₦airaland Forum

butterfly88:
yeah you started the computer logic Lol...tryna to use it to support you claim but in the wrong context then I tried to correct it but you persisted...

.now another twisting.....

but here is the point again is the father aware before hand that his soon while cause such troubles? even before given birth to him?

is the father aware that his son will lead millions into the abyss of no return....if yes then the father is to be held responsible

if no then your logic holds no water...cause it simply means that God has no perfect knowledge

butterfly88:
did God know he will dis obey?...is God all knowing?

cause from all you've stated it's as if God is not all-knowing

cause if I intend to create something to my taste and I'm the greatest designer there is how come my design ends up giving me headache?

Omg..cant you see?

butterfly88:
don't try to twist the logic I made with the computer the loopholes existed cause of the imperfection of the scientist but on a nutshell the computer is a wonderful device

so now if the devil is the computer and God the scientist...now thus is another type of computer I purely dangerous computer ...now is the scientist in this case God imperfect for creating a totally bad computer when he Infact intended to create a magnificent device?

so who do you blame for the creation of a bad computer? the inventor or the computer that is what my question is

raphieMontella:
did god kill the babies who die in wombs?(naturally)

what about intersex babies?
Did god make them?

butterfly88:
lol..god took a big risk?...I risk not a product of uncertainty and imperfect knowledge

so Satan is next in rank to God? so God is not even all powerful and Satan to can be ranked second in command...

and all these makes sense to you?

dorox:
God taking risk implies that He is not omniscient. I hope you know.

butterfly88:
lol...I still find it hard to comprehend you sir...so God first created man hand his creation was flawed by what God didn't create and wasn't "aware" of

taking the computer for instance it is a beautiful work like you acclaimed but had some loop holes quick enable all kinds of cybercrimes...and mind you the computer underwent several modifications...so as to get a so called " perfect computer" which as far as I know doesn't exist

so is this the same process God is using in his creation of a perfect man and a perfect world?

raphieMontella:
sorry o
.but your parents mated to make you...or you wouldnt exist

this is not logical.

butterfly88:
is God unaware of what Satan will become before he became what he became?

butterfly88:
owk..using your above logic,, there is imperfection in God's creation in the same way as there are mistakes in the creation of the computer?

butterfly88:
Owk assuming I'm a scientist I want to create something, and I knew before hand that my invention will cause a lot of trouble for the future generations,but I did invent it nevertheless

now if such a thing kills say million who should blamed? the invention or the inventor?

butterfly88:
1st if God is all knowing he should have know that Satan will rebel and cause unrepairable damages..then he shouldn't have created Satan in the 1st instant

2nd -you said pride in Satan,who created pride?

3rd- God never created sin,who did? is there another creator other than god?

4th- so who should we blame? Satan or his creator?

ValentineMary:
I thought I was arguing with a smart person.

butterfly88:
so who marred God's creation if he was the one who designed it as he wanted it,, soo because he loved us so much he gave us provision to sin?

and after words he hard to slay a lamb " himself" to appease himself for the sins he created by himself?....what kind of perfect designer is this, is this how a knowledgeable being should act?

please throw more light

Also if rebellion against GOD is the reason for such plagues why do the innocent and sometimes the child with no sin suffer?

ValentineMary:
I hope u know the 2 bold text contradict?

ValentineMary:
Like seriously u gave zero evidence for ur claim and u still feel it is proper to push it on people did I say God does not exist I only said give me evidence. Which u failed to give and u want me to believe you Are u sure u are not blueagent?


You speak just like blueagent @ bolded. How can u say that it shows u are inconsiderate and selfish. What of the 2 month old baby that died of AIDS in Uganda or the 3 year old killed by the tsunami what sin did they commit Religious fanatics like you are very insensitive and wicked. How can any sane human take u serious?

Now this is laughable as well as senseless. It is so senseless that it does not deserve a reply.

butterfly88:
I don't get you...is this God imperfect,and not all-knowing as we proclaim?

ValentineMary:
Jealously is a personal feeling and only you can know if u feel that way or not. But when u say a God made me, you are no longer keeping it personal rather u are forcing a belief on me. And all I ask is proof.

Everything like hurricane, tusnami, HIV/AIDS, solar flares, etc. Waw he is so benevolent.

johnydon22:
I have no problem at all i am quite happy about your openess in clarifying your belief.

Jealousy = emotion [a neurological projection of the human brain]

Since to you God is established just like emotion it means.

God = emotion

Therefore Jealousy and God are of same essence and not an entity...

You have done marvelously well - Have fun worshipping God [your emotion]

Weah96:
Jealousy is a human emotion. And I'm pretty sure that it doesn't reside in your heart but your brain. You only feel your heart because it beats FASTER when you're jealous.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1147525/The-green-eyed-monster-lives-brain-Scientists-discover-jealousy-lobe.html

johnydon22:
You got it very correctly - God exists just like Jealousy, Jealousy is an emotion not a being, not an entity.

Therefore just like "Jealousy" "God" is also not a thing, not a being nor entity but an emotion, your emotional projection..

You solidified your words here

Just like your "Jealousy" is your emotion so is also your "God"

Thank you my brother, you've done good. . . The best part is that you said it yourself not me.

ValentineMary:
[i] Wait a sec, u said a creator exist and I asked what's ur evidence. And u provided none but u just went ahead to say I should disprove what u have not proved. U brought this claim, and u should prove it for anyone to take u serious. Imaging this scenario

I stand before a science conference and say "I have discovered that Bleep gene is responsible for GTP synthesis" and an older scientist ask me to prove it and show evidence. Instead of me to prove it, I went ahead to tell the scientist to disprove it.

That's just how u sound

johnydon22:
Just like you can disprove he doesn't have a golden pig he talks to right now in his room.

Can you?

Why is it that you all don't really check to see how ridiculous your assertions sounds before posting them.

johnydon22:
Our aim should be to establish objective truths not base our conviction over what "makes us feel good or loved"

The truth should not matter whether it makes you feel good or not - what matters is that it is the truth.

It is sinister for you to propose a mode of deduction based on your emotions and need to be loved.

objective truth is above that platform

raphieMontella:
Doctoralien,,
how do you see the southern hemisphere inhabitants from above the north pole?
That verse itself is in accordance with psalm 33:14..
The flat earth verses which you asked for...here
www.nairaland.com/3274173/where-god-before-he-created/5#48431999

wolesmile:
[s][/s]


Have you clarified the issues on ground? Why get yourself more confused with questions you can't answer?

wolesmile:
[s]I cannot work an argument into the consistency of a mental gag. I wonder why you are still trying illogically to prove that two and two do not make four. Can't your feeble mind differentiate between a horse chestnut and a chestnut horse?[/s]

felixomor:
Yeah right, I am actually about to show u r the dumb one insulting his teacher.



There is one conclusion I can certainly make almost 100% that u r not my match there.
I wrote mathematics in waec from SS2 with my ss3 seniors and I had a distinction.
Dont dare go there.



I actually loved this part where u really exposed urself.

That paper u just cut is a "cylinder"
No matter how flat that paper is. Once u can touch it, its no longer a circle.
Sorry.

Quote me anywhere.

Circles, squares, polygons etc are shapes that can only be represented in drawings and images. They are imaginary shapes.




So u can see u didnt actually make sense?

Just do some more study before coming up with threads like these. Sorry

wolesmile:
Are u for real? How could you be so dumb? Or are u so poor in mathematics? Don't you know the difference between a circle and a sphere? Take a piece of paper, flat paper I mean. Cut it into a perfect round shape. That's a circle. It is flat. Take a ball. That's a sphere. Compare them. Are they the same? Now take a ball and an egg. The ball is spherical. The egg is a sphere called geoid. That is to tell u the earth is not even a perfect square. Am I making sense to u? Or are u still "Dogmatically" lost?