₦airaland Forum

AbuEzeFemi:
1. Anambra

2. Awka Ibom

Raskasal:
Why e be say na when election dey come dey deem it fit to do all they are supposed to have done? Ehn?

www.nairaland.com/attachments/6398279_f_jpegc3ec80e26d4338f9d81fc822f43d1c98



www.nairaland.com/attachments/6398282_d_jpeg606f2d2c5cc4b1a0bcf4de5a863bea72




www.nairaland.com/attachments/6398285_a_jpeg14a53cac5a312f3d1ad4980fec051d42

hoodmenconcept:
you are stupid once again
we are talking about economic growth and development of a nation... you are talking nonsense about someone being a bastard n shits... do u know how many bastards r there in US and other developed nations.. i don't exchange words with low IQ people... find ur mate and discuss with him/her

asshole
arindin
oponu

hoodmenconcept:
oloriburuku ni hausa/fulani lineage
u r so dull n gullible
is that your own economic growth meaning....

i pity your generation

https://247ureports.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/obiano-water.jpg



[img]https://3.bp..com/-j1neQAdaB-A/VrEckruRmDI/AAAAAAAAL6I/mkqoyngumJc/s1600/2g.jpg[/img]

hoodmenconcept:
you are very stupid for saying.. he is the best governor.

a governor encouraging increase in population without increase in economic growth, how will the population growth survive without economic growth... you guys are gullible and you are the one drawning nigeria backward.. i wonder where on earth God created low iq people like you.
no education
no reasoning
all of una thinking in thesame direction

no hope for this country if these gullible tribe r still part of Nigeria

www.nairaland.com/attachments/6371371_242939115413972595432872353053461577278306n_jpg9eb9786f6939fce6c65afa88642c530d





XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXx




www.nairaland.com/attachments/5535356_cracks1_jpeg1d491ab30bff0af18de8dcc8ac3d8287


www.nairaland.com/attachments/5535357_cracks3_jpegfe073bd3110e1c3eaf2ee3d550600d8f


www.nairaland.com/attachments/5535358_cracks2_jpegb7c83461acd888f4ec1780c44d5a5ddd

www.nairaland.com/attachments/5535359_cracks_jpeg987e4c42e7eeb9b84d212523344a882d


www.nairaland.com/attachments/5536748_br_jpegc8117c630082344e94d7be0bf2d0edc6


www.nairaland.com/attachments/5536749_capture_jpeg6d0ce43c2e6495dc5ba7597dd3872afd



www.nairaland.com/attachments/5340963_p6131929562_jpeg71ac4f0ae60335fa57529b51af594697

onwards:
We are saying the same thing. It is effectively a 4 lane highway but the center lanes are now converted to a flyover.

the old road is effectively eliminated I'm afraid. I attached a photo for clarity purposes

onwards:
If there were an underpass and overpass, we wouldn't be debating this design.

Actually, the flyover DOES lift the preexisting road off the ground and away from the commercial centre. At least going by the pictures presented in this thread. The bridge is supported by two piers per section and not one central pier, the old road is effectively eliminated I'm afraid. I attached a photo for clarity purposes.

UfuomaUN:
Nigerian governors think development is about overhead bridges! Cosmetic projects to siphon funds. The only state that probably needs a bridge of this magnitude is Lagos cos of the huge vehicular traffic in that state! Why spend a lot on building a 2km bridge when cheaper alternatives exist? A state with a very high poverty rate for that matter!

onwards:
1. The foot of the bridge I meant is the one linking the busy center to the length of the main flyover.
2. It saves time, manpower and eases movement but not for the economic center to which these indices really matter.
3. The difference is in the access of pedestrians to the speed lanes which would be next to impossible or terribly arduous with the flyover design. I am also advocating simplicity.
4. Not necessarily, the road needn’t be widened beyond reason, a lane or two extra is not going to be much of a big deal.
5. A ten lane expressway is an overkill in this case but I get your stance, although I doubt there is a need for such level of expansion on that road.
6. Maybe or not. But of course they have the figures and I don’t, I am only questioning based on what the photographs here tell me. But if this was the only solution that could be reached, well…
7. Human traffic slows down vehicular traffic and for the busy area this is actually a real problem as you would have more people using that zone that vehicles on a normal day. i.e. a market.
8. compared to the economic relevance of that city center, I’d wager you are betting on the wrong horse but then again we don’t have the numbers so we can only speculate.
9. If the accident happens along the busy lanes, how do you reach and evacuate the victims speedily knowing the level of congestion the bridge solution must have inflicted upon the road network within.
10. Actually, there is such a course as Highway Engineering and they take all those metrics into serious considerations when evaluating design options.

1.Obafemi Awolowo University.

2.Bowen University.

3. Redeemers University. ...

4. Joseph Ayo Babalola University. ...

5. Fountain University. ...

6. Oduduwa University. ...

7. Osun State University. ...

8. Adeleke University.

onwards:
The Flyover as a solution is actually counter intuitive from a design standpoint. The goal is to decongest traffic but what I see is just a relocation of the traffic hotspot from the center of the commercial area to the foot of the flyover.

In engineering, utility, aesthetics and safety are the three tenets and sadly this overly complex flyover meets none of these criteria convincingly. The Flyover is unnecessarily long, the space beneath it doesn't link more than one perpendicular road network i.e. eliminating roundabouts, nor is it economically viable (warehousing) due to safety concerns.

A reasonable solution is to create a 4 lane road. With, the two center lanes dedicated to commuters who have no business with the commercial area. The two other outlying lanes will go through the busy area. Each flanking the speed lanes


Each of these four lanes will be adequately seperated by means of concrete lane guards or short width trenches (for drainage purposes if that is a concern) complemented with simple wire fences. This will automatically prevent any vehicular or human movement from one lane to another. Separation of concerns is complete.

To tackle the traffic in the busy lanes, two or three strategic locations will have pedestrian bridges (crossing the entire 4 lanes and with stairway access to the two speed lanes).They will be erected to ease human traffic out of the market and allow the people means to access the speedlanes so as to board vehicles out of the area fast. This will prevent any further traffic buildup on the busy lanes.

In case of emergencies too, you can easily access the busy lanes through the speed lanes using contraptions over the trenches and cutting through the wire fences to reach victims. There will be no need to factor in elevation contingencies as would be the case with this 2km long flyover. Now all 4 lanes will share the traffic load optimally and prevent any gridlock in the future. This solution meets the three engineering requirements adequately.

In engineering the simplest solutions are the best. Ockam's razor and yes, this flyover is not only unnecessary but sub-optimal as a solution.

gretblue:
Fayose bridge is not up to 2klm .