₦airaland Forum

lukaino: Many times we hear women complain about men not helping out with any of the domestic chores and people are quick to conclude that such men are wicked and insensitive. I think men have reasons for not helping out. Mine for example is that all the times i tried to help out with something, my wife automatically makes it my duty every other time; she'll even remind me when i don't do it. I think one should help out of one's free will. Guys what are your reasons?

Logicboy03: #butthurt

Logicboy03: lol...are you not African American?

Logicboy03:
Erm....we have the same ancestors

You are a psychopath.

Logicboy03: Pleep and Sagamite are just douchebags but coogar is a real psychopath! Gaddem! A black man in support of slavery!

afrodoc: de gea could have done better with the shot,maybe parried it further away from goal.however rafael has to learn how to protect his keeper from rebound goals,he is usually caught ball watching in such situations(made d same mistake against bilbao last season)

"Well, De Gea didn't really have much to do [in the whole game]. This is the goal. You see his view is blocked by Ferdinand and the view is blocked all the way and where the ball actually goes past Ferdinand through his legs and for me that is a fantastic save and you just hope in a situation like that, your defenders are a tiny bit more sharp."

"There is a big difference between this and the one at Newcastle because he actually pushed it out... and this is a great save and, you know, he was just very, very unfortunate that Sturridge was following in."

bjcole: I dont get angry any more wit abuse 4rm women o, after all these yrs in marriage, na 2day, to deal wit a woman, u need a very long rope.

ileobatojo: First of all, I'm not trying to make the man the bad guy. From the OP's scenario, I absolutely don't blame the man for how he has decided to go. Men and women do not respond the same when it comes to matters regarding children. I can see things from his point of view. I would not do the same but maybe it's my estrogen talking. I recognize the law is unfair to father's and there are law firms springing up that specialize in father's rights during divorce. So in the midst of all the arguing I have never really had a different view thanost of you guys. Also I can assure you that none of you can produce one post of mine that contradicts what I just said. I have questioned some things that did not make sense to me that's it.

Secondly, a restraining order affecting the woman alone and not the children does not preclude him from seeing the kids. It makes it less convenient for all involved but not nearly impossible.

I disagree that paying child support automatically means he plans to see his children. These are two separate issues as far as I'm concerned.
Oh! By the way, I haven't read a word that scarf tying, estrogen laden, tantrum throwing infant has said some I notified him I won't be replying to his posts anymore. Zipped right past them. In case anyone is wondering.

wiegraf: Personally, I like it for the most part. At least it's much better than say yours. But that's another topic

Hold on to the bolded and read this...
Genius. I didn't even need to quote another post. hehehehe, you m.oron

Or it's only acceptable when jews do it? Ah yes, only when it was done 2000 years ago by jews. Your parents no try...

Oh boy, u stoopid no be small. As in, enough to invoke pity. Your god bows down to the whims of humanity? We decide what he decrees as law? The bolded is particularly fantastic as well.

So, my incredibly slavish, irrational and foo.lish blockhead of a friend. Slavery is never, has never ever been acceptable. Ever. It may be the very last option for some of us mere mortals, others may simply have been bred as sheep and actually just flowed with society, indeed being happy (like you), but it has NEVER been acceptable. There always could have been a better option a more educated being, like say your dog, could have recommended. Actually, even enforced considering omnipotence, but we don't see that.

Again, and since I'm not getting paid to school you this will be the last time I point this out, an omnipotent does not, ever, need to compromise. The great creator of the cosmos, of the myriad galaxies you've deluded yourself into thinking he built just so he could watch big brother earth, making a compromise? What happened to "it is all his will" your great re.tardness? He would state clearly, with or without our approval, his views on an issue. Free will nonsense you like to invoke or no, he would state his law, and 4k what anyone thinks. He is dog, no? He had time to condemn and talk about all the things I listed (working on sabbath, eating shell fish, living in fish (err mammal), etc) yet he never found the time to strongly condemn slavery?

If he never condemned it, or indeed supported it, then he doesn't give a 4k about it or indeed approves it, or he was afraid of stating his real opinions because he did not want to lose 'votes'. ie, he would have sold out on his ideals in order to satisfy the powers that be of the day that supported slavery. So which is it? Did your omnipotent dog approve of slavery or was he afraid of looking politically incorrect?

And don't try to hide and claim it was some sort of harmless slavery. That is patently disingenuous, so much so it's disgusting. You'll do anything for your master, like claim slavery is harmless, hmm? Really sad. Children born into slavery, as already pointed out earlier...sheesh. Pathetic excuse for a human you are. Even for adults, you actually think it was all voluntary? Even if we ignore that and focus on those who as adults voluntary sold themselves into slavery, all I've said still very much stands.
The fact that all this needs to be repeatedly pointed out to you says a lot.

Therefore, they deserved to be enslaved!!!
Again, they were stoopid. Everyone's ancestors were stoopid at one time or the other, what's your point? They were stoopid therefore they deserved to be enslaved? Makes perfect sense to me.

For the bolded, so he should be given a medal for doing what any decent human being with simple common sense would have done?

Anyways, again, your stoopidity beggars belief. So, you guys just cherry pick from the inerrant word of god? Do you know what cognitive dissonance means, hmm? Did you read @colds post at all? So the word has to be adapted to fit the whims of man, hmm? Again, if xtianity originated from mayan america it would have had to allow for human sacrifises? They were the norm them, no? Yes, yes, of course, like abaraham. Making him near kill his own son to test his 'faith' Nice to see you admitting y'all make $hit up as you go though (and a lot of other nonsense too). And of course you have no problem with your role models collecting foreskins? Well done

Do you even know what the word intelligence means? Simple things have been explained over and over to you, but it seems a lost cause without crayons, diagrams, miracles etc.
If you don't have a point, why waste energy on all the insults? To mask stoopidity? It only highlights it.

There is no hope for you, I'm surprised you qualify as homo sapien. Actually, I'm not even sure if chimpanzees would accept you as one of their own. You're far too stoopid, so proceeding would be a waste of time. I've said all that needed saying here. kudos, at least for this thread, my good slave, yet great master of the whargarbl

ileobatojo: Oh please! Just admit that you are all penciling in 'till sometime later when I will come back for them' on your own accord. Because the man never said so himself, not according to the OP.

And for the record I have no problem with the assumption. my problem is in the denying it is an assumption. While expecting everything else to be taken at face value. How hypocritical.

ileobatojo: There's my evidence by the way.

ileobatojo: Cop wetin? He has been acting like a toddler throwing a tantrum all over this thread. I'm tired of talking to a child. Let the adults continue the conversation abeg.

ileobatojo: Present your evidence that the man plans to come back when he mentioned no such thing to the OP.

ileobatojo: We really could do this all day. I'm going to stop replying you now. Apparently what baby said about you is true.

ileobatojo: What is the basis for your assumption that he plans to come back for them? Did the OP say so? Or are we not taking it at face value anymore? Do we only take the parts that fit your own opinions at face value?

ileobatojo: Of course.....Yeye!

ileobatojo: Probably take some time to regroup and build a strong case for myself. If I'm truly innocent. Perhaps the stress of it all would make me cut back on the visits but I would not cut off my children completely. I certainly understand how stressful and risky it is for the man but even if it means only calling them weekly and seeing them once in 6 months, I would stay in touch with my kids. I would take measures to fortify myself against false claims as much as possible. I would remain one step ahead of the ex wife.

ileobatojo: Why though? And what does she stand to gain from that?

dayokanu: Debosky, Coogar, Roland17 and any other interested party

Wager Arsenal vs Bayern.

Bayern eliminates Arsenal $200 wager. Anyone who wants to take the offer.

Roland17: The Foul call was the right call, the penalty call was also right, but the Red Card is highly questionable..

Wenger gambled with the line up, Diaby had no business in the first eleven, Diaby should have been substituted after the red card and a more mobile Midfielder brought in..infact ....

This is one week i wish to forget in a hurry, first the Packers get mauled and now Arsenal losses.

ileobatojo: In other words you have no evidence?

Can you stop trying put a false spin the discussion then?

The main argument for the bulk of this thread was whether it was ok for the man to stop trying to see his children with both sides putting forth their argument. All the while not a single woman supported the wife.

The fact that some are now trying to address holes in the story doesn't mean support for cheating or frivolous accusations on the woman's part. Abeg!

chrisley024: Wich site says dat? Bt his markin n wkrate was excelent especialy in 1st half jus dat his finishin as usual was poor

ileobatojo: Evidence?

wiegraf: You don't like my penmanship?

So, my wonderful example of xtian charity, you think slavery is acceptable? It was "not a bad thing"? Even today's version of slavery, which clearly still exists under different guises?

You think the unerring word of god could not have said something forcefully against such a scourge, yet it had time to discuss killing people who ate shell fish, living in a fish for 3 days, killing those who work on sabbath, etc etc?

If owning cattle was wrong in some way, like say they all gave us mad cow by just being in their vicinity, then the right thing to do would be to condemn owning cattle you eediot. Owning slaves is wrong, in any fashion, your dog didn't seem to care much.
Oh wait... My bad. You think slavery was good...

You're saying what I said, you m.oron; dog's message was diluted to appeal to masses. Omnipotent dog has to bow down to the times and play politician. Curious. Human law said thus, and thus omnipotent god had to accommodate for it. Was he afraid of strongly condemning slavery? And your eediocy continues. Perhaps it's some sort of medical disorder..

..hmm, like maybe a mental handicap? It is silly to say your ancestors are barbarians, hence they deserved to be enslaved, you imbe.cile. Anyone with a working brain would be able to tell you that.

Why are you completely avoiding the fact that the bible has some great models of human behavior we should all look up to with this nonsense? Does this address the issue, in any way? Seems your programming has come across a divide by zero error, or maybe it's set up to turn you rabid in these situations. You brought up the issue of OT being void these days earlier on in the thread your eediotness, I was just pointing out how disingenuous that cop out is.

Do you hear me complaining about that, hmm? I do think something had to be done, just not slavery you ret.ard. Note, slave, unlike many around I do think our ancestors were remarkably foo.lish, but I think people like you trump them, unquestionably. You've sold out your entire being to become a slave for jesus, or are just incredibly stoopid. I do hope the latter is the case.

Anyways, they sold us out for mirrors, you, for an invisible ticket to an invisible heaven. Despite all the education available today, which they did not have mind you, you remain a slave. Again, I hope your views are not motivated by selfishness, I really do, else you stand as excellent proof that there's little hope for humanity. Even your fellow brainwashed don't condone slavery, your slave masters do their best to sweep it under the rug or make amends, you remain here proudly supporting it. Lol

An eediot to trump them all
Erm, re.tard, if slavery was not condoned by god yet his books were used repeatedly to justify it (well, they don't exactly condemn slavery, do they?), wouldn't that qualify as a failure? Another one to chalk up to your omnixx.x god, no?

However, again, you are the genuine article, a truly brainwashed goat. I never thought I'd come across someone as m.oronic as you in my life, I'm serious. Someone that actually supports slavery. So you can't blame me for not accomodating the option of finding a human with an actual brain that supports slavery in my post. And this is your case, you actually think there was nothing wrong with the message delivered. In fact, seems to me you think it perfect. Incredible what a fellow human can be reduced to...

Note: Come to think of it his books were recently used in that region to justify the child witch hunts, no? Luckily though these days there are sane HUMANS who step out to stop such nonsense. That's another issue though

Lol. Legendary but.thurt levels attained. Perhaps there's even more? Super sayan mode maybe. You about to hand out some justice, OT style?
Note, again, 4k you're stoopid

dayokanu: De Gea palms the ball into the danger area again
Surely its a problem with him

wiegraf: @slav.. Err coogar
The eediocy you've displayed explores new depths. I probably should ignore you, but I'll point out some of your foo.lisness as it could aid the few saner religious out there, even if my approach may not be the most lucid.

Sure we could forgive and forget, proffer solutions rather than play the blame game, but to blindly defend doctrine that supports or condones slavery beggars belief. Brainwashing, slavery, I don't know what to call it except surreal. Now, I couldn't read all of that as it was frankly rather repulsive, but some notes here

In essence you, our great hero, are saying that in order to survive xtianity had to compromise by allowing slavery. Wow. The word of the absolute ruler of the cosmos, compromised just so he could score some political points. Again, this word, supposedly final, unquestionably wise and true, unerring etc, was/is diluted just so it could have some populist appeal. Fantastic, Dog the politician. Frankly, you strike me as another imb.ecile who would not have problems with societies mixing religion and politics. Like an xtian version of the regular muslim. So if xtianity had originated from south america around the epoch of the mayans dominance, it should have adulterated its message to allow for human sacrifice, abi? Ah, yes, but of course; abraham*

Everyone's ancestors were barbarian at one point or the other. Even if not strictly black civilizations, I believe when egyptians and nubians were boss the rest were regarded as barbarians, yes? In fact, most societies though history have regarded their neighbors as being barbarians, no? As for pure savagery, at some point or the other one group may have been more barbaric, at another time less, etc. To say your ancestors were barbarians is silly as depending on the era, everyone had barbarians as ancestors. But regardless, how the 4k does their being barbarians justify slavery in any shape, way or form? Are you saying there were no other alternative means of 'civilizing' them? Two wrongs make a right? Another compromise? Or was the aim of condoning slavery something other than rehabilitating the barbarians? 4k you're stoopid

And the silly OT is irrelevant argument, seen here again, causing a great deal of bemusement to those not blinded by your faith. NT being all nice and flowery is a veneer, the unavoidable problem is that OT dog and his followers infamy is very well deserved yet they still remain ROLE MODELS. God, the omnibenovelent, the being we should look up to, hardens hearts then kills children. Brilliant. The other dude, I forget his name, that collects foreskins should be lauded as well for his commitment to the cause, yes? Just like abraham's shenanigans with his son, hmm? Or those who killed people that worked on sabbath? I wonder who the barbarians in today's world would be.

*Btw don't you think political compromise is more the style of say a...human? Rather than the great omnipotent, hmm? What's that you say? his prophets failed to convey his message clearly? Then what the hell has been doing since to rectify the problem? Ah, hell, that's right. He's probably there hanging out with strippers, hmm?