₦airaland Forum

dayokanu: Gomez off and germany collapse again

Why remove Gomez?

you didn't see how van persie sent mat hummels
on an errand with a sharp turn? there are many
bad things you could say about van persie but the
dude has got the illest tekkers in europe bar
berbatov!

coogar: https://i1231.photobucket.com/albums/ee512/zonal_marking/germany.jpg

the german team are the most talented and the most well-equipped going to this tournament.
spain missing david villa and carlos puyol might hamper them to go
full throttle.....

mesut ozil will probably win the player of the tournament!

i said this before....

the germans have the most well-equipped team in the tournament!
there's no make shift player anywhere in the team. no injuries at
all....the cons of playing less league games than their counterparts
plus the luxury of having a winter break in between.

another mat hummels block
this guy might win the player of
the tournament. perfect timing!

holland might beat germany...
every team in that group would finish on 3 points
after matchday 2...

medjai: I wonder what Dayokanu has to say about those Ronaldo's misses which were far easier than Torres'

yes, phat ibime would say ronaldo has scored 70 goals this season for
club and country so those misses don't count at all. that's the latest
escapism from the anti-torres camp.

BlueDiva: ^^^^
He should, with all the players coming in.

bluediva, remember our discussion as per
the performances of nani and ronaldo at the
euros......who has contributed more after 2 games?

super breaking news....

di matteo signs a 2-yr deal with chelsea!

StarBoard: For some reasons this England side appears solid without the much-fancied players.
Just an observation although it was something of a change seeing England being tactically astute.

england were lucky france were also shyte!
a competent team would have ripped that team apart.
let ozil catch the bumbling scott parker or let podolski
square up with glen johnson....

that england team lacked creativity...parker/gerrard
were dire. they only defended well, offensively,
they were very hopeless. welbeck and young were fed
with scraps.

r231: ^^^^^^thats like cisse's goal against Chelsea

better than cisse's....cisse fluked it!

.

StarBoard: Powell. . .
Shaking my head.
We hardly know this guy.

speak for yourself....
i really really know him...
he's a super duper player - loads of potential in the
mould of cuenca and tello...

he did that @ wembley...
see the tekkers and the execution.....it's simply lewandowskish!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=gjzdeXOQD9Y

Odunnu: Big corks dont carry infections - urban medical journal, 2011

more often than not, infection made the corks big in the first place.

ronkebp: she might not think immediately that her hubby is gay, but subsequently that thought will erupt....okay!! he likes locking the door....why did it take him 30 mins to open when he knows his wife was waiting?, why didn't he excuse himself, quickly appraoch the wife and ask her to take a seat that he was going to be with her in a couple of minutes that he had a clent??. All that little gesture, just shows respect...he utterly embarrassed her by keeping mute in satying still in his office till his "so-called " client was ready to leave.

1 - it's an office!
2 - the man was not expecting his wife
3 - due process should be followed
4 - the man was trying not to disrupt the conversation he's having with the mystery girl
5 - they could be praying in that 30-minute interval.
6 - a cheating husband would not wait for 30 mins with the knowledge that his wife is around.
7 - et cetera, et cetera!

ronkebp: if the guy was not an authority in that office, why was the door locked, how come he was the only one in the office with a customer, who is female

they could have been discussing confidential matter.
the man said he likes to lock the door in his office...he has been
doing that before...the op's problem was finding a girl there.
if she had found him with a guy, would she think her husband was gay?

ronkebp: Oh!!!! i used to walk into my father's office anytime i wanted, and there was no padlock on the door....till now....why would an office door be locked when someone is in the office...what is it supposed to be, a room it is an office, where he should be meeting clients...and not entering them.

that's because your dad owns the office or he has the highest authority there.
in an office, due process must be followed. check with the secretary if the
person you're looking for is on seat...the secretary then asks if you have
an appointment and she then calls your host to acknowledge him of your
arrival. i don't think my wife should barge into my office just because it's
mine. simple courtesy demands her to wait like other peops.

clementcro: Hello Everybody, Please I need your advice on my relationship,


I will be settling down very soon, so I met a young lady in my church, I proposed to her, but she hasnt agreed, she told me she would need to pray on my name and her parents too would need to do that.


So her parents went ahead and prayed on 3 names she provided for them, and my name was selected has God's will for her, but the problem now is this, she said she doesnt love me, and the person she loves, is one of the other guys whose name wasnt selected when prayed upon.

She told me to look for another girl or even we should be ordinary friends


I have met with the parent, the mother to be precise i told her about what her daughter told me , but she told me to neglect that, that her daughter must surely marry me, cos i am the one selected by prayer.

The mother even went to the extent of calling me when she was with the pastor that prayed on the name, and the pastor also told me to be patient that the girl will finally marry me.


But this girl is not responding very well to me, although she picks my calls, and we do talk attimes

Please what should I do, her mum is assuring me that i would be the one to marry her, that i should just be patient , but the daughter is telling me that she doesnt love me...


I need your advice, what should I do? should i be patient like they said , or I should look for another lady to be in relatinship with,


Please ur urgent advice would be appreciated.

Thanks

if the girl doesn't love you, there's no point waiting....
what type of girl even submits 3 different names of men to a pastor? nonsense!
if you go ahead and marry her like her parents say, i guesstimate your divorce
to be 3 months after your marriage......

Odunnu: Lie! Lie! Lie! Lie! Lie! Lie!

when you get infected....don't open any yeye
thread about nigerian men and their sexual
hygiene.

ritchboy: Ode, how is Welbeck posting 92% in a one-off game relevant? Does he post 92% every season?

fabregas posted less in a one-off game yesterday in the same position.
your idiotic theory about being further forward falls flat in the face.

When did I say this? Were Sanchez and Messi included in the stats you provided? Is it my fault you cannot read?

this boy is daft.
you said fabregas plays further forward for barcelona which is the reason his stats
don't measure up with busi,xavi and iniesta. i then said fabregas does not play
further than iniesta,thiago, pedro and cuenca. how come these guys still manage
to complete more passes than fabregas in a season?

Proof?

the burden of proof is so heavy for you, you might
cop a stiff-neck after this debate.

When was this posited? Was Xavi not in the Spanish team i posted earlier?

he was, but you wanted him to play deep....whereas, stats show the highest
number of passes to a team-mate in the match was xavi passing to fabregas
18 times. that's why only a r[color=#000000]e[/color]tarded numbskull like yourself would want
xavi anchoring the spanish team. he's too good offensively to be playing
dice with casillas and pique.

Abeg, don't suck me into your imbecilic arguments again. . . I can do a lot of things but i cannot cure stupidity!

see this mumu...you have been marked an imbe[color=#000000]c[/color]ile since your rebirth as "bitchboy"
there's no solution to your ailment yet. hopefully, synagogue church might get lucky and sort you
out before you infect the populace with your stupidity.

humour me, where do you want cesc to play in spain's next game? as a sweeper?

chic2pimp: Parker and Gerrard actually play well considering they were outnumbered at the centre of the park for most of the game.
Parker and Gerrard were tiggerish....The chased and hassled and were one of the reasons why the French hardly created any clear cut opportunities.
Gerrard even sprayed three or so quality balls too. I think the centre Mid did the job Hodgson asked of them.

exactly!
parker and gerrard played like defenders. they were there to destroy, they
created nada. if the delivery is lacking, how then do you expect ashley young
and welbeck to flourish? england had 35% possession to france's 65%

opta is telling me cabaye passed 18 times to nasri.....gerrard's highest number
of passes to a team mate was 7. and that teammate was lescott. parker's highest
number of passes to a team mate was 9. that team-mate is glen johnson.

abeg, parker and gerrard were decent defensively, but they were useless offensively.

A.Young for had a subpar game today by his standards. I'm 100% certain this would be his worst of the tournament.
May be I was a bit harsh on Wellbeck(was expecting too much perharps) but definitely not Young.

i think he did well considering the circumstances. he needs his midfielders
to get the ball to him and they didn't supply their strikers with enough ammo.

P:S What were your predictions for this game again?...

england 1-5 france.

i was a bit disappointed in france but then this is like their worst
squad going into a tournament. benzema? nasri? malouda? is this what
the french team has been reduced to?

i reminisce about the days of zidane, vieira, henry, trezeguet,
makelele, anelka, etc....

ritchboy: You still dey yarn?
Anyway before I sign out it's imperative I don't leave you believing this myth Cesc cannot retain possession as well as Keita and co by letting you know Cesc doesn't play furthest forward because he has the lowest pass completion percentage, he has the lowest pass completion percentage because he plays furthest forward.

you are a glorified simpleton!
what has cesc's playing furthest forward gotta do with this?
welbeck was a forward tonight and he posted 92% pass completion....

cesc is a liability...telling us he plays furthest forward in a team
that has messi and alexi sanchez makes you a world class Arrow. one thing
is clear, cesc is inferior to the other barcelona midfielders.

Anyone with half-a-brain knows it's easier to keep the ball closer to your goal where (A) The opposition are happier to let you have it and there is less pressure, and (B) You're attempting far less risky passes(i.e through balls). That's why DMs/DLMs(incl. Denilson, Mikel, Keita etc) always have some of the highest pass completion rates.

so cesc plays further than pedro and cuenca?
cheiii, this boy is daft! ritchboy would tell me now
that pedro, cuenca and thiago are all defensive midfielders.

Go and check Cesc's ratio when he played deeper and make sure you keep tissue on stand by!

his ratio is horrible wherever he has played.....cesc is always attempting risky passes.
one of those led to arsenal being gang-[color=#000000]r[/color]aped @ nou camp...there have been others too.

P.S. According to your logic Joe Allen is the sixth best "shape keeper" in Europe, no?

what has this gotta do with the argument? your theory that xavi should be benched for cesc
makes you a bumbling oaf. that busquets should start from the bench for cesc makes you an
inscrutable leprechaun. when the masters of the midfield(xavi-busquets-iniesta) are talking,
cesc should cover his face with your sullied drawers.

chic2pimp: Tbh both Young and Wellbeck were England's most disappointing players tonight.

you musta seen another match.
bbc nominated him as the man of the match and young did very well.
the best pass of the game was supplied by young and james milner
bumbled it....welbeck made movements, he defended from the front
and his general link-up play was class!

the ineffective goats are parker and gerrard.
how many times did they give the ball away looking for hollywood
passes? they couldn't maintain any composure in the middle of the
park...that england made little chances was because the central midfield
did nothing. milner's crosses were also dire.

dayokanu: When Mourinho won with Inter Milan what formation did he play? That was Di matteos method of winning and as at last check its a legal means.
Let UEFA take it away from Chelsea cos they playd 79-0-0 tactics

mourinho's team scored 2 unreplied goals in the final....they didn't
have to do back to the wall defending hoping for a penalty...jose's team
also beat barcelona 3-1 @ san siro in the semis...you must be an [color=#000000]i[/color]diot.

You bumbling oaf, AvB left a team trailing 1-3 in the tie, I ask how many coaches have been able to turn around a 2 goal deficit in the CL knockout stages. The skull content should be used by the missus as mentrual pads

obdurate [color=#000000]w[/color]anker!
you let yourself down on these pages spewing balderdash.
1-3 trailing in a tie away from home is recoverable...arsenal nearly
did against ac milan. they reduced a 4 goal deficit to 1. so what's there
to have a party about? when intelligence was being distributed, you were on a sick
leave!

dayokanu: If Schweini converted his kick, If Messi converted his kick, If benfica scored one of their chances, If Cole didnt have numerous blocks, If Drogba didnt beat Boateng to the header. We can continue the game of ifs, If my grandma had balls she would have been my granddad.
The fact is Di matteo calculated on what he needed to do and he did it and wonthe holy grail.

no, he did not....a manager turning his nose off the premier league
should have walked the champions league without needing to play 10-0-0
to win it. yet, di matteo needed some back to the wall defending to win it.
in spite of his concentration on only one competition, he was a whisker away from
losing it.....that to me isn't calculation.

If it was Mourinho or hindick that took over chelsea in March and achieved what Di matteo did, He would have been named the best ever since.

how so?
mourinho hates living on someone else's achievements.
i am sure he would have dedicated the victory to villas-boas who
allowed them to get there in the first place....the competition
was joint-won. for [color=#000000]f[/color]uck's sake....city and man utd crashed out
of europe, villas-boas qualified and you want us to rubbish his achievement?
you're a saphead!

What foundation did AvB give to RdM? A draw vs Birmingham in FA cup? which Di matteo went on to win. a 3-1 trailing vs Napoli? which Di Matteo turned around? How many teams in the CL recent history have turned a 2 goal deficit to win the game?

he qualified from his group in europe....that is not a foundation?
have you traded your intelligence for a plate of pot-noodles.

What was the lineup Chelsea used for the last 3 games of the league you trogolyte.

how's that ma business?

Di matteo never lost a game in the CL. Despite playing giants like Barca, bayern, Benfica and Napoli

yet he lost against newcastle at the bridge playing the strongest team possible!

-------Lloris------
Debuchy-Rami-Mexes-Evra
---Diarra---Cabaye----
Malouda--Nasri--Ribery
-------Benzema-------


------Welbeck-------
Milner-Young-Chamberlain
----Gerrard----Parker-----
Evra-Lescott-Terry-Johnson
---------Hart---------

dayokanu: What a mor0nic stats. When it was obvious RdM turned off the from the league with like 3 matches to go and concentrated on cup competitions and was playing reserve players

BTW RdM won 2 cups in 3 months, How many did AVB win

you're very s[color=#000000]t[/color]upid....
had schweini converted his kick, chelsea would have missed
playing in the champions league....turned off from the league
my white butt-cheek!

roberto di matteo roofed the building villas-boas started from foundation.
if villas-boas didn't qualify from his group in the champs league, what
would di matteo have won? if villas-boas didn't win the early rounds of the
fa cup, what would di matteo have won?

dayokanu...you are by far the most [color=#000000]r[/color]etarded twit on these pages!

BlueDiva: @coogar,
Does that stuupid stats take into consideration things like pressure or caliber of games played?
RDM is a better manager than AVB. Simple.

I love RDM as a manager and as a person but i'm honest enough to admit that he is a very lucky man.

what do you mean by calibre of games?
every game in the premier league is 3 points....
di matteo lost to newcastle at home, villas-boas beat man city
on the same ground. so what do you mean by high-calibre?

i have just given you their stats...

BlueDiva: Not talking of a caretaker.
Grant was a caretaker.

We all know RDM was lucky.
It's the luck factor i'm trying to emphasize. A lucky Rookie!

If we won in a manner that was clear cut, then i doubt if we would be talking of a 1 year contract.
Gomes with 14 CL goals was missing clear cut chances, Messi with all his 84 goals couldn't score against us. . .common!!!

The point is Roman knows RDM was lucky, you can't hope on faith for another 4years.

lemme bust your bubble!

https://www.talksport.co.uk/sites/default/files/imagecache/ts_magazine_big_picture/RDMAVB100512.jpg

dayokanu: Did you watch the game?

Yet we are made to believe Robben didnt give Persie the ball when he side footed a good chance off target
Unmarked in the box, with only the keeper to beat yet its not glit edged? Then whats glit edge?

GLIT_EDGED anyone?

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/06/09/article-2156641-13878A91000005DC-195_634x358.jpg

the best chance on the night was missed by huntelaar(a bundesliga representative)!
i am sure van persie would have scored that!
cocksure.

ritchboy: I don't have time to be yarning long thing with you, but to sum up, you think:

because you have nothing to say....

Xavi cannot play alongside a primary DM(something he's already done a billion times including Euro 200[color=#000000]8[/color]), but Schweinsteiger can.

things have changed since then....firstly, it was under a different manager(aragones)
since 2010, the whole continent has moved to playing 4-2-3-1 from their traditional
formation.....then there's now the emergence of busquets and xabi alonso has redefined
himself. so of what essence would it be to sacrifice xavi as a pivot when cesc cannot
even retain possession as much as xavi? you are very daft!

B. Fabregas cannot retain possession.

i know you would put a spin in this.
all i said was cesc is more likely to give the ball away trying
hollywood passes than xavi, iniesta and busquets. the stats
proved so, why are you still moaning like a [color=#000000]b[/color]itch?
your rebuttal to that was comparing joe allen to maradona.

C. To win a tournament, you MUST play with two "pivots".
Coogar, you are a disgrace!

yes, you must play with 2 pivots.

in the last world cup....

spain - alonso + busquets
holland - de jong + van bommel
germany - schweini + khedira

football managers have now learnt to be more cautious
and reactive than going gung-ho and getting thrashed.

ritchboy, you are a disgrace to football punditry!
rest one of busquets or alonso? in 2012? your brains should
be quarantined.

Koolefe: Hello pls I own a blackberry curve 9360........ Its currently on os 7.0...... I wanna knw if it can be upgrade to os 7.1 via d fone itsef...... I mean without using d desktop manager....... And wat are d new features available to os 7.1......will os 7.1 increase d ba3 life? Pls HELP

use the desktop manager....the speed provided by 3G is too
risky to install an upgrade. your device would freeze up
and get stuck in between.

an apploader or desktop manager is your best bet!

ritchboy: Mr Mumu, if you consider Swiny part of the "pivot" then you must be completely mad to suggest Xavi can't do the same.

schweini is a pivot pairing with khedira to form a double pivot.
they link the defence with the 4 forward players. xavi cannot play in there!
you were the one saying one of busquets or alonso should be dropped...i told
you they won't be dropped.

Hehehe "as predicted", even the lice in your nether region knew they would start so what exactly did you "predict"?

nah...the lice in your nether region was too stubborn to admit this is tournament football
and not a friendly match against vanuatu. spain play 4-2-3-1 in tournaments. defensive
stability is a priority.

Your "prediction" was Cesc would only start the final group game, one of his aforementioned clones must have scored then!

cos i never knew cesc would start ahead of his strikers....but i said
cesc can't be trusted to play in the midfield ahead of the quartet of xavi, iniesta, busi
and alonso. i said cesc can only play a forward role where his funky passes wouldn't hurt
his team as much.

I'm sure i also told you few years ago the perks of playing for Barca/Real.

which yeye perks.....what has this gotta do with our argument that cesc can't be trusted
in the midfield? del bosque played him as a striker for a reason and if he could trust cesc,
he coulda moved him back to the midfield and sub one of alonso/busi for a striker....but it
was cesc that got subbed.

your idiotic assumption that cesc is also better than iniesta was finally put to bed last night.
iniesta murdered cesc with his almost messi-like performance. dribbling players at will,
providing the passes, linking the play, etc. ritchboy, it's time you start paying attention
to football in the advanced level and stop your douchebaggery watery analysis.