₦airaland Forum

DriverX:
LOL

It's safer to keep the baby than abort it..

actually abortion is safer than child birth.

Whiteheartbit:
Hello naira landers.
I really need your advice on what to do about this.
Sex with my wife has become so so boring that after it i most often time regret leaving whatever I was supposed to do for it. I mean the feeling of it was not worth it at all
I've tried all I know, I've read books and bought some for her to help out for our sexual life, yet the improvement is short leaved.

We've been married for Six years with two kids. Yet from the day we got married I can count how many times I've kissed my wife during or not during sex.
I've called her attention to it, if I managed to kiss her I must have begged my way through.
Like a secondary school chap.
------ I enjoy kissing -------- which she knows, she'll promise making a change yet no Change.

Okay, I've come to understand with her that maybe kissing is not her thing as it is for some women. Fine I don't go to that area any more.

All of a sudden, she's not interested in fore play of any kind, which I love to engage in no matter how badly I want to get in because I want the satisfaction to be mutual, but She just want me straight in.
Many times I'm filled with wondering thoughts while making up with her.
Peradventure she agrees to a pre-intimacy after much bagging and persuasion, it's not more than 5mins with restrictions to some parts. GGGGGGGGGGod!
I'll just be like what is this.

I've called her on serveral occasions if something was wrong, if she was going through any emotional stress or something I could help out with or change, response always negative.

Yet no improvement.

I don't know who to talk to, because I'm a very private person and respects privacy.

I'm doing my best to make her and the kids happy, to the best of my ability as God is helping me.
I'm a very charming and romantic dude, the best I know about myself in that area, which she has also told me.
I've never cheated on her, not once and I don't intend to and she knows.

I had to come up here to seek for help because it's getting out of hand.

To the point that I seek her consent if we can make out for the night ( it's not the top priority in our lives though, but it's necessary) she sometimes come up with an excuse which I'll understand or she agrees but ends up disappointing ( i.e sleeps off or not in the mood) and I get pissed off, because I'm left ganging and she doesn't care. My God!
For about a month it's been dry sex and it's making me feel as if I'm violating her, forcing her against her will.
The very last time it was as if I was making out with a dead body, no sound, no moves, no connection. Mahn o Mahnnnn

I'm at the verge of taking the selibacy way, because that was my vow before I married her.
This sex thing is distracting me.

I need advice, is there something about women I don't known because I've read and researched about women.

Honestly. I'm in your shoes too.

But thankfully it's with my girlfriend. Anyways I'm going to break up with her latest today evening.

Mine behave as though having sex with me was doing me a favor.

And if you do anything for her, all she thinks about is that you did it because you want to have sex with her.

And I think if I ever get married to her, this your condition will be child's play.

Ballzproblemm:
I am open-minded to conspiracies but this is just loads of crap

I guess when the aliens wanted to leave, they packed out and only left their automatic cameras behind to auto-snap the empty cities.

Or the first European that came to the abandoned cities took pictures and then later went to call the rest of the clan hiding in the bush.

That explains why there are no people in the pictures

Goodlyhrt:
To be ignored by the only girl you cared about. I love her so dearly but I am afraid to be in a committed relationship with her over the fact that I am financially constrained and this type of girl needs mad maintainance gentle men she is HOT!

It's not that I do this often o in fact I don't keep female friend at least for now but this one is hard to let go so I just kept her contact around and call her once a while to check up on her. Normally she bills me and I sha send the little I have and so on.. But recently she does not pick my call again o hmmm. Both whassap and voice. I will call her and she will busy my call. Now I am having a melt down right here.

Now I am having a melt down. I think she finds me of no use and have moved on you know new guy and stuff (her wassap status tells me).

If I have the money I will marry this girl today so that I can keep her to myself because she is damn worth it.

But alas I am not man enough and its killing me. I am weak and I need some one to talk to. I'd call my momma later today. Her emotional support is needed here.

You guys wouldn't understand fully the details of our friendship. And i do not have the strength for the article. You just have to note that I don't FAFF around with a girl for games or shii.. If I got it I flaunt and if I don't then no show kinda guy.

maintenance.

And you De beg

Ballzproblemm:
so what is this thread implying

that Europe was designed by aliens.

Same aliens that designed the pyramids in Egypt

That's always the gist

T

The reason why we can't fight corruption in Nigeria is because corruption is a grass root problem.

We see the highest form in the government.

But if you dig deeper, you'll see corruption in every aspect of the country.

Most of our righteous people are that way because they don't have the power yet or no access to the treasury.

Imagine delegates that are supposed to make sure that Nigerians get the best are already selling their power to the highest bidder.

Funny how people can easily be forgotten especially after being on every screen

Mynd44

OAdj

Fynestboi

Missyb3

Source: Facebook

Richsteemit:
nairaland pls help me I don't what is happening to me nowadays. Whenever I see lizard and cockroach my dick will be rising. Pls help

Shey lizard get nyash wey you dey look abi the cockroach get big breast wey you go wan press?

Honestly I no understand

Over 7 billion people in the world but you keep disturbing anonymous people with your unexciting times

myn44

OAM4J

Key Points

1. The Central Bank of Nigeria has issued a new directive to banks asking them to charge indemnity on transfers above N 1 million for individuals and N10 million for corporate bodies

2. The new rule also pegged a higher limit on transfers above N200 million for individuals and N250 million for corporate organisations

3. The order is meant to insulate the banks from any loss or risks associated with the transactions and place the liability on the customers

Nigeria’s apex bank, the Central Bank of Nigeria has issued a new directive mandating bank customers to pay indemnity on bank transfers above N1 million for individuals and N10 million for corporate organizations.

The CBN pegged an upper limit on the amount transferable at N25 million and N250 million for individuals and corporate customers respectively.

CBN offloads risks and liabilities on customers

Vanguard reports that the new directive is to absolve the banks and put liabilities for any breach or risks arising from such transfers on the bank customers.

CBN stated on Thursday, May 2, 2022, in a circular issued to banks on the Review of operations of the Nigerian Interbank Settlement System (NIBSS) Instant Payments System and other e-payment options with the same features. The circular conveying the directive was signed by the Director of Payments System Management Department, Musa Jimoh.

The circular said: [I]“Further to the Circular on the above subject referenced BPS/DIR/GEN/CIR/01/011 and dated August 13, 2014, banks are hereby required to comply with the following:

“Accept indemnity from customers for ‘Highly Secured Online Funds Transfer above N1 million for individual and N10 million for corporate, subject to a maximum of N25 million (Individual) and N250 million (Corporate);

“Provide customers with the option of electronic or paper indemnity based on the customer’s preference; Implement electronic indemnity with stricter controls requiring biometric verification of identity;

“Adhere to multiple factor authentication (MFA) for ‘Highly Secured Online Funds Transfer; Inform and educate customers on the use of indemnity to increase transaction limits where applicable.” [/i]

Source: https://www.legit.ng/business-economy/economy/1472876-new-cbn-rule-mandates-bank-customers-indemnify-banks-for-transfers-above-n1-million/

Wingscloud:
you have the hardest Job on earth!

apparently the job of killing people given to you by Mohammed is not so difficult.

Does the gentle approach involve stoning them to death?

Does it mean after stoning them to death, we should drag their body on the streets?

Does it mean we should burn them after dragging their corpse on the streets?

Lexusgs430:
Did he have to kill her .........


He would be locked up (for life or killed) and the child would be returned to the mother............

He can only run, he CANNOT hide . ..... Think before you act ......

who told you that one?

With luck, he might solve there in the USA.

All he needs is to obtain false paper, do illegal plastic surgery or even become homeless for some time.

No be movies be this an real life. He's 40% sure to escape if he learns to keep a low profile or have good friends

It's better to groan alive than to be burnt alive.

When you talk about the CIA, you have to understand that in its early days, the organization was involved in a lot of experiments because then, science was still young and filled with people who still hold on to their superstitious beliefs.

There were even experiments on pastors when they were speaking in tongues to see where it was coming from.

Today, do you think scientists will plug any pastor to an electrode device to find out if he's speaking in tongue is natural or coming from the spiritual world?

Looking at the past for knowledge is a very bad thing. It will make you dumb because people from the past have little knowledge and as we progress, our knowledge adds up in the bank.

Imagine reading about egyptian account of how the sun revolves around the earth and saying it is the truth. Honestly, some of you need to be banned from nairaland

OurTruth:
The first pdf document was posted as proof that remote viewing exists and is a fact and was carried out by the CIA in the 1970s.

The picture I posted was from a remote viewing session done using Reptilians as targets. CIA carried out various remote viewing seasons on different targets

But the CIA Reptilian remote viewing session is just one out of many. There are multiple remote viewing institutions that have carried out various remote viewing sessions on Reptilians and proven that they are real. Check out Farsight Institute and their remote viewing sessions for example.

The natives of Dulce New Mexico see Reptilians all the time because their underground bases are close to their residents. If you have cash for a plane ticket and a Visa, you can travel to Dulce yourself and interview these guys. They will even show you entrances to their underground locations. Enter and you get devoured. Simple as that.

If US is far, South Africa is close by. Just travel to there and interview Zulu shamans yourself and hear what they have to say.

Research past life regressions hypno theraphy and you will see multiple sources around the world claiming to see reptilian beings.

I've watched interviews of Buddhist monks with their third eye open who also see these beings. You could also travel to China and India and interview them.

Instead on sitting in your dogmatic chair in Nigeria and saying everything is a lie, why don't you do some real research?

There have even been accounts of lizard man sightings and similar sighting in the US.

I could go on and on.

Reptilians are real. There are just two many corroborating sources to dismiss it's validity.

The difference between me and you is that I've spent over 10 years doing serious research on this subject but you clearly haven't done any.

First of all, the CIA document which you presented as evidence has no basis for anything reptilian. If you say the document for reptilian exist then provide the link here and not some other document about talking about remote viewing.

Secondly, the CIA document you provided above is in no way a conclusive evidence that remote viewing or seeing the future or time travel Is possible

If anything, the document is only an investigation of a man who says he can remotely view the future from the present. He was then asked to describe what he saw happening on a particular date, precisely 4 days from the present.

He described a restaurant.

But it was never concluded and neither was there any evidence that the events he described that he saw were verified.

The document was merely putting someone to test.

Like when a friend walks up to you and say he can see the future and you tell him, "what will happen 4 days from now at so and so place?"

and he began to describe the events that will happen.

Unfortunately, you didn't make it to that place on the date to verify his claims.

Will you say based on the above that your friend actually saw the future or that remote viewing is possible?

Of course not. Because it was never verified.

The same with that CIA document that you are using as evidence.

The man's claim of seeing the future was never verified. So, that document is as useless as trash.



Thirdly, because you have been studying the reptilian things for 10 years is not a proof that they exist or that your claims are valid. For one, there is not proof whatsoever that you have been studying them for over ten years other than you saying so.

But let's not concern ourselves with that.

The whole of humanity believed in the bible creation stories for over 3,000 years until, one day in 1859, that Charles Darwin published his book On the Origin of Species which shows that man actually evolved and was not created in 7 days. Even with glaring evidences of this, there are many people who still hold onto their religious beliefs that they were created.

The church almost crucified Galileo Galilei because he found out that the earth actually revolves around the sun contrary to the church's over 2000 years of doctrine + the over 3000 years of biblical texts from old Israel making a total of over 5,000 years of documentation that it is the sun which revolves around the earth.

Till today, there are still millions who dedicate their whole lives trying to proof that the earth is flat.

What I'm saying is that, you may dedicate hundred of years to learning something but so long as you are reading the wrong texts, it will always be false and will never stand with evidence.

Stop reading conspiracy theories.

Pick up a textbook or something that is universally proven and learn from it. with time, your eyes will become open to make deductions and knowing knowledge from garbage.

OurTruth:
My knowledge about Reptilians is derived from various sources. The Emerald Tablets is just one. I have never posted just the Emerald Tablets as sole proof of the existence of reptilians. I usually post multiple sources, like I did in this thread, but you conveniently avoided the other sources I referenced and latched on the Emerald Tablets cos it was an easy strawman argument.

All my theories have multiple corroborating evidence. I just don't pick ancient proof in isolation. Almost every ancient civilization references Reptilian beings. From the Hopi indians, to the Mayans, to the janists, to the Gnostics, Zulu shamans in southern African, the Chinese, Egyptians etc. This isn't one random isolated account. There are carvings and drawings. If one ancient culture makes a random claim, of course it shouldn't be taken seriously, but when multiple ancient cultures all say the same thing, then that should raise an eyebrow. Then you fastfroward to modern times and people are still saying the same thing, then there is some validity to that claim. Do you see anyone believing the sun is a God today? Do you see me taking the claim seriously? And still all this evidence from ancient cultures and ancient writings is just one source; just a single thread from the fabric of evidence.

There are other sources, like account of users of psychedelics, account from remote viewers like the CIA one I posted, account from abductees, from contactees, account from military whitsle blowers that by the way have been assassinated for sharing their info, account from past life regression sessions, account from spiritualists etc. I could go on.

The arrogance in your write-up in very similar to the one I had years ago. I would challenge any view that seemed out of the ordinary and I would do it with much conviction. Let's just say people grow. The more you thirst for knowledge genuinelywithout being shackled to dogma, you will surely find it.

not arrogance but wisdom.

The only credible source you had was the CIA document and that turns out to be a lie.

Check my above post where I already made some modifications.

OurTruth:
"In the form of man they amongst us,
but only to sight were they as are men.
Serpent-headed when the glamour was lifted but appearing to man as men among men. Crept they into the Councils,
taking forms that were like unto men

Yet, beware, the serpent still liveth
in a place that is open at times to the world.
Unseen they walk among thee
in places where the rites have been said."

The above text is from the emerald tablets, very ancient stone tablets just recently translated.

I think people like you really need to start getting their sh*ts together before making a thread on Nairaland because not all of us are dumbs.

First of all, because something is ancient and written on an emerald does not mean it is true.

The Bible is an ancient book and so is the Quran.

These books tell different stories that does not mean that they are entirely true or accurate because they are ancient. For instance, the bible said 'the sun was made to stop' which is inaccurate because the earth rotates around the sun and not the sun around the earth, so you can't stop the sun that is already standing still but the earth that is rotating.

The same is true for different cultures. The Egyptians you are quoting belief that the sun rising of the sun is because one of their gods is riding a 'fiery fire chariot'

That is an ancient belief that is well documented from ancient times, does that make it true?

People from the past don't know as much about the world that we live in as much as we do today. Most times, it is totally wrong to go into the past to search for truth from people who were only making things up to explain the things they don't understand.

People like you love what I call selective knowledge. You go into a bank of information and pick only those things that satisfies your narratives while ignoring the millions of evidence against it.

The Egyptians and every other ancient civilization have thousands of false stories about the world, like how their pharoahs are not human beings but divine beings but you ignore that because it is not only false but also ridiculous and then at the same time you hold onto their discussion about the reptilian world because it satisfies your narratives.

While not also believe that the sun is is actually a chariot of fire? why not also believe that their pharaoh is a divine god and not a human being? Heck, why not also belief that God spoke to Mohammed and that Mohammed is the true messenger of God and Islam is the only true religion since you believe that their account of a reptilian community is true?

Please, you are educated for chrissake. so behaving like someone that has never seen the four walls of the school

Proof of existence of reptilians from remote-viewing.

Remote viewing or 'extra sensory perception' was developed in the 1970's by the CIA and was used for espionage purposes. Remote viewing is the ability of a human being to perceive information and imagery of remote geographical targets, regardless of time and space. While this is a natural ability, it is very hard to do without training.

Note: The CIA has declassified numerous documents proving the existence and use of remote viewing:

This CIA document is prove that the CIA have been using remote viewing since at least the 80's.

https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00788R000700070001-8.pdf

Just so we are clear, I took my time to read the document you said was from CIA and actually it was..

However, the document clearly is about a man who thinks he can see the future (remote viewing) and not anywhere close to your reptilian narrative.

I didn't even find the world reptilian mentioned in the document.

Furthermore, your sketches was different from the ones in the document. the document describe a man on the 13th of December 1981 who was made to 'go ahead in time' to 17th of December 1981.

He was then made to describe the activities he could see in a restaurant by focusing primarily on man having his lunch in the same restaurant.


He was then made to describe the man, his clothes, behavior and so on.

Wuppdex:
And how many wars have the USA convincingly won till date, Vietnam, Irak, Afghanistan ? your mumu no be here, ode

You dey yarn dust.

First off, those were not war fought near or even close to USA soil.

Secondly, you can't technically call them USA wars.

simply because Nigerian soldiers went to Liberia for peacekeeping doesn't mean nigerians are at war with Liberians.

The USA in each of those wars went in to fight factions that are overpowering their country government.

pansophist:
Russia do not have a "no first use policy". Russia's nuclear policy is that it will be used when the existence of the state is under threat.

Even if Russia nuke Ukraine, the UK, US or whoever will not nuke Russia, because of something called MAD (mutual assured destruction). You can only nuke a country that can't nuke you back (eg when the US nuked Japan in ww2).

Russia can mobilise and take care of its army. What do you take Russia for? If Russia can mobilizer armies thousands of miles away in Syria to prevent the overthrow of Assad, why can't they do it in Ukraine which is just a stone throw from home?

Russia defeated nazi Germany remember, and that was over seventy years ago when they haven't been this sophisticated in weaponry. Don't underestimate Russia man.

Ukraine is a pawn. I'm sure you know that. It is just being used by the west to contain Russia. When this war is over and Russia's aim is accomplished, Kiev will be ignored permanently for good. Tale a clue from Georgia mate.

You dey yarn okotor.

Ukraine doesn't have nuke so I guess that satisfies your equation for nuking so why can't russia go ahead and nuke them?

Afterall, according to you, no one will do anything.

Again, Russia cannot mobilize all of its army to ukraine even if it wants to.

It cannot

If Buhari na woman him for be ashawo because na ashawo no dey like stay one place

pansophist:
How can Russia loose in this war? Its impossible. Worse come to worse, they nuke Ukraine once and for all. Seems like Putin being careful is seen as weakness. Typical of idiots.

Russia has more army due to its over x3 of Ukrainian population, is a defense powerhouse that designs and manufacture everything it needs militarily. Ukraine simply can not defeat Russia no matter how much weapon is pumped into it. Its a future impossible tense.

Russia have nukes.


But Russia cannot fire nukes because of the "first use policy"

If it fires nukes at Ukraine, then USA, UK and other NATO members will nuke it.

It's a bad idea to be the one to fire a nuke first especially against a country with no nuke like Ukraine.

If Russia will fire a nuke then its like saying 'I have already lost everything what more can I loss?'

Having more army is not the koko. It's the amount you can mobilize and take care of at the same time.

Russia cannot take all of its army to Ukraine at once or even gradually. Secondly there's need for food, and all the other essentials