₦airaland Forum

CanadaOrBust:
No I haven’t.
I commended him too.

I follow where the evidence leads. I’m not on anybody’s side

Okay. So how can we get Abians out of this mess?

FFK must have sniffed his wife's vagina again.

orisa37:
SANUSI OFFENDED THE GOVERNOR NOT THE PEOPLE. ONLY THE PEOPLE CAN REMOVE THEIR KING NOT THE GOVERNOR. GANDUJE IS SIMPLY PARANOID.

Go and read up the powers of a governor as it concerns traditional rulers to know who has what powers.

Greystone:
His adversaries think this is his end.

The future is even brighter for this Legend.

Only if PDP gets back power in 2023 which is very unlikely. People thought Rabiu Kwankwaso had prospects too until Ganduje extinguished him.

Lovelyn451:
even Ado bayero was killed for him to be enthroned, that was how we always hear bokoharam attacked Emir's palace everyday, until they finally got him and killed him. shebi bokoharam have stop attacking Emir palace since sanusi became Emir...yeye

sanusi and Kwankwaso, these two Fulani men? Evil

Kwankwaso is an Hausa man.

GEEBITE:
Take it to the bank,Rimi and Ganduje are both Fulanis. This is coming from someone whose great grandma was a pure Fulani with roots in Augie Kebbi state.

I don't know about Rimi but Ganduje is a pure Hausa man. No fulani has ruled Kano state since 1999. Hausas hold and guide the political power there jealously. A very wrong misconception that many Southerners have about northern Muslims is the belief that they are all fulanis. Hausa are majority in the north. Fulanis are just a noisy minority. Even Aliko Dangote that many think is a fulani is actually an Hausa man. Kano state is the melting pot of the hausa people.

Abia1stboy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_eHbzBZPnA

Thank you.

Afamed:
What next now that you have seen the video? Do you need more evidence?

Many thanks for providing this irrefutable evidence. CanadaorBust has fled

CanadaOrBust:
In this age of photoshop? U can’t be serious

Many people have confirmed it as genuine. They say that Kalu released the photos after Orji stopped paying him the agreed sum.

Ojiofor:
Chris Ngige was taken to the same shrine by Uba brothers way before T.A Orji did,why is Anambra case different?

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjThfSUg43oAhWSrHEKHfO1B3kQFjADegQIBhAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fallafrica.com%2Fstories%2F200408161581.html&usg=AOvVaw38PXxYeN23gWQFeHtSrsYV

It depends on the kind of oath they took.

Abagworo Afamed ChinoElects okpalaAnambra MelesZenawi gidgiddy CanadaorBust justtoodark Bragalane Africonji NaijaRoyalty
Is there any truth in this matter?

It shows former governor T.A. orji getting washed with fetish items and taking oath to keep Abia state in bondage. Former governor Orji Kalu now languishing in prison was said to have supervised the oath taking.

Which country will FFK join, Oduduwa or Biafra? He is confusing thunder.

It will start and end in the social media.

Buhari is being managed carefully after multiple surgeries. When Abba Kyari wants him to talk, he will talk.

Propaganda from the defeated party gives me joy. Hope till 2028.

You won't see much traffic in this thread because it isn't something that will provoke insults.

It's not by force to create topic.

Baby factory, fake drugs, drug trafficking, Advanced fee fraud, etc

The only pastor that has the keys to the gates of hell. If na God or Satan give you, on judgement day you will explain yourself.

Ngozi Okonjo Iweala who supervised the mindless looting of our resources by appointees of Jonathan during the four years of locusts (2011-2015). In saner climes, she would be rotting in jail.

If it is possible for Abia state to be merged with Akwa Ibom so that the state can be liberated from underdevelopment and filthy environment, so be it. It looks like the job of governance is overwhelming Abia leaders. Ikpeazu is just there sharing kerosene while his state rots.

kahal29:
The same Justice Nweze that ruled that APC has no candidate in 2019 Rivers State elections.

Don't mind him. He and Ex CJN Onnoghen are on the payroll of Governor Wike, with Mary Odili as their facilitator. Buhari should thank his stars that he moved in time against Onnoghen or by now he would have been answering ex-President because Onnoghen had already been directed to uphold the Atiku server results.

Complete the Osissioma flyover first before dreaming of airport. Who did this to Abia? The state stinks!

Ihedinjo and his lawyers are only postponing the doomsday. Come tomorrow, the thief will go back home to mbaise in shame.

XANDERBOY85:
You people are truly despicable! You know you have no legal leg to stand on based on the merits of the case, so you resort to what you’re good at: searching for technicalities!

Why you lot that say Ndigbo are inconsequential yet are determined to get a foothold in Alaigbo by hook or crook is what one can’t understand!

I abhor brainless people like you. What is the technicality in quoting the electoral act that clearly stipulates a time limit for resolution of post election cases in the supreme court? Your stupidity is in overdose.

There are only 2 reasons why Ihedinjo will not be returned as Imo state governor.

1) He did not get up to 2/3rd win all over the state which is compulsory.

2) Second but more importantly, the 60 days for the supreme court to decide his case from the day the appeal court gave their own judgement is over.

Enyibaba:
By Anayo Ugwoegbu


Fraud was one of the invariable factors established by Hon. Emeka Ihedioha, through his legal team, led by Chief Kanu Agabi SAN, CON in their application for the Supreme Court to set aside its January 14, 2020 misjudgement on the 2019 Imo State governorship election, that the apex court erroneously awarded to Senator Hope Uzodimma.

And according to pundits, fraud is indeed apt and succinct summary of the whole mumbo-jumbo pertaining to the highly controversial and contentious 388 polling units and the ridiculous votes and result sheets emanating therefrom, which were submitted by Uzodimma, and on which the Supreme Court based its misjudgement.

Without any further preambles, the following is the exact and precise, unedited statement by Hon. Emeka Ihedioha, through his legal team to prove that the declaration of Senator Uzodimma as winner of the election and consequently governor of Imo State was based on fraud.

Enjoy the treasure of facts:

"THE JUDGMENT SOUGHT TO BE SET ASIDE IS A NULLITY IN THAT WAS OBTAINED BY FRAUD"

"The Appellants/Respondents misled this court into holding that a total of 213,495 votes were unlawfully excluded from the votes scored by the 1st Appellant/Respondent in the gubernatorial election of 9th March 2019 in Imo State.

"The 1st Appellant/Respondent admitted under cross-examination that it was him and not the 3rd Respondent [INEC] or any of its officials, who computed the result that allotted to him the 213,495 votes alleged to have been excluded from his total votes in the election.

"The total votes cast as shown in the 1st Appellant’s computation was more than the total number of voters accredited for the election and in some polling units more than the total number of registered voters.

"The result computed by the 1st Appellant showed only the votes of the 1st Applicant and the 1st Appellant without specifying the votes scored by the other 68 candidates who participated in the election.

"Exhibits 63RD1 to 63RD19 (INEC Forms EC40G) show that there were no valid elections in the 388 polling units where the additional 213,495 votes claimed by the 1st Appellant were allegedly generated.

"We submit that the judgment sought to be set aside was obtained by fraud because the 1st Appellant/Respondent fraudulently misrepresented to this honourable court that he had an additional 213,495 votes which were unlawfully excluded from the final result by the 3rd Respondent. To this end the 1st Appellant/Respondent pleaded a table of excluded votes (Exhibit KGA3) which are at pages 9-27, Volume 1 of the Records. In that table the 1st Appellant/Respondent failed to plead the votes scored by the 70 candidates who participated in the election. He only pleaded his own votes and the votes alleged to have been scored by the 1st Applicant. In ADAMS v UMAR (2010) All FWLR (Pt 513) 1289 at 1386 - 1387 paras H-B it was held that –
‘While there is no obligation on the petitioner to join any candidate who lost the election as a party, the petitioner has a duty to comply with the provisions of paragraph 4(i) (c) of the First Schedule to the Electoral Act, 2006 by stating among other particulars, the names and scores of ALL the candidates that participated in the election … The raison d’etre for this is that, where in an election petition a petitioner fails to plead the scores of all the candidates at the election, it will be impossible to grant any prayer that the petitioner was the duly elected candidate or that the 1st respondent was not the duly elected candidate.’

"Apart from the fatal error of failing to plead the result of all the candidates in his table of excluded votes, the 1st Appellant/Respondent also admitted in his evidence during cross-examination at page 2601-2603 in Volume 4 of the Record that the number of votes he allocated to himself in the table are in excess of the registered voters in the polling units where he claimed he obtained those votes. He further admitted under cross-examination at page 2603 of the Record that instead of INEC he was the person who computed the disputed votes tabulated in the petition.

"In his private and personal tabulation of the votes (shown at pages 9-27 of Volume 1 of the Records) the 1st Appellant/Respondent stated in column 69 that in Polling Unit 08 in Eziama/Okpalla Ward he scored 819 votes whereas the total number of registered voters was 462. In column 285 he stated that in Polling Unit 12 in Odudiaro Ward he scored 780 votes whereas the total number of registered voters were 449. In column 377 he stated that in Polling Unit 6 in Umuozu Ward he scored 367 votes and the 1st Applicant scored 4 votes making a total of 371 votes whereas the total number of registered voters was 367. In column 384 he stated that in Polling Unit 6 in Umunkwo ward he scored 526 votes and the 1st Applicant scored 2 votes making a total of 528 votes whereas the total number of registered voters was 526. These are just a few examples of the fraudulent results the 1st Appellant/Respondent induced this court into accepting as a part of his votes.

"In the tabulation of the votes at pages 9-27 in Volume 1 of the Record, the 1st Appellant/Respondent did not state the number of accredited voters in each of the listed 388 polling units. He stated only the total number of registered voters. We submit that without a record of accredited voters, the votes alleged to have been scored in those polling units were invalid and void because there can be no valid votes without accreditation – FAYEMI v ONI (2009) All FWLR (Pt 493) 1254 at 1309 paras F-H. So evidently the scores in those 388 polling units were allocated arbitrarily. They were not the product of a valid election, and this was corroborated by the evidence of DW5 who tendered INEC Form EC40G as Exhibits 63RD1 to 63RD19 to show that in those polling units, the election was cancelled due to electoral violence as reported by the presiding officers in those units.

"Unfortunately this court was misled into accepting the fraudulent result tabulated by the 1st Appellant/Respondent and consequently 213,695 votes were added for the 1st Appellant/Respondent and 1,903 votes were added for the 1st Applicant. This brought the total number of votes cast in the election to 953,038, while the total number of voters accredited for the election as shown in Exhibit A1 was 823,743. This is a clear case of fraud and corrupt practice for which the nullification of the election is the only proper order this court can make by virtue of section 40(2) of the Electoral Act (as amended). In effect, the judgment and orders returning the 1st Appellant/Respondent as elected are contrary to law and evidence and is to that extent a nullity.

"Where a judgment is obtained fraudulently as in the instant case, we submit that the court which gave the judgment is entitled to set it aside upon an application such as this. In OGBU v URUM (1981) LPELR 2290SC at 20 paras C-E, this court held that –

‘.....a court would also have inherent jurisdiction to set aside its judgment if it could be shown that it was obtained by fraud.

"Also in EDE v MBA (2011) LPELR 8234SC at 26-28 paras E-A this court held that –
‘....this court under section 22 of the Supreme Court Act and Order 6 has the power to set aside in certain circumstances its decision like any other court where the circumstances demand, such as (i) where any of the parties obtained judgment by fraud or deceit (ii) where such a decision is a nullity or (iii) where it is obvious that the court was misled into giving the decision’."

There's nothing to add or subtract. No addition no subtraction. It a quod erat demonstradum QED!

On Hon. Emeka Ihedioha's legal team include the following legal luminaries:

*Kanu Agabi, SAN, CON

*Onyechi Ikpeazu, SAN

*J. T. U. Nnodum, SAN

*K.C.O Njemanze, SAN

*S. I Ameh, SAN

*Emeka Etiaba, SAN

*Umeh Kalu, SAN

*Emeka Okpoko, SAN

*L. M. Alozie, SAN

*Essien H. Andrew, SAN

*S. A. Anyalewechi, Esq.

*A. S. Ogujiofor, Esq.

*Charles Ndukwe,Esq.

*Uchenna Njoku, Esq.

*Others.

I count 14 lawyers in this Ihedinjo's legal team. That equates to at least 280 million naira that Uzodinma will smile home with after the judgement of Monday next week.

wwwihy:
When you see them shouting up and down... you should know that there are skeletons in their cupboards....hence when they are caught....the next thing you will hear .... PERSECUTION

Exactly. Fani Kayode is one of them.

This is why they are always attacking Buhari. God bless our dear President. The anti- corruption war is on course.

dj4wealth:
I will not be surprised.
This government will be willing to give IMO state back to PDP and target BAYELSA because of Revenue allocation to that state.
1. To weaken opposition financial strength
2. To steal more from the state.

Bayelsa and Imo will still be in APC. Wailers will only wail.