₦airaland Forum

Truthseeker10:
😂😂😂😂so it was because of the "....and the Word was God" that "The" was absent in the kjv?

No!

I don't know why it was absent in KJV.

How many times will I knocked this into your dull head?

If "The" is added to the kjv, will ".....and the word was God" become a grammatical error?

No!

This is what I've already explained many times but you're too dull to grab it.

What is your point now?

LordReed:
Publish your findings in a scientific journal or win a Noble Prize for overturning the ToE.

What is ToE?

Lucifyre:
We're in the age of abundant digital information where it's easy to educate ones self quickly, with just a few strokes on a keyboard and we still have people spouting ignorant and daft statements like this confidently. Live observation of the Dunning Kruger effect on this thread, na wa😅

Since you know this, just provide a video where evolution was observed from one stage to another in any animal

LordReed:
I should show you something that takes millions of years, now? Can you hear how dumb you sound?

This lie has already expired.

Evolution takes millions years yet there's no single proof to support that and you believe it.

Also, there are millions of animals in our world today, we can then ask:

Do they evolve at the same time? If the answer is No!

Then we should be seen real evolution in various animals today not that only human.

MaxInDHouse:
Bugaa wọn!

Lori irọ́

Shameless lying liar.

So, you want to swallow your lie and agree that Jesus was actually The Word of God long before creation happened, right?

I know the reason you made that ante-Bible statement is because of the way you were confused after so much screwed about Michael's position and life after leaving heaven

Truthseeker10:
😂😂😂The analogy was correct not because of "The" but "The" is absent in the kjv because it might be due to grammatical accuracy? Please shed more light on this grammatical accuracy since the kjv does not use "a god"?

The lost voice of a confuse being.

The grammatical accuracy is "...and the Word was God"

How many times should I knocked this on your dull head?

Truthseeker10:
But when "The" was in your analogy, tou claim it was correct without any error.

The analogy was correct not because of the definite article "THE" when you asked about the definite article "THE" it was then I told you it's in the original Greek but KJV didn't add.

So, what is your point at this junction?

Is "a god" In the kjv? If no, what is the possible grammatical error that you asserted if "the" is added in the kjv since you added "the" in your analogy and claimed there was no error?

Already answered times without number.

MaxInDHouse:
You really know how to deal with him, he always hings on something that's out of point each time he is hooked.
Imagine quoting our publication that Jesus "has been serving as the word of God before coming to the earth and this is the same thing i told him before" that he kept asking where we got it from now he hings on that claiming he's saying something meaningful.
Abeg is there not a difference between someone acting as president and the one elected or appointed to rule as president?

@1st underlined to 2nd underlined-color is the reason why I do say, you're a lying liar like your father the Devil.

You lied that "Jesus only became the Word of God after his mission on earth"

I have to proof from the Bible that Jesus has been the Words of God before CREATION.

When you're still priding in your ignorance and refused to accept the scripture, I have to provide evidences from your own organization to support my claim that Jesus didn't became the Word of God after his mission on earth but has been the very Word of God before coming to Earth.

Cai...see broad day lie

@achorladey
@gabrielshow24

Come and see this shameless lying liar.

Truthseeker10:
Oga is kjv not a bible?

Yes, KJV is a Bible.

Is "a god" In the kjv? If no, what is the possible grammatical error that you asserted if "the" is added in the kjv since you added "the" in your analogy and claimed there was no error?

I've repeated this times without number just that you're blind.

I have also removed the definite article "THE" from my analogy.

So what is your point exactly?

Truthseeker10:
Is "a god" In the kjv? If no, what is the possible grammatical error that you asserted if "the" is added in the kjv since you added "the" in your analogy and claimed there was no error?

Why are you talking about KJV?

Did I quote KJV?

Is KJV your own translation of the English version?

achorladey:
Pay attention to how you listen.....

Truthseeker10:



Emusan:

1.


2.




Truthseeker10:



Achorladey: This is no longer an assignment for Emusan but for you Truthseeker10 to find. You can choose to share your findings with him after you are done. For now I don't expect you to repeat your questions I showed how Emusan responded to it accordingly.

Your repetition of it from here on means where intend to lead him towards is not working you had to keep regurgitating the question to make it look like he hasn't responded to it to project circular reasoning.

Him keep repeating the same question for the past three days shows he has lost in his own POV.

He didn't know where to turn to.

Truthseeker10:
You used "The" because you said it appeared in Greek.

Yes! To show you that I didn't go out of my limit in my explanation.

I asked you why it didn't appear in kjv English, you said it might be due to grammatical accuracy.

let me put it in capital so that your blind eyes can see it "IT MIGHT BE"

Kindly tell us why you used 'the" in your analogy and claim it was grammatically correct[ but assert that the absent of "the" In the kjv might be because of Grammatical accuracy.

I used THE for explanation purpose.

How many times should I repeat this for your dull brain.

I have even removed the definite article "THE" in my explanation.

Yet it's still correct just as it was in the KJV.

So what is your excuse now?

So what would be the possible error if "the" appears in the kjv?

The possible error is a god.

This is what I've repeated several times.

What is your next line of excuse?

achorladey:
This discussion just open two other areas I didn't notice before about their teachings about Jesus Christ

1. Jesus serve as the Word

Jesus is the Word not serve as the Word

2. Jesus name is the Word they decide to call it personal title

Their using Jehovah and saying others don't know God by name is as good as a fraud of a doctrine when the Bible categorically say the name of an individual is this and they choose to call it title yet the one that don't even exist in the Bible is picked as God's name

They pulled this lie in other to justify the reason why they claimed Jesus is the SPOKEMAN of God.

because if Jesus didn't serve as the word of God and they agreed that Jesus is THE WORD OF GOD. it means without Jesus God can't speak.

But where their delusions really exposed their lies is when they linked the same WORD OF GOD to the creation account in Genesis 1.

Which means, Jesus isn't just SPOKEMAN of God but the VERY WORD OF GOD Himself as the Bible says.

achorladey:
Since you know it's a claim, you can research and debunk the claim.

It that not what a supposed educated person should have done in the first place?

It's evident he's just chasing shadows.

Truthseeker10:
Oga we have gone past the error of "a god" since it does not appear in the kjv.

Where are we now?

Why would you claim that "The" is absent from the kjv because it might be due to grammatical accuracy but your analogy contains "the" and you claim it is grammatically correct. Is that not hypocrisy😂😂?

I've said I used "THE" for explanation purpose.

Is that rocket science for you to understand?

Also, I said whether I used the definite article "The" or not, it doesn't change the fact that "it's about NATURE"

In conclusion, it's evident that "The word(God) can be with God" this already answered your question.

Now, you're just chasing shadow because you're already lost in your own POV.

Your initial thought about that diagram was that "God" at the central of that triangle is about PERSON and not NATURE(if you ever hear such word before).

Now, you read my point which you can't refute and you are hooked.

Truthseeker10:
😂😂😂you are not a translator but you are claiming it might be due to grammatical accuracy. Na wa for this man oo.

Yes!

@red-color shows you lack comprehension.

You asked me and I said "IT MIGHT BE"

Which is just my own opinion and I've repeated this times without number.

Oga tell me the possible grammatical error if kjv adds "the" in John 1:1 just like you added "The man" in your analogy below.

The grammatical error is "a god"

Even if I removed "THE" from my illustration the fact still remains that MAN(GOD) is about NATURE which makes it accurate that "The woman(man) can be with man"

What I'm expecting from you is to proof me wrong "HOW THE WOMAN(man) can't be with man".

Truthseeker10:
Why did kjv and other translators not insert "the" if you claim it is there?

You don't have question.

Am I the translator of KJV and others translations?

Truthseeker10:
My Diagram have proved that you don't know what you are talking about concerning John 1:1.

Your diagram shows The Father, The Son & The HOLY Spirit are GOD(singular)

Your diagram leads to your question "How can the Word(God) be with God"

My illustration using the first man & woman shows "The woman who is also MAN can be with man"

So, it means your wrong understanding of "GOD" as used in that diagram leads to that your question.

Your explanation of "with God" in John 1:1 is not consistent.

It is and very clear!

You claim there is a "The" in the original Greek. But the kjv does not have it.

Yes! There's definite article "THE" in the original Greek and KJV and even many translations didn't insert it.

The point is that, "The woman(man) can be with man"

What do you want to proof from your diagram?

MaxInDHouse:
Bugaa wọn!

Yes oooo buga in lying liar

Truthseeker10:
😂😂😂baba screenshot where you answered it.....after telling me to go and meet king James and other translators who did not add "The" in John 1:1? Lie small small na..😂

You claimed kjv did not add "The" because it might be due to grammatical accuracy that you've not been able to prove till now.

Following your logic, there is a possible grammar error in your analogy below in the screenshot for adding "The man" in the sentence you claim to be grammatical correct.

So, what do you want to proof from your diagram?

achorladey:
Revelation 19: 13 and he is clothed with an outer garment stained with blood, and he is called by the name The Word of God.

A personal title. “The Word” also appears in the Bible as a title for Jesus Christ, both as a spirit in heaven and as a human on earth.

A personal title or name?

Jehovah's Witnesses go about shouting Jehovah all over the place as God's name yet in the case of Jesus being called the Word it is a title

To tell you how demonic and obsessed they are about Jesus.

Even their perverted NWT use "NAME" yet change it to TITLE.

Just that lying liar claimed Jesus only became the Word of God after his mission on earth.

When the scripture says "...and The Words became flesh" not only that his own organization also said Jesus served as the Word of God before coming to Earth.

Just lie lie people confusing themselves up and down.

MaxInDHouse:
POLITENESS or keep on ranting!

Shameless lying liar!

You must beg for that politeness.

The screenshot below is directly from your own organization which is a direct message from your own gods in Warwick.

Things to know!

1. The Title which asked: "What did Jesus do before he came to the Earth?"

2. The last part which says: "He served as the Word.

Now that your own organization claimed Jesus has been the WORD of God before coming to Earth.

Why did you lie that Jesus only became the Word of God after his mission on earth?

Let's see the person his blood is getting hot right now

Truthseeker10:
If there was "The" in the original Greek, why is "The" reflective in your analogy but not reflective in English in the kjv since the kjv does not use "a god" which your analogy has claim to be the only error?

I've answered this several times, you already lost in your own POV.

You don't have a point anymore.

So, what do you want to proof from your diagram?

MaxInDHouse:
POLITENESS or nothing for you!

Shameless lying liar.

Below is a direct message from your own gods in Warwick.

Things to know!

1. The Title which asked: "What did Jesus do before he came to the Earth?"

2. The last part which says: "He served as the Word.

Now that your own organization claimed Jesus has been the WORD of God before coming to Earth.

Why did you lie that Jesus only became the Word of God after his mission on earth?

Let's see the person his blood is getting hot right now

Truthseeker10:
😂😂😂Oga you claim there might be a grammatical error if "The God" is added to the king James version.

Yes! What is your point?

The error your analogy brought out was "a man" in which "a god" is not present in the king James version.

Good, so why are you displaying your ignorance by asking me; "WHICH grammatical error will it added to the KJV by adding the THE GOD"?

Like I said, it's evident I've already answered your question but because you're too daft and already lost in your own POV, you begin to sink in your own confusion.

Kindly tell me the possible grammatical error that might happen If "The God" is added to John 1:1 since "a god" was not used in the kjv... just like you added "The man" in your analogy of John 1:1.

Your question already answered but your confused mind won't see it.

Fact, there was "THE" in the original Greek of John 1:1, you haven't counter this point.

By the way, what do you want to proof from your diagram?

MaxInDHouse:
His blood is always hot anytime he sees a JW it's as if we must not talk at all but i will never take that from anyone, i only attend to them at my leisure whenever i have a serious person to chat with i will quickly ignore them!

Yes oooo because every lies must be dismantled.

Below is a direct message from your own gods in Warwick.

Things to know!

1. The Title which asked: "What did Jesus do before he came to the Earth?"

2. The last part which says: "He served as the Word.

Now that your own organization claimed Jesus has been the WORD of God before coming to Earth.

Why did you lie that Jesus only became the Word of God after his mission on earth?

Let's see the person his blood is getting hot right now

Truthseeker10:
😂😂😂see this man.....after you've told me that you've provided me the reason why "The God" is not in the king James version but "The man" is in your analogy. Baba not until you tell me the possible grammatical error that can come from adding "The God" in the kjv of John 1:1, your explanation to my initial question is null and void.

That is why I said you're too dull.

The screenshot you provided earlier showed boldly my response with "THE GRAMMATICAL ERROR."

If you are so sure provide the same screenshot here.

You already lost in your own delusions just rest.

That is the best for you.

MaxInDHouse:
Which name has he been calling me?

You started it!

You called him MAD BOY.

Now trying to be forming saint

Hypocrite!

MaxInDHouse:
Who is begging for the other person's response?

Provide the person begging for response.

A wan follow you yarn before?

Yes! It was after your lies that you started looking for escape route

The Bible: "And the WORD became flesh"

Which means the person is already exists with that name THE WORD.

Watchtower article also said "The word was agent during the creation citing Gen 1"

Why did you lie that Jesus only became the Word of God after his mission?

That your tears must flow heavily tonight.

MaxInDHouse:
I don't!

Lying liar.

So which name you called Johnw47 in that screenshot?

MaxInDHouse:
Ask POLITELY or keep your opinion to yourself!

Until you beg for that politeness.

Not my opinion but the scripture and Watchtower statement.

Jesus served as God's SPOKEMAN from beginning. Watchtower

Lying liar

MaxInDHouse:
What do you call (johnw47) who always call me names when he is not open for any discussion?
A Christian or pagan?

A Christian!

Do you not also call people names?