₦airaland Forum

ileobatojo:
I'm sorry o, but doesn't this support Mondisweets' point?

ileobatojo:
I'm sorry o, but doesn't this support Mondisweets' point?

Mondisweets:
if no one was affected why did other passengers move away? and if no innocent passenger was harmed, what do you call hitting those passengers who tried to stop the fight?

do you call the beat-down he gave to the second girl "minimal"?

and the passengers plus the video cannot prove that both parties acted violently in public?
please tell me why its called public violence again?

Mondisweets:
look up res ipsa locquitur. if the facts speak for themselves there will be no need for a passanger to expressly claim that he/she was affected. do you wait for a dead victim to express a claim that he was killed before you charge someone with murder?


i never refused that he retaliated after being attacked.

the moment the fight escalated to include other people it exceeded limits of defence, it became an act of violence in the public

Mondisweets:
If negligence is sufficiently proven as a form of fault she can still be found guilty of assault not public violence. Same way Oscar Pistorius was charged with culpable homicide as opposed to murder because the state prosecutor failed to prove an intention to kill.

I will give you an example of 2 similar cases were different judgments were given

In, Pinchin v Santam a pregnant woman was involved in a car accident and as a result of the accident she lost amniotic fluid and when her child was born, the child was born with a disorder. she managed to prove that there was a casual link between the car accident with caused her to lose amniotic fluid and the disorder her child developed. she was awarded compensation for damages.

In RAF v Mtati a pregnant woman was involved in a car accident and when the child was born the child developed brain damage. she could not sufficiently prove the casual link between the car accident and the brain damage her child suffered and her claimed was dismissed

in both cases the nasciturus rule was applied in the Pinchin case it was allowed and in the Mtati case it was denied. Each is considered on its own merits

Mondisweets:
definitely, like I said he had the right to retaliate but it had to be within reasonable and justifiable means.

amakufrancis:
about 90% of guys ike fiqure 8 girls which am not excluded...... Bro you damn funny oo, you mean you dont fancy em girls with large boobs with plasma flat screen bottom?

ileobatojo:
There's no need for long story. Here you go. Here are excerpts followed by a link describing the MSCEIT test in great detail and the meaning of each aspect of it.



The study you quoted said women were better in the branch of managing emotions after controlling for age. That branch is described above.


You're welcome.