Cap28's Posts

Nairaland Forum › Cap28's Profile › Cap28's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 (of 199 pages)

Foreign Affairs › Re: The Lies Against Brother Leader Muammar Gaddafi by cap28: 1:03am On Nov 11, 2011

kodewrita:
Ut the crap, cap.

You might as well blame them for sleeping with Hitler's mum.

Hitler is solely responsible for all the horrors attributed to him.

The Bolsheviks irrespective of the source of their funding, cannot escape responsibility for their actions.

Active agents are as culpable as the forces behind them and even more culpable because in the final analysis the final decision rests with them.

And to educate you my dear misguided friend. The Nazis nationalised Ford factories like so many other businesses and handed them over to armaments producers like the Krupps to produce on behalf of Germany.
So they were effectively under German control NOT AMERICAN.

okay fine, beleive whatever you want to believe.

It is common knowledge to most informed people that the nazi war effort was financed by prominent american corporations.

ford motors in germany was a subsidiary of the american branch and it WAS NOT NATIONALISED BY THE NAZIS it was simply renamed ford werke but REMAINED UNDER AMERICAN CONTROL - it supplied armoured vehicles to the nazi SS and Henry ford the founder was a personal friend of Adolph Hitler and wrote a book entitled - the international jew: the world's problem, ford motors was awarded one of the highest honours during the nazi regime as recognition for his contribution to the war effort.

ford motors is just one of a few other american financiers which aided and abetted the nazi regime, others were general motors,chrysler JP Morgan, Rockefeller, General Electric Company, Standard Oil, National City Bank, Chase and Manhattan banks, Kuhn, Loeb and Company -

a german company by the name of IG farben was responsible for building the concentration camps and producing the chemicals which were used to gas jews to death - this company had americans on its board of directors - and it purchased its fuel from american oil company - Standard Oil owned by the rockefeller family -

this is all documented - you can research it.

Foreign Affairs › Re: Whites Opinions Of Africans by cap28: 11:04pm On Nov 10, 2011

^^^^^^

morpheus24:
stay focused numskull. She bolded it because I mispelled it in my original post plus many Afrikaaners trace multiple roots from French hugenots, Dutch, British and Portugese settlers so she can be MOSTLY Dutch AFRIKAANS or a combination of the others.

Intuitively from her name SA lassie one can deduce that she is likely has "English descent as well.

I could be wrong though!

lets give you a round of applause for taking the time to explain in minute detail the lineage of a purported white person on a nigerian forum.

i find it mildly amusing when domesticated house negroes like yourself fall over themselves to defend the very people who have done nothing but keep you in a permanent state of subservience.

Einstein im tired of this your "yassa massa" routine, for heavens sake get up off your knees and learn to be a man for once in your life.

Foreign Affairs › Re: Herman Cain! by cap28: 10:47pm On Nov 10, 2011

[quote author=tpia@ link=topic=794190.msg9525143#msg9525143 date=1320952110][img]http://bossip.files./2011/11/herman-and-gloria-cain1-e1320684075728.jpg?w=402[/img][/quote]ahh young love

well at least their marriage has stood the test of time.

Foreign Affairs › Re: Herman Cain! by cap28: 10:40pm On Nov 10, 2011

martinosi:
Dammmm yo! CAP28 went "HAM" on these Dude!, Please CAP28 Dont Hurt Em!!!!

I nearly fell of my chair!!!! Please CAP28, u know your mind is like
the size of[b] "Google's Back up Drive"[/b]!!! Please go easy on these "Pen Drive mentality" posters lol!!!

Foreign Affairs › Re: Whites Opinions Of Africans by cap28: 10:38pm On Nov 10, 2011

[quote author=sa_lassie link=topic=799835.msg9525638#msg9525638 date=1320956265]morpheus24, yes I am mostly [b]Afrika[/b]ans.[/quote]mostly Afrikaans - what does that mean?

i noticed you bolded afrika - i have a feeling that you're a nigerian pretending to be a white south african.

Foreign Affairs › Re: Whites Opinions Of Africans by cap28: 12:38am On Nov 10, 2011

^^^
then you need to go on to youtube and read some of the comments that the more "mainstream" whites make about africans and see if there's a huge difference.

Foreign Affairs › Re: A White Racist's Analysis Of Africa by cap28(op): 12:36am On Nov 10, 2011

frosbel:
^^

Do you sleep dreaming about white people and their racism

Wow !!!!

morpheus24:
Abeg help me ask am that question again!

Kai dan buru ba!

typical attitude of the cowardly nigerian - too foolish and ignorant to deal with the issues raised in the article - only good at tryign to attack the bearer of the message - no wonder it was so easy for the europeans to conquer us - with weak punks like you lot in our midst we have no hope.

Foreign Affairs › Re: Herman Cain! by cap28: 12:24am On Nov 10, 2011

^^^^^

Mutant Chimp - how is that your massive forehead? has it developed a life of its own yet?

i noticed you took that your awful picture down so fast after we crucified you over it - next time you put it up make sure you attach a warning first cos i had some serious nightmares after seeing it grin

Foreign Affairs › Re: Herman Cain! by cap28: 11:33pm On Nov 09, 2011

yawwwwwwwwwwwwwn!!!!!
who cares whether he harassed her or not- he's just another black puppet being wheeled out to oversee the final phase of america's fast approaching economic collapse - if he wins he will not stop the rising unemployment , the foreclosures and the rising poverty amongst blacks in america.

Foreign Affairs › Re: A White Racist's Analysis Of Africa by cap28(op): 10:33pm On Nov 09, 2011

^^^

yes i read some of them and you can see how contemptous they are of africans, i wish more nigerians could wake up and understand how these people see us, it will provide us with the much needed kick up the backside to do something to change our situation.

one thing i have to say though is that his analysis of neo colonialism in africa is very accurate.

Foreign Affairs › Re: A White Racist's Analysis Of Africa by cap28(op): 2:55pm On Nov 09, 2011

But Neocolonialism could only work when applied to weak states, of which Africa has plenty. Some African rulers, buoyed up by Islam, Communism, or Arab Nationalism, could escape its grasp. Examples here include Nasser in Egypt, Gaddafi in Libya, and Mengistu in Ethiopia. Against such rulers, Neocolonialism could do little except play a waiting game.

Nor was Neocolonialism always negative. Under its first president Houphouët-Boigny, Ivory Coast saw particularly good relations with its ex-colonial power, France, and the development of the country’s coffee and cocoa crops, with a large influx of foreign labour from poorer Northern countries like Burkina Faso and French experts who helped run everything from the army and economic planning to the cocoa harvest. This gave the country one of the highest standards of living in post-colonial Africa, leading to the term “The Ivorian Miracle,” although problems started to set in following the slump in the price of its main export cocoa in the 1980s.

[b]Many of the coups and revolutions in post-colonial African history that otherwise look so random and pointless, and seem like the result of tribalism or over-ambitious army officers, start to make more sense in the context of Neocolonialism. Ivory Coast is a good example. In 1999, Houphouët-Boigny’s successor, Henri Konan Bédié, was removed by a coup; while in 2002 an attempted coup tried to remove Laurent Gbagbo, and ended up splitting the country into Northern and Southern halves. Unlike their esteemed predecessor, both these leaders succeeded in antagonizing France, most noticeably by attempting to shore up their positions through mobilizing resentment against immigrant labourers and foreign economic interests.

But old-fashioned Neocolonialism of the type that was behind removing Bédié and putting and keeping Mabuto in power in the Congo had to rely on low-key opportunism and subtle methods. The public back home could not be made too aware of the bribery, contacts with thugs and tyrants, weapons smuggling, and occasional employment of small groups of mercenaries. The environment of the Cold War also meant that Neocolonialism had to tread softly, so much so that even petty dictators like Robert Mugabe, who could benefit from the crutch of having a White population to oppress, were able to defy it.

But the soaring need for African commodities combined with the festering apathy of Africans, who, after 50 years of being tyrannized and brutalized by their own kind, have largely lost their faith in the dream of independence, has led to a major revamping of Neocolonialism, so much so that it has effectively become something else that can best be termed “Global-colonialism” because (a) it is designed to subordinate Africa to the global division of economic functions, (b) the moral justification for the system hinges on globalist “humanitarian values,” and (c) its chief agents are the key globalist nations, America, Britain and France.[/b]

The system retains many of the methods of Neocolonialism, including setting tribe against tribe, extensive bribery, weapons smuggling, and giving the green light to those with their own axe to grind. But there are also important differences:

Unlike Neocolonialism, which preferred long-term rulers and only sought to remove leaders who were uncooperative, Global-colonialism has a preference for shorter-term leaders and places more emphasis on elections. This actually creates more leverage as rulers constantly need the endorsement of the West. Even if elections produce the “wrong” result, they can always be declared invalid due to ballot fraud or corruption as these phenomena are always present in any African election.
While Neocolonialism tended to be low-key and avoided publicity, Global-colonialism is noisy and demonstrative. It always tries to involve the media, which is one of its key arms. (In the event that the individuals and groups it elevates turn out to be Al-Qaeda sympathizers or genocidal thugs, expect Orwellian U-turns and the full exploitation of the public’s short attention span and near total ignorance of Africa.)
Global-colonialism is prepared to use much greater military force. This includes the smuggling of larger quantities of arms than before, as well as higher calibre weapons, such as the Ukrainian tanks the U.S. was caught smuggling to the Southern Sudanese rebels through Kenya in 2008. It also includes direct military intervention of the kind that removed Gbagbo and prevented Gaddafi crushing the Libyan rebellion. There is a preference for air power and specialist ground forces rather than the kind of heavily involved military intervention that has occurred in other parts of the world. Cost may be a factor. Nevertheless, this is certainly a step up from the old days of “The Dogs of War.”
To justify such military action, “human rights” and “protecting the civilian population” are tirelessly invoked. However, such “Totalitarian Humanism” can be applied very selectively, as we see in the case of Ivory Coast, where massacres by the French- and UN-approved rebels did not result in any military action being taken except on behalf of the same rebels.
There is a willingness to change borders as seen in Sudan and the suggestion that Libya too might be partitioned.
Perhaps because the system is new, Global-colonialism places great importance on getting someone—indeed anyone—to sign the chit for its actions. This is supposed to give a disinterested gloss to any intervention. Ideally, the signer should be the United Nations, but other suitable candidates include the African Union, the Arab League, or even, I suspect, the local chapter of the Abidjan Boy Scouts.

http://www.alternativeright.com/main/the-magazine/africa-and-the-new-world-order/#disqus_thread

Foreign Affairs › A White Racist's Analysis Of Africa by cap28(op): 2:46pm On Nov 09, 2011

Wednesday, 20 April 2011
Africa and the New World Order

By Colin Liddell Comments (31) Print

To paraphrase Harold Macmillan, a “wind of change” is blowing through Africa. But, unlike 1960, when the former British Prime Minister made his famous remark, the wind today is not that of a growing national consciousness in the mud huts and shanty-towns, but instead the stiff breeze of a new kind of Neocolonialism.

Already this year, we have seen significant events in three places: Sudan, Libya, and most recently Ivory Coast, where the country’s President, Laurent Gbagbo was successfully removed from power with the active military participation of France and the United Nations. In these three cases we can see the emerging lineaments of a new modus operandi in Africa, one that secretly recognizes the limitations of African society and under a false flag of humanitarian concern ruthlessly exploits what the continent has to offer.

To understand what is happening, we need to bear in mind Africa’s very specific role in the greater global economic order. In fact, this also explains a lot about its history. In order to maximize economic efficiency in the last few decades, the world has seen a major separating-out of the key economic functions, rather like the division of labour described by Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations, and while any racial implications in this reorganization are strenuously denied, much of it is based on the inherent characters of different national and racial groups.

For example, the qualities of the Germans and the Asians have marked them out as the world’s premier manufacturers; while the individualism, extravagance, sense of entitlement, and former economic greatness of North Americans and some Europeans make them the perfect global consumer class. While many may look askance at citing consumption as an important economic function, in our overproducing global economic system it is vital. Without the massive trade deficits of the West, the rest of the World would be sunk. Indeed, it is the world’s overwhelming need for a major consumer that more than anything shores up America’s increasingly hollow power.

It may have been the dawning sense of this new global “division of labour” that hastened the removal of the old colonial system from Africa rather than any impetus caused by the largely feeble efforts of African nationalism. Although colonialism certainly taught the African to hate the White man by driving home his inferiority in a number of key indices, [b]anyone who has lived in Africa, as I have, will know that petty tribalism, and not broad-based nationalism, has been and is always likely to be the driving force in that considerable part of the world.

So, what use does the global economic order have for Africa? Sadly, the Africans are terrible producers, lacking the precision, conscientiousness, group ethic, and self-sacrificing qualities needed to constitute a hard-working, reliable industrial population. Not to mention the issue of IQ! They are equally inept when it comes to consumption, and not only because of their proverbial penury and otherwise laudable penchant for reusing every piece of junk that comes their way. Even when they have money to burn, they seem more attracted to simple bling than to acquiring the wide variety of gizmos, gadgets, home appliances, bric-a-brac, and exotic interests that support vast export industries. The lack of protection accorded property in Africa also plays an important role in disqualifying them from this key economic function.[/b]

This means that Africa’s economic destiny is simply to be a raw material source—oil, gas, minerals, and a few tropical crops—something for which its still relatively virgin vastness makes it an ideal candidate. In the past this was always the case, although then it was gold, ivory, and slaves that slowly turned the wheels of commerce. Nobody thought the continent was worth bothering about beyond this, especially the Sub-Saharan portion. That was until the discovery of the Americas, two virgin continents that proved eminently more developable.

The tragic shortage of labour in the fast developing New World, in large part caused by European diseases, led to the unfortunate institution of the trans-Atlantic slave trade, and while the labour mobilized at the crack of whip played a key role in working sugar cane plantations and silver mines, the partial success of the system also fostered the mistaken belief among Europeans that Africa and the Africans had the same sort of economic potential as anywhere and anyone else in the World. All it would take would be a few guns, Bibles, and copies of Samuel Smiles Self-Help to turn Bulawayo into Chicago.

This is how 19th-century colonialism really should be seen—as a vote of confidence by Europeans in the capabilities and ultimate potential of the Black man. Without the belief that the African could ultimately become just as economically upstanding as the European or Asian, the great 19th-century wave of colonization and investment in the Dark Continent would never have happened.

Harold Macmillan’s Winds of Change speech probably marks the point when European colonialists and capitalists realized that the game was up and that, for one reason or another, Africa was never going to be America or Japan, leapfrogging from wilderness or agrarian backwater to economic greatness.

Once the colonialists upped sticks, merely allowing Africa to revert to its wild state was not an option. In the period before colonization, various goods from the interior had naturally trickled down to the European and Arab trading posts and forts dotted along the coast. However, in the post-colonial period the kind of amounts produced by this process were wholly insufficient. Although the flags were lowered, Africa had to be kept on tap. This is what determined the characteristics of Neocolonialism: a system that could get the raw materials out more efficiently than the natives would left to themselves. Absolute efficiency was not required as that would simply flood the market and reduce profits, but some quickening of Africa’s natural tendencies was required.

The characteristics of the system of Neocolonialism that emerged included:

Creating and maintaining vast ethnic and tribal patchwork states that ignored the principle of local self-determination

Fostering tribal divisions to keep the states weak, encourage tyranny, and to exert leverage on the rulers

Various forms of bribery, including corporate bribery, foreign “aid,” and other incentives

Granting major Western corporations carte-blanche exploitation rights and allowing them access to cheap unskilled labour to supplement imported skilled labour

Occasional, low-key military intervention

The most successful African dictators, like the Congo’s Joseph Mobutu and Ivory Coast’s Félix Houphouët-Boigny, realized that their role was to facilitate raw material extraction, rather than develop their countries or challenge the ex-colonial masters. They instinctively understood that their slice of the profits should be used in ways the Neocolonialists found non-threatening—depositing the money in Swiss banks, for example, importing European haute-couture, or building shining palaces or cathedrals in the jungle.

http://www.alternativeright.com/main/the-magazine/africa-and-the-new-world-order/#disqus_thread

Foreign Affairs › Re: The Lies Against Brother Leader Muammar Gaddafi by cap28: 12:12pm On Nov 09, 2011

kodewrita:
Pro-libyan yes. Prowestern no.

I support libyans fighting for their freedom. I support helping them topple a dictator. I support removing a dictator who refuses to leave peacefully. I could care less what the West think.

Saddam didn't need to have WMDs. His mere existence was a continued insult to every right-thinking individual. Anyman who would kill thousands of Kurds(his citizens) and Iranians with chemical weapons does not deserve our pity.

Vietnam was justified but badly handled. Communism has been conclusively proven to be a soulless, impractical and doomed ideology. Allowing vietnam to fall easily would have led to the fall of countries way more mportant( Indonesia, Malaysia). Vietnam just like Korea sent a message that america was willing to shed blood to stop the spread of communism. Am I happy they did? Definitely. A godless ideolody that downplays basic human liberties for some obscure perfect human ideal needs to be killed @ all costs (Nazism, Communism, Fascism, Institutionalized Slavery).

Your ignorance is sooo glaring - i would advise you to find out who funded the bolshevik revolution in russia - here is a clue - they owned (and their descendants still own) the international banking cartels and many of them spoke with american accents.

The Nazis were funded by the US govt - research the role that major US corporations played in arming and funding Hitler - research the background of companies like Ford motors - did you know that they had armaments factories in Nazi Germany where army trucks were built and assembled for the Nazis - did you knwo that US fighter pilots were instructed by the US govt not to drop bombs on any Ford assembly plants in germany during the second world war?

You dont know the half of it my friend.

Foreign Affairs › Re: The Lies Against Brother Leader Muammar Gaddafi by cap28: 12:00pm On Nov 09, 2011

some fools still think saddam was removed because he was "murdering his own people" - saddam was muredered because he stopped accepting the US dollar in exchange for his oil and started using the euro -this one act would have meant that other oil importing nations would have had to pull out of the dollar as well and start trading in euros - which would have led to the subsequent end of the US dollar as the world's reserve currency.

Qadaffi went even further than Sadam and came up with a single african currency backed by gold which would enable african countries to dictate the price of their commodities thereby giving them greater control over their own economies - this among many other reasons was what led to him being allegedly executed by NATO.

By the way the gas that saddam used to slaughter the kurds was bought from the US defence contractors, Cheney and Rumsfeld negotiated these contracts - they also armed and funded him to wage war on Iran hoping that at the end both countries would be so weakened from war that they would both implode giving the americans the opportunity to move in and take over, i just wish some people on this forum would try researching history for once in their lives.

Politics › Re: The Daft Nigerian Intelligence Agency by cap28: 2:57pm On Nov 07, 2011

Beaf:
^
Crap28, comrade brother!
Do you still see Gaddafi alive in your yellow-eyed feverish dreams?

Who argues with a mad man that is convinced that Gaddafi is still alive? Maybe even swinging from bolts of lightening above the firmament and bestowing gifts on fawning mankind like the new Jesus?
Taken your meds today? No?
You should be sectioned, sir.

hahaha - how long did it take you to retract your tongue from GEJ's butt hole? or can you eat and write sh.it at the same time?

I'd rather have feverish dreams about a man who refused to enslave his people to the IMF and World bank than spend all my time worshipping a dim wit who spends his whole time on his knees saying "yes oga madam" to Hillary Clinton, like your idol does, tell me - is it true that GEJ has to stop off at the US ambassador's residence every morning to sweep their compound, make the beds and prepare breakfast?

being a subservient fisherman with zero intelligence that should come naturally.

Health › Re: Nigerian Nurse's Licence Withdrawn In Uk For Calling On Jesus For Help! by cap28: 2:45pm On Nov 07, 2011

this nurse and many other nigerian religious fanatics like her are actually mentally ill, poverty and ignorance is a dangerous cocktail which pushes many nigerians like this woman into this kind of mindset.

I have come across many nigerians like this woman - common sense and rational thinking are not in their dictionary - in a normal society people like this woman are usually kept in psychiatric units in order to protect them from doing any damage to normal people.

i remember reading about another nigerian religious fanatic who actually jumped into the lion's enclosure in london zoo some years back because he was trying to mimic the story in the bible of daniel.

he was mauled so badly and lost a lot of blood, - fortunately for him the lions had just been fed and as a result he lived to tell the story.

if not for the timely intervention of the staff it would have turned out a lot differently for him

this is how far gone many nigerians are in their religious fanaticism.

Politics › Re: The Daft Nigerian Intelligence Agency by cap28: 2:28pm On Nov 07, 2011

logica:
Why should they be the ones to proffer solutions? Isn't that the work of the government? It's always funny when I see incapable people happy to fill positions and then be expecting the public who are not being paid a dime to assist them. If you are not capable, you have no business with the government (or any position of authority for that matter).

thank you bros - he doesnt demand accountability from the freeloading thiefs that have sold his birthright to the IMF and world bank, he doesnt demand answers from a clique of people who have impoverished him along with 90% of the population -no of course not - that would be asking for too much instead he expects those of us who are not even privy to the decision making process to be the ones to come up with the solutions - when i say our people on this forum are prize fools i mean it from the bottom of my heart.

Politics › Re: The Daft Nigerian Intelligence Agency by cap28: 2:23pm On Nov 07, 2011

belabela:
@ Cap 28

You seem to be well enlightened on how things work under the American empire. I often wonder at the reasoning of my Nigerian brothers and sisters. Gaddafi arrested and crush militants who had thesame ideology as Boko Haram in Libya and with the help of CIA and MI5 but thesame intelligence unit sold the news that Gaddafi imprison, tutored and kill his own people. And many Nigerians lifted up their voice in folly shouting how wicked Gaddafi was. Some even approve of how he was assassinated. Now Al-Qaeda flags are flying high in many cities in Libya and Shariah law has been imposed on the people.

We are having a taste of what Gaddafi crushed as a leader and the same people who called Gaddafi a wicked man are calling for intervention and want BH members to be crushed. Whether America helps us out or not some day they would use that to justify why Nigeria should be invaded because the government has committed many human rights offences by killing her citizens. Then the world would not be told that those killed were members of BokoHaram.

Every form of human government is a beast, whether it has human face or lion face they are all thesame.

Thank you my brother

Your statement about Qadaffi is 100% spot on.

In my opinion Boko Haram are a creation of US intelligence - just as the Al Qaeda/NTC militants are a creation of US intelligence - these extremists are created, trained and armed and are used to destabilise resource rich countries around the world - usually they overthrow regimes that are not towing the line - Qadaffi planned on creating a single african currency which would have undermined the US dollar - for this he had to go - the US govt had no qualms about using al qaeda militants to do the job.

the nigerian govt is a puppet of the US and britain but the one thing that the nigerian govt is doing which i beleive the US are not happy with is its trade with china.
watch how GEJ, OBJ and other nigerian puppets keep pussyfooting around these boko haram militants - its as if boko haram are the govt while GEJ and co are the impostors - have you ever seen anything like this before?

As you correctly stated a similar scenario occurred in Libya where western trained militants (Al Qaeda/NTC rebels ) were threatening to overthrow Qadaffi - as a result Qadaffi had to cut a deal with the US govt and the US govt handed all of them over to Qadaffi who (quite rightly) had most of them executed - unknown to Qadaffi the west were planning on double crossing him and using some of the surviving militants to overthrow him at a later date.

GEJ and co shoudl remember that as far as the west is concerned there is no such thing as a permanent friend - just permanent interests.

Health › Re: Nigerian Nurse's Licence Withdrawn In Uk For Calling On Jesus For Help! by cap28: 1:18pm On Nov 07, 2011

religious fanaticism is a huge cancer that has eaten deep into the psyche of many nigerians - the funny things is many of these religious fanatics are far from godly in their day to day life, many of them use religion to make themselves appear to be kind and caring people when their hearts are filled with pure evil.

another problem is the level of ignorance amongst these backward fanatics - this is the same way we fold our hands and pray for god to come down from heaven to remove our tyrannical leaders from office instead of actually taking the bull by the horns and doing something to change things ourselves - most nigerians are virtually human vegetables as a result of this slavish and sheepish adherence to an alien religion.

if only we could understand that this same religion is what was used to make us s.tupid and docile and keep us enslaved to the white man.

Politics › Re: The Daft Nigerian Intelligence Agency by cap28: 12:56pm On Nov 07, 2011

Beaf:
This post is disgusting and ill-bred.

@frosbel
Your analysis is correct. We need to really be looking at outside strategies to combat the menace of boko haram; it is common-sense that we should do everything to cooperate with with the powers that be over what is evidently part of the global threat of al qaeda. We really do not want the US to invite itself in when it is too late for us to direct their intervention in a way that benefits us; it will only take the death of a single American for marines to hit our shores and dictate the tune.

Your breathtaking stupidity is a wonder to behold - how is it that nigeria who can not even defend herself from being overrun by any western nation will now be in a position to dictate the tune to the US.

A nation which has just recently finished unleashing an unprovoked attack on a sovereign state (Libya) and is getting ready to attack Iran along with the UK and Israel - do they strike you as a nation that nigeria could ever dream of dictating to?

Have you ever researched world history in your life before? Are you aware that america is an empire?

are you aware that it controls ALMOST ALL OF THE WORLD'S RESOURCES?

dummy go and ask your master GEJ who he takes his orders from - while you're at it, ask him why he met with US ambassador to nigeria Johnny Carson before members of his own govt after being sworn in as Acting President.

Politics › Re: The Daft Nigerian Intelligence Agency by cap28: 12:48pm On Nov 07, 2011

frosbel:
If indeed there was or is an intelligence department in Nigeria, the recent recurrences of bombing and maiming is enough proof to conclude they are not intelligent.

Sadly to add , we have a department of Nigeria homeland security who are as useless as a bike without wheels.

President Jonathan's rule has been sabotaged by some senior members of the Boko Haram sect in government.
It is high time that we get in the FBI , M16 and Mossad to help us root out these hoodlums. The Nigerian Intelligence Agency is so useless and inconsequential , we might as well assume they do not exist.

Never should it be heard that the daily loss of live in Nigeria is as common as the call of nature, 100s of lives lost on a weekly basis and no solution in sight.

If you are in government and or in some high position and read this, please start a movement to deliver us from this stigma called Boko Haram. We cannot continue to live like this.

No need, nigeria is already crawling with the above mentioned foreign intelligence operatives.

when IBB was in power MOSSAD provided him with intelligence and protected him from being overthrown

Shell BP is crawling with MI6 - this was highlighted in the wikileaks "expose" british intelligence has documented evidence on many nigerian officials which they use from time to time to blackmail them when it suits them.

The CIA were responsible for installing most of nigeria's heads of states - the most notable being IBB and OBJ - so dont worry they already know whats going on (they are behind it) but like many nigerians who dont read and research history you have no clue

all puppet govts work in collaboration with foreign intelligence agencies

Foreign Affairs › Re: West Undermining African Self-determination – Mbeki by cap28: 12:35pm On Nov 07, 2011

^^^
how much are they paying you in that your miserable cleaning job in london?

how does it feel to go to bed on a full stomach and have 24 hours of electricity and running water? is this why you are so in awe of the white man? is this why you swallow all his lies without question?

do you think that you will have a job if there is mass unemployment of whites in the UK? do you seriously think you will be welcome in the UK if thousands of white europeans start losing their jobs?

you better get your tongue out of whiteys arse fast cos when the sh.it hits the fan he will throw you under the bus so fast your feet wont touch the ground.

Foreign Affairs › Re: Is Obama Likely To Win His Relection Bid In The States? by cap28: 12:16pm On Nov 07, 2011

^^^^^

hahaha - here we have a sheep who beleives that gadaffi was a bad guy despite providing the highest standard of living in africa for his people and the good guys are the ones who dropped bombs on innocent men women and children and looked the other way while black libyans and other african immigrants were beheaded, tortured and in one case strapped whilen still alive to an anti aircraft rocket - these are your heroes -

no the reason you dont argue with me is because you can not defend your position - you are one of those subservient nigerians who is so grateful to have escaped starvation and poverty in nigeria that being in the presence of a white man is like being in the presence of God - your motto is white man good - black man bad - they say ignorance is bliss - but i think in your own case i would say ignorance is a curse.

Politics › Re: Bomb Attacks Possible In Abuja This Week - US Embassy by cap28: 11:58am On Nov 07, 2011

Beaf:
It is only a matter of time before the US army sets up in Nigeria and engages in a scorched earth engagement with Islamic extremists in the North. They are the ones calling for the marines.

Personally, I would welcome the mighty power of the US to straighten one or two minds.

Of course you would welcome the "mighty power of the US" you know why? because you are too braindead to understand that they are the ones orchestrating this whole boko haram campaign in the first place, read my lips: the war on terror is a creation of the american intelligence organisation - they are looking for an excuse to occupy your land and FULLY APPROPRIATE YOUR OIL RESERVES THEREBY BLOCKING CHINA'S ACCESS TO THEM

every oil rich nation that is not fully under US military occupation/control is now under attack - your precious goodluck has no say in the matter any more - very soon all decisions concerning nigeria's oil reserves are going to be made by the US Africa Command - get ready for the second phase of slavery.

You were laughing at Qadaffi's demise the other day - the demise of your own country is staring you in the face and you are too dumb and blind to see it.

If you are capable of doing so - take a look at every oil rich nation which america has invaded/occupied - what is the standard of living of the people in those countries like?
nigeria - has some of the world's dumbest people!

Foreign Affairs › Re: Is Obama Likely To Win His Relection Bid In The States? by cap28: 11:20am On Nov 07, 2011

justwise:
You are actually brain dead, Occupy Wallt-street is about greedy bankers and corporate society, its not only in America, Uk and other EU countries witness the same demonstration.

They were not killed for demonstrating unlike your hero Gaddafi and other dictators would have done

do you live in the real world or a fantasy one?

why is it that the average american or european know fully well that they're govts are liars, murderers and hypocrites and yet you who claim to live in the west are still wrapped up in disney world - WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOUR BRAIN?

here you have an american explaining in a very matter of fact way why gadaffi was removed and you still sit here spewing the western corporate media's garbage:

[flash=300,300]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCBPEeWrXac[/flash]

Foreign Affairs › Re: Is Obama Likely To Win His Relection Bid In The States? by cap28: 11:06am On Nov 07, 2011

martinosi please forget justwise he's on another planet grin

Dr Warren said something really interesting in this video clip - he said that america assisted china's economic rise by allowing the transfer of their technology and outsourcing all of their manufacturing capacity to them - im confused - if this is the case - why is america blocking chinese access to oil resources in africa?

I dont think the american corporations thought this whole thing through, looks like they were only thinking of making a quick buck from china's cheap labour without realising the consequences for their own economy in terms of mass unemployment.

do you agree with the doc that unemployment in the US might hit 40% by next year because of the scarcity of jobs?

Foreign Affairs › Re: Is Obama Likely To Win His Relection Bid In The States? by cap28: 10:25pm On Nov 06, 2011

martinosi:
President Obama may have just served his Purpose of Opening up Africa for the Corporate Elite
Masters that control Him

See video Below

[flash=200,200]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0X1vN3wZYw[/flash]

hey my man i totally agree - Obama was used to fool and trick gullible blacks into beleiving that we have now reached the promised land.

many of these dim wits are blissfully unaware that Obama is nothing more than an enforcer - he was brought in to enforce the dictates of the multinational corporations and the international banking cartels.
He has no real power - he is nothing more than a wall street puppet.

I think its a waste of time trying to educate the likes of justwise as people like him are beyond help -

The people who really understand whats going on in america are of course people like the former reagan adviser Dr Paul Craig roberts in your video or this african american theologian Dr Lee Warren:

[flash=300,300]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUbbYpxD2Ys&feature/related[/flash]

[flash=300,300]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCo8I1-41nk&feature/related[/flash]

Politics › Re: Only Prayers Can Sustain A Nation - GEJ by cap28: 9:46pm On Nov 06, 2011

the truth of the matter is that GEJ is way out of his depth and lost control of the situation a long time ago - but the question that is yet to be answered is - who is behind boko haram?

Foreign Affairs › Re: An Excerpt On Obj And Usa by cap28: 4:16pm On Nov 06, 2011

THE CIA IN NIGERIA:
COUPS PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE
Source: http://www.africa2000.com/bndx/BAO232.htm

THE U.S. CONGRESS INVESTIGATES THE MURDER OF FOREIGN LEADERS BY THE C.I.A. AND CALLS FOR A PRESIDENTIAL DECREE TO END THE PRACTICE. MEANWHILE, THE ECONOMY GOES INTO A TAILSPIN BECAUSE OF RISING OIL PRICES AND A NEAR-COMPLETE OIL EMBARGO AGAINST THE WEST. [b]JUST WHEN PUBLIC PRESSURE MOUNTS FOR A REFORM OF THE GOVERNMENT'S SECRET OPERATIONS OVERSEAS, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE SINGLE-MOST IMPORTANT OIL SUPPLYING NATION FALLS INTO NATIONALIST HANDS. THE PRESIDENTIAL ORDER IS PREPARED AND SIGNED -- BUT NOT UNTIL FIVE DAYS AFTER A COUP PUTS NIGERIA FIRMLY UNDER 'FRIENDLY' RULE. WAS IT COINCIDENCE OR CONSPIRACY? SUSPICIONS STILL LINGER,

At the time of the infamous 1976 coup that put Olusegun Obasanjo in power, there was little in the way of concrete evidence linking him to the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. But over the years that followed, Obasanjo became a highly visible part of a complex network developed by the United States government to wage political and economic warfare against Nigeria.

A series of formerly-secret cables between Lagos and Washington, along with other documents from government and private sources, reveal ties between Obasanjo and at least two groups working closely with the CIA -- and also make it appear likely that the recent plot to overthrow the Nigerian military government originated in Washington. [/b]

Destabilisation Campaign
When Muritala Mohammed was killed on 13 February 1976, suspicions were widespread that the CIA had a hand in assassination. This much is reflected in a secret report prepared by the U.S. Information Agency, the propaganda office that oversees VOA broadcasts and U.S. Information Service (USIS) installations around the world. The USIS 1976 Country Plan for Nigeria, declassified only five years ago, acknowledged that the political climate in Nigeria following Mohammed's assassination had been one of "uncertainty, distrust and suspicion." It further advised, "Charges of U.S. (CIA) backing for the attempted coup were prevalent [and] the Chancery and all USIS posts were physically attacked."

The USIS document leaves no doubt about American intentions toward Africa's most populous nation. Indeed, the same confidential report called Nigeria "the primary external source of crude oil for the United States," and repeatedly stressed the need for increased American influence.

Many of the State Department's Nigeria cables for the months prior to the assassination of Brig. Muritala Mohammed are still classified. Others, which have been released to investigators in recent years, are inconclusive. But the record nonetheless illustrates the paranoia that existed in the United States at the time about access to oil and about Nigeria's growing capability to influence the rest of the continent.

A 26 September 1975 communique complains, for instance, that Nigeria had supplied several thousands of dollars to leaders of the then-banned African National Congress in Lusaka. Another, written in January of 1976 and classified as "confidential," cited rhetoric heard with increasing frequency from Nigerian leaders about the "uncompromising supremacy of Nigeria's national interest," as well as opposition to what Mohammed himself had reportedly described as "blackmail and vicious propaganda" from the west.

Perhaps worst of all was the unpardonable sin committed by Mohammed when he declined an official visit by U.S. Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger which was proposed for May of 1976.

U.S.intelligence-gathering operations likewise escalated at an alarming pace during Mohammed's rule. In a 20 January 1976 cable from Lagos to Washington, for example, U.S. Ambassador Donald Easum warned:

"If Nigeria wants to use oil as a political weapon to promote its foreign policy, this would not necessarily involve further nationalisation. But could mean FMG is considering ways it might assert greater control over which consuming countries get Nigerian oil, depending on positions those countries take on foreign policies issues of interest to Nigeria. We understand several other possibly important papers/addresses delivered at senior officers meeting, reportedly including Un/Ife scholar's advocacy of Nigeria's using oil weapon. We and consul Ibadan will attempt obtain relevant papers and will report further if warranted."

And yet another secret dispatch, written less than two weeks before Mohammed was killed, hints that U.S. officials were prepared to sabotage Nigeria's booming economy. Nigeria, wrote Ambassador Easum on 2 February 1976, "desires to play leadership role, [and will] require modern army if its power (within African context) is to be credible. Further, it likely that given foreseeable internal political realities, Nigeria will maintain relatively large army for some time to come."

The same telegram listed a series of modern weapons likely to be acquired by the Nigerian government, and asserted the belief that a "civilian government might exercise a more restraint." But it ended on an even more bitter note:

"One development would act as a constraint on Nigerian arms purchases: a sharp drop in the price of petroleum. Defence budget would presumably have to be cut proportionately with fall in revenue if government were to meet minimum developmental and social demands on its resources. Easum."

http://www.dawodu.com/cia1.htm

Politics › Re: Olusegun Obasanjo. Like Or Loathe Him, Is The Greatest Living Nigerian. by cap28: 2:22pm On Nov 06, 2011

General buhari thanks for posting those excerpts on that criminal - the sooner we open our eyes and stop acting like sheep the better for all of us - this man still wields a lot of power behind the scenes and is responsible for lumbering us with that other clueless puppet GEJ.

Foreign Affairs › Re: Us/britain Prepare For War Against Iran by cap28(op): 2:31pm On Nov 05, 2011

world war 3 predicted last year:

[flash=300,300]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6C8UzRnodw&feature/related[/flash]

Foreign Affairs › Re: Iran 'Is Ready For War' - Are we headed for World War 3 ? by cap28: 1:43pm On Nov 05, 2011

^^^^^^

i agree, i have no sympathy for the iranians following their traitorous betrayal of libya,

in my opinion it doesnt matter whether they are developing nuclear weapons or not because Israel, the US and the UK are determined to attack them and they will use any pretext in order to get their way, with libya the lie was they needed to intervene in order to protect civillians now with iran its - we need to stop them from developing a nuclear bomb - the question this time around is - will china and russia sit back and watch from the sidelines like they did with libya?

[flash=300,300]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqpi3oX8kB8&feature=related[/flash]

just to add i misread your post above - i acutally dont give a damn about what happens to iran

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 (of 199 pages)