Combatmedic's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Combatmedic's Profile › Combatmedic's Posts
1 2 (of 2 pages)
Most Nigerian girls are claiming to be virgins these days, even those in maternity wards are also claiming to be virgins. ![]() |
Press-up position, DOWN! Raise! Lower! Raise! Lower! Raise half-way! Hold it there! Get off your f-ucking knees! Raise! On your feet, UP! Army no be joke oh! I have been there, done that, and got the T-shirt. ![]() |
Mizita03: @ Combatmedic,You are a rare gem. Goodluck to you and yours. |
BUMP! ![]() Living the dream. Train hard, fight easy! ![]() |
Mizita03: Reading the comments of some people here made me really laugh! Granted that our society is quite mean to disabled people but the question that if a Nigerian girl will marry/date a disabled guy without money involved is a resounding Yes! At least i am. My sweetheart was afflicted with polio from the age of three and walks on crutches. Today, he is living a good life, gainfully employed and should i mention, deliciously handsome to boot! FYI, i am not hungry and if i am a golf digger, the gold is in his heart and not his pocket. He has the most beautiful heart and believe it or not he has lots of girls that want to be his, so he is not nice because he is afraid or insecured.We are not just talking about disability, but its extreme forms. Would you have still been attracted to your spouse if he had no hands as well as having no legs?! Personally, I don't blame ladies who say they can't do it. It is typical for female animals to be attracted to the strongest alpha-male animal, they do it subconsciously for the strength and survival of the species. |
Hooray! Hooray!! ![]() Two of my threads have hit front page within the space of 24 hours, this calls for celebration! ![]() Time to pop Champagne, God is good!!! ![]() |
If all the above responses are true, then there must be a disconnect somewhere. I wonder how people who live in a country that is the second most religious nation on planet earth can be selfish to their own ilk. This is another reason why we cannot progress as a nation, we are a bunch of selfish hypocrites. |
"By all means marry; if you get a good wife, you'll be happy. If you get a bad one, you'll become a philosopher". SOCRATES In my opinion, married people and religious people have one thing in common. They both say it is the route to happiness; but how come they are not happy then?! Singles seem to be happier than married couples. |
tobssyt: Dis one crious o. D girl get good heart. Indeed, this is true luvShe is a rare gem. |
This is NOT a Nigerian ladies bashing thread, so please go away if you are looking for such. I came across this picture on Facebook and decided to share. Can we find this kind of love in Nigeria or is the lady in the picture married to this man's money?! Would a Nigerian lady marry a man who is 'hand-less' and 'leg-less' regardless of his financial status?! Would a Nigerian man marry a lady who is 'hand-less' and 'leg-less' regardless of her financial status?! I wonder. . .
|
I wonder how come ALL the ladies who have spoken on this thread are against this research! There has to be a paradigm shift from a culture that subtly stipulates that a man/woman is 'incomplete' unless he/she is in a marriage. Marriage has since outlived its usefulness. |
Yield: Correlation does not equal causation.Let me just address this point you raised. I totally agree that correlation doesn't necessarily imply causation; this is the reason why before this research (and every other statistical research for that matter) was published, it was tested using other statistical tools besides basic correlation analysis. Correlation analysis is the first basic test used to pre-determine causation, it may not imply direct causation, but it is a useful tool widely used within the scientific community to narrow down possible causative factors. |
The life expectancy of the average Nigerian male is less than 50 years. I think we can safely say that the Nigerian female plays a big role in reducing the life expectancy of the Nigerian male. |
Getting Married and Getting Heart Disease: A National Study A report of an 8-year study of heart disease, based on a nationally representative sample of more than 9,000 people in late mid-life. When the study first started in 1992, the participants ranged in age from 51 to 60. The participants were contacted five times from 1992 and 2000. Their marital status, cardiovascular health status, and health behaviors were assessed. Other information (for example, socioeconomic status) was also recorded. There are five different marital statuses: • Continuously married (i.e., first and only marriage) • Remarried • Widowed • Divorced • Always single Let's look first at the prevalence of heart disease at the start of the study. (Heart disease = doctor diagnosis of heart attack, coronary heart disease, angina, congestive heart failure, or other heart problems, or stroke.) In the table below is the percentage of people (averaged across all ages) who had heart disease at the start of the study. Lower numbers indicate less prevalence of heart disease, so the group ranked #1 is the healthiest. The rank-ordering of heart disease for the 5 marital statuses was the same for the men as for the women. See if you can guess which marital status goes with each rank. WOMEN MEN 1. 8.4 13.0 2. 8.7 13.5 3. 10.7 16.4 4. 10.8 16.5 5. 11.6 17.7 Okay, here are the answers: 1. Always single 2. Continuously married 3. Remarried 4. Widowed 5. Divorced So there you have it. The lowest rate of heart disease is found among the women and men, ages 51-60, who had been single all their lives. The rates for the continuously married are higher, though not statistically so. The study went on for years, and the authors calculated the probability of experiencing heart disease for each age, from 51 through 65. (See Table 5 in the article.) Of course, the probabilities increase with age for men and women of all marital statuses. Let's see where they end up at age 65. Here are the results for the MEN. 1. 29, always-single men 2. 33, widowed men 3. 42, remarried men 4. 46, continuously married men 5. 50, divorced men Look at what has happened to the continuously married men. At 46%, the likelihood of having heart disease is greater for them than for any other group of men except the divorced. The always-single men are doing way better, at just 29%. (For women at age 65, the probabilities were 32 for continuously married, 38 for always-single, 43 for widowed, 45 for remarried, and 47 for divorced. So even though men typically have higher rates of heart disease than women, the always-single men have the lowest rates of all 10 of the groups.) The authors also looked at how the risk of heart disease changed for each successive year of marriage. Here, in their words, is what they found: "Each year in marriage increased rather than decreased the risk of cardiovascular disease by 2% for both men and women." The risk increased each year both in first marriages and in remarriages. Because the authors collected data on health measures such as smoking and obesity, and on conditions described as morbid (really, that's the technical term), they could venture a data-based explanation as to why each year of marriage added to the risk of heart disease: "Longer marriages were associated with less healthy behaviors and an accumulation of morbid conditions, such as hypertension, diabetes, and high cholesterol." Culled from: http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/living-single/200902/single-men-have-good-hearts Basically, what this research proves is that the so-called 'peace of mind' that people say we get from being married seems to be at best elusive or at worst a mirage. |
learn: oga, i just opened this email, no vex just open a fresh email and give me biko, nothing fishy, no vex bikoIf nothing is "fishy", you might as well ask the question here so everyone can benefit. I would not waste my time opening a new email account simply because of you. |
learn: HI Combatmedic learn: combatmedic, please can u mail me on schoolgirl352@yahoo.nl pleassssssssssssssssAsk your question here so everyone can benefit, I don't give my email out to online characters for security reasons please. In conclusion of this epic tale ,I have since safely passed out of basic training. A word of advice to Nigerians in the diaspora; NEVER, EVER GIVE UP! |
Already on week 3 of training, 11 more weeks left in this shithole and I will be on my phase 2. No massive injury worries yet for me, my body seems to be holding up remarkably well. Sapele_Don:The British Army does the same medical checks as the US Army, but you can be medically discharged whilst in training if you pick up an injury. I'm not aware of any monetary compensation though. |
jennykadry:Since I can't make you believe the sincerity of this thread, no worries. dnative:It's a 12 year contract actually, but you are committed to complete 4 years before you can leave. The Tory cuts is applied to 'deadwood' in the system, not to fresh recruits. Moreover, Medics are exempt from cuts due to the critical nature of the work they do. |
Well, I have thought about it for the past 24 hours. I have made a decision to start with the Army tomorrow. IF I get medically discharged within the next 4 weeks, I will simply take my scholarship letter to the Australian High Commission, and apply for a student visa to Australia. IF I am able to pull through the Army basic training, I will honour my contractual obligations to her Majesty, and then pursue a PhD afterwards. Bonne Chance. . . |
TroyJay:@OP: Just ignore this drivel. It will be by far better for your friend to go back in time and take advice from cave men, than it will be if he does what this poster says. |
jennykadry:If my mind was made up, I wouldn't have bothered to open this thread in the first place. The thing is that my own family are also as divided over this issue, the same way the opinions on this thread are divided. It may be likely to get a good job in Australia after studying a PhD in Public Health, BUT it's not guaranteed. The thorny point of this PhD has to do with the long-term prospects, but in the short-term, it is by far the best option. |
violent:I smell sarcasm here. ![]() My guy, I just wanted objective advice, no need to be sarcastic. Cheers anyway. @JennyKadry: The value of the tuition fee is $24,400 per year, and the living allowance is $23,728 per year, all applicable for 3 years with a possibility to get a 6 month extension. If not that I already have this Army contract starring me in the face, I would have jumped at the opportunity to go and enjoy free money in Australia. |
alfablondy:I get paid the same wages a Colonel in the Nigerian Army earns, if not higher. I'm due to report to the barracks on Monday though, so I guess I have only got 24 hours to make a decision. Thanks anyway. |
^^ Cheers my guy, nice points you have there. To answer your question as to the reason I chose to apply to join the British Army, I was once told that an ideal job must contain 3 key ingredients; 1. Love what you do. 2. What you do should help people. 3. Have fun/adventure doing what you do. The Army is one of the few opportunities in life to actually provide these 3 attributes in a holistic package. I would love to pursue a PhD in Public Health in Australia, I may even be able to use my knowledge to help people, but the question is would I have fun in that line of career?! Another way of looking at this issue is for me to self-sponsor a PhD after my Army contract is over. The proviso here is that I would live through my contract with my limbs intact. As a Combat Medic, we are in the thick of the action, we MUST go to war. |
This is really a dilemma, but I think I'm tilting more towards the Army option. Cheers lads. |
^^ Sound point. |
chika98:I agree. The only problem there is that I'm assuming I will live through my 4 year contract with the Army. There is always a possibility of getting killed in a war zone, that's the major risk of this option. |
Kx:There are times when I think of it, and my mind tilts towards the Army job, but on some other times, it tilts towards pursuing the PhD (the PhD offer is valid for 2 months before it expires). I'm just trying to weigh opinions, and do a cost-benefit analysis of both options. |
chika98:That's what I thought. frank 94:The thing is that getting the so-called well-paid job after a PhD is very likely, but not guaranteed. claremont:It seems racism is rife in Australia. |
British Army; Advantages: 1. Guaranteed contract of employment for 12 years. 2. Opportunity to travel round the world. 3. British passport at the end of 4 year service. ![]() Disadvantage 1. I could be beheaded in Afghanistan by the Taliban. 2. I could get injured in training, and be medically discharged. Australian Scholarship Advantages: 1. Free Tuition and monthly stipend for at least 3 years. Disadvantage 1. No guarantee of employment after PhD. |
ojdollars:I wish it was that easy. I have put in a whole year of my life going through the selection process of joining the British Army, and just when I signed my 4 year contract, this PhD offer came through. Wetin man go do now! ![]() |
yemmy_ma:To be honest, I would like both equally. I'm equally comfortable doing both, but the thing is that I can't do both at the same time . Thanks anyway. |
1 2 (of 2 pages)


