₦airaland Forum

MaxInDHouse:
I'm sure you are not a good person

This is the issue when all you do is seeking the praises of men.

You claimed his is not a good person but was taking the glory for his comments about you and that of @achorladey.

You want people to take you serious now and see CJStarz as EVIL person but you forgot I warned you then.

Anyways, this keeps pointing to one fact that all your claims on this forum are just pure delusion.

This thread is on POLITICS section and @CJStarz never even mentioned you. What are you doing in POLITICS SECTION to have found his comment which has nothing to do with previous posts about you and him?

Why such vexations on a thread that has no connection with you nor any previous posts?

You need to give Internet a space, this is not your Hall where you can use manipulations or (elder) to fool people.

Gabrielshow24:
Is that a sign of concession? 🤔 Aemmyjah must be somewhat different from the rest. I’ve never seen Max agree before! He always changes his argumentative colors like a chameleon! 🤕From one slippery slope to another 🤔, he ultimately arrives at the inerrant conclusion that he is performing the Lord's work! His decision tree leading to this conclusion would leave most AIs frozen, as such a dastardly act defies any logical reconciliation. 😔

They do have a lot of disagreement amongst themselves it's just that lying liar Max that do portrait JWs as having one line of thought.

See evidence below

Or maybe he has not really gone deep into watchtower brainwashing.

Aemmyjah:
What is your church name
Cos I know this description is not in Deeper Life

Here come Mr intelligent

But you didn't ask about my church name when you quoted my post first.

It's time to display your Bible knowledge you ran to "what is your church name?"

If my church description isn't showing deeper life, does that mean you and all your deluded brother has been lying for saying I'm so and so person including someone who is well know to be JWs(Ex)?

No matter how long lie may run truth will always catch up.

achorladey:
I need to quote this post again to expose the werey peddling brains of Janosky aka JaNosense



Let's substitute so you see how manipulations and lies work in the realm of Jehovah's Witnesses when they have a cooked doctrine already and have to show horn it into the Bible as truth

But the prince*+ of the royal realm of Persia+ was standing in opposition+ to me for twenty-one days, and, look! Miʹcha·el,*+ one (head, senior and first) of the foremost* princes,+ came to help me; and I, for my part, remained* there beside the kings of Persia.

This is the werey peddling brains of Janosky telling us based on context

When you realized that Jehovah is even the Prince of Princes

Aemmyjah:
Maybe I don't know or I'm wrong about the emblems and you know better

You don't have the mind of your own about the emblem reason why you might not be partaking about the emblem despite claiming to be a follower of Christ, but had it been you read scripture without Watchtower brainwashed, you could have seen that eating the emblem has no discrimination as stated by Jesus and without partaking in the emblem you have no LIFE IN YOU AND YOU'RE NOT IN UNION WITH JESUS. John 6:53-56

Kindly demonstrate how you and your church are doing it
So I can learn better

Everyone who believed that he/she is a follower of Christ partakes in the emblem without separation in our church.

Which is in line with the scripture.

Does everyone who claimed to be follower of Christ partake in the emblem in your hall?

Aemmyjah:
Who said John 6: 54 to 56 is about the emblem

I said so and you disagree by asking me if it's about the emblem.

Do you agree that John 6:53-56 about the emblem?

You're suffering from dementia old man 😭

Says the person who can't remember how the discussion started.

Let me remind you. I quoted the OP by siting John 6 of which you quoted my post in disagreement and asked "Is John 6 (that I referenced) about the emblem?

Why did you ask that question?

Let's agree it's about the emblem

Which means you don't agree before.

So, what does John 6:53-56 all about?

Are you partaking of it?
When last?
Is your church observing it?

This shouldn't be your next question(s)

Your next question(s) should have been:
1. Does John 6 separate people into groups; as one group partakes and the other group are onlookers?

2. Does John 6 actually reflect the fact that ALL BELIEVERS are to be a partaker of the emblem?

Na JWs be your problem
Oldie 😂

Emotional crying and wailing

Aemmyjah:
Only among Jehovah's Witnesses do you see people mention and use God's name
Only among them do they express strong hope in the resurrection and a paradise earth
Only among them do they observe the Memorial on the same night it was instituted yearly
Only them preach in the same pattern of the 1st century Christians


Emusan will keep on asking stupid questions for his old age tagging us as if we are not doing the right thing where as he's in the dark and can't even mention his own church

If my form of worship is a problem to you
Meet ur wife to console you (if you have any)

This type of wailing and pain is second to none.

I didn't quote you on this thread, you're the person who quoted me first of which I told you by the time I started with you either you chicken out or find excuse to run away.

You quoted me by saying is John 6:53-56 about Emblem?

Which I answered boldly, Yes!


Till now, you haven't provided just a single point to counter my position of how John 6 I quoted wasn't about Emblem but ranting up and down deflecting from the main point.

Yet want to be claiming he is intelligent

What is so difficult for a self acclaimed most well vast in the Bible to provide more insight about John 6 and how it wasn't about Emblem?

Or you have searched through your publications and Google and you didn't see any material to do copy and paste

Aemmyjah:
A monkey that want to remove a driver from his car
Yet, he can't drive or move the car
That's what you are
Keep wailing and gnashing teeth

Ordinary simple Bible discussion is what is causing this severe pains

You started what you can't finish.

Low IQ is so bad.

MaxInDHouse:
I was talking to my brother not you!

Lie lie....

But it's about me

achorladey:
Na to run remain or start looking for back up from their Trinitarian mentors according to Janosky aka JaNosense

That publication needs to be protected by all means before they use new light to erase it.

MaxInDHouse:
My business is with the OP who mentioned me not you!

If you don't have business with me, so why did you talk about me?

MaxInDHouse:
What is the religion of the OP?

Am I the OP?

achorladey:
Where is Truthseeker10? He was the one that started using Daniel 8 :25.

That one will just find a way to change the gear and continue to repeat himself on his own question

MaxInDHouse:
So if i warned my brother not to answer you how come you now expect me to answer you?

You didn't warn but lied against me.

So if your point is true.

Address my post, which is:

Your own is to proof how this and emblem that some JWs eat are different.

I just confirmed my post that I didn't even ask you question but made the above statement.

You can see playing the victim card I talked about before

achorladey:
Jehovah is an Archangel paapaa going by what they put there

Abi are they not the ones always saying Arch means chief?

And it was clearly stated that "Micheal is ONE OF THE FOREMOST..."

That screenshot has opened a lot of carn worm

MaxInDHouse:
Because you asked me a question!

I asked because you talk about me.

So what is your next excuse?

achorladey:
Agree ke?

You know how he used to manipulate his own organization teaching.

That's why I asked

MaxInDHouse:
Default mode!

Continue on the default mode then.

When you wake up.

Don't forget the my question.

Do you agree with your organization that ONLY Jehovah God is the Prince of Princes?

MaxInDHouse:
He is the one who mentioned me here i have no business with you!

Why asking me about his/her religion then?

MaxInDHouse:
Default mode!

Because you're short of lies

Do you agree with your organization that ONLY Jehovah God is the Prince of Princes?

MaxInDHouse:
What is the religion of the OP?

Ask him/her

Why asking me?

MaxInDHouse:
empty

Default mode activated

Christ isn't the Angel of the Lord.

Do you agree with your organization that ONLY Jehovah God is the Prince of Princes?

MaxInDHouse:
You are just wasting your precious time he will continue arguing whether what he is saying makes sense or not all he is bent on doing is to attack all JWs.

Always playing the victim card

My point here is centered on John 6:53-56 which proves that emblem has no separation but what all believers need to partake and without eating the flesh of Jesus and drink His blood you have no life in you and you're not in union with Jesus.

Direct from perverted NWT:-
"So Jesus said to them: “Most truly I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in yourselves. Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood has everlasting life, and I will resurrect+ him on the last day; for my flesh is true food and my blood is true drink. Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood remains in union with me, and I in union with him."

Your own is to proof how this and emblem that some JWs eat are different.

MaxInDHouse:
empty

Christ isn't the Angel of the Lord. I've answered this already.

Do you agree with your organization that Jehovah God is THE ONLY PRINCE OF PRINCES?

MaxInDHouse:
@ page 50 Churchians are still bitterly angry with the OP as if their grievances answered the question:

Your organization says the Title Prince ONLY applied to Jehovah. Do you agree?

achorladey:
This is for Gabrielshow24 consumption


Daniel 8:25​—Who is “the Prince of princes”? The Hebrew word sar, translated “prince,” basically means “chief,” or “head one.” The title “Prince of princes” applies only to Jehovah God​—the Chief of all angelic princes, including “Michael, one of the foremost princes.”​—Daniel 10:13.


Loooool!

Truthseeker10 come and keep peddling your irrelevant questions to foster your redundancy. MaxInDHouse the madness and insanities peddling brains alongside Janosky the werey peddling brains be the guest of Michael547

Cc: Emusan

Jehovah too na Prince. This will get more interesting now. From here Jehovah's witnesses doctrine of only one ARCHANGEL is a lie too. Jehovah is the chief and heads a many archangels. Even Jehovah na Archangel paapaa

The Title Prince applied "ONLY" to Jehovah God

So their Jehovah is also an Angel

Aemmyjah:
Tell me how your church eats it
So I'll come and eat also


Agbaya 😂

So it's how my church eats it that you want to know not how Jesus statement in John 6 is different from Emblem.

Continue...

achorladey:
The same Jehovah's witnesses that belief Christians have two hopes when the Bible say Christians have one hope of their calling

They have successfully divided Christians into two first class and second class Christians. Some are anointed and some are non anointed Christians.

They will just pick a term that don't exist in the scriptures and attach it to people as doctrine of the Bible

This is a clear sign that Watchtower is actually raising some people above others

Janosky:
Empty headed Emusan dunce,

Genesis 1:1 "in the beginning God created heaven and earth (the Universe)", NOT his Son the Word.

But The Word was there at the creation.

Isn't it?

Hebrew 1:2 "God created the Universe NOT his Son.

So, Jesus did not do anything at creation bah

Carry your folly komot from Nairaland.

Genesis 1:1 & Hebrew 1:2 versus Emusan delusion

Awon faithless miscreant throwing tantrums & deceiving himself.

When the head is empty, you can't expect meaningful things from it.

The point is Jesus has been The Word long before creation.

True or false?

Aemmyjah:
Ok
I never said so too
Anyone can benefit for Jesus sacrificial death and have his sins forgiven and everlasting life

That's not the point.

The point is, Jesus said "WHOSOEVER" Which means eating Jesus flesh and drinking Jesus blood has no separation into groups.

The statement is clear, if you don't eat it and drink you have no part with Jesus.
True or false?

Stop thinking like a baby

A baby can't be reason with you from the scripture.

Do you think as an adult?

Aemmyjah:
So the Samaritans also ate the emblems when Jesus visited them
You're like a monkey that want to remove a driver from th car
Oya, come drive na
They can't even move it

Another ranting for no reason.

Jesus Christ body and blood is the flesh and wine

Good!

So what does Jesus mean here?

"Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood has everlasting life, and I will resurrect him on the last day; for my flesh is true food and my blood is true drink.“ - NWT

We literally 'eat and drink ' it by exercising faith in it's
The eating of the emblems is part of a covenant between Jesus and the little flock

Kindly provide the scripture to support your statement @color part.

Those ones have the hope of ruling with Jesus as kings and Queens over the earth

Jesus statement about His Body and Blood never separate people into group.

You are yet to proof how Jesus statement in John 6 is not about Emblem.

Don't forget that part

Aemmyjah:
Was Jesus statement literal or figurative?

Was Jesus statement about Emblem literal or figurative?