Chimex38's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Chimex38's Profile › Chimex38's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 (of 119 pages)
Youngzedd:@Bolded Unfortunately crude oil among other global commodities are exceptions to this rule.. I suppose whole-sale byproducts as well especially as DR is located in a free Trade zone |
Agbalowomeri: ![]() I doubt if even COVID can do that stunt again. ![]() |
Streetinvestor2:Be calming down... ee go better |
Mpeace:They just need a benefit of doubt until 2027 when their latest modus operandi will end ![]() Afterall, dem dey premium board, so them no go dey do anyhow. |
KarlTom:be like lawyer n Court fees bin dey inclusive for the Davido $30bn Account matter. Now wey ee be out of Court things, na bargain Price sure pass.. Na guess I dey guess ni Make this case kuku settle make Otudeko fit drink water drop Cup. ![]() |
GeneralDae:Seplat is already to the moon.. Na Sun now eee day target for share price ![]() |
Agbalowomeri:Zenith bank has officially joined the bank-Brokerage gang. They seem to be learning tge ropes gradually |
GeneralDae:thanks for the update.. But it still suggests the deal isn't finalised yet.. From the page, they even had to delay the crude-shipment at the sea pending whether the naira-crude deal will continue or not. But the major issue isn't the crude-Naira deal, it's the quantity. @297kbpd you quoted is even less than 50% of DR requirement. Depending solely on Nigeria will run DR bankrupt. He will and is currently sourcing from outside. https://businessday.ng/news/article/dangote-refinery-eyes-higher-imports-amid-talks-on-naira-for-crude-deal/ Seems NNPC in all their joint ventures don't have enough to go around after deducting statutory obligation. But I am coming from the angle that the future-oil-contract sale might just be a blessing in disguise given current global price and possibly low demand. (though I don't know the terms of the sale-contract)
|
zendi:The Nigerian Mafia ![]() Those ones don't have crude to beg Dangote to take again. They have sold all of them 5-10 years in advance if not more.. Shey u dey read the latest shenanigans and tit-for-tat playing out in the Crude-for-Naira Deal? ( to be or not to be going forward) I think the mafias will be better off if crude price crashes. As they have already sold our crude 5yrs in advance at a costlier rate of $70 and above before Drill-baby-Drill ascension to power. ![]() So weather low prices + low crude demand worldwide.. The so called mafias have secured their future clients.. |
Youngzedd:Lol.. @ Ad spaces.. ![]() When ee go strike, na spaces go dey do the Ads Free-of-Charge.. ![]() |
Padipadi:Its not programmed. If it were, same questions by everybody as well as repeated questions will produce the same answers to every one.. It's responses are not programmed. |
KarlTom:With Aradels 41.67% ownership of NDWestern and 20.84% of Reinessance through ND western, That breakdown suggests/Infers: ND western holds about about 50.01% stake in Reinessance and by extension, also about 50.01% stake in the Shell acquisition as well.(20.84/0.4167) Thus ND western are the majority holders of the consortium-Renaissance. Therefore by extension, baring any other single majority holder in NDWestern (verification needed), it can be inferred that ARADEL with an assumed single majority of 41.67% stake in ND western==> who in turn owns a calculated-known majority stake of 50.01% in Reinessance, is the Outright Majority holder of Reinessance Energy consortium with a strong controlling and decision making interest despite its 33.34% stake. Summary: Aradel is the Outright Majority holder of Reinessance Energy with 33.34% stake. The rest of the consortium outside NDWestern will make do with ==> 37.49%. 100%-(50.01% +12.5%) I hope I dey make sense? ![]()
|
SonofElElyonRet:The guess is on the premise that UBA fully comes to the market for the 40-45% balance of their capitalisation. If they break the capitalisation method to include PP or debt instrument. It might not happen. |
courage89:@Bolded if Na you nko? ![]() Though I just think his Oil business aren't much in their numbers yet and as competitive as their peers.. Him never get wetin him want from that oil sector yet. |
BabsO2:I guess interim will be sustained or a little more. They still need to capitalize. The general public will also need incentive as RI. |
BabsO2:Say no more ![]() https://nairametrics.com/2025/03/12/billionaire-tony-elumelus-net-worth-surges-to-2-15bn-as-heirs-holdings-firms-see-record-growth/ |
BabsO2:U be really Pro-Elumelu ![]() On his Mandate ![]() |
Valthegreat:As @Mpeace has stated and shown and to throw more Light. Those with 100% ownership-transcorp takes the top level decisions in those, manage staff and daily resources and directly operate the company.. Those between 50-70%, Transcorp probably makes the top level critical board decisions. I don't think they directly manage the staff, resources or day to day running of the company.. A holding company makes major decisions in all of its subsidiaries. By holding at least 50% or majority stake in all its acquisitions, transcorp is a holding company. Also, there are others not listed on NGX like the Afam Power companies, Transcorp crude oil (OPL 281), Transcorp hotel Portharcourt, etc which they control, manage staff and resources and operate day to day 100%.. These 95-100% ownership can be referred to as the core business of Transcorp PLC.(the company) |
crownprince2017:The Deed has already started ![]() Page 127
|
Streetinvestor2:Exceptional items.. ![]() |
pluto09:You are right though Dividend is based on 10.16bn OS. But the earning isn't. I guess since they didn't Outrightly cancel the OS but reserved, the earnings attributed to it will also be reserved as well, hence the abracadabra ![]() If the reconstructed shares were cancelled(similar to selling an asset), then probably an Eps of ₦5+ isn't out of place (similar to sharing a sale-proceed) |
KarlTom:Lol.. They can make blatant mistake Oo.. no one is immune. I believe they made an error in their Eps computation of their Q3 UFS result. |
Streetinvestor2:Lol..na 35bn OS. As i no see Q4, From my little calculation, Q4 PAT for controlling interest no reach ₦7bn(even ₦6bn sef). If Tony bin pay 1₦/share as final=₦10.16bn, that one na to give out 100% PAT from Q4 + dip jara from Q3 ![]() He sha needs retained earnings to settle debts and liabilities. I prefer to look at it from PAT rather than the OS. full year PAT--₦51.52bn payout--(4.1bn + 6bn)10.16bn Payout ratio≈≈20% He should sha do better this year. |
BabsO2:Lols.. I get you sha, but not quite meaningless per say. It will create a false narrative on performance. An apparent eps of ₦5 is no different from the hype then-when it was widely reported that Transcorp has done over 400% increase=in SP .They didn't factor the re-construction. From their 9months UFS PAT(Q1-Q3)= ₦44.874bn 9month EPS = ₦1.104k Q4(assumption) By working backward, in Q4, they probably made (51.524bn -44.874bn)= PAT =₦6.65bn OS= 10.162bn EPS= ₦0.65439k Add this Q4(assumed) EPS to the 9months UFS Eps => ₦0.65439k + ₦1.104k =₦1.75839k Not far-off from the Audited full year of ₦1.45k. So, 4th quarter PAT is between₦5-₦7bn (controlling interest). It's obvious Transcorp never made up-to ₦1 EPS in any quarter. If you add all dem quarterly eps together, How do you now explain Eps of over ₦5 for Full year? ![]() |
Agbalowomeri:I believe, iF some of the Profit was made from the old OS. Then Eps (not dividend) will consider this old OS |
KarlTom:Exactly, Another angle.. I think i prefer yours ![]() |
unite4real:Hmmm.. But I want to believe by my understanding that the 51bn PAT is just consolidation from the quarterly results and not entirely new profit.. Out of it, interim has already been paid already with old OS of 40.64bn. The report is just to present accounts for the full year with what is in the bank account. I think the issue is we don't have a separate Q4 result for more informed decision. All I see is- for the year ended 31st December 2024. There would probably be issues if they had used the 35bn OS on Q4 result alone.. |
BabsO2:Well, Shares were ![]() I believe that should count for sth. Also, the OS was over 40bn for about 9months.. Seems only appropriate for the full year. ![]() Probably 10.16bn should be used only from Q4,2024 going forward I suppose. |
unite4real:For the full year 2024 result, Transcorp used the fact that the OS for the entire Business year was not always 10.16bn neither was it always 40.64bn(pre-reconstruction). Hence they used the Weighted Average of the two OS. how? The Weighted average between: The Pre-reconstruction OS & the Cancelled OS Cancelled OS= Old OS -New OS = 40.64bn -10.16bn=30.48bn I think they believe the cancelled OS was still part of the business year capitalisation.🤷 Weighted Average=(40.16bn +30.48bn)/2= 70.64bn/2 =35.32bn OS for the year.. It kind of makes sense the weighted average OS used(35.32bn) is skewed closer to the old Pre-construction Os(40.64bn) since for over 9months of the business year-2024, the old OS was still in play.. If one divides the the controlling interest portion of the PAT by the weighted-OS (35.32bn), one will get how are they arrived at the EPS. The details are in page 97 as @KarlTom has already pointed out. |
Agbalowomeri:yes I agree.. but not to that extent. But I think the extent of 40% will be felt more by heavy bulk purchases across items. Which I never find out yet. |
SocialJustice:Nope. but they have a tower already Edited: I was wrong. UBA should follow as you suggested. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 (of 119 pages)




