DeepSight's Posts
Nairaland Forum › DeepSight's Profile › DeepSight's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 (of 808 pages)
tctrills:I repeat for the umpteenth time. You are the one reasoning as if the Jews fell from heaven directly to that land. They did not. They found others there and exterminated them. Arabs also found others there and colonized them (they didn't exterminate the Jews though). Each has become indigenous one way or the other. You can't say only the remnant Jews had a right. I have been asking since whether Native Americans can wake up to send Caucasians packing from America today and that question is taboo for both you and Unbiased1. I don't know why you also imagine there there are no remnants of Canaanite descendants anywhere. Who will give them a "right of return." You have to both stop the reasoning that that land belonged to the Jews magically from heaven. For Christ's sake Abraham came from Iraq. He was no Jew. And his descendants were scattered into Egypt. 400 years later they wandered back and started decimating everyone there in the claim that their God promised the land to them. |
IronGalaxy:Its all good. BTW I dont even know if you are naija or SA. |
IronGalaxy:Nope, its not all I ever do. I have been here 16 years, so probably you would not know. Recent developments in the US and Israel have simply concentrated me there for now. By recent I mean more than just Israel/ Gaza. Anyone who knows my participation on this forum knows very well my centre of discussion is religion, theology and philosophy. To dismiss the talk as "just white people" is also telling. But anyway, na so for Africa man. We havent qualified yet oh. Playoff remain. Enjoy bro. |
IronGalaxy:What is the same thing? I hope you dont mean your analogy of the tiny elite? Its extremely different. Extremely. If Ikoyi / VI/ Lekki were strictly reserved for white people till 1994, you will understand the difference. Especially if you as a Nigerian needed a passbook to go there for menial work during the day. If only white people could contest elections here till 1994, you will understand. If they kept maybe Awo / Zik etc in prison for 27 years because they wanted a free Nigeria for Africans as well, you will understand. After all that, if white Brits owned 70 per cent of land in Nigeria TILL TODAY and almost all of the GDP TILL TODAY, u will understand. If you were not allowed to go into a restaurant or shop for white people, you will get it. If you had to use different toilets, you will get it. I can go on and and on. Just thank God for your hot weather and mosquitoes otherwise you will be in this situation till today. |
IronGalaxy:Bad analogy. That analogy applies in every country of the world. so please, man, I'm celebrating our win, stop telling me about white people, don't you guys tire of talking about them? damn!I am happy we kept hope alive even if slim. Sorry, I am a black nationalist activist and writer so parson me for my obsession with black marginalization in the world. |
IronGalaxy:He is right from the economic and land perspectives one hundred per cent. |
IronGalaxy:He is right though. |
Unbiased1:If you can show me where I have ever said Jew were not indigenous, I will be happy. European Zionist replacement Jews cannot be proven to be indigenous - that one we all know. Thats why you run away from the word Ashkenazi. Netanyahu, is a Polish man with a Polish name who only changed his name to appear Jewish. So are most Zionists from everywhere including Argentina. And Netanyahu says there will NEVER be a Palestinian State. This is the leader of the country you say is always ready to make compromises. Also you know very well that the settling in the West Bank didnt start today. And the mission has been clear - to ensure that there will be no Palestian place whatsoever. Same with Gaza. Its a great pity that anyone who saw what the Afrikaner Dutch did in South Africa (same strategy of banishing blacks to tiny tibelands and taking everything for themselves - which is why up till today they own over 70 per cent of the land) - can support what Europeans are doing to Arabs. Its a real pity. Especially for black men like you to support it. I repeat: they called the ANC and Mandela terrorists. I repeat, the USA left Mandela on its terrorist watch list till 2008 even after he had been president and left for ten years. Black men will never learn. |
JimRohn:Time to dissect Mo and his history and antecedents. |
Unbiased1:So you see the point? Just dont try to use euphemisms like "supplant" when you know the ancient world was full of conquest. That is intellectual dishonesty and and shows your terrible bias. I have heard Caucasians saying that they only settled in America when the truth is that they conquered it and aggressively exterminated its native population. Will you say today those Caucasians should leave? I keep asking you this and your silence is one of the hints that for you, white conquest of others is okay. My own point remains that after 1, 300 years in the area NO ONE can say Arabs are not indigenous as well. Rather you will say Jews were there before as if they didnt brutally wipe out the Cannanites there as well! What was the offense of the people in Jericho? Jerusalem nko that David took, were there not others there before? Did he go to beg them and purchase it amicably? 2 Sam 5:6-10 - David captured Jerusalem from the fiercely independent Canaanite tribe of Jebusites in c. 1004BC. cc Kukutente23 / Tctrills |
Pootle:And so. Is there no native god, strong babalawo or dibia in naija who can enter shrine now to magic two goals for Rwanda? |
GOAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Unbiased1 why do you say Jews "supplanted" Canaanites? Can you see? That a euphemism for conquest and extermination. E.g: Jericho. Same way white Americans will talk about Native Americans when the truth is they exterminated them. |
Unbiased1 before I digest everything note that I have never claimed Jews are not indigenes of the land. My claim is that movement is fluid and once people have inhabited a place for over a millennium you can't exclude them from being indigenes too. So you can't exclude Arabs. This is why it was also wrong for Europeans to exclude Jews from Europe for almost two millennia. This is why Hitler was wrong as well. Will digest the rest later. PS: How would Peters line remain Jewish for 2000 years in Europe. Do you think you can even identify them with all the genetic mixture? That would be absurd. I have told Kukutente23 that is possible for a black man today to descend from a Mongolian. He still disputes something so obvious. |
Unbiased1:The point is you only see one side as terrorists. You will never for example, see Israel as terrorists no matter that they do. Even murderer settlers in West Bank, you will not agree. That's enough for me to know and infer that for you, oyibos are not terrorists. Only Arabs and blacks probably are, in your estimation. I mean, you dismiss the ICC. You dismiss the UN. So I can quite infer. If you didn't, I would know that you have a balanced view. Not everything must be said openly before one can tell. It's because one can see from a distance that to you, terrorists are whoever white people say they are. As such, you can't see Hamas as freedom fighters matter what. Don't you know the ANC once had an armed wing? |
Kukutente23:Imagine |
johnie:Marcello Bielsa, Jose Mourinho |
Referee should be Tom Ovrebo |
Gmone:LEAVE STORY. ITS OBVIOUS WHAT YOU WENT THERE TO DO. |
Gmone:Stop telling unfathomable lies. You went to seek commercial sex for your sex and if you went penniless then you went in an attempt to get it free by sounding like a pastor. This is glaring. No one here is as gullible as you think. Your story is fabricated. There was probably no friend you went with. You went on a mission to enjoy olosho. |
Unbiased1. In response to your insistence on Judea and Samaria being Jewish homeland and your support of the West Bank being taken away from Palestine, I am reposting below my last post to you on the other thread which I never saw a response to. Because it contains points which are important in this regard. Especially the analysis of population at various points in time. Unbiased1:You will note that I acknowledged that there was a remnant of Jews there, nevertheless this was a very small minority. At the end of the 19th century, the Jewish population in Palestine constituted a small minority, making up about 5-7% of the total population. The majority of the population was Muslim (around 80%) and Christian (around 10%)." Please look at the table of demographics in the link below which sets out the percentage of population of each group (Muslim, Christian and Jewish) at various points in history. https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jewish-and-non-jewish-population-of-israel-palestine-1517-present You will note that - 1. From 1517 to 1882 through the rule of the Ottoman empire, the Jewish population varied from 1.7% to 8%. Thus it is clear that the Jews were a distinct minority throughout that period. 2. By the end of the 1st World War, they had become 9.1%. 3. Throughout the period of the British Mandate they grew from 11 percent in 1922 to 32% in 1937. This was the period of the first wave of significant Zionist migration from Europe, and so it is obvious that the majority of Jews in the land were now migrants from Europe. But hang on, the evidence gets worse - 4. Between 1947 and 1948 - a period of one year only - the year of the creation of the State of Israel, the percentage of Jews jumped from 32% to a staggering 82% - in ONE year only! This shows conclusively two things - a. That the migration from Europe formed almost all of the population of Jews by that time as compared to the negligible percent prior to the British Mandate b.In the same period of ONE year the poulation of non-Jews fell from 1.3 million people to 156, 000 people! The foregoing discloses conclusively what had transpired. A mass migration of Europeans had flooded the land and there was a mass evacuation/ removal of non-Jews. Please note that these figures are from the Jewish Virtual Library, lest you claim they are biased. Therefore the case is firmly made, that the Jews of today are essentially European migrants. It is also crucial to note that the Arabs had been on that land prior to that time since the time of the Byzantinne Empire for some 1, 300 years. https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-206581/ And as I have said repeatedly in my last submission, it is absurd to deny a people who have been on a land for over a millenium their indigeneship of that land. I repeatedly used the example of Europeans in America who have only been there for a few centuries and yet no one questions their right to be there. 2) Did you know that Palestine, before the British took over, never had an actual boundaryThis is false. Both the Romans and Ottomans had clear boundaries of their territories there, for example. But the fact still remains that Arbas had occupied the land in question for over a millenium. And that speaks for itself. In one of my previous responses to you, I begged you to mention the names of Arab villages and communities taken over by the Jews before or in 1948, but you didn't mention any, so your claim that Jews not acknowledging the presence of Arabs on the land is utterly false. Also note that these lands purchased were completely different from communities already occupied by the Jews, who never left the Levant.This is a meaningless point. Even today American States and cities bear Native American names. Where do you think names like Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Connecticut, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachussets, Michigan, Minnessota, Missisipi, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, North/ South Dakota, Tenessee, Texas, Utah, Wisconsin, Wyoming - all come from? All these are Native American names or derive from them and this shows you that it is normal and natural for the old names of a place can and are often retained and this does not then mean that the current white population should all be chased away from America does it? As I have said before, as a purist, I dont mind that happening if the scanty Native Americans can muster the might, but I acknowledged that the time which has passed and the length for which the current population has dwelt there already renders the point quite meaningless as that length of time has effectively made those places their genuine homeland. How much more for Arabs who have been in Palestine for over 1, 300 years? ? ? ? Now to hammer this point home and show just how meaningless it is for you, where do you think the so called Jewish names of most of the old towns and cities came from? Thats right - they were old Canaanite names that preceded the time of the Jewish invasion of the land! Examples - ---------------- Jerusalem (Yerushalayim) Original Name: The earliest known name for the city is Urusalim, found in ancient Egyptian texts from the 14th century BCE. The name is believed to be of Canaanite origin, possibly meaning "foundation of the god Shalim" (a Canaanite deity) or "city of peace." Hebron (Hebron) Original Name: The ancient name of the city was likely Hebron, as it is referred to in the Hebrew Bible. The name's origin is debated, but some scholars suggest it may be related to the root ḥbr, meaning "to be joined" or "alliance." The name has been in use since the Canaanite period. Beth She'an (Beit She'an) Original Name: The city was known as Beth-shean or Beth-shan in ancient times. The name is a Semitic term meaning "house of comfort" or possibly "house of the god She'an." It was a significant Canaanite city-state. Jaffa (Yafo) Original Name: The city's name, Jaffa, is one of the oldest port city names in the world and is mentioned in ancient Egyptian texts and the Hebrew Bible. Tel Megiddo (Megiddo) Original Name: The ancient city, a site of numerous historical battles, was known as Megiddo to the Canaanites. Gezer (Gezer) Original Name: Gezer was a major Canaanite city-state, frequently mentioned in the Amarna Letters (ancient Egyptian correspondence). Its name likely means "a separated place" or "a cutting." - - - Culled. There we go. So summarily you can see how meaningless your point on the names of villages and towns is! Now as to your question as to what Arab towns and villages were taken over, the radical change in demography by ethnic percentages between 1922 and 1948 suffices without mentioning any list of towns. From a Jewish population of 11 % in 1922 to 80 per cent in 1948 (fifty per cent of which came from Europe in the last one year before 1948) -is enough to prove the point! 3) Did you know that when the British officially called the area "British Mandate of Palestine", the Arabs were not comfortable with the name "Palestine" as they claimed that it was an attempt to erase the Arab identity of the area? Today, these same people have embraced that name as a tool for political warfare against Israel. As stated by a PLO commander, Zuhair Mohsen and member of the PLO's executive committee, in an interview with Dutch newspaper Trouw on March 31, 1977:Frankly the name is not important. That is looking at form over substance. The substance is the fact that you had a local population of Arabs, Christians and Jews (majority being Arabs) for centuries. Indeed as late as the 16th century the evidence above shows that only 1.7% of that population was Jewish. So you can bicker about names, but an apple by any other name will still remain what is known as an apple. When the UN created the partition plan of 1947, the plan was to create a Jewish state and an Arab state, not a Palestinian state, because both parties were identified by their ethnicities, not as Palestinians.So why is there a Jewish State today which is resisting the existence of an Arab State, even after occupying the little land left to them, cornering them and oppresing them? There were no "Palestinian people". The only Palestinian people were the ones newly invented by the British after they defeated the Ottoman Empire.As I have said, the name is inconsiquential. Were there people called "Americans" at a point in history? No. The key thing with reference to the area called Palestine is that there was a local population of different ethnicities, simple. Attempting to say that "Palestinians do not exist" today is a racist statement geared at extermination and ethnic cleansing. 4) You mentioned the biblical claim of land by the Jews and even went ahead to call the Jewish God barbaric, and you also spoke about compromises. I'll address both. When the Jews in diaspora returned, they were hoping to get all of Palestine for their Jewish state. The British dealt a big blow to that plan by cutting a huge chunk of the land, a whopping 78% of it, to create Transjordan. At this point, it became clear to the Jews that the promised land their God offered them was no longer feasible in modern times.We agreed to leave out the promises of any imaginary God from this discussion as anyone can do that. Nonetheless, nowhere in Jewish history did the state of Israel extend to cover all of that country today known as Jordan. Parts of that land were conquered by Israel and given to the tribes of Reuben and Gaad, but much of it remained with Canaanite tribes such as the Moabites, Edomites and Ammonites. But this is irrelevant because the table detailing the population of the current land at issue through the centuries (the link from the Jewish Virtual Library which I gave above) discloses that the current land being discussed - not Jordan - was populated up till 1948 by a Muslim majority. Following the creation of Transjordan in 1920, the Jews thought the remaining 22% of the land would be the Jewish state since the Arabs had gotten 78% already. That thought was dead on arrival as the Peel accords of 1937 carved out a small chunk of that 22% to be the Jewish state. The Jewish state was 17% of that small piece of land, largely made up of the old Jewish communities and the newly purchased Jewish lands, Jerusalem, and to extent, Bethlehem were to remain under the British Mandate due to their religious importance to both Jews and Arabs and this part made up 8% of the land, while he rest of the land, about 75% of the land was to be an Arab state. Despite the projections of the Jews, their Biblical beliefs and to their great disappointment, they accepted the deal nonetheless. That right there is the COMPROMISE you spoke of. What did the Arabs do? They rejected the idea of having a separate Jewish state and insisted on having just 1 country where Arabs will be the majority. That right there is NOT COMPROMISE. In this war, Israel has compromised by agreeing to release Palestinian prisoners, many of whom were charged with Murder and other crimes, including Hamas members. One of the youths who took part in the famous Ramallah lynching of 2000 was also released by Israel. This is a huge COMPROMISE as Israel is putting itself at risk by releasing these criminals to society, who can attack Israel in the future. On the other hand, one would expect Hamas, whose people are dying to also compromise by releasing all the hostages to stop these frequent Israeli attacks and the complete takeover of Gaza City, but no, Hamas and the Arabs never compromise, and unfortunately, no one is forcing them to, as everyone is focused on Israel.This is utterly fraudulent hogwash. To attempt to claim that since Arabs had already got Jordan, then that should have been that is fraud. The land at issue, Palestine, at the time concerned has already been disclosed as being predominatly Muslim. Thus any division of that land concerned should have been proportional to the existing population. However as it turned out mass migrations to and from the territory occurred under the pressure of international powers, and no one would suggest that given what occured in 1947-48 (I have already highlighted the drastic change of population above - which was nothing short of ethnic replacement) - no one would suggest that the local population and their ethnic Arab allies were not entitled to resist this scenario. Whilst Israel turned out to be the stronger military power with Western backing, the fair truth remains that those lands left to the Arabs today, as small as they are, (Gaza and the West Bank) should be accorded the right of sovereignty and self determination - just the same as the Jewish State of Israel enjoys. And most countries of the world today recognise them as such, and it frankly is only being resisted by Israel backed by the USA today. Indeed I just heard in the news today that the US has revoked the visas of the entire Palestinian delegation to the next UN General Assembly meeting. They dont have a right to do that, but that just shows you how far they would go to suppress the Palestinian voice. Their duty as the host country of the UN does not extend to unilaterally banning states from attending meetings of that multilateral organization. The last time this happened the UN relocated the meeting to Geneva. One hopes they will have the balls to do that this time around. In this matter, the abominable attitude of Israel and supporters of Israel to international Law cannot be excused. Israel is the ONLY country in the world which routinely disregards International Law with the support of the USA. If other countries did that, they would be called rogue nations. Israel goes about routinely bombing its neighbours such as Iran, Lebanon and Syria, including attacking embassies and the premises of international organizations like the United Nations and its sub-bodies - ALL they time. No other nation operates with such a complete disregard of international law but all that supporters of Israel like you can say is simply, to hell with the UN, to hell with international law (as you alluded in your subsequent post). Of course to hell with everyone else and all treaties and laws because Israel is a supreme master race chosen by God and subject to no laws whatsoever, not even laws of decency. No wonder it is meaningless to people like you that Benjamin Netanyahu has been indicted of war crimes by the International Criminal Court and as such cannot currently travel to most countries in the world. While you will claim that the entire UN and ICC are "antisemitic" it is noteworthy that even two former Israeli Prime-Ministers, Ehud Olmert and Ehud Barack have condemned the so caled war as involving war crimes and being a war of deception. Various international expert bodies have also conclusively called it a genocide. I will find some time to address the ethnic supremacist worship of Israel in your second post. cc: Kukutente23 Tctrills |
tctrills:It is not over by any stretch of the imagination and only those who worship Trump would even think for a moment it is. |
Unbiased1:1. One mans terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Also it's unfortunate that some of you have allowed the West and it's allies to appropriate the word terrorist, such that they can describe their enemies as terrorists at will and you will agree. Whereas they do far worse things and you will never describe them as terrorists. I haven't heard you ever describe King Leopold of Belgium as a Terrorist for example. I haven't heard you describe Blair and Bush as terrorists for all the crimes they committed in Iraq through telling lies about weapons of mass destruction which never existed. I haven't heard you describe the CIA as terrorists regardless of the amount of people they have murdered around the world. I haven't heard you describe the apartheid government of South Africa as terrorists. I haven't heard you describe the many imperialist mass murderer governments of Europe which killed millions around the world to steal their lands as terrorists. Yet this same West labelled Nelson Mandela a terrorist and I have not heard you question that. You simply agree with whoever they label a terrorist and that's that. Armed resistance is not terrorism but you seem to think only the West and their allies have the right to this. Do you know what this is? It is simply slavery of the mind to white skin. 2. Every single offer of peace to Palestine has been unjust. And they are a people with a spine so they don't just jump at any offer. No one would do to white men what has been done to them and white men would jump at any offer. They would fight and die to the last man to insist on their full rights and even to steal other people's lands and no one would call them terrorists. As for a place being the Jewish homeland, I have explained to you in detail how movement of people is fluid. Arabs cannot dominate a place for over a millennium and you keep insisting it's not their home as well. That's not the way demographics work. I even gave you a table from the Jewish Virtual Library showing you the population of Jews there through various key points, and that concluded the point. You never responded to it. It is absurd that you don't contest America being Caucasian homeland even when they have not been there for up to half the time Arabs have been in Palestine, but you contest the rights of Arabs in Palestine. Furthermore it is most absurd to think that the Jewish population which returned from Europe remained the same of of 2000 years ago. That is biologically and genetically impossible in human interactions. |
Kukutente23:Well if so, it can only mean US presidents have been generally debauched criminals. A con artist is who you praise so? |
tctrills:Carpet bombing and other such tactics make it clear that they were out to kill innocents regardless. They also have even their own estimates of Hamas fighters and evidently non Hamas casualties were far more. Again, babies can hardly be Hamas. |
tctrills:Indiscriminate and reckless murder of even babies is criminal. |
Kukutente23:You also think DJT is the greatest president ever? |
tctrills:Here is what i said - DeepSight: |
tctrills: |
Kukutente23:My error then. |
tctrills:It is not possible to destroy Hamas. Every last Palestinian will have to be killed including all those in diaspora, and all children and descendants every where in the world. The reason for this is not that every Palestinian belongs to Hamas. The reason is that it is impossible to tell every one who belongs to it. |
Unbiased1:1. Do Terrorist Groups contest elections. 2. There will be no end to the Palestinian struggle until Palestine is free. Nothing else can end it. This is what history teaches us. Situations of slavery, colonization and other unjust scenarios are simply unsustainable no matter how long they last. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 (of 808 pages)
