₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,325,080 members, 8,420,201 topics. Date: Thursday, 04 June 2026 at 01:25 PM

Toggle theme

EMANY01's Posts

Nairaland ForumEMANY01's ProfileEMANY01's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 (of 27 pages)

PoliticsRe: Boko Haram Sponsorship: We’ve Been Vindicated – APC by EMANY01(m): 2:07pm On Sep 03, 2014
Orunto: Who vindicates APC? No one. Nigeria is coming after all of you until we deal decisively with all who once threatened GEJ Nigeria's security
.

Fixed.
Foreign AffairsRe: Another Look At Idi Amin - Why Was He Unfairly Demonised? by EMANY01(m): 1:59pm On Sep 03, 2014
birdman: Prove what has been proven with evidence in lawsuits against shell? They couldnt sue Abacha because the chances of getting a a fair judgement in Nigeria is zero. But they could sue Shell because it was a foreign company, and therefore could be sued in a place with a sane legal system.

But let me play your game for a second.

You are suggesting that Saro Wiwa was murdered without any input from Abacha.
That the specially convened military tribunal and the execution (hanging) by the military had no Abacha input.
Somehow Abacha didnt know about Shell paying witnesses who would later recant
Abacha was busy with something else and didnt notice the rape and pillaging of the Ogoni.
The repeated frustrations of the Ogoni 9's lawyers (who would quit) was an accident. Abacha had nothing to do with it.
That somehow, convicting the Ogoni 9 without proper defense was a fair thing, and Abacha could have done nothing about it.

While you are at it, lets ignore Sgt Rogers and Al Mustapha's confessions Or the numerous student activists who were disappeared by the SSS. Somehow, Soyinka became afraid of his own shadow overnight. LOL

All these are events recorded in multiple newspapers, home and abroad, and vetted as evidence in two justice systems. But somehow, the same Abacha that was so powerful even IBB had to mechonu, the same one that jailed a sultan without any recourse...somehow this same Abacha had no control in the Ogoni case. *I have to SMH here*

You are willing to swallow this much BS just because you think Abacha "stood up to the white man". Whatever Abacha did, he didnt do it out of patriotism or black nationalism. Abacha was a mad man who fought anything that stood in his way, fact that would lead to the engineering of his death. May your (and GenBuhari's) need to appoint balck saviours not lead you to embracing mad men, criminals and despots. AMEN!
Why you waste energy debating with the likes of that one I do not know.I just sigh and ignore them until they come out in real life to say that sh.it.They should try it in real life that's all I ask.
PoliticsRe: MR DAVIS: The Target Of A Long Con With Strategic Consequences For SS/SE by EMANY01(op): 1:50pm On Sep 03, 2014
focus7: ......................................................., a CBN official was mention, though a serving official but I have read some insinuating comments trying to rope Sanusi but one thing the HAUZAS has proving is that they are more mature, honourable and ready for whoever is involve to face prosecution, they were not trying to shield anybody from investigations that could lead to ending the boko haram menace. ...........................................
http://www.thecable.ng/exclusive-boko-haram-funded-through-cbn

With this "additional information" released by Mr. Davis,I hope you can still repeat this post of yours seeing as you know who the revelation points to
PoliticsRe: MR DAVIS: The Target Of A Long Con With Strategic Consequences For SS/SE by EMANY01(op): 1:36pm On Sep 03, 2014
barcanista: i am not taking sides but just refraining from tribalising the whole thing.
I am not saying you are neither am I taking sides even though I am the first to admit that the thread both in topic and content seem pro south at first read maybe even repeated reading for those who have a one track mind.
Logically assessing the current situation and the release of this information we have to ask ourselves :
what we knew before the current "revelations" ?
what the new revelations tell us?
How does it benefit bokoharam to reveal the names listed as their sponsors?

We always have to bear in mind the avowed goal of bokoharam "The creation of an Islamic state of Nigeria whose society is administered by Islamic law" .
What is the single most obvious obstacle to this goal? The constitutional(?) state of Nigeria and the presence of people in positions of power who are either moderate(?) Muslims or worse infidels (kefir's).
We know bokoharam has wanted to smoke sheriff a Muslim (some say he helped found BokoHaram and was their patron for political reasons until he fell out with them, story for another day) since 2011 at least.
Like I said in an earlier post naming Azazi and Ihejirka as involved in the bokoharam problem automatically ropes in the current Administration which could fall if the pot is stoked with enough fire by politicians playing to a predetermined script.
So the Jonathan Administration falls, who takes over a Muslim (not necessarily allied to bokoharam) but the fact that Jonathan,Azazi and Ihejirika are implicated in the bokoharam debacle will be ammunition for the establishment of the day to purge the military security hierarchy of top ranking south southern and south eastern personnel.
The removal of those class of personnel would mean the removal with minimum effort of the section of the country that would most likely object to the infiltration of the Nigeria of those days security infrastructure by Islamists and their sympathizers.
Whenever one try's to analyze the politico/security situation in Nigeria it is beneficial to look at the big picture and the long view not just/only isolated and seemingly currently pertinent events.

BokoHaram is playing for the long term /view if we do not recognize that fact and adjust strategies to counter that, we would definitely be talking about a divided country in the long term.
PoliticsRe: INSURGENCY: Davies, Ihejirika, The Government And The Opposition by EMANY01(m): 1:01pm On Sep 03, 2014
barcanista: Another issue to consider....
Mr Davies said a Top official of CBN aids funds movement for the sect. BUT Refused to name him
Mr. Davies said "Opposition" members are involved, BUT refused to name them.
........................

I think you should read that thread for an insight.
I made the same observation in my own thread.While I'm not questioning Mr Davies's sincerity I seriously question the source(s) of his information.
Can you please post a link to the thread you are referring to?
PoliticsRe: INSURGENCY: Davies, Ihejirika, The Government And The Opposition by EMANY01(m): 12:46pm On Sep 03, 2014
barcanista: You need to understand my position....

Let us Press Mr. Davies to provide evidence against General Ihejirika IF he's so sure, submit same to the American Government and the Federal Government and IF it is weighty enough, I am sure the Americans will act IF the Fed Government Fails to act. It will be ungrateful on our part to WRONGLY accuse him and will be UNPATRIOTIC to WRONGLY defend him. We can't just assume whatever he verbally says to be binding. We have to respect the LAW that posits that "General Ihejirika remains Innocent" at least for now except PROVEN otherwise.

I want the sponsors named but we have to be very careful so as not to rope in innocent people. I want Mr. Davies to provide evidence and submit same to the USA and FG.
I couldn't agree more.
PoliticsRe: INSURGENCY: Davies, Ihejirika, The Government And The Opposition by EMANY01(m): 12:16pm On Sep 03, 2014
barcanista: .
..................................................................
[b]Governorship Ambition Not Presidency

Ihejirika is not running for the Presidency but Governorship. What is the benefit or link between his governorship ambition in Abia State and BokoHaram insurgency in Borno and the NE? Is Ihejirika a gunrunner?
Why Would Shekau and Friend's Name Him?
1. It could be that they are trying to get back at him
2. It could be that he sells arms or divert the Military Arms to the sect for financial gains and still "betray" them
3. It could be that Shekau and co were instigated by hard drugs(Similar to when they called Oshiomole the Governor of Lagos)
4. It could be that Mr. Davies is only acting to a script knowingly or unknowingly.
The Governement:
The Government and Security Agencies should beam their searchlight inwards as well as outwards. They should not play politics with it nor play to the gallery
The Opposition, Politics and Sincerity
The Opposition has called for investigation, which Ideally is good. But did they call for Sheriff's prosecution and Investigation when he was in the Opposition? What is the sincerity in the call when some section of the Opposition are even CONDEMNING the General before trial? What support did the opposition give to him when he was COAS? Why pressure the Presidency to submit Ihejirika to ICC instead without facts to nail him and considering that the NEF has threatened to sue him for ethnic cleansing?
My Opinion:
General Ihejirika reached the pinnacle of Army Career. He served as COAS. It will be ungrateful on our part to WRONGLY accuse him and will be UNPATRIOTIC to WRONGLY defend him.
What Do We Do?
Let us Press Mr. Davies to provide evidence against General Ihejirika IF he's so sure, submit same to the American Government and the Federal Government and IF it is weighty enough, I am sure the Americans will act IF the Fed Government Fails to act. We can't just assume whatever he verbally says to be binding. We have to respect the LAW that posits that "General Ihejirika remains Innocent" at least for now except PROVEN otherwise.

God Bless Nigeria
Much as I think that I do not like you nairaland personality,your write up is fairly balanced.
Your thinking (at least for this post) is logical and unlike those who just swallowed the "revelations" hook line and all because it fit their already preconceived ethnic /religious /political view of the situation in the north east of the country and the north in general.
PoliticsRe: MR DAVIS: The Target Of A Long Con With Strategic Consequences For SS/SE by EMANY01(op): 11:55am On Sep 03, 2014
barcanista: THE AUSTRALIAN NEGOTIATOR HAS BEEN THE TARGET/VICTIM OF A LONG CON STRATEGICALLY DESIGNED TO WHITTLE DOWN THE GROWING INFLUENCE OF SOUTH SOUTHERNERS AND SOUTH EASTERNERS AT THE TOP LEVELS OF NIGERIA'S SECURITY AND DEFENSE INSTITUTIONS


he said Ihejerika(SE) not Minimah(SS). Beside he even mentioned Sheriff (NE)
I guess Azazi's name dropped from the sky.
You know as well as I do that Sheriff has been on BokoHaram's target list since 2011 at least.

http://www.thisdaylive.com/articles/boko-haram-lists-conditions-for-cease-fire/129351/

So consider that they named one of their avowed local enemies as their sponsor which he may or may not be (there are a lot of speculations as to why BokoHaramis is after sheriff but that is talk for another day),where does that leave us?
We are left with the two men who have worked with Jonathan to deal with the menace from BokoHaram within that time frame (Azazi and Ihejirika) who could be said to have done a good job of it.
Name them as sponsors which automatically ties the president in with them, what do you have ? The fall of the Jonathan Administration .A critical first step in their avowed larger plan in taking over Northern Nigeria as an Islamic state and eventually expand southwards.
Adding Sheriff to that "list"(?) was killing more birds with one stone.
PoliticsRe: MR DAVIS: The Target Of A Long Con With Strategic Consequences For SS/SE by EMANY01(op): 11:02am On Sep 03, 2014
Rapist: Some Nigerians are so fvcked!!

Davies is now the opposition spokesman, right??
I never said that.If anything I made the point that Davis only repeated the in for he received or was allowed to receive from BokoHaram.Nowhere in my post did I infer that Davis is a spokesman for the opposition.
While everyone seems hooked on the naming of the former COAS, as a sponsor no one seems to be addressing the fact that he point blank named the opposition parties as sponsors as well.
Treating the reports logically how do you reconcile the fact that he named Ihekirika ,and Azazi and Sheriff but refused to name the CBN link and people in the opposition parties.Is that not inconsistent?
PoliticsRe: MR DAVIS: The Target Of A Long Con With Strategic Consequences For SS/SE by EMANY01(op): 10:42am On Sep 03, 2014
Truckpusher: It is in the North's interest to behave and this we all are well aware .
Please explain I do not follow.
PoliticsRe: Boko Haram Sponsorship: We’ve Been Vindicated – APC by EMANY01(m): 10:06am On Sep 03, 2014
Ngwakwe: What a shameful answer to ridiculous rubbish

Can you imagine this reply from the Aussie to Saharareporters phone call. See what the Australian Negotiator answered Saharareporters

The excerpt below:
"Asked whether Mr. El Rufai and former military ruler, Muhammadu Buhari, had a hand in funding or sponsoring Boko Haram, Dr. Davis said their names have not been mentioned to him by any Boko Haram connections" .

Doesn't the above in purple sound ridiculous to be taken seriously or be engaged in discussions by any Intellectual?

This means Bokoharam connections go about revealing their source of funding to any spy.
Proves what I said in my thread:
https://www.nairaland.com/1885512/mr-davis-target-long-con

The guy actually says his evidence is What he was told by his BokoHaram connections .If somebody wanted to spread a rumors you would never believe and make you buy it he will use somebody you are predisposed to believing.Someone who would almost swear by his like that what he is saying is gods truth.
PoliticsMR DAVIS: The Target Of A Long Con With Strategic Consequences For SS/SE by EMANY01(op): 9:46am On Sep 03, 2014
I made this point earlier on and the more I think about it and the more I watch the response of Nigerians of diverse groups :politicians ,political commentators,the opposition political parties and ethnic supremacists' the ordinary citizenry,the more the scenario becomes realistic.
THE AUSTRALIAN NEGOTIATOR HAS BEEN THE TARGET/VICTIM OF A LONG CON STRATEGICALLY DESIGNED TO WHITTLE DOWN THE GROWING INFLUENCE OF SOUTH SOUTHERNERS AND SOUTH EASTERNERS AT THE TOP LEVELS OF NIGERIA'S SECURITY AND DEFENSE INSTITUTIONS .(forgive my cap locked type set but the point had to be communicated).

I have never been in the camp of those who call the Aussie a "mad man" .I think he is a very smart and man who has been used as tool,an intelligent and by the view of some people believable and trustworthy individual who has simply been coned.
The question then is how do you con a very smart individual?
It's quite straight forward.For a self confident and intelligent individual like that who is on an assignment with the hopes of a nation relying on him to find a way to negotiate/ secure the release of the girls captured by boko haram (why this atrocious situation has to be the case is discussion for another day) ,whatever information you wish to pass to him and have him believe, you must never make it easy for him.
Have him jump through a series of hoops ,make him feel truly endangered and afraid for his life in the cause of his "work"(?), let him believe he has gained a bit of trust of people within factions of what he is led to believe are boko haram terrorists who might be genuine but all the while leading him to a path that has already been determined by the con runners.
Let him have some information that while true is not widely known making him feel privileged (when that information becomes common knowledge much later) , leak some information about boko haram that while interesting and earthshaking puts the group in no real strategic danger or setbacks when revealed publicly.
For the coup de grace plant carefully designed but very false information to slip to him.
Hell they wouldn't have told him they would more likely have made it seem to him (the target of the con) that he discovered the information himself.
The target of the con MR Davis IS OBLIVIOUS OF THE FACT THAT SOMEONE/GROUP RAN A LONG CON ON HIM.
We all know that the truth you are told is just believable information but the truth you "find out through painstaking work" you will regard as life itself.
As someone who was born and raised in the north I have never fallen for the myth of the north(northerners) being less intelligent than the others southerners.I grew up with them I went to some of the best schools in the north with the children of contemporary northerners and I tell you they are smart.There are good ones and there are bad ones.
The failure of the south more specifically south easterners and south southerners to realize that they are in conflict (in a manner of speaking after all politics,is war by other means) with very intelligent people,has led them into major strategic blunders a situation which perseveres to this day.
Taking it further the people who orchestrated the name dropping of Ihekirika and Azazi know that reasonable analysts will throw the accusation away but what they hoped to achieve , what they might yet achieve with this is to discredit all top ranking Igbos and south southerners in the security services in this country.
THIS IS A SYSTEMATIC ATTEMPT TO BLACKLIST DISENFRANCHISE SOUTH EASTERNERS AND SOUTH SOUTHERNERS FROM THE TOP HIERARCHY OF THE ARMED FORCES AND SECURITY SERVICES OF NIGERIA FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE.
Obasanjo let it slip when he alluded to the possible resolve by people he never identified (possibly the owners of nigeria(?) to never let an Ijaw man (read south southerner) to assume the most powerful position in Nigeria again.
The allegations against Ihejirika and Azazi and by extension Jonathan won't stick,but if the plan of the people who put it in motion works ,it will bring so much institutional distrust and discrimination against military personnel and security personnel from the south south,south east at the highest levels in Nigeria essentially reinstituting the defacto policy of Nigeria's security apparatus since 1970.
PoliticsRe: The Australian Negotiator Used Our Brain? by EMANY01(m): 8:46am On Sep 03, 2014
kingchuks101: Dear Mr Davis, the Australian Negotiator,
Thank you for your services sofar. And thank you particularly for expanding the scope of duties for which we Nigerian engaged you to include identifying Boko Haram sponsors. Thank you for informing us that Lt.Gen Ihejirika, Sheriff and unnamed person in CBN are sponsors of BH. Since no information is useless, we are going to keep it in view.
We are particularly interested in the primary and the only reason for which we engaged you: the release of Chibok girls. How far? Am not good at hasty conclusions, otherwise I would have aligned myself with the conclusion that due to lack of result, you gave us distraction to discuss. Is this position correct?
.

More than likely his own brain has been used against the current government of Nigeria and it's allies.
The scenario is one I laid out in an earlier thread last night.I for one do not think the Aussie is a "mad man" as most people seem to call him. I think he is a tool,a supposedly intelligent and by the view of some people believable individual who has simply been coned.
PoliticsRe: Jonathan’s Hostage Negotiator Puts Him In Atight Corner by EMANY01(m): 8:22am On Sep 03, 2014
Onyegecha: Why are we so paranoid about the break up of this monstrous entity called Nigeria; a land that consumes its inhabitants and rewards those that love her with bitterness? Please let this country break up but PEACEFULLY. I don't see why rational human beings cannot understand when the game is up and do the needful without much ado.
I have wondered about this for a long time.Less than fifteen days from now,the people of Scotland would be voting whether or not to continue their existence as a component of the British union or to go as a different country.We are talking about a union that has existed for the past 300 years.
The possibility that the vote might be YES (for separation from Britain) is just as much as that the vote could be NO(for continued union with Britain).
If a country has managed 300 years under the most peaceful arrangement and still feel incompatible enough to seriously consider separation what would one say of Nigeria.
PoliticsRe: General Ihejirika: A Loony Biafra Fanatic Or Just Deadly Corrupt? – Dr. Peregrin by EMANY01(m): 10:33pm On Sep 02, 2014
omoalaro: Those struggling to deny Ihejirika's complicity would have been jumping up and down with joy and praises for the aussie if he had mentioned Buhari. They wouldn't bother to ask for any evidence. But now, the aussie is a mad man talking trash.
I for one do not think the Aussie is a "mad man" I think he is a tool,a supposedly intelligent and by the view of some people believable individual who has simply been coned.
Have him jump through a series of hoops ,make him feel truly endangered and afraid for his life in the cause of his "work"(?), let him believe he has gained a bit of trust of people within factions of what he is led to believe are boko haram terrorists who might be genuine but all the while leading him to a path that has already been determined by the con runners let him have some information that while true is not widely known making him feel privileged (when that information becomes common knowledge much later) , leak some information about boko haram that while interesting and earth shaking puts the group in no real strategic danger or setbacks then for the coup de grace plant carefully designed but very false information to slip to him.
Hell the wouldn't seemingly have told him they would more likely have made it seem to the target of the con that he discovered the information himself.
The target of the con MR AUSTRALIAN NEGOTIATOR IS OBLIVIOUS OF THE FACT THAT SOMEONE/GROUP RAN A LONG CON ON HIM.
We all know that the truth you are told is just believable information but the truth you "find out through painstaking work" you will regard as life.
As someone who was born and raised in the north I have never fallen for the myth of the north(northerners) being less intelligent than the others southerners.I grew up with them I went to some of the best schools I, the north with the children of contemporary northerners and I tell you they are smart.The failure of the south more specifically south easterners and south southerners to realize that they are in conflict (in a manner of speaking ) with very intelligent people,has led them into major strategic blunders a situation which perseveres to this day.
PoliticsRe: General Ihejirika: A Loony Biafra Fanatic Or Just Deadly Corrupt? – Dr. Peregrin by EMANY01(m):
nku5: For me this is a very simple matter. There should be a very serious investigation and all the actors like ihejirika, modu sheriff, the aussie etc should be thoroughly questioned and the outcome should be widely publicised in the full glare of foreign media.

Without being told I know BH a full fledged terrorist army with links to al-shabab and isis cannot name its sponsors like amateurs, they are playing the very old game of misinformation to stir up passions and supposedly smart people have bought it because its within their comfort zones of bigotry and small minded politics.
The smartest post made on this matter.Taking it further the people who orchestrated the name dropping of Ihekirika and Azazi know that any reasonable analyst will throw the accusation away as it is illogical but what they (the orchestrators) hoped to achieve , what they might yet achieve with this is to discredit all top ranking Igbos and south southerners in the security services in this country.
THIS IS A SYSTEMATIC ATTEMPT TO BLACKLIST AND DISENFRANCHISE SOUTH EASTERNERS AND SOUTH SOUTHERNERS FROM THE TOP HIERARCHY OF THE ARMED FORCES AND SECURITY SERVICES OF NIGERIA FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE.
Obasanjo let it slip in his infamous letter last year,when he alluded to the possible resolve by (the owners of nigeria(?) to never let an ijaw man (read south southerner) to assume the most powerful position in Nigeria again.
The allegations against Ihejirika and Azazi and by extension Jonathan won't stick,but if the plan of the people who put it in motion works ,it will bring so much institutional distrust and discrimination against military personnel and security personnel from the south south,south east at the highest levels in Nigeria essentially reinstituting the defacto policy of Nigeria's security apparatus since 1970.
PoliticsRe: General Ihejirika: A Loony Biafra Fanatic Or Just Deadly Corrupt? – Dr. Peregrin by EMANY01(m): 9:57pm On Sep 02, 2014
nku5: For me this is a very simple matter. There should be a very serious investigation and all the actors like ihejirika, modu sheriff, the aussie etc should be thoroughly questioned and the outcome should be widely publicised in the full glare of foreign media.

Without being told I know BH a full fledged terrorist army with links to al-shabab and isis cannot name its sponsors like amateurs, they are playing the very old game of misinformation to stir up passions and supposedly smart people have bought it because its within their comfort zones of bigotry and small minded politics.
The smartest post made on this matter.Taking it further the people who orchestrated the name dropping of Ihekirika and Azazi know that any reasonable analysts will throw the accusation away but what the hoped to achieve , what they might yet achive with this is to discredit all top ranking Igbos and south southerners in the security services in this country.
THIS IS A SYSTEMATIC ATTEMPT TO BLACKLIST DISENFRANCHISE SOUTH EASTERNERS AND SOUTH SOUTHERNERS FROM THE TOP HIERARCHY OF THE ARMED FORCES AND SECURITY SERVICES OF NIGERIA FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE.
Obasanjo let it slip when he alluded to the possible resolve by (the owners of nigeria(?) to never let an ijaw man (read south southerner) to assume the most powerful position in Nigeria.
The allegations against Ihejirika and Azazi and by extension Jonathan won't stick,but if the plan of the people who put it in motion works ,it will bring so much institutional distrust and discrimination against military personnel security personnel from the south south,south east at the highest levels in Nigeria essentially reinstituting the defacto policy of Nigerias security apparatus since 1970.
PoliticsRe: General Ihejirika: A Loony Biafra Fanatic Or Just Deadly Corrupt? – Dr. Peregrin by EMANY01(m): 9:56pm On Sep 02, 2014
nku5: For me this is a very simple matter. There should be a very serious investigation and all the actors like ihejirika, modu sheriff, the aussie etc should be thoroughly questioned and the outcome should be widely publicised in the full glare of foreign media.

Without being told I know BH a full fledged terrorist army with links to al-shabab and isis cannot name its sponsors like amateurs, they are playing the very old game of misinformation to stir up passions and supposedly smart people have bought it because its within their comfort zones of bigotry and small minded politics.
The smartest post made on this matter.Taking it further the people who orchestrated the name dropping of Ihekirika and Azazi know that any reasonable analysts will throw the accusation away but what the hoped to achieve , what they might yet achive with this is to discredit all top ranking Igbos and south southerners in the security services in this country.
THIS IS A SYSTEMATIC ATTEMPT TO BLACKLIST DISENFRANCHISE SOUTH EASTERNERS AND SOUTH SOUTHERNERS FROM THE TOP HIERARCHY OF THE ARMED FORCES AND SECURITY SERVICES OF NIGERIA FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE.
Obasanjo let it slip when he alluded to the possible resolve by (the owners of nigeria(?) to never let an ijaw man (read south southerner) to assume the most powerful position in Nigeria.
The allegations against Ihejirika and Azazi and by extension Jonathan won't stick,but if the plan of the people who put it in motion works ,it will bring so much institutional distrust and discrimination against military personnel security personnel from the south south,south east at the highest levels in Nigeria essentially reinstituting the defacto policy of Nigeria since 1970.
PoliticsRe: Fani-kayode: Australian Negotiator’s Allegations Against Ihejirika Despicable by EMANY01(m): 3:37pm On Aug 30, 2014

"How many terror suspects have the US arrested just because they suspect they have link with terrorist groups let alone know for sure but without proof as you wrote?"


To be honest,NONE at least none have been arrested without proof and held beyond the stipulated limit for incarceration without charging them to court.
We are not talking about those kidnapped off the streets secretly and hidden in one deep hole indefinitely.
If GEJ were to do that I would be the first to call for his head because I recognize that even if he was 100% sure of the culpability of the person and no proof he can present ,leaving that kind of power in his hands may not be dangerous but will be devastating when another man (read northerner) replaces him.
PoliticsRe: El-Rufai Is Boko Haram’s Executive Commander – Ihejirika by EMANY01(m): 3:21pm On Aug 30, 2014
TolaniLuv: Because of people like you! Nigeria will never move forward. Civil war that was in the past, I'm guess you would want Nigerians to apologize or what do y'all want? I won't even have any tribal issue with you . I'm focusing on the topic and ur option about civil war shows that you are still living in the past . Typical black people mentality !!!
My friend,no country in modern times has made any progress POLITICALLY by avoiding honest and serious intellectual discussions regarding the wars in their history whether three years ago or three hundred years ago.
The Nigerian civil war is not nearly past enough for us to act like it never happened but we are all hostages to the issues that precipitated that war no amount of denial will change that.
Scotland is voting in 20 days time to decide if they still want to be part of Great Britain or not inspire of three hundred years as part of Britain.
No one can genuinely argue that the various components of Nigerian Union/federation have a better deal than Scotland in the National structure of the British union but they seem unsatisfied enough to want to vote their way out of the Union its is only sustained and reasonable honest discussions that have led to this happening peacefully if we (Nigeria) continue this way we would come to this same stage sooner than later and it will happen on a far larger,distributed scale violently.
Talking about the civil war and the issues raised/ leading to ot is critical at this point in our national life.To not talk about it is to let the issues fester until an amputation becomes the only recourse.
PoliticsRe: El-Rufai Is Boko Haram’s Executive Commander – Ihejirika by EMANY01(m): 2:58pm On Aug 30, 2014
nduchucks: Stop smearing the good name of the Nigerian government. These documented attrocities and war crimes have never been the policy of the Nigerian Government. It is not the policy of the Nigerian Government to have soldiers slitting the throats of Boko Haram suspects and dumping their bodies in a mass grave.
Are you sure you are not talking about bokoharam and Isis?
If you has said the Nigerian military summarily executed BokoHaram suspects obviously by shooting them,I would say plausible the NA has a long history of doing that.Your allegations about slitting throats exposes your attempts to throw different kinds of sh.it on the wall and see which one sticks
PoliticsRe: Fani-kayode: Australian Negotiator’s Allegations Against Ihejirika Despicable by EMANY01(m): 2:15pm On Aug 30, 2014
gists: You just violated one of the forum rules trying to impersonate the original Cramjones.
Anyway Seun and co knows the right thing to do to you

On the topic: Why didn't former Chief of Army Staff (i.e Gen. Azubuike Ihejirika) arrest or at least let us know who were the sponsors of the teror group he claimed to be fighting? As a HIGH RANKING officer (a general and a Chief of Army Staff for that matter) and key player in the gov, he should tell us that he (a general) was intimidated/afraid of bloody civilian politicians? Why didn't he at least name them if he was too afraid to arrest them?
I gave this answer in a different thread but I think it applies to your post as well.
Have you never had the term"actionable intelligence" ?
In a nutshell it means you suspect an individual / group is responsible for something and your intelligence "sources" indicate that they are indeed responsible .Your intelligence service also has the fortune of finding evidence that confirms the suspicions and intelligence.With actionable intelligence you can act:arrest,prosecute and war(in the case of nation states).
Finding evidence for something you know someone is doing/has done is not as easy as you think it is.The target of the suspicion only needs to be halfway intelligent to avoid creating a connection between themselves and the act(s) they are suspected off.Examples of this situation abound:
In the US most of the mafia bosses could not be arrested not to mention prosecuted even when everyone and their mother knew how dirty and evil they were in some cases the FBI used tangential case like tax evasion to send a major crime boss to jail for 25 years because they couldn't "link him" (note the phrase) to the crimes of racketeering,murder,drug dealing and smuggling that they "knew" he was forehead deep involved in.They "knew" but couldn't touch him just like the president said he "knows" BokoHaram sponsors.
In the US and Europe there are individuals who are known to the intelligence services as being involved in terrorism and plans to commit terrorist attacks but the only put them on surveillance because while they "know" the can not prove it especially when such suspects know the they are "persons of interest" .Even with the massive surveillance some of them still get to do what they plan to do.
Knowing and proving are two different things in these days of "CIVIL Rights".You may know and be 100% right in what you know but if you can't prove it then you can not "ACT".
Knowing is not the problem ,getting proof is the challenge the world over a situation made all that much harder for Nigeria with the deliberate underdevelopment the security services had to put up with since 1985 mind you.
If GEJ or the SSS or the COAS or any other security service head come on stage to list out the sponsors they are sure of but have not gotten actionable Intel on ,you will crucify them saying its political.
PoliticsRe: Fani-kayode: Australian Negotiator’s Allegations Against Ihejirika Despicable by EMANY01(m): 2:09pm On Aug 30, 2014
mikeansy: How did we get to a point where a muderous terrorist in the comfort of his abode makes a wild claim about the former head of the army and people believe it hook line and sinker?

How did it really get to this?

Oh right sorry I forget that a terrorist Muslim is more honest than any Igbo Man!
I'm surprised you have to ask.This is the same country that EDUCATED people (supposedly),believed that crap about kola nut could cure /prevent Ebola and even after that farce was debunked believed a more ridiculous claim that salt and pepper (or is it water) could prevent Ebola.
Now an almighty Australian claims the former COAS was a frontline supporter /sponsor of bokoharam what do you suppose these same Nigerians will believe.
Foreign AffairsRe: Why Is The US Spying On Germany? by EMANY01(m): 11:02am On Aug 30, 2014
You spy on your friends and spy more aggressively on your enemies.
It's called "keeping an eye on things" in intelligence circles every who can does it only a foolish head of state will actually seek to stop it.
I use the term foolish because you can be sure the intelligence brass will never really follow that other even though they tell you otherwise.
Throughout history for the most part, intelligence agencies have a different notion of what is in a country's best interests from the political leadership of that country.This stems from many reasons but most prominent among them is the age old notion among spy's and soldiers that: politicians serve for short term(s) but patriots serve for lifetimes.
Obviously the variation from this trend is in dictatorship states where the dictator is the all in all.
PoliticsRe: Digesting Australian Dr Davis Report On Boko Haram by EMANY01(m): 10:36pm On Aug 29, 2014
.
PoliticsRe: Digesting Australian Dr Davis Report On Boko Haram by EMANY01(m): 10:32pm On Aug 29, 2014
dridowu: So Ihejirika has no proof yet he name El-Rufai has one of the brain behind boko ? Then while naming without concrete proof but El-Rufai on the hand provide the link to its news where Ihejirka was named not that he categorically mention Ihejirka name , the link is AriseTv , a sister company to Thisday Newspaper, which most PDP lovers believe they are unbias in their work ?
Now who do we blame El-Rufai, AriseTv, Ihejirika , Australian Negatiator or Boko Boiz ?
Have you never had the term"actionable intelligence" ?
In a nutshell it means you suspect an individual / group is responsible for something and your intelligence "sources" indicate that they are indeed responsible .Your intelligence service also has the fortune of finding evidence that confirms the suspicions and intelligence.With actionable intelligence you can act:arrest,prosecute and war(in the case of nation states).
Finding evidence for something you know someone is doing/has done is not as easy as you think it is.The target of the suspicion only needs to be halfway intelligent to avoid creating a connection between themselves and the act(s) they are suspected off.Examples of this situation abound:
In the US most of the mafia bosses could not be arrested not to mention prosecuted even when everyone and their mother knew how dirty and evil they were in some cases the FBI used tangential case like tax evasion to send a major crime boss to jail for 25 years because they couldn't "link him" (note the phrase) to the crimes of racketeering,murder,drug dealing and smuggling that they "knew" he was forehead deep involved in.They "knew" but couldn't touch him just like the president said he "knows" BokoHaram sponsors.
In the US and Europe there are individuals who are known to the intelligence services as being involved in terrorism and plans to commit terrorist attacks but the only put them on surveillance because while they "know" the can not prove it especially when such suspects know the they are "persons of interest" .Even with the massive surveillance some of them still get to do what they plan to do.
Knowing and proving are two different things in these days of "CIVIL Rights".You may know and be 100% right in what you know but if you can't prove it then you can not "ACT".
Knowing is not the problem ,getting proof is the challenge the world over a situation made all that much harder for Nigeria with the deliberate underdevelopment the security services had to put up with since 1985 mind you.
If GEJ or the SSS or the COAS or any other security service head come on stage to list out the sponsors they are sure of but have not gotten actionable Intel on ,you will crucify them saying its political.
PoliticsRe: Digesting Australian Dr Davis Report On Boko Haram by EMANY01(m): 9:45pm On Aug 29, 2014
agabaI23: Well I am one of those who believe that it is still possible to tame them. If the tamil tigers were rounded up and disarmed, then I think anything is possible
Just so you know,it took the government of Sri Lanka thirty (30) years to beat the Tamil rebels.Do not make it seem like it happened in one go.
PhonesRe: Your Calls May Soon Be Monitored- NCC by EMANY01(m): 9:08pm On Aug 29, 2014
ayusco85: Talk about spying on their citizens..... The movei serries "Person of interest" comes to mind....... The machine
I can't wait for the next season starting 23rd September.
PhonesRe: Your Calls May Soon Be Monitored- NCC by EMANY01(m): 9:04pm On Aug 29, 2014
lafuria1: Do they monitor chats as well. People don't have to communicate via a phone call to pass messages. With the public knowing of this info from ncc, evil doers will simply stick to BBM chat and that isn't easy to monitor.
Not if the government gets RIM to provide a monitoring platform for them which RIM will do.They already provide this in the US ,Canada, UAE,SAUDI Arabia India and China and this was as far back as 2010 .
Read it up.
PoliticsRe: Ebola: How Nigerian Diplomat Infected Doctor, Wife, Their Three-month-old Baby by EMANY01(m): 5:38am On Aug 29, 2014
GetUmad: Pls call one of the numbers above ASAP.

Nairalanders pls beware, the quoted dude is already infected, although his own is more of psychological than physical. The dude is already showing symptoms of ebola-psychosis.

The mad a.ss just spits out conspiracy theories on nairaland all the time.





Same naive and I-sabi-pass-my-neighbor mentality Nigerians had on this ebola scourge prior to its entry into the country, which made us not to have taken adequate precautionery measures.





dont know why ITK too bokuu for naija like this. eveeyone is a conspiracy theorist
BusinessRe: Divestment: Shell Sells 4 Oil Fields In Nigeria by EMANY01(m): 5:01am On Aug 29, 2014
[quote author=jpphilips][/quote]I hope you know you wasted your time trying to educate that dolt.Rational reasoning is a concept alien to that fellow.
HealthRe: BREAKING: Nigeria Successfully Blocks Ebola, Has One Case Left- minister by EMANY01(m): 9:33am On Aug 28, 2014
cococandy: When will you get sense?
No offense.
Ebola a hoax?
Na wa sha. And you're proudly saying it all over the forum. So we should get careless about ebola because rabies exists?.
I blame you for paying that simpleton any attention.He is delusional I have said it so many times.
"Ebola is a hoax
Idi Amin was a hero of the Ugandan people
Abacha was the best leader Nigeria has ever had after Buhari of course"
If you are wise you will see a pattern and steer clear of him.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 (of 27 pages)