel.

The Quran is a Zionist book too because it recognizes the people that the land belongs to

President Zelensky said it,
The UK and Europe are showing it with their actions.
If push comes to shove, they cannot defend Greenland. Their reliance on the US to protect them is mind-boggling.

Saying the US has asset their to protect British troops while denying them access to use their bases is a crime.

They are all lining up to bow to China just in case the United falls. But they should all be standing up to China.

basilico:
They plucked Maduro without a single casualty yet Democrats found a reason to oppose it.

The horrors of Normandy, Omaha Beach is something no modern day people can endure.

So, one soldier dying is a bit too much these days but Iran has been killing US service men since 1979.

Bayelsaowei said the US installed the Ayatollahs which is a baseless claim. We know people who believe blowing up themselves will send them to heaven should not get close to a nuclear bomb.

Pakistan has nukes, so is India. They both have nukes because they are rivals. Iran having nukes will cause Saudi to have nukes too.

I don't think Pakistan has nukes that works. 😂

basilico:
Telling Budaatum that Tommy is not racist is like playing music to a donkey.
We say the likes of budaatum run away when wisdom is chasing them.. in

He thinks his opinions are more important than mine.

This is the UK which failed to protect its base with HMS Dragon to the region or at least Cyprus, they are depending on Greece to protect them. And look at him saying "we have other destroyers in this region" no you don't, those are American assets.

This is the kind of free ride these nations want.

This is EXCRUCIATING to watch. This interview should immediately end John Healey's political career.

Even Sly News can see he's completely out of his depth, and amazingly they don't give him an inch.

I've never seen anything like it.

This is terrifying.
We are totally screwed pic.twitter.com/miOYoHHcQ5

— Lee Harris (@LeeHarris) March 5, 2026

raumdeuter:
https://xh.com/i/status/2030303858363166859

I agree with Al Sharpton, "the problem is not trump, the problem is us, what happened to us?"

The democrat party happened.

🚨 Al Sharpton: "The problem is not Trump. The problem is us. What happened to us?"

Great question. Black folks became socially immature, politically one dimensional, overly matriarchal, and intellectually lazy. That’s what happened to us. pic.twitter.com/n0GO3zJvnj

— Rev. Damien Thaddeus Jones (@NobleNegroe) March 6, 2026

PDPGuy:
An American ground invasion of Iran would be similar to Athens' invasion of Sicily in 415 BCE, as described in Thucydides' The Peloponnesian War. Despite its initial successes, the Athenians couldn't re-supply themselves, and their entire expedition was wiped out.

This disastrous defeat turned the war in Sparta's favor, and spelled the downfall of the Athenian empire.

Could the American empire in Iran suffer the same fate as the Athenian empire in Sicily?

They didn't use drones or planes for logistics and to fight wars back then. This era is different. They can potentially defeat Iran in less than a year.

Global airlift C-17, C-5, etc,
Satellite navigation and surveillance,
Carrier strike groups and long range bombers,
They have good regional bases for staging Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, Turkey, Diego Garcia, etc.
Precision guided weapons and drones.
So, today's militaries do not depend on a single fragile supply route the way they did back in the day expeditions.

The issue is that losing even one soldier will be seen as a failure.

budaatum:
That is your own independent opinion to which you are entitled. You however do not make laws for the UK where the courts have decided he did promote hatred, and where he himself admitted he promoted hatred.



Now, we both know we'd not agree on this despite all the evidence, so forgive me If no further responses.

What's the evidence?

Its your opinion too isn't it? You talk about how he spreads hate which is a big deal in the UK, especially against Islam but he has never been charged with hate crimes.

The police were/are afraid people like you will call them racists if they do something about the g-gangs, Tommy Robinson is willing to be called all the names by you and others to expose these people.

budaatum:
The hatred he promotes motivates some to go and attack only those grooming gangs that don't look like them when there are also many grooming gang members who look like him too.

As for your "hatred for", the government just recently lost their case against Palestine Action for displaying Hama flags, amongst other things. So I wouldn't agree that the UK hates anyone.

He does not promote hatred. The police refused to go after the Pakistani gangs because they don't want to be called racists. That is what and why he was exposing them. They were/are doing it with impunity. He sounded the alarm and the government turned on him.

While it's true that grooming gangs in the UK aren't limited to any single ethnic group—as reports have documented cases involving white British, Afro-Caribbean, and other perpetrators—the failures in addressing many high-profile scandals, like those in Rotherham, Telford, and Rochdale, have been explicitly linked to authorities' fears of being labeled racist. Independent inquiries, including the 2025 Casey Report, found that police and social services often avoided investigating or recording the ethnicity of offenders (predominantly of Pakistani heritage in those cases) to prevent accusations of racism or community tensions. This "blindness and ignorance" allowed abuse to continue for years, affecting thousands of vulnerable children. The government has since apologized and mandated better data collection on ethnicity to address these systemic issues. That said, critics argue the narrative can fuel moral panic and unfairly stigmatize entire communities, but the documented institutional hesitancy due to PC concerns is hard to dispute based on the evidence.

budaatum:
No Bem, this is not "a progressive behaviour for liberals". What it is is some people campaigning for the votes of liberals, at best, and others who might not like the current government. As as you've been informed, some are already being rejected.


I am not attacking Tommy Robinson, Ben. He does his parliament marches where I can easily walk to and I've never bothered getting out my house to go and attack irrelevant pointless him.

What you don't get is UK does not condone the sort of hatred he promotes. But I guess you might learn from the results of our next election.

And yes, your first thought is to claim it's not the same. I am telling you that here in the UK, there's no difference.

The hatred he promotes is exposing the grooming gang? Wow, the UK that will happily condone Hamas flags and hatred for Jews?

How is the police, something you support willing to set up a sting operation for cat callers but are reluctant or look the other way on grooming gangs?

She was working for Elizabeth Warren

Pocahontas’ former staffer in her own words… pic.twitter.com/zy3IqnsR1a

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) March 6, 2026

budaatum:
They are very free indeed to try.

Point is, will we liberals elect them so they succeed?

They are liberals in liberal cities.
The point is, this is a progressive behaviour for liberals.

It's why you are attacking Tommy Robinson for exposing it. You called him my friend, yes he is my friend even if I don't know him personally

budaatum:
What's your point in asking us to focus on people we will not elect if not to waste our time with needless diversions?

Those are sex offenders trying to take a spot in government office.

No one says the church is perfect.
All the noise will be made when it is Christianity but people will be called a bigot, racists and Islamophobe when it is Islam.