₦airaland Forum

Akir2025:
Does the Lawyer has Right to Demands for Account balance from the Clients Account By forging an Email in the Clients Name without the Consent of the Account owner ..Even when the Account owner requested for the Email Password he says No

This is hacking and contravenes current cyber terrorism laws.

Also false representation and abuse of attorney privelages.

Now this warrants a criminal petition to the relevant authorities.

Petition the Police and EFCC over this conduct and breach of attorney - client privelages.

Imalwayshorny:
Are you a lawyer

No.

But I have enough experience from dealing with senseless people here in Nigeria through the legal system to get an apprenticed hard knock experience on legal issues.

DaGC:
Bro, let the almighty strike 2 good options I jut suggested, and NATO wouldn't be involved. Let's see how that will go.

I'm not someone propaganda works for anyhow like you trying to change history about the Poles in 1939 forgetting that baba Hitler wanted space and started with Danzig to take Polish access to the sea; or even going as far as lying that Ukraine had the largest military after Russia in Europe, forgetting that before Russia's 'military operations' Ukraine was not even in the top 5. It was after been attacked that they started recruiting like anyone at war.

Please since you are the spokesperson, its been years already and Ukraine is still there. Or he should change his mind and maybe try Azebaijan, Kazakhstan or so many other countries since he wants to re-unite the USSR. Would have suggested Finland but they were not part of USSR and as of 2023 are a member of NATO.

Germany was balkanized by the treaty of Versailles which saw to the creation of Austria and ceding of historical and ancestral German land to Poland.

The Poles on the urgings of chews and the perfidious Albion began genociding Germans to get them to leave the newly acquired territory.

You expect the Austrian Painter to remain aloof to Germans being murdered by the baboonish Poles ?

This is exactly what Ukraine is doing to ethnic Russians to the east.

The Poles were buoyed into that fck around by the guarantee of British intervention if Hitler interrupted their ethnic cleansing on Germans on German soil .

Even Stalin berrated the Poles for their FAFO.

Akir2025:
. Thanks sooooo Much Ooo..Oh My Goodness ,I don't expect this . Honestly I'm Soooo Grateful.

I will be sending my legal fees directly to your email .

Imalwayshorny:
Sue the bank why will bank show lawyer his account balance without the account owner consent

The bank must have been informed through legal communication that the lawyer was representing their customer.

DaGC:
O

The way some of speak with confidence ehn, it would seem like all you say is fact. Almighty Russia spokesperson 🙌🏿

If we are to follow your 'opinion' that means Russia has an intention of taking over western Europe, hence your so called simulation to Berlin in 3 days; going by this submission, do you think the 30 European nations that joined NATO were wrong to do so and wouldn't go to all lengths to defend themselves against 'almighty Russia' that is always out to get them?

If truly Russia is 'Almighty' it could attack Hawaii or Puerto Rico right now and NATO wouldn't be involved (article 6 boundaries ish). It would be 1 on 1. China wouldn't even say some of the things you just said about NATO, and they are not all bark.

The simulation was carried out by NATO on a hypothetical Russian invasion.

Note that this was a NATO simulation and not Warsaw or Russian war simulation.

Deepthoughts:
Ok, please tell Putin to go ahead n launch the attacks against Poland,since NATO are toothless barking dogs ,good luck to Putin n Russia in advance.

Why should Putin attack Poland ?

Putin is only in Ukraine to protect the Russian speaking population to the east who exercised their constitutional right to leave Ukraine in a UN supervised referendum.

As per the Poles, they will cry again if they think they can take on the Russians.

JuanDeDios:
Russia wakes up and invades Ukraine. Ukrainians are stupid and looking for war.
Russia breaches Poland's air spaces. The Poles are stupid like Ukrainians, repeating 1939, and looking for war.

You guys really are a thing to behold. The fact that the FSB propaganda you FSB types spew all over social media actually works on Africans on social media needs to be studied specially.

It's really funny how you guys just regurgitate CNN propaganda


The Eastern Ukrainian regions conducted a referendum to leave Ukraine and join Russia following the US State House instigated Maiden revolution that saw to the ouster of a pro Russian President who preferred to maintain and deepen ties with Russia against joining the EU.

The Ukrainians then refused to abide by the decision of the Russian speaking populace and started genociding them using the kosher neo Nazi Azov terrorists.

Mother beer Russia then decided to intervene to protect her cubs.


Why do you guys leave out this critical fact about this war?

Russia also had no choice outside protecting her latest citizens but because of Ukraine wanting to join NATO and have nuclear missiles armed and pointed towards Moscow.


Then there's the case of NATO Bio weapon labs in Ukraine targeting not just Russian population but it's agriculture with bio weapons.

Also Zekensky had reached a deal to hand over the mineral rich and ferile soil to Bl ac k rock to begin farming GMO thereby turning the world's grannery to chewish control.

Your understanding of this war is greatly naive and one sided.

floss:
Assuming your candidate could attend the UNGA meeting here in the US, I would've been taking you seriously.... Just continue sniffing the same powder your president is sniffing for now .. I will know if macron and his gay husband will save your tulumbu

Has it crossed your mind that not only Tinubu as President has avoided UNGA since the wars in Gaza, Lebanon and Iran because they don't want to be directly lobbied by American and Israeli diplomats ?

DaGC:
NATO has never been weak. Let's get that out of the way first.

There was no NATO in 1939. Back then, they were expecting the world powers on the continent (Britain and France) to come to their aid then, and they did just 2 days later. Poland suffered during the war but their aid made the final rescue possible.

If a non NATO country attacks a NATO member nation, and the nation invokes article 5 of the treaty, then you shall know the strength of NATO. It has only been activated once.

As for the Russians, it was most likely a pilot error otherwise it would be more than 42 seconds to at least gather Intel or make an attack. But still, it could be testing the defence response time which I don't advocate for. There are too much wars already on the planet and it's the innocent that suffers.

Wrong.

NATO was created because of an existential threat to western Europe from the Soviet.

It was a defensive pact and remains so on its doctrine - Article 5 to be precise.

Note that every war simulation by NATO against an invading Soviet and later Russian military had Russian troops at Berlin in 3 days max and all of western Europe under Russian control in one week.

NATO is and always was not in anyway capable of confronting Russia and that's why at the core of NATO article 5 doctrine is the deployment of a first strike option on Russia if Russian forces invaded Europe.

Even trying to use the highly propagandized western reporting on Russian military special operations in Ukraine (it's not a war according to Russia), Russia is still a very potent and powerful adversary.

Russians have not mobilised and the war is being prosecuted with mainly paid volunteers and mercenaries.

The Ukrainians on the other hand entered this war with the most powerful and largest military (by numbers) in Europe (500k men) and also with the kosher neo nazi Azov which were numbered around 450-500k.

Ukraine has been getting full NATO military aid , volunteers , and full western diplomatic support but they can't reclaim the breakaway Russian speaking oblasts.


Even the most die hard neo con hawk will balk at your statement that NATO is in anyway capable of taken out Russia.

The reason this war is very dangerous is the high risk of Ukrainian chewish mafia launching attacks on nuclear plants in Russian controlled regions which will surely see to Russia leveling Ukraine with a Satan nuclear bomb

Deepthoughts:
How are the poles provoking Russia?,why are you reasoning like Fulani herdsmen that would claim too much farming is denying their cows of grass?

You have no clue on what led to this ongoing war in Ukraine and why it's not surprising that the b1txh slapped Poles whom the Germans (Prussian empire), Austrians(Hasburg empire) and Russians (Russian empire) have all took turns on.

The Pole carries the yoke of vendetta in Europe because of being colonised by their betters.

The modern state of Poland only came about due to the Jewish Bolsheviks seizing power in Russia


Those same Jewish Bolsheviks balkanized the Russian empire and created Ukraine as a semi autonomous oblast even though it had historically been Prussian (Russia and German clay).

The Poles even begged Washington to place tactical nukes and short and medium range missiles on their territory.

Who will senselessly agree to house US nuclear missiles targeting Russia if not the senseless Poles.

Note that Germans are also aghast at Poland for providing support for the terrorist attack on Nordstream 2 gas pipeline.

If anything, the Poles want to see a deindustrialized Germany and a weakened Russia.

And they think the paper tiger NATO can achieve this.

I laff.

omoredia:
Europe is divided. Islam has taken it over

Europe has never been united.

Two world wars were fought on European soil in the last century.

Europe's borders have never been constant in the past due to constant wars between European states and kingdoms.

If the French are not acting up under Napoleon, the Perfidious Albion ala Britain is always causing trouble on the continent.

Then there are the Poles with their senseless Chihuahua antics that can be described as pure suicidal.

Even Stalin blamed the Poles in provoking Hitler to invade Poland with their senseless anti German policy and state sanctioned pogroms against the vast German population who ended up in Poland following the treaty of Versailles.

For a country that was literally begging to go to war against Germany, Poland was the first to fall to the mighty German machine.

Now the same Poles have been provoking Russia for no reason other than to appear more western European despite the Pole being identical to Russians through shared Slavic ancestry and ethnicity.

I have never seen a more suicidal nation like Poland.

Hopefully, Putin breaks Poland and hands over the German speaking part back to Germany and turns the rest to a radioactive waste land for the next 1,000ys.

A country that is known for nothing but empty belligerency.

MrPresident1:
The USSR will be back

Putin wants USSR

USSR was a satanic chewish contraption.

Russia is not Soviet Union.

The Poles are repeating their madness in 1939 that provoked Germany invading Poland.

Back then Poland was of the assumption that the British, Americans , French and Soviets would come to their aid which never happened.

Since Warsaw wanted war it got more than it bargained for.

Now these same Poles are itching for a NATO war with Russia thinking NATO will swing in despite how weak NATO has become.

Well, the Poles are renowned for their very low iQ with only Ukrainians being adjudged more stupid than them

Akir2025:
A Lawyer was Engaged to Remove a Garnishee on an Account. % Was agreed on to be Given to the Lawyer Once he Successful with it.

The Lawyer Was Told to Provide some Funds so his Clients who has nothing on him for his Upkeeps till the Garnishie is Removed and He has Access to His Funds.

The Lawyer Could only Provide 1% or the Funds Requested for by the Client for his Upkeeps .

Since the Client Funds was Still on Garnishie he couldn't have Access to the Funds in his Account,No Funds at all .

So the Client and the Lawyer Agreed that Once Restrictions is Removed and Client has Access to His Funds ,Lawyer would gets Back the Funds he Provides and also have a Certain % of Clients Funds in his Account..

Lawyer Travelled to another State where the Case is ,Lodge in an Hotel ,Shouldered the Expenses as Agreed with the Client.

Lawyer later Discovered that Client was Ignorant that The Garnishee have been already Vacated on his Account by the Former Lawyer He used .

Lawyer Discovered that it was Vacated 3 Months Earlier before he Engaged Him .

He Got the CTC from the Court .On Arrival He told His Client that He has Vacated the Garnishie on his Account and told Client he is free to Contact His Bank to Withdraw Funds .

When Client Went through CTC he discovered the Garnishie have been Vacated 3 Months Earlier before he Engaged the new Lawyer ,His name didn't Appear among the Lawyers that Got the Judgements .

He was Confronted for lying and Making demands of work he didn't do ,He Later Abandoned Asking for % and Service Fee.

Lawyer Opened email on Clients Name to contact His Bank Demanding for his Account Balance without Account Owner Awareness.

Bank Responded with Available Balance while Main Balance which has been Moved to Sundry,Ledger wasn't Revealed .

Lawyer Felts He was Lied to that Clients has no Funds in His Account why did he Engaged him in the first Place to Remove Garnishee from an Account with Very Little Balance .

Lawyer Again Assumes Account Owner have Started accessing funds in Account which was Capital No.

THE REAL MATTER NOW IS THAT THE LAWYER REPORTED THE MATTER TO THE POLICE, POLICE SOUGHT FOR COURT ORDER WHICH WAS USED IN PLACING PND , RESTRICTIONS ON CLIENTS ACCOUNT.

When Now it's Obvious that Clients Told the Truth to POLICE That Lawyer isn't the one that Vacate the GARNISHIE And Obviously he doesn't Deserve the Pay for that ,Moreso Client Hasn't Been able to Access Funds in His Account the main Purpose he Engaged the Lawyer to Ensure .

LAWYER NOW IS REQUESTING FOR EXPENSES COST HE INCURRED WHEN HE TRAVEL TO THE STATE LOCATION ...(Hotel Accommodation,TFare ,Feeding )

Client says He can Only Pay the Expenses only when The Bank Releases Funds from his Account.

WHAT ADVISE CAN YOU GIVE .

POLICE IS PUTTING SO MUCH PRESSURES ON TNE CLIENT TO PAY .

And what concerns the police in this case ?

This is purely a civil matter .

Akir2025:
A Lawyer was Engaged to Remove a Garnishee on an Account. % Was agreed on to be Given to the Lawyer Once he Successful with it.

The Lawyer Was Told to Provide some Funds so his Clients who has nothing on him for his Upkeeps till the Garnishie is Removed and He has Access to His Funds.

The Lawyer Could only Provide 1% or the Funds Requested for by the Client for his Upkeeps .

Since the Client Funds was Still on Garnishie he couldn't have Access to the Funds in his Account,No Funds at all .

So the Client and the Lawyer Agreed that Once Restrictions is Removed and Client has Access to His Funds ,Lawyer would gets Back the Funds he Provides and also have a Certain % of Clients Funds in his Account..

Lawyer Travelled to another State where the Case is ,Lodge in an Hotel ,Shouldered the Expenses as Agreed with the Client.

Lawyer later Discovered that Client was Ignorant that The Garnishee have been already Vacated on his Account by the Former Lawyer He used .

Lawyer Discovered that it was Vacated 3 Months Earlier before he Engaged Him .

He Got the CTC from the Court .On Arrival He told His Client that He has Vacated the Garnishie on his Account and told Client he is free to Contact His Bank to Withdraw Funds .

When Client Went through CTC he discovered the Garnishie have been Vacated 3 Months Earlier before he Engaged the new Lawyer ,His name didn't Appear among the Lawyers that Got the Judgements .

He was Confronted for lying and Making demands of work he didn't do ,He Later Abandoned Asking for % and Service Fee.

Lawyer Opened email on Clients Name to contact His Bank Demanding for his Account Balance without Account Owner Awareness.

Bank Responded with Available Balance while Main Balance which has been Moved to Sundry,Ledger wasn't Revealed .

Lawyer Felts He was Lied to that Clients has no Funds in His Account why did he Engaged him in the first Place to Remove Garnishee from an Account with Very Little Balance .

Lawyer Again Assumes Account Owner have Started accessing funds in Account which was Capital No.

THE REAL MATTER NOW IS THAT THE LAWYER REPORTED THE MATTER TO THE POLICE, POLICE SOUGHT FOR COURT ORDER WHICH WAS USED IN PLACING PND , RESTRICTIONS ON CLIENTS ACCOUNT.

When Now it's Obvious that Clients Told the Truth to POLICE That Lawyer isn't the one that Vacate the GARNISHIE And Obviously he doesn't Deserve the Pay for that ,Moreso Client Hasn't Been able to Access Funds in His Account the main Purpose he Engaged the Lawyer to Ensure .

LAWYER NOW IS REQUESTING FOR EXPENSES COST HE INCURRED WHEN HE TRAVEL TO THE STATE LOCATION ...(Hotel Accommodation,TFare ,Feeding )

Client says He can Only Pay the Expenses only when The Bank Releases Funds from his Account.

WHAT ADVISE CAN YOU GIVE .

POLICE IS PUTTING SO MUCH PRESSURES ON TNE CLIENT TO PAY .

The agreement is explicit to the effect that the said lawyer will be paid once the garnishee order and PND is removed via direct litigation by said lawyer.

Lawyer withheld the truth to his client concerning the vacation of the PND by previous legal representatives.

Lawyer does not deserve to be paid a dime because the agreement explicitly spelt that he will be paid for legal services relating to removal of PND on the client's account.

Why should the client then pay for services the lawyer did not provide?

If the lawyer was honest with his client which is what he is legally and ethically expected to, an agreement for payment for expenses incurred and a nominal legal fee would have sufficed but the lawyer was great and wanted to reap where he did not sow.

Lawyers are obligated to provide full disclosure to their client and not withhold vital information that arises during a legal dispute.

The client should take it up a notch and lodge a formal complaint to both the NBA and file a counter suit against the lawyer for deceptive representation.

gidgiddy:
IPOB wasn't a terrorist group. Thats why the EU, Britain and America all said they dont see the group as a terrorist group when they were proscribed

To this day, no other country in the world except Nigeria sees IPOB as a terrorist group, and they are still operating

In a desperate move to get IPOB seen as terrorist, the authorities tried to blame them for any act of violence in the East, even fabricated stories against the group

The authorities forgot one simple thing. If a group are terrorists, you wouldn't even need to fabricate stories or falsely blame them for violence. It would be the group its self announcing they are responsible for the violence. Terrorism is all about using violence to achieve a political goal.

It was all about silencing the voice of Biafra and failed woefully

This is a highly flawed statement

The FG is yet to apply diplomatic pressure on other countries to see Ipob as a terrorist organization.

AsomughaChuks02:
I hope you are aware that surveillance cameras have been mounted on the bridge too. Do any how and end up like this guy

I am suspecting that guy to be gidgiddy.

Since he was arrested, gidgiddy stopped posting here.

arantess:
this is you confirming that citizens taxes are not used to build bridges.

bridges are built by and for the president only

continue in foally

Show us one thing your Giringori built throughout his disastrous 8ys as governor.

And no , aunty Maggie's $120k designer bag doesn't count.

Unpatriotic2:
All done with the resources from the Eastern region which of course includes south south (what a funny name only registered in Nigeria)

Which resources from which useless Eastern region?

Eastern region is dead and buried forever.

That bridge was funded by money from Niger Delta oil.

So it was baffling to see Ohaneze demand that the FG name the second bridge after Ojukwu - a literal bridge burner who blew the first Niger bridge up.

Delta state that has more stake in that bridge did not make demands to the FG but it was your SE that were claiming the bridge as theirs despite not contributing a dime for it's construction.

Also, the original plan for the second Niger bridge was one of a BOT agreement with Julius Berger to fully fund, build , maintain and toll the bridge .

SE leaders went to Buhari to have the project be fully funded by the FG and to discontinue any future plans of tolling it.

That bridge was not funded from any resource from your SE region and know that Eastern region is dead and buried forever.

grandsuccess:
case that was closed since!


WHY DO THEY ALWAYS HIDE MY POSTS??

98% of my posts always hidden. Have this site started doing selective banning?

The case wasn't closed but swept away.

All thanks to GEJ and the then IGP .

gidgiddy:
In June 2009, the official vehicles of then Anambra State Governor, Peter Obi, was intercepted in Lagos by the Police as they arrived for turn-around maintenance. When the vehicles were searched, a total of N250 million Naira was discovered and confiscated.

When news of the discovery broke, accusations flew everywhere that Peter was trying to launder money. Anambra State Assembly was controlled by PDP at the time,they held all 30 seats, and they saw this as an opportunity to finally nail Obi. Overnight, the EFCC, Nigerian Police as well as the Anambra State PDP controlled Assembly, all announced that they would investigate the money.

After one month of investigations, the Nigerian Police quietly returned the money to Obi, EFCC concluded their investigation and found no case.

The Anambra State Assembly 3 man committee set up to investigate the money returned to Anambra, and announced that the N250 million was just a case of a government contractor who was paid by cheque to supply 42 cars to Anambra State government, but chose to cash the cheque in Awka, and travel with the money with governors convoy to Lagos

So for those who will talk about this 250 million in the future, if EFCC, Nigerian Police and Anambra State Assembly have investigated, found no wrong doing, and closed their case on this issue, its time for you to close your case this issue as well.

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2009/07/n250m-saga-anambra-money-not-missing-says-cttee/

It's because of this case that laws were passed making it illegal to transport/move/transact a certain amount of cash outside a financial institution.

There are about 4 legislations that were passed that were inspired by Giringori's theivery

peleson1:
You are very ignorant

You just come online to insult your betters

Pls which SW cornered Delta oil wells ?

Ondo has the largest bitumen deposit in the world outside Canada and where there's bitumen, you will find crude.

Ondo bitumen reserves can even yield oil although expensive , this where most of Canadian crude comes from their bitumen tar pits.

And where you find bitumen, there's also huge shale deposits and a pointer to huge gas reserves.

The only reason Ondo is not attracting much investors in their bitumen tar pits is because it's still much cheaper to drill oil from conventional shallow wells across the Niger Delta.

If crude prices get to as high as $150 and is sustained, you will see heavy FDI flows into developing those Ondo bitumen tar pits.

Ofunaofu:
Your level of hypocrisy is legendary, I must confess.

Where exactly did I say the bridge is the property of a particular region or some people? That’s a convenient argument you’ve created just to avoid the actual issue.

Nobody is disputing that the bridges are federal government infrastructure. The question is simple: why would a minister order the removal of advertising billboards from public infrastructure and then allow Tinubu’s own billboards to remain?

If the bridge belongs to the Federal Government, then it belongs to the Nigerian public, not to Tinubu, not to Umahi, and certainly not to any political party.

So please, spare me the lecture about ownership. The issue is the selective application of the rule. If billboards are prohibited on the bridge, remove all of them. If they are permitted, then explain why some are being removed while Tinubu’s are allowed to stay.

You can’t preach federal property when defending the government and suddenly forget the same principle when political advertising is involved.

That double standard is the real issue here, not whether the bridge is the first, second, or third Niger Bridge.

Have they paid for the right to use the bridge to host their banners ?

That bridge is FG property and Umahi as minister of works is responsible for that bridge.

If Obi and co won't pay the levies required before placing their billboards then they should not be allowed to hoist them.

If every President was like your obi who refused to invest in infrastructure, will there be a second Niger bridge or even first one, for Obi to hoist his political banner on?

helinues:
Have you not heard about Armageddon 2.0. They have more than plan B as the plan A can never be achievable.

We are patiently waiting for them

Instead of them to be grateful to Tinubu for restoring sanity to their region following Kanu and Ekpa's convictions and the dismantling of Ipab terrorists, they will rather start another fresh madness in their own land to give Tinubu's govt a bad name when security are deployed to root the terrorist out

omenka:
Do you notice they've started pushing Kanu's content back into the fore gradually? Plan B is being activated as we speak, because it has become all too clear to them Gringori is chasing shadows. From January, IPOB will come alive again. 😂

And from there they will be crying to Trump (if that one survives the blue wave) that Tinubu's Muslim govt is persecuting Ibo Jews .

DailyGistsNg:
A lawyer, Christopher Chidera, Esq., has challenged the legal foundation of the proceedings that eventually led to the conviction and life imprisonment of Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) leader Nnamdi Kanu. In a public briefing note titled “How Each Court Broke the Law in the Kanu Case — and Why the Chain Cannot Stand,” Chidera argued that a series of decisions by the Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and Federal High Court created what he described as an unlawful chain leading to Kanu’s conviction. The lawyer's position centres on the relationship between Kanu’s 2022 discharge, the subsequent appeal by the Federal Government and the repeal of Nigeria’s earlier terrorism legislation. The Court of Appeal in Abuja discharged Kanu and quashed the 15-count charge against him on October 13, 2022, holding that the Federal High Court lacked jurisdiction in view of his extraordinary rendition from Kenya. The Federal Government subsequently appealed the decision to the Supreme Court. Chidera argued that once the Court of Appeal had quashed the charges, any subsequent proceedings required a fresh legal foundation. According to him, the central issue is the distinction between saving pending proceedings after a law is repealed and reviving the repealed criminal law itself. “Savings preserve proceedings. They do not resurrect dead penal legislation,” he argued. Challenge to Court of Appeal decision Chidera specifically questioned the subsequent decision involving Justice Haruna Tsammani, arguing that the Court of Appeal had become functus officio after delivering its October 2022 judgment. The Federal Government had successfully obtained a stay of execution of the Court of Appeal judgment pending its Supreme Court appeal, leaving Kanu in detention while the legal battle continued. Chidera contended that a stay should not have been used to effectively keep a criminal discharge from taking effect. Supreme Court questioned The lawyer also challenged the Supreme Court's handling of the Federal Government's appeal. He argued that setting aside the Court of Appeal's decision could not automatically amount to reviving charges that had already been quashed. According to him, an appellate court could order a fresh trial where legally appropriate, but “continuation” of previously quashed counts raises a separate legal question. He also questioned the treatment of the repealed terrorism legislation, arguing that a repealed criminal statute cannot simply be regarded as continuing in force because proceedings under it were preserved. Federal High Court proceedings Chidera further criticised the proceedings before Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja. He argued that the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act 2022, which repealed the earlier terrorism legislation, created a distinction between preserving pending proceedings and preserving the repealed law itself. The lawyer said this distinction was particularly important in light of Section 36(12) of the 1999 Constitution, which provides that a person cannot be convicted of a criminal offence unless the offence and its prescribed punishment are defined in a written law. Kanu had raised a similar argument during his 2025 trial, contending that he was being tried under a repealed law. Justice Omotosho rejected his objections and proceeded with the case. The Federal High Court subsequently convicted Kanu on seven counts on November 20, 2025, and sentenced him to life imprisonment on several terrorism counts, with additional prison terms for other offences. Kanu has since appealed the conviction, asking the Court of Appeal to quash the judgment and discharge and acquit him. Among his grounds is the argument that he was convicted under legislation that had already been repealed. ‘Show us the law’ Chidera maintained that the legal questions surrounding Kanu's case should be resolved by examining the applicable statutes, court decisions and constitutional provisions. He identified three questions that he said should be answered: “Show us the law that brought the quashed counts back into existence.” “Show us the law that made a repealed penal statute still in force.” “Show us the written law that defined the offences and the penalties on the day of conviction.” He argued that the answers to those questions would determine whether the legal chain leading to Kanu’s conviction can withstand appellate scrutiny. The Federal Government, however, has maintained its case against Kanu, while the Federal High Court held in 2025 that the prosecution had proved the charges against him beyond reasonable doubt. Kanu's appeal against the conviction is now part of the ongoing legal battle.



http://dailygists.ng/post.php?id=945

The author is deliberately being deceptive and has refused to present the real chain of events and legal cases that followed and trialed Kanu's main trial


This is how we were being inundated here with fake live proceedings by Kanu's legal team and his relatives direct from Omotosho's court.

Instead of preparing a legal defense before Justice Omotosho, Kanu's legal team and relatives were more interested in twisting the ongoing case to garner SE support as if the SE supporters of Kanu are the ones to make a final ruling on his terrorism case.

How can the appeal court quash charges on a case that was yet to be decided ?

The Supreme court vacated a separate ruling over Kanu's extradition circumstances which Kanu had secured a lower court ruling that his then current arraignment did not hold because he was not properly extradited to stand trial.

The Supreme court ruled that the trial should proceed as Kanu was not extradited to stand trial but was extradited as a fugitive of the court who had jumped bail.

Speaking about airports, do you know Obi responded to demands for Anambra to build it's own airport that the state did not have land for such project.

He will later secretly allocate land for an airport project only to hand the land to a private developer who sold the lands to members of the public to build their homes.

The community petitioned Obiano over the land they donated to the govt for the airport project being encroached on by an estate developer.

Every attempt to secure their community land backfired as the developer provided docs showing that obi had allocated the land to the developer.

This is why Obiano had to seek another land for the airport project which Obiano did and duly completed that project.

Today , Obi flies into Onitsha using that same airport he said the state could not build owing to scarcity of land .

nedu666:
Did you see obi billboard or that of any politician on the bridge

I am sure Umahi was taken out of context and he must have said no other presidential poster will be allowed on the bridge until they pay the levies to ministry of works

clarocuzioo:
Umahi you are confused.. That place is second Niger bride not Tinubu house in Bourdillion. All these asslickung you guys are doing will definitely backfire. Time is a gentle man.

That bridge is federal property on Federal territory.

Have you asked if any of the political parties have paid the ministry of works to instal billboards for their candidates along the bridge.