₦airaland Forum

Why are people so misguided. One week is way too short. Most of what you do will be swiftly undone thereafter or simply not proceed into reality. Therefore you should only use the time to swiftly do things that cannot be undone.

I will not wish to utter the words. But we all know the one thing that is permanent and irreversible and it should certainly visit certain principalities and powers in this country.

tctrills:
But I just did, the civil rights movement led to Affirmative action and CTR.
Click the link below to study and learn more

https://unherd.com/2025/02/the-civil-rights-movement-failed/

I will not Joy Reid's personal experience. But the link I shared with you about the Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard would educate you on the subject in totality not just one person's experience.

I don't even need to believe Joy. She is not really important when I can get the entire facts. Thousands of Asians were denied entrance because of policies that stemmed from the civil rights movement

So I am to understand that your issue with the Civil Rights Act is Affirmative Action. Is that all, before I proceed?
Because it appears that you also dont know that the Civil Rights Act did not provide for Affirmative Action.

cococandy:
Kuuun

I SWEAR!

Its so shameful and painful to watch.

@Tctrills, I can bet my left testicle that you dont understand what she just said to you.

tctrills:
You keep taking of slavery. Oga slavery is over move on. The oyibo is not your problem. Tinubu is.
You are living in an 1830 mentality but you call me the slave.
I have moved on but you intentionally choose to remain a slave.
Note: I was never a slave and I wasn't even born at the time. Oga move on.

Inferiority complex is slavery.

tctrills:
So, some Asian took Harvard university to court about 2 years ago and we're able to proof that many Asians were denied admission even when the got higher SAT scores that blacks who were accepted.

Below is the link
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Students_for_Fair_Admissions_v._Harvard

So Asian were being discriminated for blacks with reduced scores to be accepted.

It was happening even in pilot schools.

Do you understand it now?
That is racism. That is what Charlie dedicated his life to fighting and that is what you are defending.

That is a wrong understandimg of what happened.

I will come back to that. But first, so that you dont run away -

1. Explain how the Civil Rights Act went too far.

2. Have you watched Joy Reid. Do you understand that we are talking, in her case, about one of the best students regardless of race?

The problem with you as an inverse self hating racist is that you will assume, like Kirk, that any black person you see in a position of privilege, did not merit it.

tctrills:
Reverse racism is nothing but racism.

And there is nothing worse than self-hating inverse racism, where one becomes the slavish defender of racists and the "house-slave" the "Uncle Tom" and the "Uncle Rukus" who is always to be seen condemning his race in favor of the views of racists who hate him.

tctrills:
You should care if you are taking serious. I have never defended racist I defend Charlie because he wanted everyone treated equal. That's the opposite of being a racist you would agree.
Now let me ask you, if Harvard or any university denies a person admission because of his race, is that racism?
If yes, that's what Charlie was fighting against. That's some of the reverse racism that the civil rights movement enabled.
Reverse racism is nothing but racism.

1. Answer the question on how the Civil Rights Act went too far.

2. See here, Joy Reid on qualifications -


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBKwGhoZRMY

Make sure you watch this to the end - its short - only 8 minutes. Then you will see that this woman for example, ranked in the best of the best regardless of race.

You dont seem to understand that (a) Requirements are not reduced for Pilots (b) neither are they for those taken into Ivy Leavue schools - or the best schools generally.

tctrills:
First, you have made yourself the racist police which is very ugly. It's not healthy at all.
Now to your question, in Charlies own words, the Civil Rights movement went too far.
Is he right to say it went too far? We could argue that. I think he was right though.
But making yourself the race police is just awful.
I know the number of times you have called someone racist since we started talking.
No one can honestly take you serious when you use that word because you have abused it.

How did it go too far. Mind you - this is not all he said, but go on, tell us how it went too far.

I don't care if anyone takes me seriously by the way, the fact is the fact. When your instinct is to defend even the worst racist statements then there is a problem with an inferiority complex.

tctrills:
You lose the point. One or 2 of the statements were made by Martin Luther king Jr. And Krik never critized him for any of these statements.
Krik was often critical of Rv King for other reasons not for his statement about equality.
Please don't conflict issues

Even if I let that slide - and I dont - go ahead and explain why Kirk said the Civil Rights Act was a mistake.

Be careful as you do so.

ClassicEvilSpir:
if only there was a purely black model country, where the blacks there actually came together to build infrastructure, good economy and all. the talks about blacks and their inferiority, and constant feeling of victimhood wouldn't be an issue. well, maybe Wakanda is up there.

I was amused when a very tribalistic individual, who had said bad things about other tribes, was insulting Kirk views. Kirk wasn't even racist, but the fact people are willing to be victims makes them blind to reading between the lines.

everyone will die one day. Nigerians are dying sef, as the biggest black nation is still celebrating roads in 2025, no central sewage, poor security especially where people in power are lax to the killings of their citizens by people probably not a secret to them.

we blacks don't love ourselves

The reasons for less development thus far in black countries are deep and rooted in a mix of geographical, climatic and historical factors which are far more complex than the lazy presumption in your last sentence.

I wish I had the energy, but I just dont - it sickens me to the pit of my stomach seeing black men defend the worst racism even against they themselves.

tctrills:
“We must judge people by their character, not the color of their skin; that’s true justice.”

Who made the original version of this statement and why is it that Kirk derided and condemned him?

tctrills:
I can bet, you just copied and pasted.

Whats the point betting, abi you also dont know the meaning of the word "culled" just as you didnt know the meaning of the word "trans?"

Charlie never made a single racist statement, he only told the truth.

I would have collapsed at this statement were it not coming from you.

And yes, when you reduce the requirements for black pilots, everyone, not only Charlie should not be comfortable having a black pilit in the cockpit.

No requirements are ever reduced for pilots.

But who would expect someone whose knee jerk reaction is to defend racists to know that?

CoronaVirusPro:
Thank God he is looking up at us now.

I have no other words to type.

Looking "up?"

Kai you are wicked.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Kukutente23:
Don't underestimate people with an agenda
You know how many fake videos exist about Israel from the Hamas propaganda machinery egged on by woke liberals?

And vice versa.

Statements made by Charlie Kirk that have been noted and criticized for their content regarding race and ethnicity include:

On Black Americans and Affirmative Action:

"If I see a Black pilot, I'm going to be like, boy, I hope he's qualified." - The Charlie Kirk Show, 23 January 2024.

"If I'm dealing with somebody in customer service who's a moronic Black woman, I wonder is she there because of her excellence, or is she there because of affirmative action?" - The Charlie Kirk Show, 3 January 2024.

Regarding Joy Reid, Michelle Obama, Sheila Jackson Lee, and Ketanji Brown Jackson: "You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person's slot to go be taken somewhat seriously." He further suggested these women were affirmative action picks. - The Charlie Kirk Show, 13 July 2023.

"Happening all the time in urban America, prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people, that's a fact. It's happening more and more." - The Charlie Kirk Show, 19 May 2023.

He has also stated that Black pilots are "incompetent" and has denied the existence of systemic racism.

He called George Floyd a "scumbag."

He said, "Just because you're a white person does not mean you have to begin apologizing simply for how God made you," to a virtually all-white crowd.

On Immigration and the "Great Replacement":

"The American Democrat party hates this country. They wanna see it collapse. They love it when America becomes less white." - The Charlie Kirk Show, 20 March 2024.

"The great replacement strategy, which is well under way every single day in our southern border, is a strategy to replace white rural America with something different." - The Charlie Kirk Show, 1 March 2024.

He argued that America was at its peak when immigration was halted for 40 years, dropping the foreign-born percentage to its lowest level ever, adding, "We should be unafraid to do that." - The Charlie Kirk Show, 22 August 2025.

He also stated he is an "incredibly, like, non-negotiating hawk when it comes to immigration," and that the parents of an "illegal" young woman should "go back to wherever she came from with her, because her parents made that mistake with her."

On Other Policies and Concepts Related to Race:

He advocated for the dismantling of "diversity, equity, and inclusion" (DEI) efforts, calling it "the enforcement arm of critical race theory" and saying, "DEI is about trying to destroy the excellence of the country and elevating racial tribal politics."

He criticized the Civil Rights Act of 1964, stating, "We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s," arguing it led to a "permanent DEI-type bureaucracy." He later said the legislation "created a beast, and that beast has now turned into an anti-white weapon."

He criticized Martin Luther King Jr., calling the civil rights leader "awful" and "not a good person."

On Religious and Ethnic Groups:

He claimed that "large dedicated Islamic areas are a threat to America" and that "Islam is not compatible with western civilization." - The Charlie Kirk Show, 30 April 2025 and 24 June 2025.

He stated that "Jewish donors have been the No. 1 funding mechanism of radical, open border neoliberal quasi-Marxist policies, cultural institutions and nonprofits" and that this "beast created by secular Jews... is now coming for Jews." He also said, "Jews have been some of the largest funders of cultural Marxist ideas and supporters of those ideas over the last 30 or 40 years."

On Other Marginalized Groups (often linked to race and ethnicity in his rhetoric):

"If you're a WNBA, pot-smoking, Black lesbian, do you get treated better than a United States marine?" - The Charlie Kirk Show, 8 December 2022.

He has also been cited for "constant comments about Black Americans."

------------------
*Culled

Scholes007:
There are so many reasons to why the military can help the local law enforcement to fight violence. You can see how effective they are at the border. Politics aside, I think it's very important the US military tackles this before facing the gangs out her shores.

There is a reason you have police, national guard, etc. The military is not for normal domestic crime. You only call them up for extreme and highly abnormal situations beyond the capacity of the police and other law enforcement. There is no such extreme scenario going on. The only reason is the desire of a child-man to play dictator.

owobokiri:
Since the days of Nixon, Kkssinger and Brezinski , the United States that used to be big globally on human rights, democracy, respect for developing nations and the observations of the "rules of engagements" in both civil and violent confrontations, has become a desperate country that is willingly using assassinatios, skewd birth control measures, the intentional spread of diseases, brutal wars and coups to dominate the world... America has totally lost the moral pedestal to pontificate on any global issues that deal with the advancement of the human race.

Their moral authority is long gone. Everyone sees them for the beast that they are now.

Elusive001:
Having tried everything against Israel and failed woefully, na here una dey?

The name israel dey give una HBP.

Israelis no dey complain of food, Americans no dey complain of food. Una wey dey in favour, how food for your country?

Those who wish to continue to use starvation as a weapon of war will of course not vote for such a human right. Mind you, using starvation as a weapon of war is against the Geneva convention - and thus it is no wonder that the same Israel refused to sign the Geneva Convention.

jchioma:
Trump means business! No time to waste. If you think there will be an extension of any sort. I personally think it’s a good deal and Hamas shouldn’t falter.

The guy still dey find nobel prize.

LordReed:
Yes and I acknowledged that already.

If you are asking me to describe a life that is not yet in existence then I can't give you an answer. Best I can do is speculate that it would have certain characteristics.

Then it would be impossible to progress this line of speculation.

Unless you have an idea of the "certain characteristics" you refer to.

LordReed:
I said:



We agree so I don't think I need a different definition.

You do because the kind of life you are talking about is not biological.

LordReed:
You have described Biological life and I have no issues with that. What we are going to have to grapple with is how to characterise the emerging Artificial life. Without any doubt it may not have certain characteristics of Biological life but I am envisaging a few similarities and certainly whole new ones unique to the new life form.

Artificial life forms will be alive but not in the way you are used to.



Even granting you the intangible non material spark of life, it still doesn't detract from the Artificial life being a different type of life.

You have to realise that at some point in the history of the universe Biological life didn't exist.

Remember I said we have to define life first, and I have given my definition. What is yours?

Timoleon:
It does. Nigeria is one of the most resource blessed countries in the world. It is the most populous black country in the world
. While we do not have military weapons to fight them, a collective resistance to them could mean a serious devastation to their economy as many of the natural resources they need come from us or countries like us. A weak but loyal Nigeria/Africa is essential for their continuous access to cheap raw materials and labour.

I agree with your last sentence (in bold), that remains true, but still I doubt that they would find any need to worry about public opinion in Africa concerning the matter of Gaza.

Kukutente23:
Ok so how does it make sense to believe this random lady who is definitely pro-Hamas over the flotilla twitter page that more or less confirmed that they truly weren't carrying aid

Do you also believe that Greta girl when she claimed she has been abducted?

Any rational being will ask the "journalist" to show the cargo manifest of each ship showing what they were carrying and the quantity as well as their entry numbers instead of some boxes that are not up to the quarter of a boat in capacity

I just find it truly incredible that a fleet of some forty boats guarded by navies and with such publicity about their aid intention would actually carry no aid whatsoever. That stretches believability.

PS: I don't like Greta. From her childhood fighting climate issues I have always seen her as being used for sentimental publicity and probably for funding.

BRATISLAVA:
You are, if you believe Igo to churches. Your conscience doesn't speak for Israeli blood so you are simply partial masquerading as a just person. It's not a conscience of it's partial, and you know it. You are openly supporting another type of imperialism. But you will deny it.

A lot of you are insincere.

How am I insincere? For you, Israel is the one that has "a right to defend itself." A poor people do not have a right to defend themselves from colonialist apartheid land grabbers armed and financed to the teeth by the biggest power in Earth.

BRATISLAVA:
Hamas are designated angels all over the world, so they need your advocacy. You wouldn't be the first Muslim to support terror if it speaks your religion. If you were Palestinian you might be eating Israeli aid and still hoping Iran would kill them for you.

I am not Muslim. One does not have to be religious to have a conscience or to detest apartheid imperialism. And Israel does not feed Gaza, it blockades and starves it.

BRATISLAVA:
Because hamas and gaza have given you the ultimate 100% truth till date?

It's best you leave them to their war since you cannot detect the true lies. If you can believe people who put tunnels under hospitals and schools then you will support evil and call it good, and call good evil.

Ultimately, na church dey worry you. And Israel no send your church.