₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,327,341 members, 8,430,487 topics. Date: Saturday, 20 June 2026 at 02:30 PM

Toggle theme

Empiree's Posts

Nairaland ForumEmpiree's ProfileEmpiree's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 (of 775 pages)

IslamRe: A Debate on the Prophet's Injunction on Washing Objects Touched by Dogs by Empiree: 5:00am On Aug 13, 2016
Updated......

This is a year old now. I think it is high time i give my opinion on this. Took me so late
IslamRe: Ways To Rock HIJAB For Different Events by Empiree: 4:30am On Aug 13, 2016
Geez, I remember this woman when she passed away in car accident on her way from NY to Nashville, TN. May her soul rest in peace.


Aminah Assilmi (born Janice Huff, 1945 – 5 March 2010)[1] was a broadcast journalist, national Muslim community activist and director of the International Union of Muslim Women. Formerly a Southern Baptist preacher, she converted to Islam in 1977 in college while trying to convert some Muslims to Christianity. As the director of the International Union of Muslim Women, she visited campuses discussing Islam. She was named one of the 500 most influential Muslims in the world in 2009 by the Royal Islamic Strategic Studies Centre in Amman, Jordan.

Assilmi was involved in the release of the 2001 Eid stamp, as well as future anniversary editions. She was also involved in creating an educational center for Muslim converts. She died on March 5, 2010 in a car accident while returning from a speaking engagement in New York. She had a daughter and two sons, as well as several grandchildren.







https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OskQ2qTVY0U
IslamRe: Muslim Please Help On This Issue by Empiree: 4:22am On Aug 13, 2016
nurain150:
i am a Muslim, please help me check on this rullings.due to some shoot-out that has died down in our area before Friday.my mum said i should not pray jumat at the central mosque .but she can send me to the area of the mosque to get her something..........and she said i should not pray ishai prayer but she can send me out at night, should i obey her or i should obey the will of allah.before i was allowed to pray jumat .though the jumat is in a market.she do not allow me to go to jumat sayinv it too far.but she can send me there.
You didnt give enough details though. it looks like there is some sort of commotion in the area of the mosque which may be detrimental to your safety. Yes, there is Islamic injunction in this case actually where you may stay away from the area until the situation gets better. Even if it rains heavily, you may not go to the masjid. Not going to the masjid does not mean you cant pray at home.

You also stated that she would send you out to the same area. Is your mom a muslima or not?. In any case, from your write up, she doesnt say you should not pray. She basically prevents you from going to the mosque due to shootout problems in the area. Well, discount the fact that she sent you to the same area to buy stuff. Pray at home for the moment. It only becomes problem IF, ONLY IF she tells you or prevents you from praying. That's where her opinion doesnt count but she has not do that as yet. There is a ruling i came across sometimes ago. The narration seems to be in the time of Kalifa saidina Ali (RA) who said if you go out to pray at the mosque in the time of war or some sort of crisis and the road is unsafe, if you die you put yourself in danger. Allah knows best. I do not currently have the correct narration at the moment.

Again, your mom's opinion doesnt count ONLY if she doesnt want you to pray. That would have constituted disobeying Allah. I mean you only disobey her if she asks you to disobey Allah. So far, she is not saying that you should not pray. You can pray at home for now
IslamRe: Shaykh Adam Abdullah Al-ilory by Empiree(op):
IslamRe: Shaykh Adam Abdullah Al-ilory by Empiree(op): 2:15am On Aug 13, 2016
Nigerian Sufi Respond To The Ongoing Brouhaha BTW Sheik Habib Ilory


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5eFCQz23XU
IslamRe: Punishment For Adultery In Islam Is Not Stoning To Death by Empiree: 11:59pm On Aug 11, 2016
This thread is funny. truthman2012, do you remember this thread huh
IslamRe: Punishment For Adultery In Islam Is Not Stoning To Death by Empiree: 11:11pm On Aug 11, 2016
Demmzy15:
I agree with you bro, when I read this work I was totally convinced. When you look at the position of the four Imams(Malik, Abu Haneefah, Shafi'e and Hanbali) Rahimahullah, their positions totally contradict each other. One of the Imams said "the Sunnah of the Prophet his is Madhab"

About the translations that placed "unmarried" in parenthesis for Suratul Nur, we should know that this Chapter was revealed purposely for Aisha(RadiAllahu anha), she was a married woman. Another verse in Suratul Nisai States that the punishment for a MARRIED slave who commits adultery, her punishment is to be halved. I wonder how Stoning could be halved.

We don't have any right to discredit our scholars, but we should also have it at the back of our minds that they're humans and ultimately make mistakes. Left to me, if a adulterer is to be punished, I'll fight for flogging because the hadith can't and would never abrogate the Qur’an.
Christianity EtcRe: Do You Have Any Questions About God , The Bible Or Christianity? Bring Them Here by Empiree: 5:34pm On Aug 11, 2016
grin Jehovah Witnesses knocked On The Wrong Door grin


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuomB-SPYuk
IslamRe: Agege For Show. Innaa Lillaahi Wa Innaa Ilayhi Rooji'oon by Empiree:
Bismillahi Rah'man Ra'him


sino:
It suffices me that the issue of rajm is an issue of abrogation and abrogation are of different types, and the type as explained by scholars, is an abrogation of the verse without the abrogation of the rulings.
This whole thing about abrogation sounds like robbery. How could a verse be abrogated and the ruling exist?. Qur'an says it was revealed in a preserved tablet. Didnt Allah knows ahead what the future holds?. The Quran is preserved in the ‘lawh al-mahfooz’ (preserved tablet) with God (85:21-22) and not in the paper copy printed by humans.


The vast majority of the scholars are of the opinion that Sunnah does not abrogate the Quran. They say that there is no example of such abrogation and that the examples given by the other side are not correct.

Imams Shafi’i, Ahmad b. Hanbal, ibn Taymiyyah (rah) & others were of this group of scholars.

On the other hand, there are few scholars who believe that the Sunnah abrogated the Quran. Muhammad bin Nasr al-Marwazi is one of them. They use the following two examples which was rejected by vast scholars:

1- Surat al-Baqarah 180: It is prescribed, when death approaches any of you, if he leave any goods, that he make a will to parents and next of kin.

But the Prophet ASWS said: No entitled heir is to be included in the will.

Response: This verse was already abrogated by the verses of inheritance in Surat al-Nisaa. So this is not a good example of Sunnah solely abrogating the Quran.

This is just a tip. It shows that if a verse was ever abrogated, both would still exist in the kitab. There was NEVER a verse of Qur'an that USED to be there. That's fabrication!





And I was talking about shi’ah and believe of their scholars that the Qur’an is incomplete is quite different from the understanding of abrogated verses.
I have always have problems with Alhu Sunnah anytime they accused Shi'a of this while they appear to be guilty of the same. I do not believe that Shi'a believe Qur'an is incomplete. It is simply a wide misconception. If such a thing was/is written in their literature, it is only to be understood as a mistake or corruption in their literature just like some corrupted texts in the Sunni literature. A Sunni Sheikh went to Iran for religious dialogue in 2012. During their discussion, he asked them if they believe Quran is incomplete?. He said they were not supersized he asked because it is a misconception being transported around. So they denied the allegation.


Here is a brief explanation on abrogation of verses in the Qur’an:

Abrogation of Verses

Allah (subhanahu wa ta’ala) says in the Holy Qur’an:
ما ننسخ من آية أو ننسها نأت بخير منها أو مثلها
Whichever verse We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, We bring one better than it or like it. (2:106)
Abrogation and it rulings are in conflict with Qur'an. It creates confusion and distortion. The abrogation of Quranic verses, arguably the greatest lie against the Quran, was originally invented during the fourth century A.H. (late 10th century A.D.) by some Muslim scholars notably Ahmed Bin Ishaq Al-Dinary (died 318 A.H.), Mohamad Bin Bahr Al-Asbahany (died 322 A.H.), Hebat Allah Bin Salamah (died 410 A.H.) and Mohamad Bin Mousa Al-Hazmy (died 548 A.H.), whose book about Al-Nasekh and Al-Mansoukh is regarded as one of the leading references in the subject. According to this concept, it is claimed that some verses in the Quran are abrogated and invalidated by other verses!

The verse that is the abrogator they call (Al-Nasekh) while the abrogated verse they call (Al-Mansoukh).

These scholars have come up with hundreds of cases of abrogated verses to the extent that they have formulated a whole science of the subject filling lengthy books and references. These scholars came up with different numbers of abrogated verses. Alama Dr. Muhammad Iqbal, Dr. Ishra Ahmed, Sheik Daud Alfa Nla and a host of scholars came up with bunch of numbers, which means the issue of abrogation is base on opinion. There is no redundant verse in the Quran. It is all VALID till the Day Of Judgement.




The scholars have observed three kinds of abrogation. The first is the abrogation of the ruling alone. The second is the abrogation of the ruling and the recitation. The third is the abrogation of recitation alone.

The existence in the abrogation of recitation is a commonly accepted view according to many Islamic scholars, even ones from outside the Sunni school. Jalal Al-Deen Al-Suyuti in his Al-Itqaan quotes several examples of this form. Such narrations usually include a companion saying, [size=20pt]“We used to read such and such during the life of the Prophet.”[/size] When returning to the Qur’an, we do not find these verses within it. Scholars refer to such as an abrogation of verses.
Again, it is all theory base on their understandings. See the highlighted part really problematic and contravene Dawah effort. Not only that, it is in conflict with PRESERVED TABLET.


"But this is an honored Qur'an. [Inscribed] in a Preserved Slate." (85:21-22)

Here is a short story by a Sheikh and his teacher(senior teacher) in 1960s. After tedious and exhausted lecture for the day, the student in question was tired and faced down on his desk while his teacher was in recess in his office. Of-course other students were present in the class. Sometime later, one of the teachers came in and was having disccsuin with a student. The Sheik said he heard their discussion when the teacher said "their used to be a verse of rajm in the Qur'an." This Sheikh said he quickly got up and went to his teacher in his office and relayed what he heard from other teacher. His teacher, Dr Maulana Fazlur Rahman Ansari (1914-1974), the author of the book ‘The Qur’anic Foundations and Structure of Muslim Society’.

He said 'there is no abrogate verse(s) in the Qur'an. That the abrogation is referring to previous revealed Holy Books, like Tawrah, Injil etc. He said the scholar used the wrong methodology was the reason they came to the conclusion.' That's why you see schlars came up with different numbers of abrogation. Muhammad Iqbal came up with some seventeen (17) i think. Dr. Ishra Ahmad came up with five(5). Some came up with pretty much more.




Even though the abrogation of recitation has been something that has always been accepted by Muslim scholars, we do find that there are some that have doubted the existence of it. Their main argument is that they do not see the wisdom of such a thing and that abrogation of recitation creates nothing but confusion.
grin grin grin That's just the truth. Forget about what scholars said. What about you, dont you see confusion and misconception?. Let me give you another example,


“Verily, those who believe and those who are Jews and Christians, and Sabians, whoever believes in Allah and the Last Day and do righteous good deeds shall have their reward with their Lord, on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve.” [al-Baqarah 2:62]

In the 'tafsir' given by the kingdom of Saudi where the Qur'an was printed, says in the footnote that the verse ^ was abrogated by Sura 3:85


"And whoever desires other than Islam as religion - never will it be accepted from him, and he, in the Hereafter, will be among the losers."


Does that mean Sura 2:62 is redundant?. At least this is fair because both (Al-Nasekh) and (Al-Mansoukh) are present and valid. It only depends how how to explain the former if the later abrogates it.




However, such an argument holds no weight, since it is not required for the creation to understand the wisdom of the actions of Allah as a requirement to accepting those actions.

According to Sulaiman Al-Lahim, in his introduction to Al-Nahhas’ Al-Nasikh wal Mansookh (1/118), one of the wisdoms of the existence of the abrogation of recitation is that it makes the Qur’an easier to memorize. He quoted the following verse:
الآن خفف الله عنكم وعلم أن فيكم ضعفا
For the present Allah has made light your burden, and He knows that there is weakness in you. (8:66)

By returning to the context of the verse, we find that Allah is decreasing what He expects from the Muslims at war. This is indeed a mercy upon them, for they were expected to stand up to armies that are up to ten times in number, but then the number was decreased to twice in number.

Similarly, the abrogation of those verses is a form of mercy as well, since Allah’s words can never run out, and having the Qur’an in its final state makes it easier to memorize than what it could have been if no abrogation of recitation existed.
This is solely opinion of this scholar and he is beng emotional by citing that we may not know the 'wisdom' for the abrogation. The only time we dont know WISDOM behind something is such thing had to come from the lips of the prophet(p). Also, wisdom is, when Allah commanded Nabi Ibrahim(as) to slaughter his son(as), he(as) had faith in Allah and did not question WHY. But the 'wisdom' cited by Sulaiman Al-Lahim is in direct conflict with Quran. Allah is not author of confusion because he said in His Glorious Book An-Nisa Verse No:82


"Do they not then consider the Qur'an carefully? Had it been from other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much contradictions."

Interesting, this was also discussed before,

https://www.nairaland.com/638130/abrogation-quranic-verses-greatest-lie

https://www.nairaland.com/348098/abrogation-quran




Please note again, this belief of the ahlu sunnah is far from what the scholars of shi’ah believe, I had already posted a link for your perusal.
Interestingly, Shi'a belief in rajm. Only recently Albaqir rejected the idea.



Again your arguments and debates must stem from genuine facts, and supported by scholarly opinions, if you think just that stoning the adulterer is barbaric, hence your argument, then we may also look at cutting of the hands for a thief, and even whipping a fornicator 100 lashes can also be viewed as barbaric, not to mention the continuous pressure from some quarters to abolish death sentence. The last paragraph of the above post is very instructive. The Question to ask yourself are: Are the narrations on rajm authentic according to Islamic scholars?! If yes, why do you reject them?! If no, then who weakened them, and on what basis were the reasons for the weakness of the narrations?!
Underlined, you have pretty much derailed. That's not the point at all. Point here is establishing hudud properly not rejecting them. I insist that "stoning" is not our (Islam) rule for punishing adulterers and fornicators. I strongly believe it is for the People Of The Book and still exist in their Book. It is not seeing it as barbaric. If it is in Qur'an like lashing, bismillah.





"The scholars are the inheritors of the Prophets. The people of spiritual wisdom (hukama’) are the inheritors of the Prophets." ~~ Sacred Tradition



“As matters stand in the Muslim world today, it is the decline of religious leadership from the Islamic standard in a serious measure that constitutes a major cause of its inability with regard to its emergence from the abyss into which it has been descending since some time. The remedy for the situation is obvious.” - Fazlur Rahman Ansari, ‘The Qur’anic Foundations and Structure of Muslim Society’.




NEXT: Rajm (Stay Tuned)
Jokes EtcRe: My Hilarious Picture Album by Empiree: 4:59am On Aug 11, 2016
IslamRe: Allah Swear To Muhammad by Empiree: 6:57pm On Aug 10, 2016
When someone's brain is dented and suspended don't expect him to utter anything meaningful. That's reality of Op
CrimeRe: Boko Haram Kills 1,900 Fulani Herdsmen by Empiree: 5:59pm On Aug 10, 2016
Aroh48:
You called me a loser? I laugh in chinese.How I wish you know me well you shouldn't have made that useless statement.I just pray the herdmen visit you soon so that you can feel the pain the people of agatu and Enugu are feeling right now.
You have a good day, sir. You are not making sense
CrimeRe: Boko Haram Kills 1,900 Fulani Herdsmen by Empiree: 4:57pm On Aug 10, 2016
Aroh48:
1,900 dat's a small figure.they shld kill more.
This is careless statement. No one should rejoice at another human's misfortune. Every life is worthy. You should rather be objective and not allow bigotry to hack your sense. From your write up, you are BH supporter. In another minute from now you are going to say you are educated. What a loser!
CrimeRe: Boko Haram Kills 1,900 Fulani Herdsmen by Empiree: 4:53pm On Aug 10, 2016
wastedsperm:
Until Nigerians run out of supply of beef then we will appreciate the importance of the fulani herdsmen we love to demonize. I have always maintained that there is a conspiracy between the press and reporters to paint the herdsmen as killers just to discourage the grazing bill which will benefit all nigerians in the long run. Every one knows the fulani herdsmen are always armed with sticks to guide their cattle. The Bokoharam terrorists are cattle rustlers who kill fulani herdsmen and use their cattle as a disguise to migrate to other parts of the country due to military onslaught against them in the north east. We have committed a great sin against the fulanis by labeling them killers when all they do is raise cattles for our beef and milk consumption. How many southerners can rear cattles like the fulanis? Instead we claim to be educated and see them as primitive. We Nigerians need to apologize to the fulanis and instead condemn the terrorists killing them and stealing their cattles to perpertrate evil. No wonder the president insist the killers are not fulanis but terrorists who migrated from Libya after the fall of ghadaffi. God bless the fulanis, God forgive majority of Nigerians who demonizes them especially the Igbo's sad
Wow, this is intuitive. Question for you, do the Fulani herdsmen have history of killing the locals as currently portrayed now?

Far as I am concerned, I have always been skeptical about recent news about the herdsmen. I used to get close to them in the 90s and no problems. You know there is another way to look as things which many Nigerians are missing. Most Nigerians especially christians are not that intelligent. They have allowed bigotry and hatred of others to cloud their reasoning. In this Day and Age a lot of things do not appear the way they are or are meant to be.
IslamRe: Testimonies: To Give Or Not To Give by Empiree: 2:51pm On Aug 10, 2016
^^^

Na'am. I like the fact that you didn't shy away to say this. I felt ashamed to say that cus I don't think i ever came across ijma of kufr on them.

I refrained from saying that cus at some point he seems to show love and affection for Quran. But then, he gets too close to not just non Muslims but the craziest of kufar and made them his awliya and, would go to any length to backbite Muslims before them.
IslamRe: Alhamdullilah by Empiree: 2:30pm On Aug 10, 2016
Was Confused For A Minute

shocked shocked shocked

Trojan Horse Alert


shocked shocked shocked


Fed Thing tongue

EFCC Is In The Lookout For Ya Cus U Talk'bout $$OIL$$ $$$GAS $$$ grin

Kim K?


#SayWHAT
Christianity EtcRe: Truthmans2012, Annunaki2 Or Parisbookaddict, Who Is The True Christian? by Empiree: 6:59pm On Aug 09, 2016
Another evidence, catholic, the largest Christian sect is excommunicated here


Ochoiho:
Catholic and Idolatry, An image have appeared to give credence to deception. It must be from the devil
Christianity EtcRe: Truthmans2012, Annunaki2 Or Parisbookaddict, Who Is The True Christian? by Empiree: 5:19pm On Aug 09, 2016
I Just dey enjoy having fun with his moniker. I had fun with him before. He got funny moniker to play with. Nothing to regret. He understands it is SARCASM. His moniker is not deity. That would have been a different case.
IslamRe: Testimonies: To Give Or Not To Give by Empiree:
^

Honestly i feel sad for him. The way he's threading will eventually land him in the FULL company of Kufr. That's why i cant take his silly "reform" serious.


Yea, i notice you barely talk to non-muslims. So do you consider this Quraniyun kafir?.

If he had only rejected some ahadith narrations, that would be fine. But he threw the baby out with water. That makes his case execrable and irrelevant.
IslamRe: Agege For Show. Innaa Lillaahi Wa Innaa Ilayhi Rooji'oon by Empiree: 4:09pm On Aug 09, 2016
^^^^

I think i have explained myself [above] what i meant
Christianity EtcRe: Truthmans2012, Annunaki2 Or Parisbookaddict, Who Is The True Christian? by Empiree: 3:46pm On Aug 09, 2016
udatso:
Sir you clearly know how to prolong issues. I am beginning to think you are always gonna have a reply for me whether it takes us forward or not.
That's dolphinman for you. He will always do that unless and until you cut his head off and take it with you grin cheesy

That's the only thing that can STOP him.

Christianity EtcRe: Truthmans2012, Annunaki2 Or Parisbookaddict, Who Is The True Christian? by Empiree: 3:33pm On Aug 09, 2016
dolphinheart:
I will not tell you which church, denomination, group of people , organization to associate with. ill rather tell you to read the word of God first, try to know the requirements for salvation. If you know what to look for, you'll probably know where to find it. You will be in a better position to separate the truth from false.
This Dolphin man talks too much. What is it you don't understand? , hum? .


Dolphinman

IslamRe: Agege For Show. Innaa Lillaahi Wa Innaa Ilayhi Rooji'oon by Empiree: 7:46pm On Aug 08, 2016
AlBaqir:
I don't get it @underline. # That Prophet stoned or existence of ayat rajm?
Brother, leave oshogbo weed at home grin. Don't take it to work with you grin.

Why do you misunderstood me today? . I never agreed @underlined.



# Again there are too numerous ahadith about stoning for adultery but not that ayat rajm existed. The later (ayat rajm) is found in both Sunni and Shia ahadith but I simply don't believe them. I believe its part of traditions of the Prophet (due to numerous ahadith).

# I believe so much in Allah's mercy for sinners. Death punishment is however for the unrepentant sinners who defiantly continue to cause mischief on the land. Interestingly, my favourite Sahabi reported this hadith (thank Allah the hadith is par with the Quran):

Narrated Abu Huraira:


The Prophet (ﷺ) said, "The one who commits an illegal sexual intercourse is not a believer at the time of committing illegal sexual intercourse and a thief is not a believer at the time of committing theft and a drinker of alcoholic drink is not a believer at the time of drinking. Yet, (the gate of) repentance is open thereafter."

Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 6810
In-book reference : Book 86, Hadith 40
USC-MSA web (English) reference : Vol. 8, Book 82, Hadith 801
(deprecated numbering scheme)
this should be directed at sino
Foreign AffairsRe: France To Ban Foreign Sponsorship Of Mosques; A New Plan For Islam by Empiree: 7:40pm On Aug 08, 2016
WORDWORLD:
Okay here it is. After Charlie Hebdo Paris attack which was as a result of a supposed caricature of Prophet Muhammad.

A FRENCH LADY BY THE NAME ISABELLE MATIC REVERTED TO ISLAM 4 DAYS AFTER . SHE IS A FILM DIRECTOR .

She wrote as thus which is how we muslims should always behave. Not by puting laws into our hands. THOUGH ITS ONLY THOSE WHO ARE CONTROLED BY EMOTIONS THAT BEHAVE THIS WAY .


"They are making fun of Muhammad and do not harm him. They are making fun of a character that they have imagined and to whom they have given a name. THIS MAN IS NOT OUR PROPHET" Isabella matic

Alhamdulillah! Allah has spoken the TRUTH.
" AND CERTAINLY THE MESSENGERS BEFORE YOU (MUHAMMAD) WERE MOCKED AT. (so what's new if you are also being mocked?). BUT THAT AT WHICH THE SCOFFED ECOMPASSED THEY SCOFFERS AMONG THEM" Quran 10 : 10..

KEEP IT UP..........WE ARE ENJOYING YOU!

www.moroccoworldnews.com/2015/01/149537/french-director-converts-to-islam-after-charlie-hebdo-attacks/
This is exactly what happened in 2006 when Pope Benedict16 poked fun of the Prophet (sallalahu alaiy wasalam ). Also he Baptized a 'Muslim' to make Muslims feel sad. Unfortunately reverse was the case when some Americans reverted to Islam and pointed at Pope's bigotry as a recourse
Foreign AffairsRe: France To Ban Foreign Sponsorship Of Mosques; A New Plan For Islam by Empiree: 7:32pm On Aug 08, 2016
[size=15pt]Man Of The Thread[/size]


IS



[size=40pt]MrBrownJ[/size]

IslamRe: Agege For Show. Innaa Lillaahi Wa Innaa Ilayhi Rooji'oon by Empiree: 6:30pm On Aug 08, 2016
Will be back here In sha Allah @sino. I'm very uncomfortable using my mobile. The whole arguments of yours devoid of simple


"Qola Allah Qola Rosullu"



The ONLY weight you have is you bombarded me with 'ijma' of SCHOLARS which is understandable.


As for your last paragraph, please desist from that bcus I'm not shy from implementation of hudud of Rab. I think you are being emotional by saying that. I don't want emotions involved.

@albaqir, thanks for your brief contributions. However, I think you should stand on neutral ground rather than your common tune "your scholar".


Remember you used to believe in hadd of Rajm until I brought your attention to it last year?. So please try to sound neutral so that sino doesn't feel he's dealing with sectarian arguments. Thanks
IslamRe: Are These Hadeeth Sahih ? by Empiree: 2:56pm On Aug 08, 2016
udatso:
Empi.ree
I'm shocked oooo. He said that? Maybe it's a mistake. It has to be
Yup, he did. He's a confused fellow who doesn't know what he wants l.

He explained himself here




www.nairaland.com/2734412/testimonies-give-not-give
IslamRe: Agege For Show. Innaa Lillaahi Wa Innaa Ilayhi Rooji'oon by Empiree: 2:51pm On Aug 08, 2016
AlBaqir:
Brother mi, your statement is as clear as daylight though it seemed to have contradicted your aim. Do you believe in the ismat of the Aimmat of Ahl al-Bayt or not? Why making comparison where none exist?! How can you compare the so-called sahih of a book that its supposed author know nothing about? And even if Imam Bukhari was the author, for argument sake, was he a masoom?
ok, let me clear myself before I get crucified undecided

I was basically saying that how could Sahih Bukhari be 100% valid without error?. So i meant what's the point of criticizing Shia's "inffaliable imamate" when he's also believe the same thing with respect to Sahih Hadith. In another word, saying Bukhari is error free is like saying it's inffaliable.
IslamRe: Agege For Show. Innaa Lillaahi Wa Innaa Ilayhi Rooji'oon by Empiree: 2:31pm On Aug 08, 2016
AlBaqir:
How on earth can you make an analogy between the two?! The basis of the infallibility of Aimmat Ahl al-Bayt is exclusively revealed in two divine messages:

# Surah Ahzab, the verse of purification. Here Allah purify them with absolute purification.

# Hadith Thaqalain especially the bolded part:

Imam Ibn Kathir (d. 774 H):

In the ṣaḥīḥ report, it is recorded that the Messenger of Allāh, peace be upon him, said in his sermon at Ghadīr Khumm: “I am leaving behind over you the Two Weighty Things (al-thaqalayn): THE BOOK OF ALLAH AND MY OFFSPRING, AHL AL-BAYT. Verily, both shall never separate from each other until they meet me at the Lake-Fount.

Ref: {Abū al-Fidā Ismā’īl b. ‘Umar b. Kathīr al-Qurashī al-Dimashqī, Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-‘Aẓīm (Dār al-Ṭaybah li al-Nashr wa al-Tawzī’; 2nd edition, 1420 H) [annotator: Sāmī b. Muḥammad Salāmah], vol. 7, p. 201}

These are part of several undeniable evidences which Ahlu Sunnah shy away from and Wahabiyyah deliberately misinterpret.

* So, what's the basis for the "infallibility" of Sahih Bukhari?
Don't complicate it at all. My aim is as clear as day light
IslamRe: Agege For Show. Innaa Lillaahi Wa Innaa Ilayhi Rooji'oon by Empiree: 11:01am On Aug 08, 2016
AlBaqir:
Agreed with you that what? I told you my research is inconclusive though my heart doesnt agree with it. Let me be clear please:

# There is nothing like verse of rajm in the Quran

# Whoever says it has been abrogated or erased will show us authentic hadith of what verse replaces it. No verse is erased, abrogated or cause to be forgotten except there is a better or equivalent verse to replace it {Q.2:106}

# Ahadith from both Sunni and Shia sources that talks about ayat rajm being in the Quran are nothing but falsehood.

# With overwhelming mutawattir hadith about the legislation of rajam from both schools, it is safe to conclude that rajam is perhaps Prophetic legislation for unrepentant sinners (adulterer(res)). The difficult conditions attached before punishment can be passed for adultery give room for repentance rather than that no mercy punishment.

# Today many Muslims countries have removed beheading and stoning to death from their sharii law and replaced them with life imprisonment. Quran too is very clear that if those who committed indecent acts repent sincerely and work righteously, they should be left alone.

Allah knows best
That you later agreed with me that there is nothing like Rajm as punishment for adultery. Remember the thread?. So we are on the same page here bro.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 (of 775 pages)