₦airaland Forum

MaxInDHouse:
Lie that you've not read this before:

Mr President

But not in Toronto Canada!

MaxInDHouse:
He speaks for God in heaven among the angels

So Jesus didn't speak for God on Earth before his Earthly mission, right?

but it's after he completed his earthly mission and successfully achieved what no prophet has ever achieved before:

No man has seen God at any time; the only-begotten god who is at the Father’s side is the one who has explained Him. John 1:18

The above qualifies Jesus to bear that title the word of God both in heaven and on earth!

Just answer the simple question above first!

Truthseeker10:
😂😂😂....."The" doesn't change the meaning.

Yes! Which I've demonstrated here.

But it might be absent in the kjv due to grammatical accuracy.

Which is just MY OWN OPINION when you asked me why was it absent in KJV.

You see that you have no ground to stand upon.

Grammarian Emusan. What is the possible grammatical error if "The" is added?

I've answered times without number.

MaxInDHouse:
E go pain you tire because Jesus wasn't God's word until he speaks for God and the title was confered on him after his earthly mission.

So Jesus started speaking for God after his Earthly mission, right?

MaxInDHouse:
In Toronto Canada was Mr President.

Was Tinubu president back then?

Olódò...

How can you said in Toronto Canada was Mr President?

Kai...see ignoramus.

Is Mr President a name?

Does Toronto Canada have any file of any Mr President?

Can Mr President be attached to any Tinubu documents from Toronto Canada?

This delusion is out of this world.

Meanwhile, The Word of God isn't a TITLE the scripture says IT'S A NAME

Truthseeker10:
😂😂Oga Emusan, your explanation might have possible grammatical error if "the" is added according to you. Does that not show that you are not even sure of the grammatical accuracy of your explanation?

I've said this times without number but your dull head doesn't want to assimilate it.

Whether there's the definite article "THE" or not it doesn't change the meaning.

You have been hidden under KJV which has NOTHING to do with this discussion in the first place.

It's evident that you're just confusing and chasing shadows.

Truthseeker10:
😂😂😂 How can I learn from a statement that Might have possible grammatical error if "the" is added? Na wa oo. Grammarian Emusan.

Stale as usual.

Look at the @color part again to rewind your empty skull.

Gabrielshow24:
Obviously because the scriptures were written after Jesus' earthly ministry🤨.

Irrespective, the very same scriptures confirm Jesus as the word of God!!!
Genesis comes to mind! 🤨

Stop with this your JW propaganda!
It won't help you. 🤧

You didn't see the lie he pull up there.

He claimed "The Word of God" is a TITLE given to Jesus after his Earthly mission.

Meanwhile, Bible never says The Word of God is a TITLE but "NAME"

Jesus is The Word and The Word has been before Creation.

He wants to use lie to cover up his initial lie that "Jesus ONLY became the Word of God after his Earthly mission"

Truthseeker10:
😂😂are you saying that "The" is absent from the kjv because you are not sure of the grammatical accuracy if "the" is added?

Stale...

At least you've learnt something.

It's evident, the Word(God) can be with God!

MaxInDHouse:
It's OK, thanks for your time!

It's not your time and I don't need your thanks

MaxInDHouse:
Hiding it from intelligent or unintelligent people?
So you guys need to be told who is behind the moniker despite his attitude!

No!

we respond to any falsehoods even if it's done with 100 different monikers.

MaxInDHouse:
Yet i helped you to recognize the person you're chatting with through his attitude.

You just want to exchange insults jọọ!

Then who told you I want his identity to be revealed?

Is it your insult?

Truthseeker10:
😂😂😂 so you were not confident when you said that "The" might have been absent from the kjv due to grammatical accuracy?

Still priding in his ignorance.

How can "CONFIDENT" and "MIGHT" go hands in hands?

Might means NOT SURE!

Like I said before, you're already lost in your own POV and reason why you're just beating around the bush and exposing your ignorance.

achorladey:
I nearly talk this oooo with his style of asking unending questions and failing to respond to yours

Now I see why he doesn't didn't bother to respond to my post knowing the person who I am on nairaland. A scared student who is afraid to fail and not ready to learn when corrected.

The dull max didn't know the guy wanted to hide his identity but ignorantly revealed it

MaxInDHouse:
This means you guys just attack anyone whose thinking goes in line with JWs it's easy to know people by attitude nah!

You're too dull.

He quoted me first on this thread, of which I answered all his questions but only to start showing his trait

I guess he knew his folly has been known through that old moniker, reason for creating a new moniker in January thinking his identity will be hidden until you pour sand sand in his Garri because of your dullness

Sand2022:
If you're not of the 144000, you're not part of the Christian congregation of God according to Scripture, you're not part of the body of Christ, Jesus is not your mediator, you've not been justified, and you've not been declared righteous as a Son of God. The benefit of Jesus ransom sacrifice has not been applied to you, you're still dead in your sins and trespasses. In fact, what is written in the Christian Greek scriptures for the congregation is not with you in mind.

Seriously, this implies that you're not even a Christian. You are still in the world needing someone to preach to you.

This might sound extreme, but that's what the Jehovah's witnesses leadership means. Their applying some scriptures to their other sheep (those to inherit the earth) is by EXTENSION. It was not the primary purpose of those scriptures.

They are creating two classes, while in reality there is ONE body, the body of Christ.

Tags: achorladey, Jozzy4, MaxInDHous, MightySparrow, NowYouKnow, TemmyT002, johnw47, Boomark, Emusan, Dtruthspeaker, Notatribalist, Truthseeker10

The fact that you can't take part in the emblem as JWs is a proof that they don't belong to Christ according to Jesus own statement.

LordReed:
It is. Read again the definition of evolution you were given.

It is not. The fact that there are giant on earth is a proof.

So what if they had tales of giants? Where is the physical evidence?

You that can't provide a single proof of Evolution transition is talking about tale and PHYSICAL EVIDENCE

Yes there could be a gene develop that could make us grow wings but it won't happen tomorrow and the environment has to favour that change for it to propagate into the population.

Pure lie.

There's no gene that could make human have wings, if there's, human will have wings.

The kind of changes that are more likely are to the shape our skulls, bone density, limb length, lung capacity, thoracic size and so on. This is because we can see things already happening like our brains becoming bigger, changes in nutrient availability, changes in air quality and so on. Its not magic. Nobody is telling you humans will become flying monkeys tomorrow.

Just another lie, do ape brains also getting bigger?

The pattern in human has remained the same, if human will be 100 millions years, human will continue to give birth to human and nothing like transition to another thing will ever occur.

No single person would have seen it happen all at once but if they had been keeping records of the changes they would see something like the attached picture.

And you believe it.
Attached picture by just your imagination not what not anyone can observed.

The common ancestor of humans, apes and monkeys was a mammal that already had four limbs, 2 eyes, 1 nose, 1 mouth, 2 ears, a tail and other anatomical features you can see on any mammal.

Does the ancestor of the common ancestor of your ancestors started with 2 eyes, four limbs, 1 nose, have brain or no brain?

If there were people to observe and record the changes they would have see the tail get shorter and shorter till it is no longer visible.

Speaking so confidently as if he saw them with tails

The spine will change curvature as bipedal motions becomes more and more used rather than going on all fours. Skull shape will be changing because the brain is getting bigger and diet is changing. Fingers, thumbs and toes change shape because of more terrestrial dwelling than arboreal. And so on and so forth. These changes will be observed over several million years not at once like a magic show.

When you don't even know how anything was like in just 500 thousand years ago.

How does evolution happened within Tree to living beings?

Which first came up?

What transition do you think we should have observed by now?

Like human begin to born a baby with a finger like wing or rock or instead of hair on the head we should be seen grasses which will show human are evolving at least human have being on earth for over 300,000 years.

But as long as human will give birth to another human, it shows that's how the Creator designed them to be.

MaxInDHouse:
Mike, you like trouble o!

I've been suspecting that account and you just exposed and confirmed it now.

So he was the same person as Michael547

He's using the other account while ghosting with this one for now

achorladey:
This is why I like nairaland and why people need to pay attention to how they read, listen to others

Tell am make e tell you one English school of choice pay money for his lessons

I'm telling you!

They just open mouth wah and be claiming to be intelligent

LordReed:
It is proof of evolution.

Not a proof.

For instance, many ancient tribes have giants in their storyline.

The problem is you folk think evolution is a magic show where a person will suddenly sprout wings. We have hammered it over and over again it is the gene characteristics of the population of a species that changes and accumulates over successive generations.

Of course everyone knows that's what evolutionists mean but what right thinking people are saying is that, for such to happen, there must be a change to human gene like what will make human to develop wings or something else which was never be part of our gene.

You will never see a monkey give birth to a human and no one who understands evolution will ever tell you that that is what happens.

If one to be around during the evolution of fish, what will the people see?

Our common ancestor continued to change and speciate to give rise to the branches of the clade that includes humans, apes, monkeys, etc. There is no magical leap from monkey to human or anything of the sort.

Where you're missing it is, between the transition, what will people observed?

For instance, your ancestors who continue to change, they are not human and whatever they are at that time started from something. Do they start with having two legs, one eye or even no nose at a time or just one leg, two ears e.t.c

If evolution is true, transition from those things that evolved million years before human would have been taken place by now and be observed.

That's is my point.

LordReed:
Ok I understand.

Yes trees evolved before humans so yeah some species will emerge before others even though all living things are evolving.

Good!

Why those things that evolved millions years(as the lies evolutionists always tell) before human evolved aren't observed to have evolved to another thing?

jaephoenix:
Lol. Evolution is still in action.
Humans in some parts of Europe are getting taller. Bacteria are adapting to overcome antibiotics etc.

Growth has been part of living things, it's not a proof for evolution.

The same part of Europe that are getting taller can be grown smaller in few years time.

Have you recorded transition of one animal to another thing as you claim about living things evolution on earth?

LordReed:
Yes all living things evolve. I don't know what you mean by "at the same time" but they are all evolving, some more rapidly than others.

What I meant by "at the same time" is if human and tree evolution started at the same time.

If it's not. For instance; it means, either trees evolved first then human or human evolved first before trees.

Do you understand?

jaephoenix:
Yes every living thing evolves.
No we don't evolve at the same time.

Any other questions

Good!

So, why we don't see evolution in action now?

jaephoenix:
So you why can't you believe evolution without a video or audio?

because The proponent of the theory of evolution didn't attach it to supernatural but NATURAL PROCESSES.

Do you believe evolution is a supernatural process?

jaephoenix:
So you believe all the supernatural claims there, despite there being any videos, audios or any observable evidence?

I even thought you have meaningful thing to contribute.

Yes! I believe the SUPERNATURAL claims there.

You don't need VIDEO or AUDIO in BELIEVE.

Abi Bible claim to be a scientific journal or book?

LordReed:
Evolution is the change in the heritable characteristics of biological populations over successive generations. It occurs when evolutionary processes such as natural selection and genetic drift act on genetic variation, resulting in certain characteristics becoming more or less common within a population over successive generations. The more these changes occur and accumulate the more diversity you get.

Good!

Do all living things on earth go through the process of evolution?

Do all living things evolve at the same time?

jaephoenix:
Do you believe in the bible stories? Yes or no? I don't need rigmaroles

Yes!

jaephoenix:
Have you heard of speciation?

Just provide a single video evidence that show evolution from one stage to another.

LordReed:
That is not how evolution works, you've been told this over and over again.

How does evolution work?

LordReed:
Theory of Evolution.

So you can't provide just a single evidence where one animal has evolved to another.

Truthseeker10:
😂😂😂Ahh.....baba you don't know why "the" was absent in the kjv but you asserted that it might be due to grammatical accuracy. Please explain what you asserted?

You want to play smart meanwhile you're dull more than anything else.

The purple-colors show you want to play with a choice word meanwhile it's just evident that you're daft. I can't "assert" on something I used "MIGHT BE" for as seen with color-red.

Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
noun
a confident and forceful statement of fact or belief.
"his assertion that his father had deserted the family"

It's evident you don't have any meaningful thing to say after your questions have been answered.