₦airaland Forum

Saturnalia:
It is too late to sanitize the Nigerian Army.

Boko Haram & Bandits have infiltrated it beyond redemption and it is polarized with Politics & Religion.

Yes, I remember the case of Ruth Ogunleye who was dismissed from the Army for accusing Colonel Abdulkareem of sexual assault & rape.

Joining or enlisting in the Nigerian Army is a very bad idea, especially for women. All the Pot-Bellied, Corrupt, High-Ranking Officers will just turn them into their Sexual Playthings.

MOJ584:
I don't like it when men lack courage to say their mind. Oga, be man enough to name them.

It is the Core North AND their wife the South West. Very simple! Haba !! Heaven will not fall.....

The couple have completely destroyed whatever is left in the Contraption by their British masters!!

AguluLiar:
If Nnamdi Kanu is released, I will campaign against Jagaban in 2027.
Only Jubril of Sudan can release him.
Kanu must rot in Kuje

Almunjid:
Explain how Obi's presidency would benefit me. Did his governorship bring positive change to Anambra during his eight-year term? We have witnessed his poor performance and the criticism he faced from the Igbo community, as evidenced by Nairaland threads from 2012. Notably, Obi left Anambra to reside in Lagos with his fellow tribesmen who sought better opportunities there, while Tinubu remained in Lagos.

You mentioned, "The present state of Nigeria is the product of regressive ideologies mixed with deceit by a certain set of people in order to try and achieve supremacy and dominance over a certain people, even when it doesn't benefit them." I now realize that your statement accurately describes you and your tribesmen. You refuse to acknowledge any leadership qualities unless the leader is an Igbo man, even when their performance is lackluster. How can one exhibit more regressive ideology than that?

In a nation of over 200 million people in the 21st century, it is irrational to believe that everyone must share the same ideology to maintain unity. Do countries with larger populations than Nigeria, such as China, India, and Brazil, require a uniform ideology to function as a single entity? If Nigeria were divided into geopolitical zones, could the Igbos sustain themselves? We have observed that the Southeast struggles to generate sufficient revenue for self-sufficiency. This perceived dependence might explain their insistence on including regions like the South-South and parts of North Central in their proposed Biafra.

Do other languages not have the right to lead the country as well? What about the rights of minority tribes like ours? Must leadership be exclusive to the three major tribes? This is not democracy but rather "ethnocracy," as I previously mentioned. If Nigeria were to elect an Igbo man in 2027, regardless of his competence, you would be satisfied because leadership is your primary concern. If the Igbo cannot lead, should the country be divided? Should the other 500 languages demand the same? Would Nigeria even exist in such a scenario?

I sincerely engaged in this dialogue, believing that we were exchanging productive ideas as patriotic citizens. However, it is now evident that our discussion has been futile. Nonetheless, I appreciate your time, but our dialogue has reached an impasse. Please don't take offense if I don't reply further; I cannot afford to participate in unproductive exchanges that lead nowhere. Once again, thank you for your time.


Peace!

Almunjid:
Will it pay you should Obi emerges as the president of this country?

Almunjid:
It's intriguing how someone in the future might reference our past discussions and attempt to infer that [b] I voted for Tinubu,[/b] when in reality, these exchanges don't provide sufficient evidence of my actual voting choices. Nonetheless, I can assert with confidence that, if given the choice, I would choose Tinubu over Obi and Atiku without hesitation.

Now, let's circle back to the question at hand: I am still curious to know your reasoning behind supporting Obi's candidacy in the 2023 elections, considering your knowledge of his previous shortcomings as the governor of Anambra.

Almunjid:
Interestingly, you seem to have overlooked the part where I mentioned that even Buhari's supporters voiced their dissatisfaction with his performance. This statement indirectly implies that I did not cast my vote for him in the 2015 and 2019 elections. Often, I abstain from participating in the voting process due to the belief that uneducated Nigerians predominantly influence the election outcomes. However, regardless of who is elected, I make it a point to offer my support and wish them well in their endeavors.

On the topic of Obi, I am curious to understand why you supported his candidacy in the 2023 elections, given that you were aware of his previous shortcomings as the governor of Anambra.

Almunjid:
Even Buhari's supporters expressed disappointment in his performance. However, acknowledging his shortcomings does not negate the effectiveness of some of his policies; I have commended the successful ones while criticizing those that fell short. Despite not voting for a president, I believe in setting aside differences once they assume office and offering support whenever possible.

I refuse to adopt the stance of Obidients who dedicate years to hoping for their president's failure, relentlessly seeking negative news about their country, and dismissing any positive developments or accomplishments as mere propaganda. Notably, throughout Peter Obi's eight-year tenure, his constituents frequently voiced their discontent, as evidenced by Nairaland threads from 2012 and beyond. Yet, those same individuals, including yourself, insist on promoting him.

Supporting someone who is currently faltering may be problematic, but endorsing a candidate who has already demonstrated failure as a governor is even more misguided. Doing so is akin to knowingly deceiving others.

Gracias!

malali:

Exactly !!! If the dollar is coming down and the loan is in dollars.......Why is the naira value of the loan going up ? LMAO
There is a lot of voodoo statistics going on.

Almunjid:
At that time, the situation had not escalated to its current state. Consider the factors that have changed in the past decades: Nigeria's population has grown substantially, fuel consumption has increased, and governance costs have risen. Furthermore, corruption has worsened, exacerbating the challenges the country faces.

In the 1990s, these issues were already accumulating, similar to the progression of a mosquito-borne illness. Initially, the patient may continue with daily activities, but as it accumulates, symptoms gradually manifest. The worsening condition eventually reaches a critical stage where the patient's life is at risk. This comparison illustrates how Nigeria's problems have intensified over time, culminating in the current crippling economic situation.

Had subsidies not been removed at this juncture, Nigeria for don collapse kpata-kpata. Tinubu's ability to effect change would have been severely limited. International institutions such as the World Bank or IMF would hesitate to lend support, knowing that the country's capacity to repay loans is compromised, partly due to the pre-sale of substantial amounts of crude oil.

Shalom!

abc115:
You people are tired of stating in dollars because it will not serve you propaganda purpose

God Bless President Bola Tinubu
God Bless Federal Republic of Nigeria

Almunjid:
Lol. Is the perceived inaccuracy in my argument related to the fact that Obasanjo initiated fuel subsidies and naira defense measures? Or does it concern the notion that his decisions have led to growing challenges that have weakened our economy? Buhari inherited an economy already in decline due to the effects of subsidy and naira defense, yet he continued paying subsidies and defending the naira until the country could no longer sustain it. He borrowed heavily and sold some of our crude oil in advance just to keep these policies going.

You condemn Buhari as though you would do better if given the chance. Buhari was just like you when Jonathan was president; he thought he could do better—promising one naira to one dollar and solutions to youth unemployment—until he got the opportunity, and for eight years only took the country backward. The presidency of Nigeria is like a football pitch: when you’re not playing, it’s easy to spot mistakes and criticize players for missed goals or poor passes, but once you’re on the pitch, you realize it’s as challenging for you as for anyone else. Buhari discovered this firsthand.

It’s not fair to label Tinubu as a failure like Jonathan and Buhari. Tinubu’s situation is unique and cannot be judged the same way, especially considering the poor economic state he inherited. So is his fault removing subsidy and floating the naira—policies that are good but come with their own challenges? Should he be called a failure just because the policy brings hardship? Furthermore, all the 2023 presidential aspirants, including Atiku and Obi, also planned to remove the subsidy and possibly float the naira. Lol, Are you upset simply because your preferred candidate did not lead these reforms?

Peace!

Cromagnon:
PDP nko that allowed it to get to this level?

Almunjid:
It's ironic that, when comparing the administrations, Yaradua did not perform better than Obasanjo, and Jonathan did not surpass Yaradua's accomplishments. Similarly, Buhari failed to outperform Jonathan during his time in office. In this context, Buhari's shortcomings appear justified. Before assigning blame, it is essential to identify the underlying cause of these issues. The root of our current predicament can be traced back to Obasanjo's tenure. Despite his notable contributions to the country, we still grapple with the consequences of his decisions.

The Olusegun Obasanjo military regime introduced fuel subsidies in Nigeria in 1977. The practice of "defending" the Naira, which entails managing its exchange rate, began in the 1980s with the implementation of the Second-Tier Foreign Exchange Market (SFEM) and the Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) in 1986, although exchange rate policies have since undergone numerous revisions.
As time progressed, the costs of subsidizing fuel and defending the naira became an unbearable burden for the country.

Throughout Obasanjo's tenure, his administration failed to address these issues. Yaradua tried to tackle them but encountered challenges, as he focused more on managing the problem rather than finding a permanent solution. During Jonathan's term, he recognized the pressing issues, particularly the widespread fuel subsidy fraud, and made efforts to address them. However, opposition parties exploited the populace's gullibility, hindering his attempts. Upon assuming office, Buhari faced the same challenges but lacked the courage to confront them due to concerns about potential adverse impacts on the poor. Buhari's administration failed because the problems he attempted to manage grew significantly compared to Jonathan's tenure, and they would have become even more insurmountable during Tinubu's presidency.

Had Tinubu not addressed these problems, his administration would have fared worse than the combined tenures of Obasanjo, Yaradua, Jonathan, and Buhari, as the issues have become increasingly complex and unmanageable. It is crucial not to ignore or merely manage problems but to actively seek solutions. While all the administrations that neglected these issues ultimately failed, the one leader who took action to address the root causes of our predicament is paradoxically the one we wish to remove from power.


Salam!

hopexter:
Does your state make more than Ogun state or Oyo state? Who says Im from southwest?

Almunjid:
To be candid, each leader faces significant challenges during their tenure. However, Nigeria appears to have experienced a decline in leadership quality since Obasanjo's administration. Yaradua did not perform better than Obasanjo, Jonathan did not surpass Yaradua, and Buhari failed to outperform Jonathan.

Regarding the comparison between Buhari, Jonathan and Tinubu, it's important to note that Tinubu's situation is unique and cannot be labeled a failure, particularly considering the poor economic state he inherited and his bold decisions to remove fuel subsidies and float the naira. These actions demonstrate courage that Jonathan and Buhari lacked. One thing remains certain: if given the opportunity, Obi would not surpass Tinubu in performance.

Salam!

dapadawee:
How and what yardsticks are you using to compare obi and buhari, obi should be compared with soludo or sanwo olu or ngige and some of the political class of only governor's how can you compare obi to buhari are they political mates do you know what it takes to be president not once.

ubimagos:
I Find it hard to believe how you guys managed to smuggled this dullard name into important discussions, I mean, Obi. It is phony!

Almunjid:
The perception of an incumbent government as a failure is primarily fueled by opposition parties seeking power, irrespective of the current administration's efforts. They effectively convinced us that Jonathan's administration was a failure to secure our votes. Similarly, they have portrayed Buhari's administration as unsuccessful and are now employing the same tactics to discredit Tinubu. This pattern suggests that opposition parties are more interested in fulfilling their own presidential ambitions than in addressing the nation's problems.

Despite the challenges Tinubu faces in implementing policies such as fuel subsidy removal and naira floatation, he has laid a foundation for future administrations to build upon and address the nation's problems. However, if you ask any presidential aspirant from the opposition parties (Atiku, Obi etc) if they would revert these policies should they come to power, they would say "no", as they acknowledge the need for such reforms. Yet, they still seek to remove Tinubu from office due to their own presidential ambitions, not because they are better suited to lead the country.

By continuously falling prey to these political narratives, we enable politicians to manipulate public opinion, prioritizing their greed and selfish interests over the betterment of the country. As seen in the case of Jonathan's administration, the use of insurgencies to create instability and depict him as incompetent ultimately led to his removal from office. This strategy is being repeated to target Tinubu, taking advantage of Nigeria's vulnerability to such tactics.


Peace!

IbnB:
He got no major votes anywhere, he was simply announced as winner

Almunjid:
Honestly, Tinubu and Buhari possess more impressive track records than Obi, who is being vigorously promoted solely due to the Igbos' determination to secure the Nigerian presidency by any means necessary. Northerners would rather cast their votes for a deceased Buhari than a living Obi. Interestingly, we can find discussions on Nairaland from 2012 where Igbos themselves expressed their discontent with Obi's incompetence during his governorship in Anambra. Now, they claim he surpasses a visionary leader like Tinubu, which is difficult to accept. It seems improbable that Obi represents the best the Igbos have to offer; perhaps they are just not in favor of their most capable candidates.

Peace!

Hammylawali:
If had stayed on buhari’s economic policies (subsidies, printing of naira and almost zero oil production), you would have been living like Venezuela by now. We will have money but can’t afford commodities, because inflation will be super high. The best time to reset Nigeria is was in 2023 and the restroom that opportunity to do so. We can’t keep living on subsidies and keep sending all our revenues servicing debt, yet the borrowing will be increasing yearly. That’s not life but a collapse of the economy. A country can’t work like that.

Hammylawali:
Buhari that rejected the imf and world bank advise, how did he leave the economy?… some of you just talk out of hatred, and not because you know anything.

hopexter:
Rely on people from your state to develop it for you.

IbnB:
Buhari knew that the entire north would be the worst affected out of all six of Nigeria's geopolitical zones, that's why

He want any brighter and he never planned to do better by Nigeria, it was just his tribalistic orientation at work

surgical:
But Peter obi said he will do the same if elected,it means they are in the same boat ,Peter obi is also dumb for saying he will implement this ideas Tinubu has implemented now
He is only lucky that he was not elected, he would have been the one facing the heat now