Empiree's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Empiree's Profile › Empiree's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 (of 775 pages)
|
AlBaqir:I dont think you get the point. We aren't talking about whether Dajjal exist, who he is or will appear or not. We basically dealing with ENGLISH MEANING OR ANOTHER WORD for Dajjal. We can go on and on and give it meanings like Dajjal: fitna, trial, deceiver, impostor, false messiah, pseudo etc. What textual reference(s) do you need for that?. From many ahadith, his description is a false being that creates turmoil and deception. Why are you stretching this?. |
AlBaqir:I repeat this is very simple. There isn't any confusion here. You basically dealing with linguistic analysis. What "christ" has to do with it is because the appearance and reality are opposite to each other. Appearance is, to Jews he will be messiah, their savior and to the Christians, he will be "Christ Jesus". Reality is, he's not. So to muslims, he's impostor(Dajjal). That's, he will be on earth to perform functional role of real Jesus the son of Mary- the messanger of Allah (as). In a nutshell, he's "Christ" and "savior" to the Jews and Christians. But he's anti (the opposite) to the muslims. Very simple terminology. So it's nothing confusing to use the word "anti-Christ" when explaining the subject to non muslims. They may not understand islamic terminology, DAJJAL. |
^ I don't think there is any ambiguity calling Dajjal an Anti-Christ. Sheikh Imran himself have used "impostor" to describe Dajjal. He even go as far as saying he (Dajjal) got Phd in deception. So there isn't any confusion using Anti-christ as alternative. Anyways, this woman further confirms Dajjalic world of women https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siG74StTSoY |
HAkorehdeh:portuguese |
MONDAY, NOV 30, 2015 10:29 AM EST U.N. voted to partition Palestine 68 years ago, in an unfair plan made even worse by Israel’s ethnic cleansing http://www.salon.com/2015/11/30/u_n_voted_to_partition_palestine_68_years_ago_in_an_unfair_plan_made_even_worse_by_israels_ethnic_cleansing/ |
enieme:I guess that's just the way you see things. Just be happy. I am sure they aren't singing Pasuma or Janet Jackson. I can't defend a particular group. I believe they are singing Qasida Burda or Naat. If you aren't comfortable with them just move on. Simple |
enieme:well, i was never goer needless to say "chronic" one. And nothing wrong with "Halqa". That has its Sunnah background as well. Halqa simply means gathering. Whats wrong with gathering for Islamic cause?. Here is video of anti-bid'a Sheikh doing his Sunday Halqa -Sheikh Imran Abdul Majeed Eleha https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzxjytDJw_8 You people funny. You would condemn something but you do the same thing. His video titled "Sunday Halqa". So why talk down Sunday As-Salatu? |
Medicis is choking on his own medicines https://www.nairaland.com/1189267/thirteen-reasons-why-doctrine-original |
. |
enieme:Now it's about whats donein gathering?. But you appeared to have problem with gathering itself. Imagine instead if the dhikr was replaced as halaqahs? Or just Muslim get together tovdiscuss issues? ivdont see much knowledge to be gained in singing and readig tasbih.The least you can do is give them excuses. I do not know what they do. And nothing worng gathering and discussing religious issues. Again, you do not appear to have spesicif knowdlge of what they do. Until you can really find that out, i cant accuse them. Besides, is it ALL different "as-salatu" that do what you portrayed here?. I am sure the answer is no. I hope all's well cos I've argued with u several times b4 and iv never seen u assume such tone as u have on so trivial an issue as this.@bolded, i dont even recall ever argued with you before. This is my first time we have a little detail discussion like this to my knowledge. My tone?. I doubt it's offensive. Well, maybe/maybe not cus I have seen many muslims condemning every slight practices they dont understand or that they dont agree with. Thats just very disturbing. |
enieme:See the way you think?. Sad. Is there anything in my writeup that says jealousy?. Do you remember in the 90s along Lagos-Ibadan expressway where Adeboye's church creates unnecessary holdup in order to gain attention?. Do you think it was by accident? . Do you think it was only for show? . No my friend. Their purpose was fulfilled and that's to get converts. Yes, they got millions of converts from muslims with their fake miracle. So muslims also stepped up their game with them while you people do nothing because in your world prophet (saw) and Sahaba (ra) did not do that. Looks like you have no idea what I'm taking about. Did you care to learn that little piece of history? . It's deeper than what I typed here. Let me give you little details. Pastors across nigeria were funded by USA and the west to end islam in Africa in 10 yrs (by 2001). Alhamdulilah they failed. Majority ulama is islam were asleep while these evil people perpetrated their deeds. So nasfat, ansardeen and all that stood up to them. If they were to use your methodology i:e prophet and Sahaba didn't do this and that, entire yoruba land and the east would be christianity by now. But their plan failed. If I see videos of pastor (now a muslim) who was actively involved in the crusade gave his account of the incident I will post it here and you must watch it before your say anything. Your methodology is wrong. No pawn intended. |
enieme:"ruling".....what ruling, Saudi shuyuk's?. Qur'an says to send Salam and salutations on the prophet. So do it however you want.... wherever you want except where its forbidden to do so like bathroom etc. Even if you are having intercourse with your wife say salat on the prophet. That's how deep it's. As for choosing specific date (Sunday), I really think you need to enlighten yourself on that. Back in the 80s, early 90s and before then it was all about churches on Sundays. What we saw was white garment people. This attracted young muslims and weak ones. They joined churches and Christianity altogether. We only have Friday to gather. But juma'ah is only 45 mins to an hour and we done. So what other program(s) muslims have than that? ...none. Truly, Sunday is not prescribed but it's Mustahab if people chose to gather for religious purposes. It was dua of Sheik Adam al-ilory that was accepted. I read his story that he lamented to Allah despite his efforts on Yoruba folks, islam still far behind. He only saw white garment folks on Sundays .....churches everywhere. He made dua before he passed. His dua was accepted after he passed. It was then different islamic organizations emerged in the early 90s like nasfat, ansardeen etc. That's how Sunday as-salatu came about. The intention is to make it voluntary religious program. Not mandatory act of worship. This is what sheikh Adam called acts that are flexible rather than rigid. It benefits include nominal muslims becoming practicing ones and non muslims becoming muslims. It's duration is lengthier than Jum'ah. Yes, more women are there. .that's even better than joining clubs. All they need to do is to coordinate it very well. |
^ i had no intention of lengthy post. That's why I reffered to them for quick exist. I'm in support of your opinion. Have always held that. And that's position of sheikh Rabu Adebayo |
enieme:please leave those people alone. If they don't bother you nor do they invite you, please its none of your business. There are ahadith also in favor of group dhikr and its beneficial. I benefited from it that's why I'm able to stand on my own today. I have told you that I do mine in privacy but I see no reason to condemn group dhikr as long as what they do is within sharia. If you are not invited and you go there condemning them, they have the right to ship you out from the arena faster than federal express. |
Naming ceremony is Sunnah. There are references to to this effect. It's Mustahab to name newborn 7days after he's born.May also be delayed if father has no money for aqiqah. Burial, you mean like Christians do it?. Or like partying etc? . All that is very wrong. SCHOLARS defer on bowing. Sheik Imran mojeed eleha is not in favor of it. He also cited sheikh Adam (ra) to back his points. However, he seems to misunderstood sheikh Adam. Sheikh Adebayo of Dawatul Aq supports bending to greet elders. What is forbidden is bowing your head touching the ground. He said its worldwide culture to bend to greet elderly. That's what he said. Sheik Alaye said every 7 joint used for ibadat for Allah must not be used to greet anymore except on unfortunate circumstances. May elaborate later if time permits |
Sermwell, you are welcome! [size=15pt]I am.........[/size]
|
YourMain:u funny |
YourMain:Reeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaally? |
ladej:U better watch your back before her "husband" oremu catches you. Oops! they divorced, sorry Be free with her. Nothing will go wrong ![]()
|
Empiree:@Fundamentalist, watch this video, here is your Sheik Imran Majeed Eleha that you revered so much. He acknowledged walimotul Quran and even other forms of walimot. Brother, you need to embrace broad scope of ilm and do away with unnecessary rigidity. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=doX4K9ax0Sc |
AlBaqir:I think you need to look at the big picture. Despite many ahadith that demerit Umar(RA), this should have had great effect for his acceptance by the entire Ummah throughout 1400 history of Islam. How come his merit survived millions of great shuyuk, Imams, waliy, scholars for the last 1400yrs?. Were they all wrong to have accepted merit of Umar?. In my opinion, these ahadith that bad mouth this great man(RA) would have to be re-examined. It doesnt bother me one bit for those negative ahadith graded sahih. Obviously the knowledge of Quran and Sunnah are the ultimate knowledge. And apparently according to this hadith on Umar's Merit, he is endowed with knowledge 'of Quran and Sunnah.' So lets verify Umar's competence.The incident apprears to be matter of ijtihad. Umar(ra) was definitely aware of these verse of Quran you cited. To rephrase, Sahih Muslim, Book of Menstruation, chapter on Tayammum: Abd al-Rabmin b. Abza narrated It on the authority of his father that a man came to ‘Umar and said: I am (at times) affected by seminal emission but find no water. He (‘Umar) told him not to say prayer. ‘Ammar then said. Do you remember,0 Commander of the Faithful, when I and you were in a military detachment and we had had a seminal emission and did not find water (for taking bath) and you did not say prayer, but as for myself I rolled in dust and said prayer, and (when it was mentioned before) the Apostle (may peace be upon him) said: It was enough for you to strike the ground with your hands and then blow (the dust) and then wipe your face and palms. Umar said: ‘Ammar, fear Allah. He said: If you so like, I would not narrate it. A hadith like this has been transmitted with the same chain of transmitters but for the words: ‘Umar said: We hold you responsible for what you claim.” Based on above narration some people allege that Umar bin Khattab (ra) was unaware of the verses of Tayammum. Basically Tayammum has been mentioned at two places in the Qur’an. First in Surah Nisa verse 43 & in Surah Ma’idah verse 6 Sayyiduna ‘Umar (ra) was certainly aware of this verses and he also held it permissible to perform Tayammum in case of minor impurity [i.e. when only ablution is necessary] when there is no water available. But according to him it was not permissible to perform Tayammum in case of major impurity [i.e. when Ghusl is necessary]. In the above two verses if the word “lams” is taken for sexual intercourse then it does go against ‘Umar (ra), however if it is taken to mean physical touch then it is not a proof against his opinion. Basically the meaning of that part is controversial among scholars. According to Imam Shafi’i the part “Lamastumun Nisa” means touching of women while according to Imam Abu Hanifa it means sexual intercourse. So Umar (ra) was not actually unaware of the verses of Tayammum but he considered them to be only for those who with minor impurity but not in case of Janabah. It was a matter of Ijtihad not like some are trying to portray as though he was simply ignorant of the verses of Qur’an. It is said that he left this opinion. And Allah knows best. Another point which clearly shows that the verse is not decisive against the view held by ‘Umar (ra) is the fact that in the incident which happened between him and ‘Ammar bin Yasir (ra) regarding the issue Ammar (ra) reminded him of an incident happened during the lifetime of the Prophet (sallallahu ‘alaihi wa sallam) and not the verses regarding Tayammum. There could not have been any evidence stronger than the verse of Qur’an and ‘Ammar (ra) would never had left it if it were against ‘Umar (ra). And Allah knows best 2. Imam Ibn Abi Hatim (d. 327 H) records:I tried to authdnticate this narration but cant find it except from your friend, Toyib-Olawuyi. I am havig hard time locating any related isnad. B. Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (S) as saying:One positive thing you ever relate with Umar(ra). Congratulations! ![]() Ahadith are before you how Umar repeatedly ran away from the battlefield. So much was his strength and valor.Mr. Sino already dealt with this I believe. # Those three according to Sunni were the best in that pecking order. Therefore to whom much is giving, much is also expected.It's difficult to fish-out who is munafiq. That's Allah's right except for a famous munafiq named Abd-Allah ibn Ubayy (Arabic: عبد الله بن أبي بن سلول, died 631), also called ibn Salul (and perhaps few others). # So there is need to separate grains from chaff. It is an insult upon the righteous Sahabah to group the Munafiqun with them altogether. Allah and His prophet separate them.ibn Salul could definitely not be compared with Umar(ra). The Prophet, peace be upon him, said, “Some persons from amongst those who kept me company will meet me at the LakeFount (in Qiyamat). I will see them, and they will be presented to me. Then, they will be forced away from me. I will say: "O my Lord, my Sahabah! My Sahabah ‟. It will be said to me: "You do not know what they INNOVATED after you."This is broad. Even salafis have used this hadith against their 'opponents'. Still doesn't specifically relate to Umar. # I respect your as-salatu but I have a bad news for you that what you are doing is Bid'ah.Bid'ah? really?. You sound prosaic here now. How about I say: "Allahuma sali ala Muhammad wa ala aliy Muhammad wa al-bayt, wa as-sahabiy, wa ala muslimeen" meaning, I simply send blessings on the prophet, sahaba, his household and the entire muslim ummah is bid'ah? smh # Were they not among the Sahabah who used to keep the Prophet company? This is a critical hadith that suggest everybody around the Prophet as suspect. And a truth seeker is saddled with responsibility of thorough investigation into the life of every companion starting with the heavyweights.So Umar ibm Khatab is suspect #1? You too much. afterall, as sino previously said he died as muslim and must be treated as such. That must be our approach. You never disputed that. After all, with some negative ahadith recorded against him, if he was so bad, how come the entire 1400yrs of Islam till present his merit survived millions of Ulama if he was that bad?. This means there were some cooked up fallacies against this man. After all he was a muslim. Not only a muslim but Amir. So.............. ![]()
|
Sheikh Mud-L-Awwal- Awalu (RTA) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZWFBdniFAA @17-18minutes, narrator says "those who call themselves Sufis but abandoned salat, you are not on the right path" |
AlBaqir:Really have no problem with this. We have talked about methodology before. That if hadith is in conflict with Quran, it is thrown out. Thats understandlable. There countless ahadith out there- while some critisize Umar, some vindicate him. Quran its;ef, despite not mentioning sahabas by name suggests that Allah has overlooked their wrongdoings. Therefore, it is unfair to rely on hadith to castige these men (Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthman). Sahabas are many but you pretty much picked on the first three. So being a "Sahabah" is an automatic ticket to Jannah irrespective of your credentials?Yes! And we must speak positively of them and leave their affairs over to Allah except for where Quran and the prophet specifically declare individual company of Jahanam. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Sahabah#A Imam Bukhari documents:And where does it mentioned Abu Bakr, Umar and Uthman in this category? Mere Mistakes?! They (the cowards) ran away REPEATEDLY from the battlefield leaving their Prophet for dead! Mere mistakes?! They disobeyed and questioned and doubted the Prophet on many occasions! Mere mistakes?! They planned to assassinate the Prophet! Mere mistake?! They accused him of Raving madness and being possessed by illness thereby denying him of his divine right?! Mere mistake?! After the death of the Prophet, the wage war upon war against his Ahl al-bayt until they were massacred. Mere mistakes?!And I believe sino already dealt with this. E.mpiree you are absolutely something else. Obviously the love of "any Sahabah" is making you to say gibberish. Note brother, The ONLY LOVE that is obligatory upon you that failure to do so is Jahanam is the love of Muhammad and his Ahl al-bayt.Fortunately for empire.e, he recites EVERYDAY [size=20pt]"Allahuma Soli a'la saidina Muhammadin wa'ala aliy wa as-sahabiy wa a'al-bayt"[/size] Olohun bawa ke Anobi, ati awon sahaba re, ati awon ara ile re ato gbogbo musulumi lapapo. Everyday, empiree says this ![]() |
usermane:Ask albaqir himself. He said several times how "alhu sunnah wajamah" rushed to grade ahadith daif or sahih etc. But he didnt say that in this case bcus it isnt in his best interest. Muhaditun arent perfect. The verse you keep drawing as vindication of Umar(Quran 9:100) did not rule that the sahabas were perfect on incorruptible, that God is pleased with one today is no guarantee that God will be pleased with him for ever. And for all we know, Umar may not even be one of the Sahabas addressed.When we say "sahaba", we are referring to those companions who embraced Islam at time of the prophet(SAW). Like Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Ali, Huraira, Abass, ibn Mushud (RA)etc NOT Kafir at the time of the prophet(SAW). @underlined, no one says they were perfect. Matter of fact, sino said earlier that sahaba(RA) are not infallible. In that case, any errors recorded concerning any sahaba should be viewed as mere mistakes and should never be used against them bcus Quran sits in judgement over the literature. I have said it in the past and will say it again, traditional mainstream Muslims know nothing about their religion. Umar in many Hadith is depicted as a very blood thirsty and aggressive brute often willing to behead his opponent at the slightest provocation. I don't have the references at the moment but i will post the Hadith on this thread once i do. Umar and Abubakar 's aggressive military campaign that led to the fall of the Sassanid and most of the Byzantine empire turned traditional Islam to a invasive military ideology that legislate aggressive warfare to conquer and rule non-Muslim territories that is exemplified by groups like ISIS todayYour attempt to link these Sahaba(RA) with isis absurd. Isis are bunch of crooks. They only hold up Quran in the air along with flags but have no idea of the contents. BIG DIFFERENCE. When Sahaba fought in battles they didint display Quran in the air to show they are muslims. So isis is mere propaganda machine. Dont dare compare them with Sahaba(RA) |
plappville:
|
I honestly think Albaqir should back off from chastising the first three sahaba(RA). It's not healthy at all.All these so called Sunni ahadith albaqir got his references from are just literature. Doesnt make them all true. Just like Christian evangelists rely heavily on seerat of the prophet by Ibn Ishaq which is full of garbage. And Christians repy on it to castigate the prophet(SAW). But Ibn Isha's accusation are pretty much in conflict with Quran just like many ahadith quoted by baqir. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 (of 775 pages)



they divorced, sorry
