₦airaland Forum

raumdeuter:
SOD09

Is this true

https://www.nairaland.com/6682196/ig-police-sacks-abba-kyari

Roland17:
I don't think he has been disengaged from the Police Force. He was only relieved from his position as head of the IRT. The Nigerian Police Force is obviously under immense pressure and are struggling to manage this situation.

Jodera:
To be sincere, our aim suppose to be selling players more then buying few strategic positions players, but we're not selling sef

We still have kolasinac, torreira, xhaka, elneny, and all the CFs available. Even if na loan sef, dem no want take dem out. I wonder how we'll get to bring in our desired signings if to sell some of our players to make way dey hard.

Reason why after White, I don close shop for TW. If dem surprise me with important signing(s), I'll be happy

Jodera:
Me, I just know say as dem sign White for £50m, TW don finish for us. Well, I just hope dey prove me wrong tho...

Havertz10:

raumdeuter:
The number of times we will see this particular gif this season. I might even find a way to embed it in my signature with the Thiago Silva shedi balabala one

afrodoc2:
Bruv I left Nigeria a decade ago. I don’t even know the price of condom there.

nihilistjnr:
I'm pretty sure this agent John innocenti in this report is the same guy that typed up the Convictus Obi one.

Ray you get the Invictus Obi report? Make we check. If I'm correct, e fit be say both are linked...

afrodoc2:


Ojo meje ni baba lo ninu igbo ko to ri ewe ja

Amoto94:
Eden Hazard has risked the wrath of new Real Madrid manager Carlo Ancelotti by returning to training "out of shape".

afrodoc2:
Why are you misinforming people with confidence na? O wrong nau!

What you just described is proof WITH ABSOLUTE CERTAINTY. However the law courts in the Western World especially those based on English law do not work like that.

They require only proof beyond REASONABLE doubt to convict even in murder cases not proof with absolute certainty. There are several cases of murder conviction without body or even DNA evidence.

PDPGuy:
I thought Kyari is being accused of being an accomplice to Hushpupi’s alleged crimes against US-based businesses?

afrodoc2:
Even if Andrew's dead body was never found John can still be convicted of the murder. There is a reason they say reasonable doubt.

Anybody doubting the claim that Obioma Kyari was part of the criminal deal is being unreasonable.

Roland17:
Lamb of God!!!!

User09:
I'm with u at the bolded.

swiz123:
This doesn't prove that Kyari knows the nature of Hush's job

Roland17:
We have gone from it does not exist to this?

Do you realize there is a difference between Premise and Logical Reasoning? There is a stark difference. That may help you understand this situation.

Oga, what is Deductive Reasoning? What do lawyers use in interrogating anyone standing trial? The best lawyers in the world use deductive reasoning. Infact, the whole idea behind court arguments is hinged on deductive reasoning.

swiz123:
There is no place for assumptions or deductive reasoning in a court room. My post was according to what I saw word for word which is the fact at hand for now.

The only thing that can nail Kyari in this is his foolish response

swiz123:
Everything here shows that Kyari can maintain plausible deniability. What Job is hush talking about... Couldn't it have been a legitimate Job? Is he taking food out of hush's mouth after he has hustled legitly?

The is, Kyari scored an own goal with that tailor story. He could have just maintained that hush decided to reward the team out of his benevolence

Nezzjnr:
Dem dey use am consult the gods??

Or him wan dey high?

Itsrm:
This is your evidence?

No wonder you had to cling onto FBIs narration and conclusion. When you're ready to think independently with your God given brain, let me know.

Nezzjnr:
Na Sand be that??

iamoyindamola:
Another JuJu merchant in the mud

https://www.nairaland.com/6675446/herbalist-arrested-preparing-charms-ipob

Itsrm:
I did not argue the Tailor story with you and I don't know how that applies here. I called you out on this statement which you have been unable to defend.

Does the evidence at their disposal show that he knew? The answer is no.

Itsrm:
What youre doing here is a logical fallacy. ITts called an appeal to authority. The FBI is on his case, they must be right, a federal judge signed his arrest warrant, so I must be wrong

Someone on this thread just told us the FBI has failed to secure conviction in close to 10% of cases. I guess a Federal Judge did not sign an arrest warrant in those cases.

If anyone has to rest , it's you.

PS: I also noticed how you have stylishly dropped the "he knew statement" and now hanging on to the Tailor statement which was a discussion I had with someone else.

I guess we finally arrived somewhere