FxMasterz's Posts
Nairaland Forum › FxMasterz's Profile › FxMasterz's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 (of 213 pages)
kingxsamz:This is very lame and does not address the matter at hand given the facts that have just been presented. This is just noise at best. Please desist from commenting if you have nothing to say. |
kingxsamz:No matter what you agree. It's not my concern. Do you believe in the existence of a Creator? |
kingxsamz:This is a lie and an outright denial. Atheists argue here on a daily basis that there's no proof of a Creator and therefore there is no God. This argument is not about the existence of a God actually. We'll get to that later but not on this thread. This is about the existence of a Creator. Now, let me ask you, do you believe there's a Creator? Since atheism is just the lack of belief in a God. |
I have used the Eye as an example in my argument above. There are many examples of other complex and purposeful designs in the earth and universe that support the argument for Creationism. Here are a few: 1. DNA and Genetic Code: The intricate structure and function of DNA, as well as the genetic code that dictates protein synthesis, demonstrate remarkable complexity and purposefulness. 2. Cellular Machinery: The inner workings of cells, including molecular motors, pumps, and factories, exhibit remarkable complexity and functional design. 3. Planetary Fine-Tuning: The precise calibration of physical constants and planetary conditions that allow for life on Earth, such as the distance from the Sun and atmospheric composition. 4. The Brain and Nervous System: The human brain's intricate structure, functionality, and ability to process information and generate consciousness. 5. The Immune System: The complex and highly specialized defense mechanisms that protect living organisms from pathogens and diseases. 6. The Water Cycle: The intricate process by which water circulates through the environment, sustaining life and regulating Earth's climate. 7. The Earth's Magnetic Field: The protective shield that deflects harmful solar and cosmic radiation, allowing life to thrive. 8. The Universe's Large-Scale Structure: The organized distribution of galaxies, galaxy clusters, and superclusters, suggesting a purposeful design. These examples above and several other such examples that we see in the universe further destroy atheism and support the existence of a Creator. There are so many individual complex and well organized systems working together for a common purpose - to make the world livable for living organisms. ------ Modified today 24th August 2024. No atheist has been able to offer any counter-argument against the arguments in the OP. One of them was even trying to get me into a different debate while avoiding this current debate. Another one up there has suddenly denied that atheism does has anything to do with the subject matter. Atheists are liars. They argue everyday that the world came into being through natural processes but here they're trying to deny because they came face to face with an argument they couldn't counter. Many of the strong atheists on this forum have avoided this thread like a plague. They should keep deceiving themselves. Atheism has been destroyed. |
The Existence of a Creator: A Challenge to Atheists I had an argument with Jaephoenix a few days ago. He was completely floored and ran away from the discussion. I observed that unlike what used to be the norm, none of his fellow atheists came to his rescue. I have presented the argument in a more organized way and hereby table it as an open challenge to all atheists worldwide. Now, let's begin: Atheism posits that complex designs and functionality in the natural world can be explained without the need for a Creator. However, I argue that certain features of the natural world demonstrate intelligent design, purposefulness, and complexity, necessitating the existence of a Creator. Key Points: 1. Intelligent Design: Complex structures like the eye exhibit intelligent design, with multiple components working together to achieve a specific purpose (sight). 2. Purposefulness: The eye's design serves a clear purpose, unlike natural processes that may create complex but purposeless structures. 3. Complexity: The eye's complexity and functionality cannot be explained by random natural processes alone. 4. Universality: The eye is a common feature across many living organisms, suggesting a deliberate design rather than a random occurrence. 5. Variety: The existence of different types of eyes (e.g., human, insect, octopus) implies a Creator who adapted designs for specific purposes. 6. Creator vs. Intelligent: The argument focuses on the existence of a Creator, not necessarily an intelligent or supernatural one. 7. Natural Processes: While natural processes can create complex structures, they lack purposefulness and intentionality, unlike the eye's design. 8. Emergence: Complex systems can exhibit emergent properties, but these do not necessarily explain the eye's purposeful design. 9. Evolutionary Explanations: Incremental adaptive changes may contribute to the eye's development, but they do not fully account for its complexity and purposefulness. Conclusion: The existence of complex, purposeful designs like the eye necessitates the existence of a Creator. This challenges atheistic views that rely solely on natural processes to explain the natural world. While the nature and identity of this Creator are open to discussion, the evidence from intelligent design, purposefulness, and complexity demands consideration of a Creator's role in shaping the world around us. Modified on 24th August 2024 For purpose to be established, there needs to be a mind or a conscious entity behind it. This mind can be human, animal, or even a hypothetical artificial intelligence. The presence of a mind is necessary to: 1. Conceive goals and objectives 2. Make decisions and choices 3. Experience desires and intentions In other words, purpose requires consciousness, awareness, and intentionality, which are all qualities of a mind. Without a mind, purpose cannot be established or exist. Hence there's definitely a mind behind the existence of these purposeful and complex designs. |
oteneaaron:Hmm. Nawa for this organization o. They would even scatter families on the basis of their deceitful organization? |
achorladey:Chai!! |
achorladey:Lol. So dem dey do rehearsal before dem fit give talks for the cult? 😂😂 😂 😂 Since they do not have the Spirit of God for inspired teachings, na rehearsal dem they do. Men are teaching them all things but Jesus said the Spirit of Truth will teach us all things. When the Spirit is absent, the flesh takes over, leading to many errors and heresies. |
achorladey:They're wolves. You can't expect anything else from them. |
achorladey:If after going through all.these, these people can't still come to see the abnormality in their cult, it is finished for them. I like the Romans 10:9 you quoted. If anyone confesses Jesus as Lord and believes in his heart that God raised Him from the dead, he'll be saved. That's all about salvation but a satanic organization is saying you must be a member of their cult to be saved. Meanwhile their members are nothing but wolves in sheep clothing. |
jaephoenix:At the bolded, your filthy self thinks I do it too? No I don't, you're the only one who does that I know by your own personal confession. I don't think you have a remedy filthy atheist, since it's a family thing. Even if you say you're no more doing, your mom and your sisters won't agree. What a family? |
jaephoenix:Oh, continue the confession of how you do your mum and sisters. The world is listening. Is your mum such a dirty fellow too to allow you do that to her? Even your sisters too? What a dysfunctional family? Let the confession continue. Dirty, filthy and ignorant atheist. |
achorladey:Gbam! I think they're trained to be able to live double lives. When Aemmyjah mentioned me here to ask my questions on this thread, I had to look at the Monica again to confirm it was really Aemmyjah. You can see the calm and respectful manner he presented himself to me here. Whereas, I have never known him to be calm and respectful. Each time I see his Monica, I expect to see a minimum of 3 insults. His common words are "You're stupid," "You're my boy", "Dunce" etc. Honestly, if the way he addressed me on this thread is the way he has always addressed me, I would have been deceived. I think they're trained for this sort of double living. |
jaephoenix:You mean you did that to your mother? Wow. Once the alcohol leaves your eyes, you'll know who you did it to. Dirty, filthy, ignorant atheist bleeping his own mother. |
achorladey:Don't these people have sober reflections? Don't they practice personal development activities to make them become better persons? How can someone have such a bad attitude, never repentant but instead has the energy to create a thread for praising himself and then pretending to be a good man on that thread. Is that not really hilarious? |
jaephoenix:Dirty, filthy, ignorant atheist, is that the name of your father you mentioned up there? I'm just curious. |
Courz:The bolded is just it. Empty barrels make the most horrible noise. It beats my imagination how people can go create a thread to praise themselves after calling people mad men, oponu, wailing wailer, dunce, ode, dinrin, weyrey, stupid, asínwín, etc on some other threads. You now start brooding over your thread like a pot of soup trying to sell off a fake identity. Even the Max that was blackmailing me here on Nairaland on the basis of lies regarding matters he knew very well about that I wasn't at fault is also flexing his muscles here pretending to be a godly man. He has no remorse for such a cancerous attitude he has. Honestly, no matter what evil I hear about anybody, I would never use it to blackmail the person just because I defer with him in opinion. I can't descend that low. I'm not such a dirty fellow. I have standards I uphold. That's too dirty. I would never blackmail anyone even if I wasn't a Christian. It doesn't matter whether the allegations are true or not, I would not just use it against the person. Meanwhile this JW fellow was propagating falsehood joyfully and excitedly, yet he convinces himself to be a godly man. If anybody blackmails me on a false premise, I'll defend my name against the lies if that's the only option I have but I would not for any reason be the first to start blackmailing anybody. This JW fellow who has such a dirty blackmailing attitude is here feigning godly and righteous on this thread. Hypocrites! |
achorladey:Lol. |
achorladey:Smiling. This JW people sef. You can't defend your organization yet you'll be calling people names for asking you pertinent questions for which you have no answers. |
achorladey:The answer is a simple yes or no but till now, no answer. Do you believe that Jesus is Lord? Yes or no? Everything now turned to a long Epistle of "You're an hypocrite", and a story about a food canteen. The whole matter turned to Simultaneous equation for JWs. Up till now, they're unable to work out the solution. |
achorladey:Lol. |
achorladey:I still expect him to mention me some day after crying several times that I should not mention him again. I'm sure he can't keep his words for long but I'll never break my promise. I'll mention him only if he mentions me. |
achorladey:You can see that Max (I don't want to spell his Monica in full as I've agreed not to mention him again according to his request) said JWs agree that Jesus is Lord over their faith. A very subtle way to make you think that they agree that Jesus is Lord like you do. They do not agree that Jesus is Lord over their lives but over their faith. See? |
achorladey:Yes. Meta AI said they do not declare that Jesus is Lord like other Christians do because they believe that Jesus is the Son of God but not God Himself. They also believe that He is a created being. Affirming Jesus as Lord therefore destroys that belief or doctrine. Hence, the denial. |
achorladey:It was just an excuse for running away. |
achorladey:Meta AI has told me that they don't believe that Jesus is Lord. It's a pity for them o! |
achorladey:Lol. Those guys are characters. |
Kingsempires:I tell you bro. He would use it to change the topic of discussion. That's his aim. |
Michael547:That's because the person I'm talking to is not a sincere seeker. We're not even talking about a false church. We're talking about a false doctrine. |
Michael547:That's none of my business. Face your front and defend your false doctrines if you can. What does mentioning Churches have to do with your false doctrines? |
Michael547:I am here to talk about the Bible only and not about Churches. Get that clear and stop asking irrelevant questions. There are several true churches who don't teach heresies like your cult but I'm not here to talk about Churches. If you want to defend your false doctrines against the Bible, go ahead. Let's see how you'll fare. Stop using questions about Churches as a cover up. |
Michael547:Let it lead to back and forth first before you stop defending it. I have claimed it is erroneous according to the Bible and not according to a Church. So, stop asking me about a Church. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 (of 213 pages)

