₦airaland Forum

Anas09:
Fin. I'm waiting for you. But don't forget yours will be exposed too.

GLYCOLYSISS:
Does it change a thing ?
Maybe you could also add these to the count, Buda,you don't have the Holy spirit in you,so stop bringing Him into the picture to back up your claims ,claiming He is the source of your inspiration(s),especially when discussing Bible.

joseph1013:
Your own understanding of the Bible is that Jesus is a son of Joseph. How can that be your understanding when the Bible DIRECTLY teaches against that? The Bible says Jesus was born of the Holy Spirit.

Amujale:
If religion means Abrahamic religions, then religion is bad and should be banned anywhere on the African continent.

On the other hand, if religion means the experiencing, aspiring and working towards virtuousness; an attempt to attain a high moral and ethical standard, then religion is a nice and cool invention.

Religion is supposed to make us relative to virtuousness.

Virtue is a nice and fun quality to have.

All the authors of Abrahamic religious text are untustworthy, dubious, liars and fakers; and are never the virtuous type.

joseph1013:
You use words flippantly.

How can evidence be about how much has been written about a subject. Does the fact that there is an avalanche of material about the flat earth theory show that it exists? Does the oral tradition of twins being witches prove that twins are evil?

You equate the fable of tortoise and hare with the Bible yet its adherents do not see it as so. So what's your point?

Your insertion of philosophy into the discussion is laughable. Another strawman. No one says religion does not exists. What is under scrutiny are the elements therein - gods, spirits, devils...

If you choose to treat them as figurative expressions, you are welcome. Revisionism is all religion has been reduced to anyway.

Belief is about knowing for religionists. They KNOW that Allah exists. They KNOW that Christ was crucified to save you from hell. They know that nothing you do on earth is good enough if you are not a christian like them. Some of them KNOW that blood transfusion is unacceptable.

You have said so much about the complex issue of god but said nothing about them. Is this a gerrymandering exercise?

I have met people like you whose understanding and acceptance of gods is nothing like the accepted dictionary definition, but rather a philosophical twisting of words.

What they do not put on the table is tangible evidence of what they proclaim. I do not pretend to be surprised by it all.

GLYCOLYSISS:
Someone filled with the Holy spirit won't bear the fruits he have so far be displaying on the religion section.

hakeem4:
Now the faith your religion teaches you is to believe something without evidence

budaatum:
This is not true! Neither is a lot more written there, but this is definitely a lie. I, buda, have faith that I will post on here tomorrow, Wednesday, and that no one here will die.

We shall ascertain the veracity of my faith based claim tomorrow when you obtain fundamentally verifiable observable "empirical knowledge" of mine and everyone else's presence here, for I forbid anyone's falsification!

wickedtuna:
"taste" that is my body and blood which is my nature, the Christ conscious nature, the logos that was made flesh by the supreme All so mankind could be saved. But "church going Christians" seem to put that consciousness away and chase "prosperity" please sir can explain why?

wickedtuna:
for even the bible says "test and see that the lord is good" to believe fire is hot is different than to know its hot. I think thats what the op isnt understanding. What do i know tho.

6.There is no way of ascertaining the veracity of any faith based claim.

MuttleyLaff:
"Jesus told them,
"My food is to do what the one who sent me wants me to do and to finish the work he has given me."
- John 4:34

budaatum:
Dissemination of the Holy Spirit.

The Holy Spirit dwells only among a worthy generation, and the frequency of its manifestations is proportionate to the worthiness. There was no manifestation of it in the time of the Second Temple (Yoma 21b), while there were many during the time of Elijah (Tosef., Soṭah, xii. 5). According to Job xxviii. 25, the Holy Spirit rested upon the Prophets in varying degrees, some prophesying to the extent of one book only, and others filling two books (Lev. R. xv. 2). Nor did it rest upon them continually, but only for a time. The stages of development, the highest of which is the Holy Spirit, are as follows: zeal, integrity, purity, holiness, humility, fear of sin, the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit conducts Elijah, who brings the dead to life (Yer. Shab. 3c, above, and parallel passage). The pious act through the Holy Spirit (Tan., Wayeḥi, 14); whoever teaches the Torah in public partakes of the Holy Spirit (Cant. R. i. 9, end; comp. Lev. R. xxxv. 7). When Phinehas sinned the Holy Spirit departed from him (Lev. R. xxxvii. 4; comp. Gen. R. xix. 6; Pesiḳ. 9a).

GLYCOLYSISS:
With the assistance of the Holy spirit ?

GLYCOLYSISS:
With the assistance of the Holy spirit ?
Done with you bro.
Take care & have a blissful day

GLYCOLYSISS:
There's nothing like someone is filled with the holy spirit 1/4 ..
You're either having the Holy spirit ,or not.
You're filled with the Holy spirit when you're genuinely sanctified & experience the Holy ghost baptism,or you're not filled at all.
The bible stated over & over again how any sincerely sanctified person is filled with the Holy spirit.
Mary did not get filled any better with the Holy spirit than any person that's sanctified & have consecrated him/she self for God.

GLYCOLYSISS:
Who is doubting if Mary is filled with the Holy spirit ?

You made a point that got my attention,so I was only looking for you to bring up Biblical passage or whatever you got to buttress your point.
Below was exactly your view ;

"Mary was filled with the Holy Spirit while most other human's seem to be only ¼ filled"

The highlighted was exactly what I want you to bring forward a Bible evidence for that.

coluka:
How many Greenlanders did your source interview? The image you posted said a Greenland resident (one person), I am sure if you interview all Greenland residents, you will find a lot of them that will tell people like you to shut the fvck up!!

jesusjnr:
Lol!

Maybe you're trying to confess that you have been on drugs since then, no wonder you've acting as someone on drugs!

I don't need drugs for anything, I got God!

jesusjnr:
Lol!

Satan trying to use the Bible to justify his lies.

Jesus loved His enemies yet told them to go and sin no more, so Buda telling you and the homosexuals to go and sin no more is the Will of God.

Though your god is not mine, for I don't worship Satan as you do, being a member of a Satanist organization, Rosicrucian Order!

Emusan:
If there's no "perfect correct", at least there should be MOST LIKELY CORRECT rendition.

Which rendition is most likely correct, the word was God or the word was a god?

Emusan:
But if those texts are already corrupted and MOST HISTORICALLY UNRELIABLE Gospel, then it can't be for the perfection of humans.

jesusjnr:
Maybe you next time you should ask Satan clearly who he sent you to, for I have not taken medication for over a year now.

So you miss road, and are completely lost.

jesusjnr:
Look at this ignorant fool, who doesn't know that my job is to do the will of God, Lol!

Or are you the one feeding me or paying my wages?

God is! For a labourer is worthy of his wages.

You and get yourself a good job not being the devil's workshop!

joseph1013:
Again, much ado about nothing.

Too many people seem to have issues with expressing their thoughts simply.

You say there is quite a lot of 'evidence' out there about gods.... Can you provide these?

It's also interesting how you keep keeping up with this strawman. You seem to have a penchant for creating your own argument and running with it.

The Christian proclaims Yahweh exist. The Muslim proclaims Allah exists. We request for evidence. They don't provide. We say it is intellectually sound to reject these claims. You turn up to say it is not good enough.

Perhaps it is because you don't know the meaning of the words you use.

A quick look at the DISBELIEF in the dictionary shows,

"inability or refusal to accept that something is true or real."

Disbelief is not necessarily in the business of searching or knowing. It is about considering the evidence or lack of evidence brought forward.

But then, we have you to obfuscate issues.

Emusan:
Claiming it's your favorite and as well MOST HISTORICALLY UNRELIABLE Gospel, doesn't make sense!

Anyway, I didn't see anything like hatred in the OP, it simply asked the same question people have asked for century.

Since you're unravelling the truth in John. Can you tell us which rendition is most likely correct or perfectly correct?

jesusjnr:
Lord give us church leaders like Peter that would rather distribute the riches like Jesus the Master would, instead of those mammon worshipping pharisees in today's church who would be accumulating it unto themselves.

SimDan95:
Although this news look fake,