₦airaland Forum

OasisX:


......but Obidients that are washing their Linens in public ain't card carrying Members of LP nah.

Okay. Including all those ones, too.

But wait. Outside of FS Yusuf being a turncoat, which other Obidient has been indicted in vote-selling?

I only saw some tweets from Obidients calling him out yesterday. Been on rap twitter ever since.

OasisX:


.......Democracy in Danger.

It's Peter Obi's presence and cast that makes it want to seem like LP is fairly better than the other parties, but all them, big and small, at their core are all the same.


LP members too would have dome worse if had the political weight the big 2 commands.

rib bit:
Apc should wade in now to settle things before they scatter their vote oil well. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

This is cap. Utter crap.


Lmaooooo, see these ediots who are trying to leverage on the mess to whitewash themselves? Which one-year "LP corruption" has surpassed the 20+ years of PDAPC?


Oro rirun.

OasisX:


.....una don dey call am to off mic. Make he no gree o.

Him matter don reach here. 🤣🤣

Toluwanise 247:
Hmmm person wey dey hear self never hear you talk less person wey no dey hear at all… woman wey you dey correct ten times still dey claim say she no hear you…waiting person wey no dey hear go talk?

See why I *love* misogyny?

I just didn't want to give my usual opinion on this topic initially because ehn...


Ati blind, ati deaf, ati dumb, ati cripple, all of us same thing same thing.

Pandering to men, and as a person living with disability leaves some unpleasant taste in my mouth. Look at all the dudes above "celebrating", that a woman who cannot speak or hear is the perfect submissive material. Now look at this contrary, albeit no less prejudicial opinion, that a deaf woman would be the hardest to date because she cannot hear.

They do not collectively give a shit about women, whether in their support or defense. They are all just looking to be with any woman as an expression of their masculinity.

Rubbish and ingredients.

Proserpina:


You let tears flow today . I wonder how they didn't get you were being sarcastic .

Lol obviously not

They should not get it o.


Me, I will not stop dishing a taste of their absurd medicine to them. 🤣

Proserpina:


You are satisfyingly wicked

It's nourishment for my soul after all.

Can I help it?

I swear I hate y'all.


Why are you people just cursed with turning words into insults and slurs? Why?

From woke to baddie to slay queen and now Gen Z. How tf are you guys using it as an insult? How?

Young people can just never have anything.

Lee Smart:
Berating her fellow colleagues is a no no for me😆😆.. If you check very well 5 naira no dey for her account, living the lifestyle of a popular female nairalander

Coming from a supposedly married man.

"Girls don't believe they are broke, too" do men believe they are used after sex?

I love the lady and her ruthlessness.

That is divine femininity in practice right there, and I wish more women like her would rediscover the true purpose of their feminine essence and being: spread their seeds and dominate men, just as Mother Eve intended.


The redpill is responsible today for so many unwoke ills ravaging our society, and most especially for the fact that it has bred a culture of entitlement to faithfulness in men.

This was literally unheard of less than 200 years ago. Women have never owed men loyalty in the past and will never owe them; it is not in our DNA to be faithful. Any woman who goes on and on about faithfulness, and propagating it, check well. She's a misandrist influenced by an utopian, patriarchal world that has had her brain rewired into thinking men desire faithfulness (the most*) in a relationship. Even nature doesn't support the female's faithfulness.


I will just advise men to go back to the drawing boards of their forefathers and restrategize. I know this can be hard for them, with them being the testerical gender (they hate hearing the truth), but they should internalize the fact that women are incapable of emotions in any form and so adjust their expectations accordingly. So long as a woman can give you a baby, a ring, and a roof, that is all you need to attain your fulfilment of masculine needs. Men's hard, larger bodies are literally made for nurturing, so y'all should get that nonsense ideas of romantic love and exclusivity out of your heads.

To find a cheating woman is to find the best woman.

Do not let me spill all these time-held, and -tested secrets to masculine liberation. I will be sharing it to you all in small doses, so you can follow me to keep up if you like. It's what I am here to do. Women are natural born cheaters, and the earlier you know and understand this as a man, the better and happier for you...


#Eunoiaa'sPotions

folake4u:
Hadn't been I know you now, I shoot you with my gun. 😂😂😂

Ahhhhh. You've carried your own and go far o. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣


You know what? I've never gotten what's funny about that phrase/video clip, but reading it from you now, I get it. I get it. I'm in stitches!

Olayinka8793:
no I am not a part of any deaf or special-needs people's community.
This is because, I live like a normal person and doesn't understand or use sign language. I communicate strictly by lip reading.

Oh. That's interesting. Can you like lip read from afar, a little bit? I stumbled upon some TikTok accounts of deaf people who lip read celebrities while they are being captured on the red carpet/at a dinner event, and I found it so cool.

I felt like a sleuth that I could FINALLY tell what those godd*mn celebrities were always whispering to each other every now and then at award shows and all.

Olayinka8793:
Any link on how I can meet these special needs women?
I am deaf myself but not dumb and I will like to have a relationship with like-minded woman.

Are you not a part of a community or something?

folake4u:
Eun oiaa

I see what you did there. Nor be only rom-com. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Abi I'm lying? 😂😂😂


You two are so entertaining.

Mr Brown Jay1:
. . .

Where has this account been? 🤣🤣🤣

I've totally missed their form of "antagonism."

I know 99% of people who will comment on this thread will all be "private, introverted, lone wolf" individuals who never gush about themselves, LMAOOOO.


Even the chatterboxes and babbling brooks.

"Which area should a woman" why are you coming at it from a gender angle? Are you not adults? Will you not be married? Can you not sit down as grown ups and DISCUSS how you want your home to be run, and share up responsibilities between you two based on each person's strengths/weaknesses?


Where one person doesn't seem to do well in, you step in and mitigate any adverse effects that may come out and vice versa. Where another excel in, you let them take charge while carrying the other along. Simple and as uncomplicated. Strength- and individual-based partnership, not gender.

immortalcrown:
Women are to button shirts for men.

How utterly, quite vacuous this comment is, lmao.

Interesting.


Apparently, there's a number of probable reasons for that. One is because women, typically upper class, used to be dressed by maidervants in the past (I assume the lower class women could not afford fancy shirts and had to wear simple gowns?), and because the majority of people are right-handed, it was easier for the servants to button up from the left.

Another theory is also because women typically hold their babies on the left arm, so it's easier for them to unbutton from the left and access their breasts? And yet another theory is because of horseriding. When women (still in the past) rode horses, they sat sideways, do buttons on the left side prevents the flow of breeze from entering their chest. While for men on the other hand, it was probably because they used to keep their guns/swords/weapons on the left side, and reach for it easily with their right (dominant) hand, say during a war or dueling. Having the button holes on the right might impede the drawing out of a sword.

Another possible reason I found quite funny was due to Napoleon's (the French nationalist) "insecurities."

He used to pose by putting his hand in-between the spaces in his buttons and women used to copy him in mockery. So he ordered that the position of buttons on women's clothing be changed. And finally, another reason might be due to simply gender 'categories.' Pink and dresses for girls; blue and trousers for boys, etc. The difference in button placement might just be another way to allude to difference between men and women, especially when it became popular for women to wear clothes traditionally considered masculine. Or maybe it was just another way to assert the "inferiority" of women. They had to *need* help with buttoning up their clothes, unlike a man who is "self-sufficient" (reminds me of something related to the making of cars, too, being more male-suited. You know, things to structurally and externally handicap women, nothing at all to do with an innate weakness).

It's really interesting how much of Western culture and norms, aided by the Industrial Revolution, has come to defined much of everyday, fashion-wear world over. Just like how pockets on some jeans have a tiny, inner pockets, and how some women jeans' pockets are sewed tight. Possibly "forcing" us into patronising handbag makers to carry our little belongings.

This is literally how the past affects the present, and the present now will influence the future; for some people who do not see any value in courses like history, archeology and other social sciences - sartorial decisions from decades ago are literally still impressing upon our lives.