₦airaland Forum

Felaincarnated:
Even u wey type dis long note, Are u ur fathers child?

100%. I have his face, voice and we share the same build and skin complexion. People mistake me for him when they hear me until they actually see me.

maasoap:
I'm even surprised that you pro-mohbad's father are wasting your time and energy here and with Wumi instead of telling the old man to be on his way to court . Why is that? Because you all knew that he will just be wasting his time, that's why you all are intimidating the wife

Again you reason funny. I am not pro-Mohbad’s father. The man hurriedly buried the boy without an autopsy and in the middle of the night. He definitely has a case to answer for that which to me makes him a prime suspect too. And if he indeed wants a dna done he must approach the court. Infact if he doesn’t then he should be questioned even further.

Some of us are neither on the side of the father or Wunmi but we can’t just sit and watch people draw foolish conclusions based on sentiments.

oziezu:
At least, educate the members with biblical reference to support your position.

I did in my subsequent replies to him.

texazzpete:
The problem for you people is that you’re not leaning on common sense here.

Even if DNA shows the boy is not his biological son, it doesn’t change the fact that Mohbad acknowledged the boy publicly as his son. So inheritance is not threatened. And the Wife herself remained legally married to Mohbad at his time of death so she will still remain his inheritor too.

Additionally, an adverse DNA test does not in any way implicate her in his death.

The law does not work like SuperStory, sorry to burst your bubble. Culpability in murder requires a case being established. Clearly the autopsy result and the police investigation do not implicate the wife in any way. And women who birth biological children for men historically have had no qualms killing their husbands.


But we should also ask why you people don’t feel distaste that the old man is so concerned about his son’s property that should not in any way belong to him.

I wish I had the time to pick your points one after the other. But work wont allow me. As for Mohbad’s father I said in my previous responses that he is a suspect. So how you are now insinuating in this and your last post that I’m supporting him baffles me. The way and manner he hurriedly buried his son makes him a suspect as well.

But then I give it to you. Your point about the difference btw a biological son and one who is publicly and legally acknowledged as a son is quite true. But then a case of wrong assumption based on false information can be instigated in the courts against his wife.

As for Geremi the dna results was what made him have a case.
And the mohbads father can make a case based on wrong assumption based on false information supplied to him or information concealed from him by Mohbad's wife. So a dna test will certainly alter the course of proceedings in both the court of law and the court of public opinion.

Klington:


Aptly put, and their followers are on the same boat with them. Shamelessly stvpid.

I tell you sir. Only a daft fool will believe after 60 years of waste by politicians that any party or politician is interested in lifting this nation up.

Kobojunkie:
This is instead what you said .. And the above is wrong considering Jesus Christ gave no grounds for divorce because Divorce is not a sin. Grounds are only needed in the case that exceptions are necessary. Remarriage is instead where Jesus Christ gave grounds and the only case where remarriage is a not considered a sin i.e. remarriage is allowed if it followed divorce that resulted from fornication in the marriage.

You seem to be silent on the Bible vs gospel issue. Don’t be proud. Just admit your foolishness in making that statement.

Now let us go to the Bible or should I say gospel passage we are referring to and see what exactly it says. Pls read Matthew 5 vs 31-32.

It says that …anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality…

Let me rephrase
…you can divorce your wife on the grounds of sexual immorality, but anyone who does so for any other reason…

Pls read all of it so you get the full context. This clearly states that there is ground for divorce and it is sexual immorality.

Let me pause so you can read that verse and telll me what it means to you so I know whether I’m wasting my time explaining to someone who can’t read and understand simple English. If Bible and gospel is confusing you then this might be challenge for you too.

Sentiments aside VDM has to realize that there are powers that be in this country that are above the law and they will deal with you as they like and nothing will happen.

texazzpete:
Oya na. Go and force her to do DNA test



He cannot. He has no stake in the matter, and the paternity discussion is solely between the legal parents of the boy.

It’s like saying Wunmi can use the courts to order the man to do mental health tests since he’s been acting really weird since his son died.

She can’t. Even the courts will throw that out as a waste of judicial process since the man has no history of mental instability so far.

He has a stake in the matter. He can simply allege that she killed Mohbad to hide the fact that the boy is not his son so that she can inherit his estate. She is expected to deny this after which the court can ask for a dna test to settle the matter once and for all

Kobojunkie:
Jesus Christ never said divorce is a sin in the Kingdom of God. He instead said that remarriage following divorce is where the problem potentially lies. Basically anyone who remarries after adultery is free from sin but anyone who remarries otherwise sins against God.

This was what I said before you started quoting me. But that is not even my issue right now. I can let that slide since it seems you have a problem with comprehension.

Just tell me how the Bible and gospel are different as you are the one that asked why you should read some Bible when you can see from the gospel that Jesus said divorce is no sin. That’s all I need to know right now.

texazzpete:
Again, you’re the child here. Not only is she NOT a suspect, even if the child were to not be Mohbad’s, it’s still a massive logical leap to assume that as a reason for murder.
Tell me, child. Who’s going to obtain the court order? The father of Mohbad? he cannot convince any court that that’s any business of his. Mohbad’s estate will go to the wife if there’s no will.

There is significant evidence that Mohbad accepted and celebrated the boy as his son when he was alive, so for all intents and legal purposes, the boy is his son.

You know poorly educated people when you see them post.

Loopholes everywhere.
1. She is a suspect including Naira Marley and even Mohbad’s father and Mohbad’s friends. As long as one party accuses the other of having a hand in his death who or what are you to exclude her as a suspect.

2. If the child were not to be Mohbad’s that is not conclusive evidence that she killed Mohbad. Any idiot should know this. But if the child isn’t Mohbad’s then it opens up another legal battle on who gets to keep his royalties from his life’s work. So sweeping away a dna test can never be done. It must be done.

3. If there is no will then the estate goes to his wife and son. True. But he doesn’t need to do much to get a court order. All he needs do is to claim she is a suspect and push the motive that she killed him to hide that fact so his estate could be hers. Obtaining a dna test on this grounds does not impede justice in any way. If it turns out that the boy is truly Mohbad’s then it’s a win-win for Wunmi which is why I don’t understand the idiots saying she should not have a test done. If it turns out that it isn’t Mohbad’s son then she has a case to answer. But saying that since Mohbad never doubted the child then nobody should request a dna is illiterate reasoning.

4. So that a man accepts a child is enough evidence that that child is his? This is the dumbest thing you have said but I will answer you intelligently.

Have you read the story of Geremi the Chelsea footballer who for 12 years celebrated his children as his not knowing that they weren’t until a dna test showed it just last week? You should feel stupid by now but hold on.

Last year a man walked happily with his family to my hospital to have genotype and blood group test done for him, his wife and three children. No suspicions at all. He stated that his reason for it was just so they know and have it recorded in their cards. Turns out that none of the kids were his. But for 8 years of marriage he treated them as his.

Now how on earth does treating them like his own make them “legally and for all intents and purposes” his children?

It’s ok to feel comoletely stupid now.

Kobojunkie:
I am sorry, what? Who is the somebody who you believe showed me what exactly? Why do I need someone to show me what has been sitting in a book for almost 2000 years?

Is it that you don't believe any of what Jesus Christ said and need someone else to show you what to believe or something? His very words are recorded right there in the Gospel and He proclaimed that they never change —everlasting.

You seem confused. In your previous quote you said you don’t need the Bible since Jesus said it himself. Now you are talking about the gospel. Ow…wait!!! The gospel isn’t the same thing as the Bible now right? I go learn another new one this night.

Pls what did you mean by “which Bible” and why are you now referring to the gospel as His recorded words? Is the Bible different from the gospel? I eagerly await your clarification on this.

Kobojunkie:
According to which Bible? I told you what Jesus Christ Himself, the Constitutional Law and Truth of God in the Kingdom of God decreed in His own Kingdom, you dey give me talk about according to some Bible. Jesus Christ never said divorce was a sin in the Kingdom of God. \

See this one forming smart. No be read you read am from somewhere? Did somebody not tell you this and then showed you where to read it? Now you Dey here Dey talk like say you Dey there when Jesus talk am. Abeg go siddon jare. I even think say na person wey get sense I Dey folo talk. If you no fit quote where you read am just shut up.

LilMissFavvy:
Girl.... don't do it. Your late husband never questioned the paternity of his child.

Women and sentiments. There are many men who don’t questions the paternity of their children but went to do a simple genotype just so they know their genotype and that of their kids. That’s how they realized they were not the fathers. This just happened recently in my hospital. So it is really daft to say that since a man didn’t question the paternity of his child then there is no reason for a woman to do a dna test.

texazzpete:
Why do you people keep saying things that make no sense?
She’s not going to do DNA test if she doesn’t want to. You can’t force her. Nobody can. Mohbad’s father is a joker if he thinks he has a say.


The young boy remain Mohbad’s heir and will take ownership of all that’s left after his agbaya grandfather has taken the clothes.

It’s easy to spot a child talking. If you were an adult and understand how the law works you will know that a court order is all it takes to have her release that boy for a dna test. But you are obviously ignorant of how things work so you’ll say rubbish thinking you are making sense.

Mrexcell:
But can't the test be done without this lady?

Yes it can. If she says she won’t do the test then Mohbad’s father can get a court injunction ordering her to release the baby to a neutral party which can be the police so they can conduct the test in 3 different centres.

Kobojunkie:
This is equally not true. Read the book without the lie-coded goggles of your pastors and you will see that Jesus Christ did not change the rules that existed regarding divorce. Instead, He said divorce followed by remarriage is what is potentially a sin in the Kingdom of God.

I’m not getting your point. Let’s take it one after the other. According to the Bible is there any reason for divorce? If yes what are they? If no then state where the Bible forbids divorce. Leave google and pastor out of this. Let us use our own brains.

Or if there is a part of my post you have a problem with pls specify.

Thomasankara:
[/color] brilliant response[color=#770077]

Thank you.

sageb:
Even former chelsea player, Geremi Njitap was deceived by his wife for 12 years.
Paternity fraud

And yet there are people who are saying that since mohbad didn’t doubt the son then no test should be done. Imagine if Geremi had died since.

ShootThemAll:
Please stop replying that kid that reasons through his anus bro or will I say Tonto, Iyabo and gistlover media ra*ts.

I will say it here again Wunmi has a hand in Morebad's de*ath. She knows EVERYTHING that happened, wanted to put it on ear infection, it didn't work, put it on Naira marley, it almost worked but flopped, switched to Mohbad's friend then a ghost Nurse with the help of 9ja police and her mum. Where is the Nurse? Where is the CCTV recordings of that day... Otilo.

Sometimes one just can’t help but educate these illiterates

Afolabimills:
the best answer of the year to a gullible fool

Thank you sir.

gassbee:
Only Mohbad can demand for a DNA test, it is an insult to her personality for anyone else to demand DNA for her son

If there is any reason to doubt the paternity of the boy then anybody of interest in the case can demand a test.

Demanding a test does not change the fact that the boy is truly Mohbad’s son so why are you people scared of it?

Available9:
Court order or no court order, why is it difficult for her to do the test even when people have volunteered to finance the test ?

I honestly do not know why myself. It helps her prove her case if anything.

IamtheTruth1:
You and the 50 women that liked your comment are very daft

Over 300 people like my comment now. It is understandable that a few people don’t have sense and you are one of them. I wish I could get you to tell me what’s wrong with what I said but it is usually impossible having an intellectual discussion with idiots like you.

I am in support of this. Go after fake rumor peddlers. And the fact that it is coming from the opposition camp makes it even more interesting. I love it when politicians fight each other thou go sadly not much comes out of it.

JooEeL:
There's rumour that he nearly drowned the baby in a water out of nearly running mad.

His union with the lady was as good as ruined already. He made moves to travel to canada for a tour and never to return to nigeria. D fake wife later found out days shortly before. The rest is history bro.

Well I believe the truth will come out soon. I really want his killers to be fished out asap so that all these rumors will be put to rest.

Yong4ever:
only a sane being would know that DNA is no brainer here.

Thank you o. I mean it’s obvious.

Jemex003:
Try go buy new Ankara cloth give your mama then take her out for dinner and mix small sk in her drink then ask her who’s your biological father cuz you sound like a bastard here.

Lmao. The way una Dey tear this jogs1900 apart ehn…he is still a kid. You guys should leave him. Sense is far from him. And the funniest thing is he can never accept he is wrong or doesn’t have much sense.

SaLongs1:
Have you ever stumbled on the phrase "paternity fraud"?

You see how this jogs1900 has made a fool of himself today? I feel for him. Sentiments without sense.

JooEeL:
Mohbad actually doubted and later found out. Reason his life was snuffed out.

Hence the need for a dna test

immortalcrown:
You are the one who needs to read and understand that part of the Bible.

You haven’t said anything or are you avoiding an explanation on why you said so because you have none? I would have expected a direct answer to what I said the same way I said you were wrong and not giving a vague unintelligent answer like this.

immortalcrown:
Only incest is biblically acceptable for a divorce.

The problem here is hypocrisy. People want to be here and there. People want to eat their cake and have it.

If you want to divorce your spouse when he or she offends you, avoid church wedding. Do your traditional marriage or any other form of marriage. The issue is that people want church wedding but don't want the cross that comes with church wedding. Church wedding vow says, "... until death do us part".

Choose a tradition you can maintain. Don't deceive yourself with church wedding when you are not willing to abide by its principles.

Read your bible well. Adultery is also grounds for a divorce. Also if your partner wants a divorce you are allowed to grant him or her that request.

Tdotbluejays1:
Proof?

Was it not in Abia state that a man shot his son because of soup.

Yes it was. But what’s your point? In the west they mine skulls so what exactly is your point?