Empiree's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Empiree's Profile › Empiree's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 (of 775 pages)
Updated...... This is a year old now. I think it is high time i give my opinion on this. Took me so late |
Geez, I remember this woman when she passed away in car accident on her way from NY to Nashville, TN. May her soul rest in peace. Aminah Assilmi (born Janice Huff, 1945 – 5 March 2010)[1] was a broadcast journalist, national Muslim community activist and director of the International Union of Muslim Women. Formerly a Southern Baptist preacher, she converted to Islam in 1977 in college while trying to convert some Muslims to Christianity. As the director of the International Union of Muslim Women, she visited campuses discussing Islam. She was named one of the 500 most influential Muslims in the world in 2009 by the Royal Islamic Strategic Studies Centre in Amman, Jordan. Assilmi was involved in the release of the 2001 Eid stamp, as well as future anniversary editions. She was also involved in creating an educational center for Muslim converts. She died on March 5, 2010 in a car accident while returning from a speaking engagement in New York. She had a daughter and two sons, as well as several grandchildren. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OskQ2qTVY0U |
nurain150:You didnt give enough details though. it looks like there is some sort of commotion in the area of the mosque which may be detrimental to your safety. Yes, there is Islamic injunction in this case actually where you may stay away from the area until the situation gets better. Even if it rains heavily, you may not go to the masjid. Not going to the masjid does not mean you cant pray at home. You also stated that she would send you out to the same area. Is your mom a muslima or not?. In any case, from your write up, she doesnt say you should not pray. She basically prevents you from going to the mosque due to shootout problems in the area. Well, discount the fact that she sent you to the same area to buy stuff. Pray at home for the moment. It only becomes problem IF, ONLY IF she tells you or prevents you from praying. That's where her opinion doesnt count but she has not do that as yet. There is a ruling i came across sometimes ago. The narration seems to be in the time of Kalifa saidina Ali (RA) who said if you go out to pray at the mosque in the time of war or some sort of crisis and the road is unsafe, if you die you put yourself in danger. Allah knows best. I do not currently have the correct narration at the moment. Again, your mom's opinion doesnt count ONLY if she doesnt want you to pray. That would have constituted disobeying Allah. I mean you only disobey her if she asks you to disobey Allah. So far, she is not saying that you should not pray. You can pray at home for now |
Nigerian Sufi Respond To The Ongoing Brouhaha BTW Sheik Habib Ilory https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5eFCQz23XU |
This thread is funny. truthman2012, do you remember this thread ![]() |
Demmzy15: |
Bismillahi Rah'man Ra'him sino:This whole thing about abrogation sounds like robbery. How could a verse be abrogated and the ruling exist?. Qur'an says it was revealed in a preserved tablet. Didnt Allah knows ahead what the future holds?. The Quran is preserved in the ‘lawh al-mahfooz’ (preserved tablet) with God (85:21-22) and not in the paper copy printed by humans. The vast majority of the scholars are of the opinion that Sunnah does not abrogate the Quran. They say that there is no example of such abrogation and that the examples given by the other side are not correct. Imams Shafi’i, Ahmad b. Hanbal, ibn Taymiyyah (rah) & others were of this group of scholars. On the other hand, there are few scholars who believe that the Sunnah abrogated the Quran. Muhammad bin Nasr al-Marwazi is one of them. They use the following two examples which was rejected by vast scholars: 1- Surat al-Baqarah 180: It is prescribed, when death approaches any of you, if he leave any goods, that he make a will to parents and next of kin. But the Prophet ASWS said: No entitled heir is to be included in the will. Response: This verse was already abrogated by the verses of inheritance in Surat al-Nisaa. So this is not a good example of Sunnah solely abrogating the Quran. This is just a tip. It shows that if a verse was ever abrogated, both would still exist in the kitab. There was NEVER a verse of Qur'an that USED to be there. That's fabrication! And I was talking about shi’ah and believe of their scholars that the Qur’an is incomplete is quite different from the understanding of abrogated verses.I have always have problems with Alhu Sunnah anytime they accused Shi'a of this while they appear to be guilty of the same. I do not believe that Shi'a believe Qur'an is incomplete. It is simply a wide misconception. If such a thing was/is written in their literature, it is only to be understood as a mistake or corruption in their literature just like some corrupted texts in the Sunni literature. A Sunni Sheikh went to Iran for religious dialogue in 2012. During their discussion, he asked them if they believe Quran is incomplete?. He said they were not supersized he asked because it is a misconception being transported around. So they denied the allegation. Here is a brief explanation on abrogation of verses in the Qur’an:Abrogation and it rulings are in conflict with Qur'an. It creates confusion and distortion. The abrogation of Quranic verses, arguably the greatest lie against the Quran, was originally invented during the fourth century A.H. (late 10th century A.D.) by some Muslim scholars notably Ahmed Bin Ishaq Al-Dinary (died 318 A.H.), Mohamad Bin Bahr Al-Asbahany (died 322 A.H.), Hebat Allah Bin Salamah (died 410 A.H.) and Mohamad Bin Mousa Al-Hazmy (died 548 A.H.), whose book about Al-Nasekh and Al-Mansoukh is regarded as one of the leading references in the subject. According to this concept, it is claimed that some verses in the Quran are abrogated and invalidated by other verses! The verse that is the abrogator they call (Al-Nasekh) while the abrogated verse they call (Al-Mansoukh). These scholars have come up with hundreds of cases of abrogated verses to the extent that they have formulated a whole science of the subject filling lengthy books and references. These scholars came up with different numbers of abrogated verses. Alama Dr. Muhammad Iqbal, Dr. Ishra Ahmed, Sheik Daud Alfa Nla and a host of scholars came up with bunch of numbers, which means the issue of abrogation is base on opinion. There is no redundant verse in the Quran. It is all VALID till the Day Of Judgement. The scholars have observed three kinds of abrogation. The first is the abrogation of the ruling alone. The second is the abrogation of the ruling and the recitation. The third is the abrogation of recitation alone.Again, it is all theory base on their understandings. See the highlighted part really problematic and contravene Dawah effort. Not only that, it is in conflict with PRESERVED TABLET. "But this is an honored Qur'an. [Inscribed] in a Preserved Slate." (85:21-22) Here is a short story by a Sheikh and his teacher(senior teacher) in 1960s. After tedious and exhausted lecture for the day, the student in question was tired and faced down on his desk while his teacher was in recess in his office. Of-course other students were present in the class. Sometime later, one of the teachers came in and was having disccsuin with a student. The Sheik said he heard their discussion when the teacher said "their used to be a verse of rajm in the Qur'an." This Sheikh said he quickly got up and went to his teacher in his office and relayed what he heard from other teacher. His teacher, Dr Maulana Fazlur Rahman Ansari (1914-1974), the author of the book ‘The Qur’anic Foundations and Structure of Muslim Society’. He said 'there is no abrogate verse(s) in the Qur'an. That the abrogation is referring to previous revealed Holy Books, like Tawrah, Injil etc. He said the scholar used the wrong methodology was the reason they came to the conclusion.' That's why you see schlars came up with different numbers of abrogation. Muhammad Iqbal came up with some seventeen (17) i think. Dr. Ishra Ahmad came up with five(5). Some came up with pretty much more. Even though the abrogation of recitation has been something that has always been accepted by Muslim scholars, we do find that there are some that have doubted the existence of it. Their main argument is that they do not see the wisdom of such a thing and that abrogation of recitation creates nothing but confusion. That's just the truth. Forget about what scholars said. What about you, dont you see confusion and misconception?. Let me give you another example,“Verily, those who believe and those who are Jews and Christians, and Sabians, whoever believes in Allah and the Last Day and do righteous good deeds shall have their reward with their Lord, on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve.” [al-Baqarah 2:62] In the 'tafsir' given by the kingdom of Saudi where the Qur'an was printed, says in the footnote that the verse ^ was abrogated by Sura 3:85 "And whoever desires other than Islam as religion - never will it be accepted from him, and he, in the Hereafter, will be among the losers." Does that mean Sura 2:62 is redundant?. At least this is fair because both (Al-Nasekh) and (Al-Mansoukh) are present and valid. It only depends how how to explain the former if the later abrogates it. However, such an argument holds no weight, since it is not required for the creation to understand the wisdom of the actions of Allah as a requirement to accepting those actions.This is solely opinion of this scholar and he is beng emotional by citing that we may not know the 'wisdom' for the abrogation. The only time we dont know WISDOM behind something is such thing had to come from the lips of the prophet(p). Also, wisdom is, when Allah commanded Nabi Ibrahim(as) to slaughter his son(as), he(as) had faith in Allah and did not question WHY. But the 'wisdom' cited by Sulaiman Al-Lahim is in direct conflict with Quran. Allah is not author of confusion because he said in His Glorious Book An-Nisa Verse No:82 "Do they not then consider the Qur'an carefully? Had it been from other than Allah, they would surely have found therein much contradictions." Interesting, this was also discussed before, https://www.nairaland.com/638130/abrogation-quranic-verses-greatest-lie https://www.nairaland.com/348098/abrogation-quran Please note again, this belief of the ahlu sunnah is far from what the scholars of shi’ah believe, I had already posted a link for your perusal.Interestingly, Shi'a belief in rajm. Only recently Albaqir rejected the idea. Again your arguments and debates must stem from genuine facts, and supported by scholarly opinions, if you think just that stoning the adulterer is barbaric, hence your argument, then we may also look at cutting of the hands for a thief, and even whipping a fornicator 100 lashes can also be viewed as barbaric, not to mention the continuous pressure from some quarters to abolish death sentence. The last paragraph of the above post is very instructive. The Question to ask yourself are: Are the narrations on rajm authentic according to Islamic scholars?! If yes, why do you reject them?! If no, then who weakened them, and on what basis were the reasons for the weakness of the narrations?!Underlined, you have pretty much derailed. That's not the point at all. Point here is establishing hudud properly not rejecting them. I insist that "stoning" is not our (Islam) rule for punishing adulterers and fornicators. I strongly believe it is for the People Of The Book and still exist in their Book. It is not seeing it as barbaric. If it is in Qur'an like lashing, bismillah. "The scholars are the inheritors of the Prophets. The people of spiritual wisdom (hukama’) are the inheritors of the Prophets." ~~ Sacred Tradition “As matters stand in the Muslim world today, it is the decline of religious leadership from the Islamic standard in a serious measure that constitutes a major cause of its inability with regard to its emergence from the abyss into which it has been descending since some time. The remedy for the situation is obvious.” - Fazlur Rahman Ansari, ‘The Qur’anic Foundations and Structure of Muslim Society’. NEXT: Rajm (Stay Tuned) |
When someone's brain is dented and suspended don't expect him to utter anything meaningful. That's reality of Op |
Aroh48:You have a good day, sir. You are not making sense |
Aroh48:This is careless statement. No one should rejoice at another human's misfortune. Every life is worthy. You should rather be objective and not allow bigotry to hack your sense. From your write up, you are BH supporter. In another minute from now you are going to say you are educated. What a loser! |
wastedsperm:Wow, this is intuitive. Question for you, do the Fulani herdsmen have history of killing the locals as currently portrayed now? Far as I am concerned, I have always been skeptical about recent news about the herdsmen. I used to get close to them in the 90s and no problems. You know there is another way to look as things which many Nigerians are missing. Most Nigerians especially christians are not that intelligent. They have allowed bigotry and hatred of others to cloud their reasoning. In this Day and Age a lot of things do not appear the way they are or are meant to be. |
^^^ Na'am. I like the fact that you didn't shy away to say this. I felt ashamed to say that cus I don't think i ever came across ijma of kufr on them. I refrained from saying that cus at some point he seems to show love and affection for Quran. But then, he gets too close to not just non Muslims but the craziest of kufar and made them his awliya and, would go to any length to backbite Muslims before them. |
Was Confused For A Minute Trojan Horse Alert Fed Thing ![]() EFCC Is In The Lookout For Ya Cus U Talk'bout $$OIL$$ $$$GAS $$$ ![]() Kim K? #SayWHAT |
Another evidence, catholic, the largest Christian sect is excommunicated here Ochoiho: |
I Just dey enjoy having fun with his moniker. I had fun with him before. He got funny moniker to play with. Nothing to regret. He understands it is SARCASM. His moniker is not deity. That would have been a different case. |
^ Honestly i feel sad for him. The way he's threading will eventually land him in the FULL company of Kufr. That's why i cant take his silly "reform" serious. Yea, i notice you barely talk to non-muslims. So do you consider this Quraniyun kafir?. If he had only rejected some ahadith narrations, that would be fine. But he threw the baby out with water. That makes his case execrable and irrelevant. |
^^^^ I think i have explained myself [above] what i meant |
udatso:That's dolphinman for you. He will always do that unless and until you cut his head off and take it with you ![]() That's the only thing that can STOP him.
|
dolphinheart:This Dolphin man talks too much. What is it you don't understand? , hum? . Dolphinman
|
AlBaqir:Brother, leave oshogbo weed at home . Don't take it to work with you . Why do you misunderstood me today? . I never agreed @underlined. # Again there are too numerous ahadith about stoning for adultery but not that ayat rajm existed. The later (ayat rajm) is found in both Sunni and Shia ahadith but I simply don't believe them. I believe its part of traditions of the Prophet (due to numerous ahadith).this should be directed at sino |
WORDWORLD:This is exactly what happened in 2006 when Pope Benedict16 poked fun of the Prophet (sallalahu alaiy wasalam ). Also he Baptized a 'Muslim' to make Muslims feel sad. Unfortunately reverse was the case when some Americans reverted to Islam and pointed at Pope's bigotry as a recourse |
[size=15pt]Man Of The Thread[/size] IS [size=40pt]MrBrownJ[/size]
|
Will be back here In sha Allah @sino. I'm very uncomfortable using my mobile. The whole arguments of yours devoid of simple "Qola Allah Qola Rosullu" The ONLY weight you have is you bombarded me with 'ijma' of SCHOLARS which is understandable. As for your last paragraph, please desist from that bcus I'm not shy from implementation of hudud of Rab. I think you are being emotional by saying that. I don't want emotions involved. @albaqir, thanks for your brief contributions. However, I think you should stand on neutral ground rather than your common tune "your scholar". Remember you used to believe in hadd of Rajm until I brought your attention to it last year?. So please try to sound neutral so that sino doesn't feel he's dealing with sectarian arguments. Thanks |
udatso:Yup, he did. He's a confused fellow who doesn't know what he wants l. He explained himself here www.nairaland.com/2734412/testimonies-give-not-give |
AlBaqir:ok, let me clear myself before I get crucified ![]() I was basically saying that how could Sahih Bukhari be 100% valid without error?. So i meant what's the point of criticizing Shia's "inffaliable imamate" when he's also believe the same thing with respect to Sahih Hadith. In another word, saying Bukhari is error free is like saying it's inffaliable. |
AlBaqir:Don't complicate it at all. My aim is as clear as day light |
AlBaqir:That you later agreed with me that there is nothing like Rajm as punishment for adultery. Remember the thread?. So we are on the same page here bro. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 (of 775 pages)

Jehovah Witnesses knocked On The Wrong Door 


