Dtruthspeaker's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Dtruthspeaker's Profile › Dtruthspeaker's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 (of 1001 pages)
FRANCISTOWN:The earth already knows that is why everywhere in the world God is feared while those who are in rouble with Him hate Him as bad tenants always hate their landlord. |
LordReed:Says the lyingDemon as a no fit find road to pass. Hahahahahahahaha ![]() |
LordReed:Says the lord of lies! See as demon go twist am! ![]() |
Were I go put paedophile now? ![]() Okay, hang for no2 with police |
See all dem paedophiles! ![]() MEN, YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO BE BATHING YOUR GIRL CHILD/WARD AFTER 1 YEAR OLD. No one is even asking where is the mummy! |
1) Politicians and their cohorts. 2) Police people and their sponsors 3) Murderers, Assasins, 4) Judges, Lawyers, judicial workers. 5) Prostituehts, multipeoplefuckers 6) Muslims, 7) Catholics (Jw suppose.dey next una for una be the same. However, as dem no dey openly commit, una go dey down down but una go still go hellfire if una no repent before a lock.) 8 ) Women, whether teenager o or edede wey be 110years for village. All of una be devil and una must go hell. 9) Wicked Mama like this girl ownhttps://www.nairaland.com/7956201/being-first-daughter 10) Wicked mama and Papa like this guy own https://www.nairaland.com/7936892/how-did-incapacitate-evil-parent#127417859 10) Cheating man/husband. 11) Atheists 12) Awon chuch business things; all of una must go hell But on top all these people are awon the evils greater than these devils, eyin LordReed, Budaatum, Sharon, kobojunkie: potential candidates for the post of the accoming Satan's False prophet, leading all to hellfire. Oya complain! |
It has started again. Military Rule is better. Oya khaki come and show them why it is not good for rulers to lie. And ehen, woman na Im start am. |
South Korea do.your own back. Let's have war since people don't like peace make this world end. Putin.oya, ready to press red button. |
MaxInDHouse:Do you not see that he already knows that he is not qualified for the new heaven and earth? so he was making a vain request like the rich man in hell |
Righthussle:Dear hussler, you have taken and are using all the life you have been allotted. And this life which you have been given, lasts forever. Thus, you shall not be having any other. Therefore, knowing this, do thou as you can with it. Secondly, any woman that you find can be as these, so God does not have to give you these. Thirdly, as you had no right in determining your present existence, so also do you not have a right to determine your future existence, for if it pleases God to make you a Christmas chicken for 100 million lifetimes, so shall it be. Signed God's Law'er! |
ProudWitch:Says Satan's wife. |
You see the signs that Catholic church is satanic yet people are shocked whenever they say something satanic. ![]() |
MaxInDHouse:Whatever the grammar, the bottomlne is that all found guilty will be thrown into a very very bad place they will hate. |
FRANCISTOWN:There are no 2 Gods as there are no to 2 Landlords. If there was, we must know as there is no way 2 Elephants will fight and the ground will not know. So, get it out your mind, God, is the only God and Allah has proven that he is Satan, so it is only God's Prison hellfire or shiny new House (A new heaven and earth) people would be going to |
Bendy:They choose it and God signs their remand in hell papers. But all these takes place after their Day in God's Court! |
Righthussle:See vex! No different from biology and agric textbook which people use. So, stick to your own book while we stick to ours. |
KnownUnknown:God is not a man made thing. Even you have proven that He is not. |
See how Satan's prophet is complaining! Brothers, take ye up the armour of God and destroy the works of Satan and the head of the serpent. |
Image123:Like asking Satan to repent! ![]() |
LordReed:Based on the identity of being a liar as you have created for yourself renders calling your name not a vioation, which even now you prove that you are a LyingDemon! ![]() So NO ROAD! Deviil Hahahahahahaha ![]() And based on the fact that you are a liar you have no right to participate in any debate since you will never ever abide by the rules, so buzz off demon. |
jaephoenix:Says the lying most stupid atheist because I cut down all the atheists tricks of lies. ![]() |
jaephoenix:See how you prove atheists are big liars? Lying even even in the face of the evidence. Smh |
LordReed:And Reed the lord of lies begins his lyings again even when it is clear thst there is no debate here. You are definitely unqualified to debate since you are always lying |
To think the word Santa sounds like a twisted coloration of Satan. And Satan does not stand for anything good so this clearly sounds like an usurpation has taken place by dubiously replacing God, The Good for Satan aka Santa! |
kimco:You do not believe Chris because you know he is like you man. But from the beginning Jesus was not man like you. For like you and Chris were born by the sex and sperm of man Jesus was not. Even before the arrival of Jesus, we were forewarned that He would come avisiting. Who announce say you or i or chris or Obi dey come? So the proof is already there if anyone indeed wanted to have them. |
10) Thou must not lie and twist your opponents words and meanings. Typical lordReed's manner of argument when he sees he is losing. Quora What's it called when you're debating someone and they twist around your words and reply to a point you didn't make? Marry Perry "I didn't know there was a name for this, but it's a classic strategy used by persons with narcissistic personality disorder in order to unsettle and dominate you and make you feel stupid so they can “win” the argument" Kim Huli-Feltz The word is deflecting. de·flect /dəˈflekt/ verb gerund or present participle: deflecting cause (something) to change direction by interposing something; turn aside from a straight course. It’s like ‘smoke & mirrors or yelling ““look over there!” Directing attention to the side issue while the main issue is being ignored- because the focus has been changed. The classic Wizard of Oz syndrome - ““pay no attention to the man behind the green curtain”…… lordReed's version is a very very wicked type of deflecting. Miles N. Fowler You are describing someone putting words in your mouth. This often takes the form of a straw man argument where someone says you said something that you didn’t say and then criticizes their characterization - or even caricature - of your position. If you are taking a position based on one line of argument, an opponent might cite a completely different supporting argument for your position even though you never used that argument. They then point out the fallacy of this other argument and try to tar you with using a supporting argument you never used. This particular twisted attack is technically called argumentum ad logicam. SEE IT, TWISTED ATTACK! ![]() John Peter Germaat What's it called when you're debating someone and they twist around your words and reply to a point you didn't make? It is possible you are dealing with a sociopathic manipulator.(SEE WHY I CALL YOU A DEVIL/SATAN?) If the debates you are speaking of occur in your personal life, you may want to think carefully about this relationship. (I PITY YOUR WIFE AND CHILDREN AND EMPLOYEES IF ANY. I Shudder) ![]() AND BRUCE R.BAIN HAS MADE MY WHOLE CASE AGAINST DEVILREED. hehehehehehe ![]() What's it called when you're debating someone and they twist around your words and reply to a point you didn't make? There are 2 errors in such arguments to be studied. The first error occurs when someone changes the words or terminology in your Standing Point. That is a violation of Rule #3, The Standpoint Rule. 1 The Freedom Rule Claimant and Challenger must allow each other to advance a standing point, and must not prevent the other from challenging any standpoint. 2 The Burden of Proof Rule If asked by the other person to defend a standin point the other person is obligated to offer a defense and to substantiate claims with reasons or evidences as appropriate. 3 The Standpoint Rule A person's analysis and critique of another's standpoint must relate to the standing point that was introduced as an original argument. 4 The Relevance Rule A person can only defend a standing point by offering claims relating to that standing point. 5 The Unexpressed Premise Rule / Hidden Premise Rule Let me rest here! E sweet me well well say devil dey complaint hahahahahahaha. ![]() |
See Devils are complaining! ![]() |
LordReed:TwistingLyingReed is back with his evil twisting and bending of words/sentences out of natural light into dark evil meanings that were never intended or given. But evil Reed must argue from the point of darkness and evil and must take the argument there like Hades in the cartoon "Herciules" must turn everything he does not like to the dark side where he lives and rules; whereas I was clearly standing in the light open for everyone to judge according to the light. Thus, even right now you prove why i call you devil/Satan for your identity is devil/Satan as you are always a lying twisting demon doing exactly as Satan/devil will do. So calling your name is not a violation of the rule. It's the identity you have created for yourself by your conduct So NO ROAD! Deviil Secondly, off point. LordReed:I never violate any rule for if an issue is a debate, i will debate but if it is an attack, then I have a right to attack back! So bring on a debate, i will debate and I will never break any Rule, Devil, son of Satan. ![]() |
9 The Law of Evidence, Rules: Be aware of hearsay, opinion, presumption and all not admissible evidences Also your evidence must be'direct' "if it is a testimony of a fact which you perceive with one of your senses such as hearing, sight, smell, touch or taste. Section 126. |
8.) Attack the argument, not the person. That is, provide evidence that either supports your case, or disproves your opponent’s. Resorting to insults and name-calling and lies and twisting of words indicates you can’t do either of the above and is a move of sheer desperation and weakness and inability to counter the opponent's case. |
From Quora 6) Thou shalt not state what your opponent believes eg presumption of "first cause) without first getting confirmation from your opponent as to what he or she actually believes. 7) ATHEIST FAVOURITE [b]Thou shalt not engage in “Gish Gallops” (i.e., attempting to overwhelm your opponent with more questions or criticisms that can actually be answered, then claiming victory when your opponent cannot, in fact, answer all of them/b] e.g. Atheist Jaephoenix https://www.nairaland.com/7659505/book-bible-gaffes#122627177 Who can ever respond to this load of garbage? Surely this is cyber bullying. |
5) THE VALIDITY RULE (Arguments must be Valid) THE REASONING IN THE ARGUMENTATION MUST BE LOGICALLY VALID OR MUST BE CAPABLE OF BEING MADE VALID BY MAKING EXPLICIT ONE OR MORE UNEXPRESSED PREMISES. (van Eemeren et al. 132) This rule is about traditional logics. Violating this rule means that the parts of your argument do not match up. For example, your cause and effect might be off: If you swim in the ocean today, you will get stung by a jellyfish and need medical care. Joe went to the doctor today. He must have been stung by a jellyfish. While this example is obvious (we do not know that Joe went swimming), many argument problems are caused by violating this rule. Here is where your knowledge of the rules of argument comes into play as you must know how to spot an invalid argument as soon as you see or hear one. And invalid argument is an argument which is not True in nature or contains something wrong in it because it violates a Rule of Argument. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 (of 1001 pages)
Hahahahahahahaha 
