Emaprince: Your pep na garbage before na. He only depends on cheque books.
He can waste a 100mil on a player..and next season sign another big money palyer for same wing.
Just like how Chelsea spent 60million on Werner then proceed to spend another 100million on Lukaku the very next season and are already looking to buy another striker for another 100million.
All of a sudden Chelsea fans realize you can dominate your opponent and create lots of chances but still get knocked out. If it was Pep that lost to Madrid in that manner I know the tune here will be different.
Amoto94: I wont be foolish to express views in a place that could lead to harm I cant bear , it's like asking me to kill a python in a place where killing it is a taboo. Before you embark upon any mission consider the timing and what the people hold dare. I wont go to a Roman Catholic cathedral and start denouncing catholicism if dey lynch me I'm to be blamed
If everybody is a coward like you, then the world will never develop. So if you go to place where twins for example are being killed because they are considered a taboo, then you will shut up and say nothing because they can harm you?
Finesse007: There was a foul on Thiago before his tackle which the ref rightly blew for and not Liverpool's fault the ref didn't see the fabinho tackle, I mean similar tackles has been missed before by the refs even in UCL as well especially Pickford on vvd which ruled him out for the season moreover ßilva completed the match but agenda no go let you see road
Mr man nobody asked you for all these epistles. Do you agree fabinho should have seen red or not?
AnfieldFan: Cancelo was offside for the corner that led to City's second goal.. Var didn't check it but awarded City the corner... Salah's ball that was ruled a goal kick despite Var clearly seeing it was a corner after checking for handball... Fabinho saw only a yellow because his foot was mainly on the ground....
[color=royalblue]But that's not what he meant naw?[/color]
It was in English not french or German. From that statement is safe to assume he is only interested in matches that comes with hate and so much emotions.
Leyqute: I wasn’t interested because there was no hate. Interesting game tho, just not enough hate between the two.
Leyqute: Where did this untethered cow come from now?
Didn’t you see where I said a match of this stature usually comes with some hatred and emotions?
Idiot
Mr man I don't know why you are throwing insults up and down like a local agbero. So because it didn't come with hatred and emotion you can't watch it? It basically means you only watch matches that have emotion and hatred attached to them. That's one of the most foolish reasons I have seen someone give for not watching a match.
CAPdan21: He beat Conte back to back after Conte did thesame d previous season....this your statement has no basis
Did pep figure out Conte Chelsea or not? Same way he is going to destroy his Tottenham side once he figure them out. Please keep your nagging away from my mentions.
popizaino: Liverpool do score him easily but he(pep) has to count on many chances before doing the same against Liverpool. Haven't noticed this from his previous encounters, and going ahead for the second time, he should have instructed his player not to completely go for the first header, so that they will have all time to spot and flick because most of this Liverpool goals is as a reason of wrong positioning from man city players after fully going to win a defensive header.
DissTroy: [s] This is déjà vu. Some nitwit quotes me with someone anus-generated alternate fact, he gets whitewashed with verified statistics and documented events, next he resorts to quoting me with single alphabets in defeat.
DissTroy: [s] You should learn to arm yourself with facts and figures before quoting me. This is the very reason your father isn't allowed to speak in your village council because he ends up making a fool of himself. Now you are continuing the family tradition.
The next time you quote me with unfounded arguments, may God x you! [/s]
DissTroy: . [s] Accursed offspring of a mutated newt, Enrique wasn't special.
Barça scored 158 goals in all competitions in 2014/2015 and Messi alone scored 58 goals and provided 18 assists. He was the top scorer in La Liga and the UCL.
In comparison, Neymar and Suarez scored 39 and 25 goals in all competitions.
Under Pep, everyone scored. Under Enrique, only 3 players headed by Messi carried the team. Messi even scored more goals under Pep than Enrique and he didn't have the support of the MSN then.
But you'd never know this. Your head would be the perfect gangan since it is empty. [/s]
When the team wins the champions league or treble it becomes Messi carried this coach to this and that with zero acknowledgement for the Coach but when they lose or get disgraced it becomes the Coach fault. You better check yourself.
DissTroy: Pep didn't make Messi. Pep has never publicly or privately taken even the smallest credit for Messi's greatest. Instead, Pep would continually tell you he is in awe of Messi and Leo being the greatest player he has ever seen; and has kept saying this even at the other club(s) he managed/manages.
Nobody makes players like Messi, Ronaldinho and CR (as much I love to troll him). They are icings on the cakes of any decent coach and team. Messi won an average and drab coach like Luis Enrique the Treble. Simeone would have more with peak Messi, Ronaldo or Ronaldinho. That truth is as certain as Will Smith simping.
Keep mute Messi didn't win sh.itt for Enrique. Enrique assembled and created a well balanced team with the fulcrum being Messi, Neymar and Suarez. Why didn't Messi win the treble for Tata Martino or the numerous coaches he had ever since?
Please nobody expected Messi to be dropping those numbers. Don't come here to be typing nonsense about Messi greatness being a matter of 'if' but 'when'.