₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,344,751 members, 8,513,532 topics. Date: Thursday, 05 November 2026 at 07:40 AM

Toggle theme

DeepSight's Posts

Nairaland Forum › DeepSight's Profile › DeepSight's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 (of 808 pages)

Foreign Affairs › Re: Exam Question On Gaza Ceasefire. by DeepSight(op): 8:43pm On Oct 14, 2025
tctrills:
So let's go back in history.
1. We both know that the Arabs came to Palestine ln about 600bc. They met Jews in the the land. It was not theirs. They were colonizers.
They forcibly moved in to the land grew their population and dominated and taxed the owners of the land.
Now, when the European Jews began to return home, the only people who had a moral right to stop them were the indigenous Jews not the colonizing Arabs. The indigenous Jews loved and encouraged the return of their brother but again the colonizers believed it was their right to decide who buys land or owns property.
This is a simplified summary of the Israeli Palestine conflict.
Please let's know if you differ.
DeepSight what say you.
I repeat for the umpteenth time. You are the one reasoning as if the Jews fell from heaven directly to that land. They did not. They found others there and exterminated them.

Arabs also found others there and colonized them (they didn't exterminate the Jews though).

Each has become indigenous one way or the other. You can't say only the remnant Jews had a right.

I have been asking since whether Native Americans can wake up to send Caucasians packing from America today and that question is taboo for both you and Unbiased1.

I don't know why you also imagine there there are no remnants of Canaanite descendants anywhere.

Who will give them a "right of return."

You have to both stop the reasoning that that land belonged to the Jews magically from heaven.

For Christ's sake Abraham came from Iraq.
He was no Jew.

And his descendants were scattered into Egypt. 400 years later they wandered back and started decimating everyone there in the claim that their God promised the land to them.
Sports › Re: Nigeria Vs Benin: 2026 FIFA World Cup Qualifiers (4 - 0) On 14th Oct 2025 by DeepSight(m): 8:26pm On Oct 14, 2025
IronGalaxy:
Im not talking about you per se, im talking about your people ..

You guys are forever talking about white people..its exhausting and its weird..

What does this football thread have to do with them? But here we are ..
Its all good. BTW I dont even know if you are naija or SA.
Sports › Re: Nigeria Vs Benin: 2026 FIFA World Cup Qualifiers (4 - 0) On 14th Oct 2025 by DeepSight(m): 7:30pm On Oct 14, 2025
IronGalaxy:
😂 😂

My guy. miss me with the Uncle Ruckus talk and lemme celebrate our qualification, deal? I'm tired of talking about white people. It's all you ever do in this forum..

This is a football page,, let's keep it at that
Nope, its not all I ever do. I have been here 16 years, so probably you would not know. Recent developments in the US and Israel have simply concentrated me there for now. By recent I mean more than just Israel/ Gaza. Anyone who knows my participation on this forum knows very well my centre of discussion is religion, theology and philosophy.

To dismiss the talk as "just white people" is also telling. But anyway, na so for Africa man.

We havent qualified yet oh. Playoff remain.

Enjoy bro.
Sports › Re: Nigeria Vs Benin: 2026 FIFA World Cup Qualifiers (4 - 0) On 14th Oct 2025 by DeepSight(m): 7:16pm On Oct 14, 2025
IronGalaxy:
No, it doesn't.. It's literally the same thing..
What is the same thing? I hope you dont mean your analogy of the tiny elite? Its extremely different. Extremely. If Ikoyi / VI/ Lekki were strictly reserved for white people till 1994, you will understand the difference. Especially if you as a Nigerian needed a passbook to go there for menial work during the day.

If only white people could contest elections here till 1994, you will understand.

If they kept maybe Awo / Zik etc in prison for 27 years because they wanted a free Nigeria for Africans as well, you will understand.

After all that, if white Brits owned 70 per cent of land in Nigeria TILL TODAY and almost all of the GDP TILL TODAY, u will understand.

If you were not allowed to go into a restaurant or shop for white people, you will get it.

If you had to use different toilets, you will get it.

I can go on and and on. Just thank God for your hot weather and mosquitoes otherwise you will be in this situation till today.
Sports › Re: Nigeria Vs Benin: 2026 FIFA World Cup Qualifiers (4 - 0) On 14th Oct 2025 by DeepSight(m): 7:09pm On Oct 14, 2025
IronGalaxy:
If that's the case then you also don't own Nigeria, seeing the economics and wealth is held by a tiny political elite..
Bad analogy. That analogy applies in every country of the world.

so please, man, I'm celebrating our win, stop telling me about white people, don't you guys tire of talking about them? damn!
I am happy we kept hope alive even if slim.

Sorry, I am a black nationalist activist and writer so parson me for my obsession with black marginalization in the world.
Sports › Re: Nigeria Vs Benin: 2026 FIFA World Cup Qualifiers (4 - 0) On 14th Oct 2025 by DeepSight(m): 7:05pm On Oct 14, 2025
IronGalaxy:
He's not.. i know it's your favorite song though, keep singing it..
He is right from the economic and land perspectives one hundred per cent.
Sports › Re: Nigeria Vs Benin: 2026 FIFA World Cup Qualifiers (4 - 0) On 14th Oct 2025 by DeepSight(m): 7:02pm On Oct 14, 2025
IronGalaxy:
Ok, whatever floats your boat cool
He is right though.
Foreign Affairs › Re: Exam Question On Gaza Ceasefire. by DeepSight(op): 6:54pm On Oct 14, 2025
Unbiased1:
Lol. Now we are getting to the point I love. We now both agree that both parties are indigenous to the land. Can you remember one of my responses to you where I spoke about compromise? The Jews where ready to compromise to share that land with the Arabs despite having a greater connection to the land. The Arabs on the other hand choose war to exterminate the Jews. The only reason why there is no Palestinian state today is because the Palestinians were more interested in destroying the Jews and the only Jewish state in the world than getting their own independence. Do you know how many people would have gotten their independence if they got the same opportunities those savages in Palestine got from 1937 - 2008?
If you can show me where I have ever said Jew were not indigenous, I will be happy. European Zionist replacement Jews cannot be proven to be indigenous - that one we all know. Thats why you run away from the word Ashkenazi. Netanyahu, is a Polish man with a Polish name who only changed his name to appear Jewish. So are most Zionists from everywhere including Argentina. And Netanyahu says there will NEVER be a Palestinian State. This is the leader of the country you say is always ready to make compromises. Also you know very well that the settling in the West Bank didnt start today. And the mission has been clear - to ensure that there will be no Palestian place whatsoever. Same with Gaza.

Its a great pity that anyone who saw what the Afrikaner Dutch did in South Africa (same strategy of banishing blacks to tiny tibelands and taking everything for themselves - which is why up till today they own over 70 per cent of the land) - can support what Europeans are doing to Arabs. Its a real pity. Especially for black men like you to support it.

I repeat: they called the ANC and Mandela terrorists. I repeat, the USA left Mandela on its terrorist watch list till 2008 even after he had been president and left for ten years. Black men will never learn.
Christianity Etc › Re: Why Jesus Is DEFINITELY God * by DeepSight(m): 6:28pm On Oct 14, 2025
JimRohn:
Do you really consider DeepSight to be on the same intellectual level as MaxInDHouse or some of the other individuals I engage with here?

Because frankly, MaxInDHouse is among the most intelligent contributors on Nairaland. In contrast, DeepSight does not even qualify for consideration when I rate people based on intellect.

That is precisely why I refuse to bring myself down to his level — instead, I choose to engage with those whose reasoning and arguments are worth my time.
Time to dissect Mo and his history and antecedents.
Foreign Affairs › Re: Exam Question On Gaza Ceasefire. by DeepSight(op): 6:04pm On Oct 14, 2025
Unbiased1:
Didn't Arabs conquer the land before becoming majority? Wasn't it an act of conquest for the Arabs to build their Islamic Dome on the Rock on the foundation of the Temple Mount? Which empire after the fall of the Kingdom of Israel didn't try to exterminate the Jews? The Romans even went as far as renaming the land to a useless godforsaken name called Syria Palestina.
So you see the point? Just dont try to use euphemisms like "supplant" when you know the ancient world was full of conquest. That is intellectual dishonesty and and shows your terrible bias.

I have heard Caucasians saying that they only settled in America when the truth is that they conquered it and aggressively exterminated its native population.

Will you say today those Caucasians should leave? I keep asking you this and your silence is one of the hints that for you, white conquest of others is okay.

My own point remains that after 1, 300 years in the area NO ONE can say Arabs are not indigenous as well.

Rather you will say Jews were there before as if they didnt brutally wipe out the Cannanites there as well!

What was the offense of the people in Jericho?

Jerusalem nko that David took, were there not others there before? Did he go to beg them and purchase it amicably?

2 Sam 5:6-10 - David captured Jerusalem from the fiercely independent Canaanite tribe of Jebusites in c. 1004BC.

cc Kukutente23 / Tctrills
Sports › Re: Nigeria Vs Benin: 2026 FIFA World Cup Qualifiers (4 - 0) On 14th Oct 2025 by DeepSight(m): 5:49pm On Oct 14, 2025
Pootle:
southie are 2goals up so nothing to play for again
And so. Is there no native god, strong babalawo or dibia in naija who can enter shrine now to magic two goals for Rwanda?
Sports › Re: Nigeria Vs Benin: 2026 FIFA World Cup Qualifiers (4 - 0) On 14th Oct 2025 by DeepSight(m): 5:37pm On Oct 14, 2025
GOAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Foreign Affairs › Re: Exam Question On Gaza Ceasefire. by DeepSight(op): 4:54pm On Oct 14, 2025
Unbiased1 why do you say Jews "supplanted" Canaanites? Can you see? That a euphemism for conquest and extermination.

E.g: Jericho.

Same way white Americans will talk about Native Americans when the truth is they exterminated them.
Foreign Affairs › Re: Exam Question On Gaza Ceasefire. by DeepSight(op): 4:49pm On Oct 14, 2025
Unbiased1 before I digest everything note that I have never claimed Jews are not indigenes of the land. My claim is that movement is fluid and once people have inhabited a place for over a millennium you can't exclude them from being indigenes too. So you can't exclude Arabs.

This is why it was also wrong for Europeans to exclude Jews from Europe for almost two millennia. This is why Hitler was wrong as well.

Will digest the rest later.

PS: How would Peters line remain Jewish for 2000 years in Europe. Do you think you can even identify them with all the genetic mixture? That would be absurd.

I have told Kukutente23 that is possible for a black man today to descend from a Mongolian. He still disputes something so obvious.
Foreign Affairs › Re: Exam Question On Gaza Ceasefire. by DeepSight(op): 4:34pm On Oct 14, 2025
Unbiased1:
You said I haven't called all those people and groups you mentioned terrorists. Well, remind me of our topic of discussion. Last time I checked, we were talking about Israel and Palestine not Belgium and CIA. The fact remains that calling those guys terrorists doesn't absolve Hamas of also being a terrorist.
The point is you only see one side as terrorists. You will never for example, see Israel as terrorists no matter that they do.

Even murderer settlers in West Bank, you will not agree.

That's enough for me to know and infer that for you, oyibos are not terrorists. Only Arabs and blacks probably are, in your estimation.

I mean, you dismiss the ICC. You dismiss the UN. So I can quite infer.

If you didn't, I would know that you have a balanced view. Not everything must be said openly before one can tell.

It's because one can see from a distance that to you, terrorists are whoever white people say they are.

As such, you can't see Hamas as freedom fighters matter what. Don't you know the ANC once had an armed wing?
Politics › Re: Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway Costs N7.5billion Per Kilometer - Dave Umahi by DeepSight(m): 3:06pm On Oct 14, 2025
Kukutente23:
Stop mouthing ignorance
How can chagoury be better than JB
You think JB is a Nigerian coy?
Imagine
Sports › Re: Most Peaceful And Nicest First Eleven? by DeepSight(m): 1:37pm On Oct 14, 2025
johnie:
Looks like most people don't get the sarcasm.

Any suggestions for a Manager/Coach?
Marcello Bielsa, Jose Mourinho
Sports › Re: Most Peaceful And Nicest First Eleven? by DeepSight(m): 1:36pm On Oct 14, 2025
Referee should be Tom Ovrebo
Christianity Etc › Re: My Funny Experience At Ashawo Motel For Evangelism by DeepSight(m): 1:07pm On Oct 14, 2025
Gmone:
Okay, if you are a patronizer, better repent now.
LEAVE STORY. ITS OBVIOUS WHAT YOU WENT THERE TO DO.
Christianity Etc › Re: My Funny Experience At Ashawo Motel For Evangelism by DeepSight(m): 12:52pm On Oct 14, 2025
Gmone:
I went to preach the full gospel of Jesus Christ. The lady gave her life to Jesus na.
Stop telling unfathomable lies. You went to seek commercial sex for your sex and if you went penniless then you went in an attempt to get it free by sounding like a pastor.

This is glaring. No one here is as gullible as you think. Your story is fabricated. There was probably no friend you went with. You went on a mission to enjoy olosho.
Foreign Affairs › Re: Exam Question On Gaza Ceasefire. by DeepSight(op): 12:35pm On Oct 14, 2025
Unbiased1. In response to your insistence on Judea and Samaria being Jewish homeland and your support of the West Bank being taken away from Palestine, I am reposting below my last post to you on the other thread which I never saw a response to.

Because it contains points which are important in this regard. Especially the analysis of population at various points in time.

Unbiased1:
Let me start like this:

1) Who is a Palestinian? A Palestinian is either a Jew or an Arab who lived in the Levant area of the Ottoman Empire and subsequently, the British mandate. Every historic account states this clearly that Jews and Arabs made up the population of Palestine even before the European Jews came there. I started with this because you were almost describing all the Jews in present-day Israel as aliens who came from Europe to reclaim something. There were Jews who never left.
You will note that I acknowledged that there was a remnant of Jews there, nevertheless this was a very small minority.

At the end of the 19th century, the Jewish population in Palestine constituted a small minority, making up about 5-7% of the total population. The majority of the population was Muslim (around 80%) and Christian (around 10%)."

Please look at the table of demographics in the link below which sets out the percentage of population of each group (Muslim, Christian and Jewish) at various points in history.

https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jewish-and-non-jewish-population-of-israel-palestine-1517-present

You will note that -

1. From 1517 to 1882 through the rule of the Ottoman empire, the Jewish population varied from 1.7% to 8%. Thus it is clear that the Jews were a distinct minority throughout that period.

2. By the end of the 1st World War, they had become 9.1%.

3. Throughout the period of the British Mandate they grew from 11 percent in 1922 to 32% in 1937. This was the period of the first wave of significant Zionist migration from Europe, and so it is obvious that the majority of Jews in the land were now migrants from Europe.

But hang on, the evidence gets worse -

4. Between 1947 and 1948 - a period of one year only - the year of the creation of the State of Israel, the percentage of Jews jumped from 32% to a staggering 82% - in ONE year only!

This shows conclusively two things -

a. That the migration from Europe formed almost all of the population of Jews by that time as compared to the negligible percent prior to the British Mandate

b.In the same period of ONE year the poulation of non-Jews fell from 1.3 million people to 156, 000 people!


The foregoing discloses conclusively what had transpired. A mass migration of Europeans had flooded the land and there was a mass evacuation/ removal of non-Jews.

Please note that these figures are from the Jewish Virtual Library, lest you claim they are biased.

Therefore the case is firmly made, that the Jews of today are essentially European migrants.

It is also crucial to note that the Arabs had been on that land prior to that time since the time of the Byzantinne Empire for some 1, 300 years.

https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-206581/

And as I have said repeatedly in my last submission, it is absurd to deny a people who have been on a land for over a millenium their indigeneship of that land. I repeatedly used the example of Europeans in America who have only been there for a few centuries and yet no one questions their right to be there.

2) Did you know that Palestine, before the British took over, never had an actual boundary
This is false. Both the Romans and Ottomans had clear boundaries of their territories there, for example. But the fact still remains that Arbas had occupied the land in question for over a millenium. And that speaks for itself.

In one of my previous responses to you, I begged you to mention the names of Arab villages and communities taken over by the Jews before or in 1948, but you didn't mention any, so your claim that Jews not acknowledging the presence of Arabs on the land is utterly false. Also note that these lands purchased were completely different from communities already occupied by the Jews, who never left the Levant.
This is a meaningless point. Even today American States and cities bear Native American names. Where do you think names like Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Connecticut, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachussets, Michigan, Minnessota, Missisipi, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, North/ South Dakota, Tenessee, Texas, Utah, Wisconsin, Wyoming - all come from?

All these are Native American names or derive from them and this shows you that it is normal and natural for the old names of a place can and are often retained and this does not then mean that the current white population should all be chased away from America does it? As I have said before, as a purist, I dont mind that happening if the scanty Native Americans can muster the might, but I acknowledged that the time which has passed and the length for which the current population has dwelt there already renders the point quite meaningless as that length of time has effectively made those places their genuine homeland.

How much more for Arabs who have been in Palestine for over 1, 300 years? ? ? ?

Now to hammer this point home and show just how meaningless it is for you, where do you think the so called Jewish names of most of the old towns and cities came from? Thats right - they were old Canaanite names that preceded the time of the Jewish invasion of the land! Examples -

----------------

Jerusalem (Yerushalayim)
Original Name: The earliest known name for the city is Urusalim, found in ancient Egyptian texts from the 14th century BCE. The name is believed to be of Canaanite origin, possibly meaning "foundation of the god Shalim" (a Canaanite deity) or "city of peace."

Hebron (Hebron)
Original Name: The ancient name of the city was likely Hebron, as it is referred to in the Hebrew Bible. The name's origin is debated, but some scholars suggest it may be related to the root ḥbr, meaning "to be joined" or "alliance." The name has been in use since the Canaanite period.

Beth She'an (Beit She'an)
Original Name: The city was known as Beth-shean or Beth-shan in ancient times. The name is a Semitic term meaning "house of comfort" or possibly "house of the god She'an." It was a significant Canaanite city-state.

Jaffa (Yafo)
Original Name: The city's name, Jaffa, is one of the oldest port city names in the world and is mentioned in ancient Egyptian texts and the Hebrew Bible.

Tel Megiddo (Megiddo)
Original Name: The ancient city, a site of numerous historical battles, was known as Megiddo to the Canaanites.

Gezer (Gezer)
Original Name: Gezer was a major Canaanite city-state, frequently mentioned in the Amarna Letters (ancient Egyptian correspondence). Its name likely means "a separated place" or "a cutting."


- - - Culled.

There we go. So summarily you can see how meaningless your point on the names of villages and towns is!

Now as to your question as to what Arab towns and villages were taken over, the radical change in demography by ethnic percentages between 1922 and 1948 suffices without mentioning any list of towns. From a Jewish population of 11 % in 1922 to 80 per cent in 1948 (fifty per cent of which came from Europe in the last one year before 1948) -is enough to prove the point!

3) Did you know that when the British officially called the area "British Mandate of Palestine", the Arabs were not comfortable with the name "Palestine" as they claimed that it was an attempt to erase the Arab identity of the area? Today, these same people have embraced that name as a tool for political warfare against Israel. As stated by a PLO commander, Zuhair Mohsen and member of the PLO's executive committee, in an interview with Dutch newspaper Trouw on March 31, 1977:

"The Palestinian people do not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality, today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian people' to oppose Zionism."
Frankly the name is not important. That is looking at form over substance. The substance is the fact that you had a local population of Arabs, Christians and Jews (majority being Arabs) for centuries. Indeed as late as the 16th century the evidence above shows that only 1.7% of that population was Jewish. So you can bicker about names, but an apple by any other name will still remain what is known as an apple.

When the UN created the partition plan of 1947, the plan was to create a Jewish state and an Arab state, not a Palestinian state, because both parties were identified by their ethnicities, not as Palestinians.
So why is there a Jewish State today which is resisting the existence of an Arab State, even after occupying the little land left to them, cornering them and oppresing them?

There were no "Palestinian people". The only Palestinian people were the ones newly invented by the British after they defeated the Ottoman Empire.
As I have said, the name is inconsiquential.

Were there people called "Americans" at a point in history? No.

The key thing with reference to the area called Palestine is that there was a local population of different ethnicities, simple. Attempting to say that "Palestinians do not exist" today is a racist statement geared at extermination and ethnic cleansing.

4) You mentioned the biblical claim of land by the Jews and even went ahead to call the Jewish God barbaric, and you also spoke about compromises. I'll address both. When the Jews in diaspora returned, they were hoping to get all of Palestine for their Jewish state. The British dealt a big blow to that plan by cutting a huge chunk of the land, a whopping 78% of it, to create Transjordan. At this point, it became clear to the Jews that the promised land their God offered them was no longer feasible in modern times.
We agreed to leave out the promises of any imaginary God from this discussion as anyone can do that. Nonetheless, nowhere in Jewish history did the state of Israel extend to cover all of that country today known as Jordan. Parts of that land were conquered by Israel and given to the tribes of Reuben and Gaad, but much of it remained with Canaanite tribes such as the Moabites, Edomites and Ammonites. But this is irrelevant because the table detailing the population of the current land at issue through the centuries (the link from the Jewish Virtual Library which I gave above) discloses that the current land being discussed - not Jordan - was populated up till 1948 by a Muslim majority.

Following the creation of Transjordan in 1920, the Jews thought the remaining 22% of the land would be the Jewish state since the Arabs had gotten 78% already. That thought was dead on arrival as the Peel accords of 1937 carved out a small chunk of that 22% to be the Jewish state. The Jewish state was 17% of that small piece of land, largely made up of the old Jewish communities and the newly purchased Jewish lands, Jerusalem, and to extent, Bethlehem were to remain under the British Mandate due to their religious importance to both Jews and Arabs and this part made up 8% of the land, while he rest of the land, about 75% of the land was to be an Arab state. Despite the projections of the Jews, their Biblical beliefs and to their great disappointment, they accepted the deal nonetheless. That right there is the COMPROMISE you spoke of. What did the Arabs do? They rejected the idea of having a separate Jewish state and insisted on having just 1 country where Arabs will be the majority. That right there is NOT COMPROMISE. In this war, Israel has compromised by agreeing to release Palestinian prisoners, many of whom were charged with Murder and other crimes, including Hamas members. One of the youths who took part in the famous Ramallah lynching of 2000 was also released by Israel. This is a huge COMPROMISE as Israel is putting itself at risk by releasing these criminals to society, who can attack Israel in the future. On the other hand, one would expect Hamas, whose people are dying to also compromise by releasing all the hostages to stop these frequent Israeli attacks and the complete takeover of Gaza City, but no, Hamas and the Arabs never compromise, and unfortunately, no one is forcing them to, as everyone is focused on Israel.
This is utterly fraudulent hogwash. To attempt to claim that since Arabs had already got Jordan, then that should have been that is fraud. The land at issue, Palestine, at the time concerned has already been disclosed as being predominatly Muslim. Thus any division of that land concerned should have been proportional to the existing population. However as it turned out mass migrations to and from the territory occurred under the pressure of international powers, and no one would suggest that given what occured in 1947-48 (I have already highlighted the drastic change of population above - which was nothing short of ethnic replacement) - no one would suggest that the local population and their ethnic Arab allies were not entitled to resist this scenario.

Whilst Israel turned out to be the stronger military power with Western backing, the fair truth remains that those lands left to the Arabs today, as small as they are, (Gaza and the West Bank) should be accorded the right of sovereignty and self determination - just the same as the Jewish State of Israel enjoys. And most countries of the world today recognise them as such, and it frankly is only being resisted by Israel backed by the USA today. Indeed I just heard in the news today that the US has revoked the visas of the entire Palestinian delegation to the next UN General Assembly meeting. They dont have a right to do that, but that just shows you how far they would go to suppress the Palestinian voice. Their duty as the host country of the UN does not extend to unilaterally banning states from attending meetings of that multilateral organization. The last time this happened the UN relocated the meeting to Geneva. One hopes they will have the balls to do that this time around.

In this matter, the abominable attitude of Israel and supporters of Israel to international Law cannot be excused. Israel is the ONLY country in the world which routinely disregards International Law with the support of the USA. If other countries did that, they would be called rogue nations. Israel goes about routinely bombing its neighbours such as Iran, Lebanon and Syria, including attacking embassies and the premises of international organizations like the United Nations and its sub-bodies - ALL they time. No other nation operates with such a complete disregard of international law but all that supporters of Israel like you can say is simply, to hell with the UN, to hell with international law (as you alluded in your subsequent post). Of course to hell with everyone else and all treaties and laws because Israel is a supreme master race chosen by God and subject to no laws whatsoever, not even laws of decency.

No wonder it is meaningless to people like you that Benjamin Netanyahu has been indicted of war crimes by the International Criminal Court and as such cannot currently travel to most countries in the world. While you will claim that the entire UN and ICC are "antisemitic" it is noteworthy that even two former Israeli Prime-Ministers, Ehud Olmert and Ehud Barack have condemned the so caled war as involving war crimes and being a war of deception. Various international expert bodies have also conclusively called it a genocide.

I will find some time to address the ethnic supremacist worship of Israel in your second post.

cc:

Kukutente23
Tctrills
Foreign Affairs › Re: Exam Question On Gaza Ceasefire. by DeepSight(op): 12:18pm On Oct 14, 2025
tctrills:
You don't know who is innocent but somehow you know they were killing the innocent. What a joke.
And I hope you don't expect me to believe a word that comes out of Hamas even though I understand your need to believe Hamas.

Anyway, I am glad all this is over. Let us rejoice together.
This is ending just the way I hoped.
Israel was already losing the propaganda war so they needed this and we all needed peace in the middle east
It is not over by any stretch of the imagination and only those who worship Trump would even think for a moment it is.
Foreign Affairs › Re: Exam Question On Gaza Ceasefire. by DeepSight(op): 12:14pm On Oct 14, 2025
Unbiased1:
Yes, terrorist groups contest elections and when they win, they cancel all future elections so they can remain in power. Hamas and Hezbollah have both contested for elections in Gaza and Lebanon respectively and we know what happened after they got their members in government.

Yeah there will be no end to the Palestinian struggle until Palestine is free. Let me remind you that Palestine could have been freed in 1937 during the Peel Accords, 1947 based on the UN partition plan, 1948 after the Jews declared their own independence, anytime between 1948 - 1967 when they were occupied by their own Arab brothers, Camp David Summit organised by Bill Clinton and 2008 meeting organised by the Prime Minister of Israel. The Palestinians rejected all these opportunities. The only reason Palestine is not a country today is because their hatred for Jews and their quest to kill Jews is greater than their need for an independent country. Unfortunately for them, the current Israeli Government is not the type that wants to be politically correct like their counterparts in the West. The current Israeli government is ready to take over more than 60% of Judea and Samaria as that area is historic Jewish homeland. The only areas that will be part of a future Palestinian state will be Gaza and Area A of the Judea and Samaria, nothing more, and God help them if another war doesn't breakout before then.
1. One mans terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Also it's unfortunate that some of you have allowed the West and it's allies to appropriate the word terrorist, such that they can describe their enemies as terrorists at will and you will agree. Whereas they do far worse things and you will never describe them as terrorists. I haven't heard you ever describe King Leopold of Belgium as a Terrorist for example. I haven't heard you describe Blair and Bush as terrorists for all the crimes they committed in Iraq through telling lies about weapons of mass destruction which never existed. I haven't heard you describe the CIA as terrorists regardless of the amount of people they have murdered around the world. I haven't heard you describe the apartheid government of South Africa as terrorists. I haven't heard you describe the many imperialist mass murderer governments of Europe which killed millions around the world to steal their lands as terrorists. Yet this same West labelled Nelson Mandela a terrorist and I have not heard you question that. You simply agree with whoever they label a terrorist and that's that. Armed resistance is not terrorism but you seem to think only the West and their allies have the right to this. Do you know what this is? It is simply slavery of the mind to white skin.

2. Every single offer of peace to Palestine has been unjust. And they are a people with a spine so they don't just jump at any offer. No one would do to white men what has been done to them and white men would jump at any offer. They would fight and die to the last man to insist on their full rights and even to steal other people's lands and no one would call them terrorists.

As for a place being the Jewish homeland, I have explained to you in detail how movement of people is fluid. Arabs cannot dominate a place for over a millennium and you keep insisting it's not their home as well. That's not the way demographics work.

I even gave you a table from the Jewish Virtual Library showing you the population of Jews there through various key points, and that concluded the point. You never responded to it.

It is absurd that you don't contest America being Caucasian homeland even when they have not been there for up to half the time Arabs have been in Palestine, but you contest the rights of Arabs in Palestine.

Furthermore it is most absurd to think that the Jewish population which returned from Europe remained the same of of 2000 years ago. That is biologically and genetically impossible in human interactions.
Foreign Affairs › Re: Exam Question On Gaza Ceasefire. by DeepSight(op): 8:33pm On Oct 13, 2025
Kukutente23:
No
But he's certainly the greatest so far in this millennium
Well if so, it can only mean US presidents have been generally debauched criminals.

A con artist is who you praise so?
Foreign Affairs › Re: Exam Question On Gaza Ceasefire. by DeepSight(op): 8:31pm On Oct 13, 2025
tctrills:
How do you know it's indiscriminate since you can't tell who is Hamas or who is not. It's only indiscriminate if you can tell or prove that majority of those killed were not members of Hamas.
Carpet bombing and other such tactics make it clear that they were out to kill innocents regardless. They also have even their own estimates of Hamas fighters and evidently non Hamas casualties were far more. Again, babies can hardly be Hamas.
Foreign Affairs › Re: Exam Question On Gaza Ceasefire. by DeepSight(op): 8:15pm On Oct 13, 2025
tctrills:
Sounds the same to me. So when you guys accused the IDF of genocide, you truly did not know if they were killing only Hamas members or not. So why were you accusing Israel all this time.
Indiscriminate and reckless murder of even babies is criminal.
Foreign Affairs › Re: Exam Question On Gaza Ceasefire. by DeepSight(op): 7:56pm On Oct 13, 2025
Kukutente23:
So on point
Every terrorist and their sympathisers have no choice but to agree with this apt analysis
You also think DJT is the greatest president ever?
Foreign Affairs › Re: Exam Question On Gaza Ceasefire. by DeepSight(op): 7:55pm On Oct 13, 2025
tctrills:
Wow so you believe every Palestinian is a terrorist. Interesting intake. No one says you should kill all Palestinians the deal will end Hamas rule in Gaza. But then if all Palestinians are Hamas as you want us to believe, then all of them should be wiped out. Killing terrorist is not genocide.
Here is what i said -

DeepSight:
It is not possible to destroy Hamas. Every last Palestinian will have to be killed including all those in diaspora, and all children and descendants every where in the world. The reason for this is not that every Palestinian belongs to Hamas. The reason is that it is impossible to tell every one who belongs to it.
Foreign Affairs › Re: Exam Question On Gaza Ceasefire. by DeepSight(op): 7:53pm On Oct 13, 2025
tctrills:
Wow so you believe every Palestinian is a terrorist. Interesting intake. No one says you should kill all Palestinians the deal will end Hamas rule in Gaza. But then if all Palestinians are Hamas as you want us to believe, then all of them should be wiped out. Killing terrorist is not genocide.
Foreign Affairs › Re: Exam Question On Gaza Ceasefire. by DeepSight(op): 7:04pm On Oct 13, 2025
Kukutente23:
You're simply too presumptuous
Words should carry their ordinary meaning
Innuendos usually lead to malice
My error then.
Foreign Affairs › Re: Exam Question On Gaza Ceasefire. by DeepSight(op): 7:03pm On Oct 13, 2025
tctrills:
You once ask me to prescribe a solution to the conflict and I told you that we have to stop pampering the Palestinians.
Give them a take it or leave it deal. Don't restrain Israel anymore. I guess someone was listening (Trump).
An unrestrained Israel was able to shake Iran, Hezbollah and all other Hamas friends including Qatar.
Israel was going to finish off Hamas that's the only reason why Hamas could accept a deal that is not good for them.
They will lose all power in Gaza and become massively irrelevant.
This is called peace through strength.
It is not possible to destroy Hamas. Every last Palestinian will have to be killed including all those in diaspora, and all children and descendants every where in the world. The reason for this is not that every Palestinian belongs to Hamas. The reason is that it is impossible to tell every one who belongs to it.
Foreign Affairs › Re: Exam Question On Gaza Ceasefire. by DeepSight(op): 7:01pm On Oct 13, 2025
Unbiased1:
There was no blockade of Gaza until Hamas unfortunately won that election in 2007. Israel and Egypt could not sit by and watch a terrorist group build itself at their borders. The blockade was necessary to prevent Hamas from getting weapons. Obviously Israel and Egypt failed miserably at that. The blockade will continue until Palestinians embrace peace and stop plotting to destroy Israel.
1. Do Terrorist Groups contest elections.

2. There will be no end to the Palestinian struggle until Palestine is free. Nothing else can end it. This is what history teaches us. Situations of slavery, colonization and other unjust scenarios are simply unsustainable no matter how long they last.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 (of 808 pages)