raumdeuter: The school is for learning and not for any other thing. Issues on sexuality should be left to parents to discuss with their kids.
I can not agree with this.
First, sex and sexuality is part of learning, since it would occupy quite a lot of a child's growing up and life long living. Not teaching about it is like not teaching social skills.
Second. Parent me might teach my children about sex and sexuality and the issues involved, like how to not get pregnant, or catch a disease, or to not let some grubby person touch where they'd not want, but the children of others might be learning rubbish from Andrew Tate because their parents can't teach them properly or at all. So I would want all children to be taught in school also so they are all on the same page. After all, it's not as if they can teach my well educated by me girl that she is a boy, especially since I'd be on her school's parent-teacher's association too.
And if you are wondering at what age. From when they are at least 5, by me, since I'd want to start early to empower them to protect their self from the predators out there, and by 8 at least in school, since I'd want all children to learn to protect themselves too.
Personally, only predators or those who believe their child's teacher is teaching their child to be a not born in gender would not want their child to learn in school about sex and it's issues, In which case, such parents are irresponsible, for they should at least know what education they are buying for their child and that it suits its intended purpose of protecting the child.
And by the way, calling it "sex education" is the same as calling HB1557 the "Don't Say Gay" Bill.
budaatum: Really? Lawyers judging their own cases?
Does that not sound like a corrupt court to you?
budaatum: No, dt, I have never "asked someone to pay you the square root of 25 Or asked to buy food in the square root of 13" because that is not what square roots are used for!
Dtruthspeaker: Have you ever asked someone to pay you the square root of 25? Or have you ever been asked to buy food in the square root of 13?
No, dt, I have never "asked someone to pay you the square root of 25 Or asked to buy food in the square root of 13" because that is not what square roots are used for!
Dtruthspeaker: As i said your stupidity is immeasurable else you would have known that this is an impossibility. Fool!
What is impossible is you arguing a case before a judge. No sensible person would hire, and a judge will have you thrown out if you managed to find a senseless person to hire you.
Dtruthspeaker: First you are taught A,B, C and 1,2,3 no problem, you got it and you understood it.
Why?
Because you saw it in Nature and Natural Living! And if you checked it, your spirit was happy, therefore you knew it was TRUE.
Then they taught addition, subtraction, multiplication and division, sentences/spelling.
And you were smiling and enjoying learning and school for you saw the Truth of these teachings in Nature and Natural Living Too. Therefore, No Problem!
Then in primary school, Suddenly they slam you with Square Root!
And problem has started. You ask for explanation but Teachers simply says just do it like this and do it like that".
Mummy and daddy can not explain it!
Meanwhile unlike the other Truths you had learnt earlier which you saw were True because you used them in Natural Living, this Square Root does not make no sense.
Every other Truth was shown you in Nature by mummy and daddy and Teacher but everyone is unable to explain how Square Root works!
Mathematicians can not explain it either,(I have asked them) they just chew their mouth raising big big grammar, which they did not do for the other settled Truths in Nature.
Neither is Square Root seen or Used in Nature, So where did it come from?
I have told you before one of the most destructive weapons in this world is True-Lies or Lies-Truths or Half-Truths or Half-Lies.
That is why you do not know Truths because your Teachers and Schooling willfully destroy your ability to Ascertain Truths having Compelled you to Accept Lies, even from an early age!
I have identified Square Roots (I know Cube Root is in front and accoming), Area (Perimeter is True in Nature but Area is a Lie) and now my son just brought home the breaking down of Whole Numbers to Fractions in Fractions and Multiplication/Division of Fractions/Addition/Subtraction of Fractions.
What a Fraud and a Deceit in Life and Living, for we do not deal with Fractions but with Whole Numbers.
Which is why we have so much injustice and cheating and stealing in the world and one nonsense Satan lawyer and advocate would come to defend the thieves using this Tricks.
kkins25: which version doesn't threaten to cut my head if i disregard the prophet hood of Mohammed?
Most versions, kk. Though not the Afghanistan type. But I do wonder why your "perfect babe" should happen to come from a faith who's prophet you want to disregard.
Did you expect she'd want to be a perfect babe to a pig who can't respect her religion? So Tate like of you, I guess.
Wilgrea7: I think him proving he's a lawyer wouldn't change much, mainly because he's trying to use it as an appeal to authority, and to try to sound smarter. None of which would affect his arguments, or our lives.
That dude is no lawyer! He can't possibly pass law school with that stupid reasoning of his. And even if he did, probably by bribing his way through, no one with a brain would hire him to defend them because he'd be sprouting his belief before the judge instead of providing evidence.
kkins25: All versions of islam prevened me from getting d perect babe. So all islam is islam to me. If i could fire a nuclear bomb, i would. 😂
All versions, kk? Hmm. Guess your "perfect babe" must have been 'perfect babes', or your one "perfect babe" was involved in all versions of Islam, or you just ignorantly assumed "all Islam" is the same Islam, because I happen to know Islam has many versions, just as there's more than one version of Christianity.
jaephoenix: It does represent religion. The Emperor's New Clothes" meaning or moral is that it is best to trust oneself and be honest; Speak up for the truth and what is right. Without honesty, people often end up looking very foolish. In today's world, many people feel the need to pretend they know what they are doing like worshipping the right god, without actually knowing or understanding what they are doing. It is best to do one's own thinking and research with empirical data rather than trusting hearsay or unreliable information, from ancient books and respectable clergies. The story is about a situation where "no one believes, but everyone believes that everyone else believes. Or alternatively, everyone is ignorant to whether the emperor has clothes on or not, but believes that everyone else is not ignorant. People ask me, "Why are you an atheist? Are you saying millions of people are wrong, and a few of you are right?" They don't know why they have to believe a particular god, only that their parents, neighbors etc believe, and they are told he's the right god, and thus, they must be right. And of course, they are scared of the everlasting torment for doubters, which is an interesting detriment thst exists in almost all religions.
Na! I'm not having it. What you described above sounds more like the nature of some human beings, to me, and not religion per se. But that might be my own limitations and nothing to do with you or the story.
I mean, I can be gullible and stupid or what not, and you might blame it on my religion, but I'm more inclined to blame my stupidity and gullibility on myself. That way, not only am I responsible for my gullibility and my stupidity, but it also empowers me to cure myself of both.
jaephoenix: He'll rain more insults and threats on you. Lol
Of course he would. Thankfully, I enjoy it when fools rain insults and threats on me, since insults show me how puny their minds are, and threats show how weak they actually are.
jaephoenix: I didn’t ask. I compared his definition to that of many Christians. Ask 10 christians the definition of 'soul' and you'll have 11 definitions… That’s what you get when you try to define a nebulous concept
That's why first question ought to be, "what is a soul", since everyone, according to you, has a different definition.
Think of it this way. Say you ask me to prove my god to you. Don't you think you'd first need to know what my god is? After all, my god is a "nebulous concept". In fact much less than nebulous, or even moreso, depending on your capability to understand and mine to explain. I sure as hell would start by explaining what my god is if I were so inclined that you "get".
Wilgrea7: You seem to have missed my point. Every argument you try to use in favor of your book as some sort of credible evidence, can be used by others in favor of their contradictory book.
A muslim can claim to have known and tested his koran as well. same as a hindu or a sihk. Statements like this rarely do anything to move the discussion forward.
If you point to a verse in the bible that claims Yahweh created humans, a hindu can point to an opposing verse saying brahma did so, and a muslim can do the same in regards to Allah. if you want to point to scripture, which is an unsubstantiated claim, then you must provide some sort of evidence to back it up.
I, buda, point to the book of the god of buda!
Actually, I'm not pointing because I don't want you finding and reading it and then getting a share of my god, but I do point myself to it.
jaephoenix: 1. How come the definition of soul differs from person to person? 2. How come soul is what is differentiating people? Does it have color or sound?
jaephoenix: Engaging DTruthSpeaker in a logical debate is an excellent exercise in futility. Worse is getting him to understand scientific phenomena, and to make matters worse, he's an extremist. An ignorant religious extremist is disaster. Dude is as smart as a brick wall And he says he's a lawyer. Like wtf
Now, don't you think we'd be better off asking him to prove he's a lawyer than prove some imaginary unseen god he has cooked up in his head?
benalvino3: tell me who is the cult leader, Trump or Tucker? Even a cult member like Tucker can change his mind. the same cannot be said about you. We can conclude you are worse than the cult.
You are the cult member, Ben. And we are working really hard to disentangle you from the cult you are in because we have faith in you.