Go to romance section, politics is too much for you
joe1309: nobody hates Peter Obi, he is not the messiah many think he is, remove social media propaganda then you would notice that this man failed as a governor bcuz the basic things he ought to have done he did not them. And for people to say that he did not steal as a governor is laughable. All Nigeria need now is young man as president, someone who should be in late 40s or 50s.
The records are there to verify, not cho cho cho or beer parlour gossips
Deadlytruth: This thread was opened on the 14th of February 2012 as can easily be seen on page 1 of it. Obi assumed office in 2006 sequel to the sack of Ngige.... meaning that this thread was opened six years into Obi's tenure and two years to the end of it. So if Anambra people could lambast Obi and adjudge him a monumental failure after six years of his eight year term, then what on earth do you mean by the bolded?
The resources you're able to pull depends on the territory you're spreading your tentacles to. Igbos spreading across Nigeria means they're pulling more resources
BATified2023: u igbos are d economic scavengers running around like castrated kangaroo
What did this man do that they're holding him perpetually?
BlowYourMind: Amazing, but bitter grieving obi people are the ones that will mourning and grieving over the news, they are filled with anguish and bitterness
Lagos-Calabar Coastal road that 1/50 hasn't been completed? You're already giving him credit for work that has not been done?
Darianboy4u: Reconstructed Lagos-Calabar coastal highway, Apapa-Oshodi express, Sokoto-Badagry costal highway, Abuja-Lokoja road, Lokoja-Benin Road & rehabilitate 3rd Mainland brige and several other bridges across the country. In total about 51 roads and bridges have been awarded as contract in 8 months in total. Believe you me, even as I'm obidient, i commend this effort.
Anytime I see this lady's comment, i get pissed. Take responsibility for voting Buhari and Tinubu, two monumental failures.
How come Buhari wasnt able to solve insecurity even though he is a general?
EreluRoz: I don't think any of the major contestants would have done better considering the mess Nigeria was in. The only solution to Nigeria's problem is revolution.
Jonathan started this mess immediately he lost to Buhari and Buhari couldn't do anything and it went on and on and here we are today. Whenever I see any clueless Nigerian praising Jonathan I just smh at his or her ignorance because Jonathan isn't what he portrays himself to be.
Whenever we are ready to get rid of all these people then we can start talking about true change. Until then let's keep recycling them and biasedly making our choices.
Darianboy4u: In all sincerity, Tinubu is doing a lot when it comes to constructing of federal roads. However, even if I give him 6/10 on that aspect, I will still give him 1/10 in every other aspect of governance.
He was a proponent of dividing the 4 regions to 12 states with the creation of Lagos State( different from the original Lagos colony)
He also made sure Biafra never succeed by suggesting starvation to Gowon and justifying it with the statement that all is fair in war(its against the Geneva convention to use starvation by way of food blockade)
Awolowo fears domination so much that he wants to remain in Nigeria but doesn't wanna be alone with the North
erniok2: How did you come about Awolowo made sure no one got out. Any proof.
But when Awolowo and the North through Gowon got power, the made such nobody goes out. Thats means they never really wanted out
erniok2: He wanted out. He was a core tribalist but wasn't called to the presentation. If he had appeared, I doubt if the country Nigeria would have existed today.
Constitution is just a document on how we chose to govern ourselves, its not some sacred document to worship. We can and should change it. We can then introduce the secession clause. We're alive and can do what we want
Kukutente23: All these talk of Constitution got the people is philosophical B'S. It doesn't mean anything tangible in the real world. Resource control was removed by Gowon in the 1970s not 1999 Constitution. The 1999 Constitution is silent about it which is why the NASS could make a law for 13% derivation. By the wordings of the Constitution however, secession is not allowed so a question if referendum can't arise
A referendum can be done on anything including the unity of Nigeria. Remember, the constitution is meant for the people and not the people for the constitution.
If the issue of secession cannot be discussed in constitution amendment today, it means even if it was in the 1960 constitution, it'd have been removed. Resource control was there but removed in the 1999 constitution
Kukutente23: Was that referendum to break up the country? It was a referendum to create a new region just as its possible in Switzerland. Reps just passed a bill to create a new state in the East. Does that mean Reps support secessionist calls from the East?
The midwest region was created through a referendum in 1963. Referendum is deferent from secession
Kukutente23: That's not true. The 1999 constitution is basically a continuation of the 1995 constitution. It was the product of a constitutional conference. It is not perfect of course but it is not an imposition as is usually being peddled.
Referendum is a quest for secession true or not? The constitution foreclosed that. The best chance was 1960 and Zik flunked it. The next best chance is through your elected reps in the legislature and they don't share your sentiments. It's same with the West. Most Westerners want fiscal federalism and devolution of powers. Their elected reps don't share that sentiment. It was even Buhari who wanted something close to that.
Was there a referendum by the Nigerian people to adopt it ?
Kukutente23: That's not true. The 1999 constitution is basically a continuation of the 1995 constitution. It was the product of a constitutional conference. It is not perfect of course but it is not an imposition as is usually being peddled.
The 1999 constitution, you and I weren't part of it, it was actually a schedule of the military decree 24 or so
Kukutente23: 1. Read carefully your reference. It did not say both regions were one country. The owners named the Upper part of River Zambezi northern Rhodesia and the lower part Southern Rhodesia. Both were never one country. They only used the river as reference. Just like Northern Nigeria and Southern Nigeria were two different countries before amalgamation. They were named for River Niger but were not one country before amalgamation. Hope you get it now?
2. Under what laws will that referendum come when the constitution says "We the people..... are one indivisible and indisoluble entity called Nigeria"? That statement alone rules out any legitimate quest for secession. Do you get it? The only way you can get a secession now is through a constitutional amendment. But I ask again. Who wants that?
Who is dying in the hands of bokoharam, bandits, iswap and herdsmen? Northerners.
From 2009 to date, over 50k Northerners hsve been killed by Northerners islamic terrorists and thats the retribution for the 1966 pogroms.
There has to be retribution, restitution, before restoration. You guys are still in the retribution phase.
You see the 20million out of school children in the North? Current banditry is child's play compared to when they grow up and realized that they're unemployable then the worst phase of the retribution would set im.
Baifra, Lower Niger Republic must have left Nigeria by then