Coogar's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Coogar's Profile › Coogar's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 (of 1148 pages)
Idowuogbo: no..... British youths not people, d youths are sick in d head!!!idowu, do you stay in peckham? |
Builder:you must be a stark illiterate or you are just trolling terry said he was just repeating what anton had accused him of.....he never denied saying those words..... this is what terry claimed in the court.... anton: did you just call me a black cünt? terry: black cünt? black cünt?(what the camera picked) Dude, u need to go back to school and ask for a refund. i give up on u and this matter is offically closed u can argue for all i careyou are a tool - you must think you are talking to your fellow villagers here. better go and read the facts up before misinforming the public. terry denied the charges......he would have gone to jail if he admitted using those words as a racial insult! |
Builder: lol, in that case we need to ban all words stringed together with anything that have to do with colour because some crazed people think its a racial slur. how preposterous... i just gave u an example of john terry and antoine ferdinad and with all the context crap.. he was found not guilty yet u still trying to prove clever. this is pure madnessstop being thick and listen attentively..... john terry denied the accusation and there was no evidence to throw the book at him. the court has to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he indeed used those words. the other independent committee set up by the football association don't have to prove beyond reasonable doubt. they judge cases based on the balance of probability and terry was adjudged to have been guilty of using a racist remark! |
tatiana009: The only thing he achieved was to prove her right! Imagine that for someone else on the train this was their 1st encounter with a Nigerian, what do we expect that person to think about Nigerians; bunch of aggressive people abi.i agree with you.... we are worse off when it comes to insulting people based on their ethnicity. "oyibo pepper" is a racial slur. ![]() |
denzel2009: Come on mr builder, in these days of political correctness, any comment that relates to skin colour would be termed as a racial slur. John Terry called Antoine a black cvnt...do you realise nothing would have happened if he had just called him a fvcking cvnt?mr builder lives under a rock - how would he know what obtains in a civilised society? "white princess" is a racial slur......if JAP(jewish american princess) can be a serious racial slur then i don't see how "white princess" is any different! both of them are complete bellends and they should be locked up for few weeks. |
Builder: imao what context is it used... how on earth wld u context "white princess" as a racial slurr. i read this same crap in the dailymail online. dude, reason and ask urself questions rather than following other people. john terry called antoine ferdinand a black bastard and was cleared by the westerminster magistrate court.john terry denied calling ferdinand a "black cünt". he said he was just repeating the words ferdinand had accused him of using. even with that, the football association's independent review still found him guilty and he was banned for 4 matches. "white princess" is a racial slur considering the context and the circumstance the word was used. .. speaking of context this two men were about to exchange blows on the field of play when the outburst happened. now tell me .. baby lawyer how could white princess be termed as a racist slur in whatever contextstop misinforming the public and get your facts right! |
shymexx: White princess is just sarcasm, there's nothing racial about it..the word "white" in that statement carries weight! white = ethnic group, no? ethnicity plus princess to describe a woman during a heated exchange is a racial slur. you have to look at the context in which he used it. he's not wooing her or asking her out. it was meant to be an insult! manny4life: Perceives it? It's not what the woman thinks, it's what the law states. I mean the term white and princess, two words are not racist, just like black and princess, and even in the context (he stepped on her) and she was whining like a little bit.ch, its not racial. What the law should interpret is simply that as a princess, no one can unknowingly step on you.in the uk, it's what the recipient thinks about it. if a white person calls me a nigga and i am not offended about it - then there's no offence. that's the way it rolls on this side of the planet! if the woman claims she felt racially insulted with the word "white princess" then the boy would go down! |
manny4life: However, white princess is not a racial comment, heck it's used in cartoons, videos all forms of media...it's not a racist comment.it depends on how the woman perceives the insult. if she feels racially insulted by the phrase "white princess" then the dude is in trouble. uk laws are funny. the recipient of a racist insult holds the 4 aces. |
shymexx: Where is the evidence and witness??underground trains have cctv cameras don't they? someway somehow they would get to the bottom of this. he should have just carried on dissing her - the dude messed up jare but his legal aid would claim he's been drinking all day. if he's a first offender he would get a slap on the wrist and sweep Peckham housing estate for 650 hours without pay! manny4life: Ok o, me I don't know U.K. law but an assault will pretty much carry penalty of community service or worst case 30days + anger management. Anyway, I still see throwing a deadly weapon (bottle) at someone carries more weight than the actual punching.it's more likely to be a plastic bottle..... the boy is way more guilty. regardless of what the woman must have said to him, you don't punch a woman. it shows total lack of respect....10 yrs ago, the other men on that train would have beaten the boy bluish blackish but today's britain is different. the mantra is mind your own business! |
lamie: Okay, so i was watching The Kardashian show and Kris Jenner (their mum) playfully bent over to get her phone off her younger daughter Kendall and Pow woah, she was wearing a black thong. I thought that's a bit unusual for a woman her age - she's 57. But its not entirely unusual for a woman like herself though. But it begs the question? When should ladies/women stop wearing thongs if ever? I ain't saying they should wear granny pants though, but there are much better suited and responsible underwears for matured ladies. what are your thoughts?how's this your business for feck's sake? |
manny4life: What other credible evidence does he need than the racial slur she mentioned? Abeg, if he has good lawyers, they will let him walk. When you make racist comments against someone you barely know, it's common knowledge for instincts to kick in leading to violence. How I wished this outcome would have been different...he would be jailed for assault n affray. he can counter-sue her for hurling a racist abuse. she threw a bottle at him, he could have just returned the favour instead of punching her to the ground. |
[quote author=oche_ejemb]I said this is not racism being displayed here. I didn't say she cannot be racist. You stop embarrassing yourself with silly analogies. And yes, to call a spade a spade, a truely racist person would not be dating, of all the people in the world to date, someone out of their own race. If you are a rapist, you didnt choose to have a mother and sisters.[/quote]"smelly nigerian" is a racist remark! she could have just stopped at "you stinking fool" - why qualify smell with nigerian? then again, i am tired of people hiding under the mask of "my grandpa is black so i cannot be racist" - that's pure rubbish! a räpist has female relatives, sometimes wives and it does not stop them from attacking women. its a cheap excuse. how do we know for sure she's dating a black man? because she said so to save face after dropping a racist remark? you don't have a prayer!!!! |
shymexx: True.. That's the problem with these teenagers, they're too hyped for no reason...he's probably on crystal meth...... women activists would march to the big ben tomorrow to have this dude arrested. a member of the public would call the police that the video traumatised him/her and he/she would never use the tube again until he/she is sure that boy has been arrested! We've got institutionalised racism to deal with not abusive words that don't mean anything... Moreover, all white people think black people stink and black people also think most white people smell like dogs...exactly! i would have turned the whole scene into mum jokes or face jokes......the chic is not even english, her accent is from the eastern european bloc. liuthania or poland! |
ikp4succes: the way british speak if u dont listen to it well u will think is anoda language.that's because they are uneducated - they are probably living on state benefits. no one should be speaking like that, really! it makes my blood boil when i see people talking like there's hot yam in their mouth! |
shymexx: Hysterical!!much ado about nothing really the teenage dude shouldn't have lunged at her - they should have just continued to exchange insults and amuse other passengers. he could get done for common assault when the met police find him. |
[quote author=oche_ejemb]She called him a smelly fuϾking Nigerian. Maybe he just happens to be a Nigerian with bad odour...who is 'fuϾking'. They were both insulting each other, she said she has a black boyfriend. This is not racism. This is an example of life in London,people steadily get into trysts with complete strangers. Big City life[/quote]stop embarrassing yourself........... so she cannot be racist because she has a black boyfriend? get out of here, my friend. what has her black boyfriend gotta do with racism? ok then, i have a mother and female siblings therefore i cannot be a räpist! |
Logicboy03: Yawn, you are a psychopath. Accept itwhich stüpid nigeria is this tool talking about? you mean there were no slavery in nigeria? people were not going to other hamlets to capture slaves and used them in the farms and their other sorta trades? you must be a complete nitwit! You can keep supporting slavery in the bible. aweh, God of slaveryslavery as at 2000 yrs ago was perfectly legal....... your forefathers sold slaves in nigeria to the white men in exchange for guns, jack daniel liquor and mirrors. it was a perfect way of trading. when a certain tribe captures the other, human beings were part of the spoils of the war. get over it and stop whining like a baboon! Furthermore, 38% of iceland's population are atheists. If you understood religious polls you would understand that people identify with a religion for traditional purposes not religious purposes (they only tick christian because family is christian)38% are atheists? what were they before they became atheists? christians right? because their family or their roots are christians. so what was the situation in iceland when everyone were christians? they had wars? suicide bombers or what? if i insult you now, people would say i am too harsh and yet you continue to display copious amount of idiocy! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Icelandrubbish poll! majority of these icelandic people have always been christians and they have always been peaceful! that's the single most important fact - to come here and bend the facts makes you desperate. you are arguing like they have always been atheists - no they are not and while they were christians, peace still reigned in their country! you really should not argue about what you don't know - you are a pleb! |
Logicboy03: Yes...yes...let the butthurt flow........you must be a tool...... christians could not fight the romans, could they? until you bend your head around the fact that slavery was a norm then and it wasn't distasteful as you see it today(2000 yrs later) then you would forever be hopelessly deluded. another case is female circümcision.....while it would be frowned upon today, it was a normal ish about 100-200 years ago with the blessings of religious leaders. so were they psychopaths or were they barbaric even when it's an accepted practise 2000 yrs ago? stop thinking like a goat for feck's sake..... Lolz.....ignorance! The peace index is not done by wikipedia! FAILwhoever said the peace index was done by wikipedia - i am attacking you for running to wikipedia to present your facts at the first sign of trouble. even the link you posted has destroyed your argument. according to your link, iceland is world's most peaceful country but it was a bit surprising that 77% of the population of iceland are affiliated to the church of iceland. another 11% are christians of the other denominations - which makes it 88%. so which is which, zombie? the irony is the fact that you call yourself a logic boy - stüpid boy would be more apt, don't you think? Logicboy03: UAE should not even be mentioned compared to these less religious countries. You love sharia law or something? Funny you should mention Singaporewhy can't we compare uae? you foolishly remarked countries with religion are not peaceful. i brought out uae as a case study and you are shifting the post that they are into sharia. who cares what they are into as long as there's peace which is contrary to your initial claims? when i mentioned singapore - i was looking at their homicide stats and it's even lower than denmark's. abeg, your argument has been destroyed and i have not made one single bible quote! |
Logicboy03: 1) I dont like to engage psychopaths. You supported the slavery of the past in the bible. No need for me to argueyou are a disgusting sack of shyte...... when you are cornered then the philosophical psychobabbles quickly follow through? your problem is your lack of intelligence.....from the 1st century to the 21st century, there were practises that were fully legal and later got abolished. people were executed for stealing bread in the same england where today, there's no death penalty......it would be silly to think the bible should not provide laws and rules governing slavery back then. slaves are meant to respect their masters just like you respect your boss. 2) It might do you well to understand the variables and criteria for composing that list;dearie me, i am debating with a wikipedia fool...... you are a disgrace to the community that sponsored your education - what is this tool talking about? countries with no religion are doing better? how so? is there religion in dubai and abu dhabi? yes.........are they faring worse than denmark and norway? hell no! the crime stats in denmark is moderate, not low as you would have us think. singapore is another country where christianity is practised - they are more peaceful than denmark so try another lie, you homoerotic pleb! |
Michky: True, violence against women has been a big problem in this part of the world. The laws are realy protecting women the more these days. THE UNITED NATIONS' recent RECOMMENDATIONS TO WORLD GOVERNMENTS one of which advocates for more women protection says alot.you mean baby_123 is a dyke? she doesn't strike me as such - can you elaborate your findings further? |
tarababy: My cosin,Who has been living illegally in the uk for four years has recently been advised by his wife in Nigeria to marry another woman in UK so that he can legalize his stay.She said she does not even mind,if another woman has a baby for him.people do all sorts for the papers these days......this does not even surprise me one jot! your cousin's wife is probably cheating on your cousin in nigeria too - she's looking forward into balancing the equation. good luck to them! |
FBS: how? you mean they are not doing enough? heck they brought in a manager in specifically for a single player? How many times and how often have you seen that in the history for football. A player who cannot even hold on to the ball?they are doing enough - see how they scored 10 goals against swansea last night! i cannot blame ivanovic, mata, hazard and oscar because they have delivered in the past....what has the past gotta do with last night's loss. a seasoned defender lost his balls twice and gifted swansea 2 goals and you pathetic lots are blaming torres. without those mistakes, the match would have ended 0-0. it's a 2-legged tie.....0-0 result is not too bad. torres did not cause the loss, ivanovic did! Got a better idea. Sell every single player out there except Torres and ship in new ones till he gets it right. Surely that should work.buncha prima donnas who cannot punch through a wet paper bag. you have a £50m talent and yet they cannot play to his strengths. team mentality is zero. come up north to united and see how they make use of every of their striker in the last 4 seasons. they even made berbatov a golden boot winner. now, that's a team! Ibime: The two foolish musketeers are still digging depper holes for themselves instead of making a clean breakaway like Nateevs.shut up your mouth already....... stop acting queer, nateevs who is busy with his day to day activities has now made a clean breakaway according to ibime. what an odious tool! when nateevs come back now to attack your brainless claims you would run back to the crevice you slithered out from. Dont worry. . . within one month, we will BOO Torres into oblivion, transfer or retirement.keep booing - torres is there to stay! when he scores the next goal, fans would calm down. no be una? |
FBS: in that case he should sit on the bench and maybe Mata will send him a text saying "come on now, we are going to create a chance for you" and once the chance goes away (10 times out of 9) he should return back to the sidelines and wait for the next chance to come since he ain't on the pitch anyway. Is that what you expect of the team?i expect a bunch of professionals to support their lead striker. a striker is useless without a supporting cast! do you guys watch football at all or you are just concerned with the player that puts the ball at the back of the net? until you show me a striker that took the ball from his goalkeeper and dribbled round 11 players to score then your comments cannot be taken seriously.... Football is a team sport and some members of that team aint pulling their weights including Torres. The major difference (aside the terrible performance) is that RA paid 50 milla for him and earns 175k. To whom more is given, MUCH MORE is expected.why bother at all then? torres cost more than the entire swansea team put together so let's leave him alone against 11 men. he's a £50m striker and he should be able to beat swansea singlehandedly without the help of the other 10 players. when will you guys learn that there's no superman striker without his midfield? |
Logicboy03: Atheism is not a religion. Also, the New Testament supports slavery!stop embarrassing yourself! slavery as at then was a norm and a way of trading - that was the level of civilisation as at then and it's perfectly normal to own slaves. 2000 yrs later, civilisation embraced a higher level and slavery was abolished. in another 2000 years, maybe guns would be abolished and the laws that govern us today would be laughed at by the coming generations. Then why dont christians throw away the old testament and why dont they use only a new testament bible? Why do christians quote the old testament against gays or to show the 10 commandments? Hmmm?you cannot just throw away history. that's an illogical point of view. some of the things in the old testament are still relevant. it's up to the believer to apply his common sense. in the old testament, every witch must be put to death - but you cannot apply that law these days after almost 3000 yrs. if jesus comes to the world today, some of these laws would be modified to fit into the world we find ourselves. that is common sense! Who said that? I said that the countries are the most peaceful not 100% peace.you must be a stark illiterate...... the most peaceful does not mean no crime or low levels of crime. what has peace gotta do with it? peace is the opposite of war. the countries up there do not go to war or have any sorta of civil war but it does not remove violent crimes. if you cannot discern the difference between violent crimes and war then you should close this thread and get some much needed education. You are a psychopath for that comment in bold. So you clearly see nothing wrong with supporting slavery in the past?you are a consummate rëtard slavery was the norm when the apostles wrote the bible - to deny such is an act of lunacy. that was the height of the roman empire. if you have any nous, you should know by now it's actually a form of trading. to then have laws written about what obtained in that society in the past is no wrong doing unless you are a dingbat! |
far majority of the chelsea fans here have no tactical nous...... demba ba did nothing for the 10 mins he was on.....apart from diving to win a penalty for chelsea. graham came on and scored! chelsea fans are the only football fans who expect a striker to score all by himself regardless of the service he gets.......read van persie's quotes again and see the reason he is topping the scorer's charts!!' |
Logicboy03: 1) You can't be violent because you are an atheist. There are violent atheists but they aren't violent because of atheism. Why? Atheism is only a stance on the existence of God.exactly my point.... that someone is violent does not necessarily mean he is that way because of his religion. the laws in the bible you are desperately hanging on to were laws made more than 2000 years ago. surely, those laws fitted into what obtains back then and cannot apply in the modern world! 2) A christian can be violent for both christian and non-christian reasons. There are violent passages in the bible or the christian could come from a violent home.there's no violent passage in the new testament - this is where you get it wrong. the pröstitute that was chased by men with stones were following the mosaic law but jesus stopped them from executing her. that should tell you that what obtained when moses wrote the 10 commandments did not longer apply when jesus was around and some of the things that obtained when jesus was around can no longer apply today. this is common sense! 3) Countries that have moved past religion are secular countries in which the separation of church and state is quite clear, religion holds little importance in everyday life and they have a significant amount of atheists/agnostics/irreligious. Japan and Denmark for one.and no violent crime exists at all in these countries? lmao!!! are you writing because you like the colour of your prints? if i print the crime stats in denmark, you would close this thread up. 4) The bible supports slavery. Django is about slavery of blacks which was supported by the bible and major christian denominations.what is wrong with the bible supporting slavery back in the days? it's a trade - an exchange of humans for money or whatever material gain. prisoners of war are kept and traded for materials. in the modern world, they are kept in prison and are exchanged for other humans. that was what the society dictated then because there was little or no civilisation. |
Logicboy03:there are good and bad elements in every organisation in the world - it then doesn't mean you should paint everyone with the same brush - are you saying there's no violence in atheism? The most peaceful countries in the world have moved past religion. Religion adds to a discrimination that already exists; religious discrimination.which countries have moved past religion? |
Logicboy03: The way forward is simple. Let the information spread. People will start questioning their belief.this is depressing - how can you compare what obtains in the 13th century and use it to whip christians in the 21st century? that's too desperate. as the centuries rolled by, man's cruelty towards another reduced and it would continue to reduce. |
[quote author=Sky-walker]World champion? skill level of 5000. ![]() My best game was with ogugua88 and that score is my highest so far. From screenshots and words here,i heard you a champion averaging 1500 per game. The more i play with good players, the more i get better. Ogugua88 don use me shine in a previous game before"revenge of the Ninja" kicked in. .[/quote]ogugua, fabsledge, ow11 are wordsmiths and i am sure they have about 14 fingers each. the rate at which they form words per game frightens me. prince is a robot! there are many good players - we should form a league soon and make this a monthly event! |
Ibime: Dem done start to turn am into argument again?there was a time lampard was booed too in this country. rooney was booed, berbatov was booed....ronaldo was booed. what has boos gotta do with it. rafa benitez was booed in his first few games at the bridge - who cares? in the coming weeks demba ba would be booed if chelsea do not get their acts right! the opinion of you fans count for nothing when it comes to roman - this is the 2nd or 3rd time he has done something the fans did not want and you did the square-root of fück all about it. |
PhysicsQED: Thief of Hearts,https://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ll75qkGInb1qinvcko1_400.gif |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 (of 1148 pages)
how could u say there were no sufficient evidence to convict him when it was screened live on TV. listen, this is how the newspapers reported the incident in the court...

