Budaatum's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Budaatum's Profile › Budaatum's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 (of 1630 pages)
shadeyinka:What rubbish is this!? He said he has seen no evidence but you want him to say what, exactly? Lie that he sees what he is too blind to see? You are very funny! |
shadeyinka:I just think asking if they agree with particular people is not the same as asking for their "personal beliefs" as you've asked above. And I agree they should tell you their "personal beliefs", so they can't accuse you of arguing what they never said. Though I think they already did, something to do with "no evidence", my Lord said. |
OLAADEGBU:Was that not what satan sent you to do with this thread? Or did satan not tell you your mission was to go and touch a nerve with this thread? |
shadeyinka:I'm enjoying the discourse but do not see how this is relevant. It's like asking a Christian if the Pope or Adeboye or TBJ are wrong! |
Shepherd00:I think you cannot just conceive that others might have journeyed different to you or further than you or faster. From where you are, you think it is you who decides what "cuts" here as if you Shepherd, are the measure of things. Those who have sought diligently and found, do not believe they will find. Or would you claim I found nothing yet transisted from Atheism? It is those who are still seeking that believe and hope they will one day find. When you too transist Shepherd, like I have done, or rather, as the Lord God Almighty has made me transist, you too will stop with your believing and instead know that Jesus Christ is indeed Lord. |
wickedtuna:Don't you worry about grammar tuna. Your point is understood. |
Hinn’s outright rejection of the prosperity gospel comes just two months after his nephew, Costi Hinn, revealed in his new book, God, Greed, and the (Prosperity) Gospel: How Truth Overwhelms a Life Built on Lies, how his family exploited millions around the world with the prosperity gospel and often traded so-called miracles for money.. |
Hinn’s outright rejection of the prosperity gospel comes just two months after his nephew, Costi Hinn, revealed in his new book, God, Greed, and the (Prosperity) Gospel: How Truth Overwhelms a Life Built on Lies, how his family exploited millions around the world with the prosperity gospel and often traded so-called miracles for money..Exposed, more like! |
Prior preparation prevents piss poor performance. |
Amujale:I'll boil this all down to "can the book be trusted", and say, it's an odd question. You would not ask me those other questions if you had considered what I posted and which states a position on such matters which by my posting ought to show my position on such matters. Trusted in what way? That it's old, yes. That it has gone through numerous revisions such that its authors and origin is unknown, yes. That it likely didn't mean what it reads like today and that bits have been tagged on and removed through the centuries and everything else you claim too, yes. Or that it is a perfect book the sort one would expect the gods to write and print on printing presses in heavens? So this book. And it's not the only one, mind, the Torah having taking over from Homer and the hieroglyphs that preceded it, but of all the books of antiquity, somehow, I get to read that one. Do you know its about the most ancient book most would ever read? Trust me, if you can replace it with Plato and Aristotle and Adam Smith, I will personally pay to work for you for free, but I don't see that happening, so I'm pretty glad that those around me read thou shalt not steal and thou shalt not kill, because, considering how much stealing and killing goes on despite their reading, I shudder to think what it would be like if some had not written a book and convinced people gods wrote it and made some believe they would go to hell if they did not believe it! But that was for then, like a thousand years ago. Now, after thousands of years of those books setting the direction of civilization of which I happen to be a product as are most of the western hemisphere, it will be silly for my own attitude towards it to be "it is lies", "it is fake", "it is copied" and is "guilty of a huge amount of criminality", is my own point, with full respect for yours. Not being aware of the books' impact through the different millennia would be remiss of me, and to be honest, I'd doubt I'd have a proper understanding of my society and myself if I had spent my time looking for the [url=https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice%27s_Adventures_in_Wonderland?wprov=sfla1]rabbit hole[/url] Alice fell through, which is what your other questions are, instead of considering the enormous influence the book has had on human thought and evolution or if it needs to be exorcised from our psyche and if so, how. Lenses. The ones we put on determine how we see, but a common error is to think how one sees is how it actually looks, to everyone, I guess. |
LordReed:They don't? You write such books, my Lord, and you will be a 'god'. In my opinion at least. Here's one more for you amu. While some are searching for God, some have gone after David. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhiABi6vw3A |
Amujale:We learn in the Garden of Eden how the Word of God can be good or bad. Study, compare and contrast would make one wonder if God would keep one naked and forbid them knowledge. I just need look to the North of Nigeria to see the consequences of such policies. Then see how long Adam did "not exactly die after being kicked out of Eden", and the intellectually robust and unequivocally honest would be inclined to ask, who lied. Adjectival lenses. That's what I call those two bolds. Lenses one wears that distorts what is there into what one wants to see. Another view is expressed with "Love God", suggesting a perspective from which to view things, which in Christianity implies, for that which is good and godly and relating to those around one. I do not have issues with such lenses, but if you put on one with blue glass, everything will seem blue, and when the glass is red it all goes red. The intellectually robust and unequivocally honest should therefore have lots of lenses with various colours with which to view things so as not to be one coloured in their view. Or they should have eyes that work well so their views are not distorted by glass. Try it. Remove the lens then watch these and tell me what you see. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5RfScpEcZ8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g40Eck6gW7U https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndAnzWduwP8 |
MrPresident1:The cheap talk and not the fruit? Typical! |
Amujale:As you may have seen from above, theres nothing like "original text", since it evolved into being over time, and even if it were fiction I'd still give it more credit than you do. I can only wonder how much of the texts you've read and understood to condemn it so much. |
coluka:Lol. |
Emusan:Not quite. Everyone still thinking it is bad when in fact, it will get worse. After all, next election is same ol' same ol' Osin v Atik, and expecting better in the coming world wide depressed times is deluded. Thing is, when you all talk "revolution", all I hear is "aluta" and you all behaving like thugs, not yet ready to revolt a la Hong Kong Way. So, please, educate your children. We might be as helpless as our parents have been, but a curse on us all if our children turn out like us. Though, we got time to pray they do because we had done proud. Next election is going to be crucial, so I'm going to suggest we sharpen teeth on Trump's reelection, or not, I hope, and learn to get ourselves the best outcome for the rest of the next decade. Di note, nobody has ever bought my political support and I do not accept gifts or contracts or payment for services rendered to and from the government. Before anyone says dem pay me! |
Empiree:Thank you jare. Even if this is unfounded, Atiku stinks! |
|
Rilwayne001:I would rather have bubu slowiness than Atiku and his now you see it now you don'tism. That was the choice before us at the time, and I'm pleased with my choice of sai bubu who never promised you food and in fact said, "you all lazy", so I expect you starving under this Next Level dispensation. 4+4 will end then you can delight in your "neglect of the rest" if Atiku wins the next election. But for now, when we have much less than we used to have, thanks for voting my bubu, says I. |
coluka:You must be the chief fascist liberal mob then since you like to "shut the fvck up", or are just rude or can't afford a mirror. coluka: |
Call on me when he's built it. |
Amujale:I think the Abrahamic ones are not the problem, the misunderstanding of the individual is. But I still delight in our failure, or rather, not having done enough to know and understand and just believe. The future, is Orange. Just wondering why these books have stood the test of time and what caused them out of all the books to be flung from so far back so I can read them is worthy of my consideration. And just reading up on what some might call inanities sure influences how I understand or see it, shall I say. And its a book. Reading is good! Below is a short trip how it got to me. You'd find it had been messed up from the start. The Hebrew Bible, which is also called the Tanakh (/tɑːˈnɑːx/; תָּנָ״ךְ, pronounced [taˈnaχ] or the [təˈnax]; also Tenakh, Tenak, Tanach) or sometimes the Mikra, is the canonical collection of Hebrew scriptures. These texts are almost exclusively in Biblical Hebrew, except for some Biblical Aramaic passages in the books of Daniel and Ezra. The Hebrew Bible is also the textual source for the Christian Old Testament. The Septuagint (from the Latin: septuāgintā literally "seventy"; often abbreviated as 70 in Roman numerals, i.e., LXX; sometimes called the Greek Old Testament) is the earliest extant Koine Greek translation of the Hebrew scriptures. The book of Isaiah was the most popular of all the prophetic books among the earliest Christians—it accounts for more than half the allusions and quotations in the New Testament and over half the quotations attributed to Jesus himself, and the Gospel of Matthew in particular presents Jesus's ministry as largely the fulfillment of prophecies from Isaiah. In the time of Jesus, however, the Jews of Palestine no longer spoke Hebrew, and Isaiah had to be translated into Greek and Aramaic, the two commonly used languages. In the original Hebrew of Isaiah 7:14 the word almah meant a young woman of childbearing age who had not yet given birth; however the Greek translation, the Septuagint, rendered it as parthenos, a word which means virgin. This gave the author of Matthew the opportunity to interpret Jesus as the fulfilment of the Immanuel prophecy: Jesus becomes God is with us (Matthew 1:23), the divine representative on earth, and Matthew further identifies Jesus with the Immanuel born to a parthenos by asserting that Joseph did not have sexual intercourse with Mary before she gave birth (Matthew 1:25). [url=https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaiah_7%3A14?wprov=sfla1]Gospel of Matthew[/url] |
Amujale:I have not at anytime advocated anyone learn only Egyptian history or mythology! You will find, if you bother, that I posted Hap 1. There are over 30 in total covering quite a lot more philosophy as it has developed in Africa, from the authors view. |
joseph1013:I know the first through study. I'm even inclined to pressume you do too and would bet top dollar that the Bible never "said" anything at all. It is indeed written in it, however, that "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness". But it would depend how it is understood, for we after all do read satan tempting Christ with the same, "Scripture given by inspiration of God, that is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness". When Christ speaks of the camel and the eye of a needle, and enter your mother's belly and be reborn, he could not have possibly meant it in the same sense as "Buhari's message of sending an envoy to South Africa", and only intellectual laziness would make me think he might have, or ignore that the report I'm reading has gone through numerous transliteration, translations, interpretations, modifications, distortions, corruption etc before it got to me, which might have changed the report I now read so many years later! And to the second, rather than "foolishly learning calculus from random people on the street" or "calling out their ignorance", which Christianity refers to as ignoring the forest in ones own eyes and which has not been found to be the best way to educate, I would rather educate to use the mind, instead of just substituting one belief for some other belief or unbelief. |
Amujale:A look at other societies that went back to consider their history would answer your question. The rediscovery of classical Greek philosopher Protagoras (490 BC – c. 420 BC) brought us to the view a thousand years later that "Man is the measure of all things" and the 1400-1700 Renaissance which evolved into the Scientific (or Intellectual) Age we are in today. Same way Newton got his calculus from his understanding of ancient alchemy texts. One can learn from history how things were done to emulate or decide which works and which doesn't. |
joseph1013:No one is asking you to accept anything 1013. It is however evidence of something, which should not only be considered as a belief or not, what I'd refer to as the insidious view of a good and evil world the theistically inclined seem to adopt. Least not by those who are "intellectually robust and unequivocally honest", in my opinion. |
Amujale:You might me surprised to know how much Africa there is in the Abrahamic religion. Over 400 years worth, according to books ascribed to Moses, unless you think we enslaved the body but left the mind free to think whatever it wanted. If only the Egyptians had shared their gods, says I. Or show me how that "intellectual property" might have gotten to me if they were not exploited to various whole new levels over very many centuries until it got to poor undeserving me. Or would you say I was so worthy and it would or should have gotten to me? And what form would it get to me? Carvings off the walls of the ruined Temple of Amun, perhaps, lol. |
GLYCOLYSISS:Actually, I read it, became an atheist because I could not reconcile it with what I was told about it. Read it again, and read it again, then saw the spirit in which it made sense to me, and have now, only since the beginning of this year, actually begun studying it, and "hope", and never said where the Holy Spirit was inside me or from elsewhere! GLYCOLYSISS:You are way too brief! "Philosophize", would be more like it, as in use all my might and soul and mind and being that the Lord God Almighty placed at my disposal to consider it. May God forbid that I not use talent the Lord God gives me and store it in fear that I might lose it! And where you say package, include "every Word God wrote" that I can get my hands on and that God gives me the time and ability to read. GLYCOLYSISS:When I look back over the many many years that constitute, "and read it again, made sense and have now begun studying it", I see very many turns by which my own will led me astray. I after all have over four decades of atheism behind me before only just seeing light, a journey I don't expect you to have any knowledge of having seen only a tiny tip of the outside. Yes, the Holy Spirit does a better job than buda! Left to me, I would have gladly gone on my own path instead of continuously demanding and working to acquire the ability to use the mind the Lord God has placed inside of me so that I can understand whatever I am given to understand. But wherefrom it commeth that I cannot attest to. For even though it is written that the Kingdom of God is within, I, buda, never said, nor inferred, that the Kingdom of God is inside of buda! GLYCOLYSISS:You infer, is all I can say, and very loosely, and based on very little data, which I somehow wouldn't expect since you would not treat Scripture that way. GLYCOLYSISS:Here, you infer a little too much. My "painstaking search & research", however much it might have been, has barely touched the surface of what is researchable, and even that which I have been opportuned to research was, brought to my attention by angels, one could say, after very many years of having the ability to consume it placed in me by the Lord God Almighty. I have, after all, got to points where I've looked back and wondered how I made the trip to where I got to knowing full well I did not get there by my own might. GLYCOLYSISS:Funny you. Who on this earth does not know they are limited. Must one state they are before it is inferred. As to "genuinely & sincerely fellowship with Him", the ultimate is "loving ones enemies", which you can see I fail woefully at where op is concerned, so I am relying on God's Grace, I must confess. GLYCOLYSISS:You will hear me say very often, "by our fruits". Lately, in fact, it's a phrase I tend to use a lot where op is concerned, even going as far as to imply his fruits are rotten. It is unholy of me, I admit, but it is one formed on historical evidence which we have built up for months, and not the reading of one or two posts and assuming "it wouldn't matter in the long run, unless you choose to glory for the mere dust you & I is". Hey, my bad. I usually need way more than a glimpse to paint a total picture". And for the inside, I go for the fruit. Though, farmer that I am, I do tend to start from the tiny little seed. So, just so you see what I glorify, I will tell you. If I, buda, do not for you whom I see, I worship satan. |
Amujale:Thank you for seeing in "spirit" instead of being stuck on the words. Not many do. Malicious intent might apply to those who were olodos in class and learnt to believe and through their lack of understanding teach that which profit not, even intentionally. Not everyone pays attention so we can not all reason equally. All religions are the manufactures of human reason. We look around us and need to find reason for, and, what to call all that which we see. Religion is what it becomes where we learn how it all has been seen. And from the knowledge gained from religion, which is learning to see as things have been seen, do we too learn to look and see for ourselves, which is an outcome of religion, or in Christianspeak, the Kingdom of God. You might want to ask me what that is, so I better confess that I do not know, yet, and that's why I refer to it as such. For every time I've thought I cracked it I find myself on the very edge of whatever I cracked, my understanding always being tiny and miniscule. Amujale:Which "most" of us would be completely ignorant about otherwise, and in a country that has decided to keep people in the dark by not teaching us history! I thank whatever it is that made it possible to incorporate the adaptations of our continental iconic characters and philosophical concepts into various texts and narratives peddled by the above religions to me. I might have been much less capable of using my mind and might likely just believe. Amujale:"Mainly known" by whom, Amujale? Are we all as blessed to see and reason as you do? For fear of repetition of my level of gratitude, please insert "exploitation" in last paragraph last section. Amujale:I think you throw the baby and the bath water away and even bulldoze the entire house! There was, or rather, we read that there was a battle in heaven and a battle in the Garden of Eden to name two. Should we therefore not reason that there must have been a battle over every Word God is alledged to have written? One should at least first do some of 1013's "intellectually robust and unequivocally honest" before coming to such a belief, I would think. Take the Garden of Eden for instance. Have you tried switching the two major characters around? They all just words after all, and who's to say no one meddled with them a little, you said so yourself, repeatedly, so why not treat it like the jigaw puzzle it is and put humpty dumpty together again? I find jigsaws to be as a bone to me dog and chew and chew and chew so I get the picture. Amujale:"Most", and not "all", as some chose to believe. Thankfully, proper, shall I say, atheists, consider the evidence before them so as to actually know. Though I see most agnostically seeking for evidence, so they don't know and merely believe just as theists do. Funny how they scream "strawman" because one refuses to communicate on straw level. Here is Something Old, Something New, amu.
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 (of 1630 pages)