₦airaland Forum

This should be so easy.

afrodoc2:
Single game or the whole tournament?

Whole tournament.

I have this random question to ask. Anyone interested give and answer with your reason. What in your opinion is the greatest individual performance in an entire Cup tournament( World cup, Champions league, Euros) etc.

spillo1:
What's your favourite player of all time? Not who you think is the greatest, just your favourite to watch. Mine is Delima Ronaldo. Combination of speed, strength, power, dribbling and finishing. He was too much of a beast.

Very many but I will go with Andres iniesta. Mixture of elegance with class.

spillo1:
LMFAO.....The worst team to ever win the champions league.

Most will consider it the 2nd worst bottlejob by a club after Ac Milan. I mean Bayern Munich where playing Chelsea in Germany and at their own stadium. Bayern held all the cards going into that final.

You can only pick 3 and bonus if you can guess the match they all started correctly.

gensteejay:
You religionists have a penchant for twisting facts to suit your agenda. You're talking about scientists as if they were just one person.

We have thousands of scientists all over the world from diverse cultures and religions. While some are atheists, others are religionists, agnostics, irreligious, etc.

So, how can scientists be "fixated on proving their is no higher being called God" when some of them believe in God?

But beliefs have no basis in science. If you believe anything, you must be able to prove it empirically.

Any scientist that knows their onions will learn how to separate their personal beliefs from their work, which deals with evidence-based knowledge.

As of yet, there's no concrete (scientific) proof for the existence of God or higher beings (gods and goddesses).

That doesn't mean these entities don't exist. There are many things in existing even in our little space around us, which we call us "nothing", but it's "something".

You look at the sky on a bright day and your brain tells you there is empty space all the way up, but on observing the same space under a powerful electron microscope, you realize the sun and the brain have tricked you.

What we see isn't always what exists.

I feel with time, there'll still be a better scientific understanding of the concept of God, soul, death, etc.

kk

Melvyn11:
Can't you see I asked him a simple question he couldn't give a direct answer and give his usually line of we will see in the future. The big bang theory simple means life as we know it stated from nothing. The fact that all existing energy came into existence from nothing at all (in defiance of known physical law) as you have mentioned before just shows how dumb it is.

We know the Universe had a beginning. Atheists/ Scientist need to explain who created it? There is no rational way you can convince me or anybody that the singularity was eternal and it then caused the big bang and now we have DNA and our complex respiratory system due to an explosion that happened for no reason. The best salesman in the world couldn't even sell that. Scientist are fixated on proving their is no higher being called God that they are ready to say anything even when it's completely senseless.

I mean take a look at your yourself or even your dog. Do people you really believe an explosion occurred for no reason and with no intelligent design and eventually you came out looking like this lol. That's a tough sell and nobody is buying it.

gensteejay:
Lol, ignorance your problem. You sound like an illiterate that says complex analysis is a stupid concept in Mathematics, since we can't see complex numbers in real life.

However, these things you call farcical in your ignorance have many applications in real life and are based on a very logical body of proofs/paradigms.

When you learn to view things without the myopic lens of religion, you will cease to comment on issues you know very little or nothing of.

KK.

Melvyn11:
You claimed anything that exist must have a source. According to the big bang theory championed by scientist how did the universe come to exist?

The big bang theory is another one of scientist must stupid theory. People actually believe in an empty space particles clashed together or combined and created space gravity and matter as we know it then those atoms slowly turned into dust and that slowly turned into life. The flaws are endless.

humilitypays:
The simple and saddest truth of this all is; black race cannot do this without a white race leading that nation.



The problem of Nigeria and other West, East and Central Africa has to do with the black race syndrome.


Nigeria need like 10 million white population positioned in top leadership, judiciary, security and other decision making positions to change Nigeria for good.


No Nigerian born black President or Governor or Senator or Minister can change Nigeria. No political party of black origin can change Nigeria.

Nigeria's problem is not Buhari, it is not Goodluck, it is not OBJ, it is not APC, it is not PDP, it is a collective black man genetic problem from origin

Black Americans are suffering same and if not for white man's leadership, black Americans would have destroyed America, France, etc.



Check other South America countries with blacks as dominant race, I am talking about Jamaica, Haiti, etc, they are worst than Nigeria, but their neighboring white nations are all doing fine, why Do they also have PDP and APC there

Dear Nigerians stop blaming Buhari, Buhari is not your problem, all Nigerians are the problem of Nigeria not just Buhari alone.

This guy made some interesting suggestions especially about the white parts in strategic positions.

spillo1:
It's based on whatever criteria each person chooses either longevity or peak performance. Like I said it's all good.

If you go by peak performance then someone like Salah is guaranteed a spot. That's the flaw in using peak performance. It should be about consistent performance over at least 5 to 6 seasons.

airmark:


2-time epl player of the season, is who you are comparing with Sallah. No wonder you don't want to drop any list. You are a clown.

k

hardeycute:
If he has no shout to be among EPL best 11, it only means you have an alternate player. Are you afraid of being criticized on your choice?

Please I don't have time for all this merry go round. My post is centred around Ronaldo and why he shouldn't be in any all time epl Eleven. If thats what not you are interested In then kindly sit down.

airmark:
Where's your epl best 11? Stop shooting and hiding. Let's see what makes your own team tick.

I see you have nothing to make a case for Ronaldo. Kindly hold your peace.

hardeycute:
You're just going round the circle, all I ask for is your own version of the EPL 11. I'm not going to force you to add him to your lineup, I only want to see a difference choice being made.

Next time don't just jump into any discussion. This was my initial post. Make your case for Ronaldo or hold your peace

Godx:
Ronaldo has no business in an all time premier league 11

Expert17:
There is a reason you see Analyst compare Veira to Keane, Makelele and those defensive minded players not Lampard, Scholes, Gerrard etc

Why are you still arguing bro. Vieira is not a defensive midfielder and was never the deepest midfielder for Arsenal or France.

Expert17:
Bold claim that Veira played in defensive midfield for arsenal............Even Gerrard played defensive midfield for England national team.

He never played deeper than others. Vieira spent almost all his career (both at Arsenal and for France) next to a defensive midfielder.

hardeycute:
I believe you have an alternative to Ronaldo, why not share your own EPL 11?

Ronaldo should not make any epl all time Eleven. If you disagree make your case for him and I will do the opposite.

Expert17:
Who were the midfielders starting at arsenal, alongside Viera??

Always do your research before making bold claims.

thorrvik55:
Oya drop ur 11 let's see the GREAT players that'll be in it

Next time don't jump into a discussion you know nothing about. Thank you once again.

Expert17:
Maybe you will understand now,.... he played deeper than the other midfielders in Arsenal midfield.

And Scholes is a central midfielder

How did Vieira play deeper?

thorrvik55:
It's obvious u are a Liverpool fan..

No wonder u can't drop ur all time PL team because it probably won't include any Liverpool player (apart from maybe Gerrard)

I am not a Liverpool fan. Thank you.

If all you need is 2 and half season of playing good in England to be guaranteed a spot in an all time best Eleven then Salah and Suarez should be the first name on your teams.

airmark:
God bless you. That was why i wanted to know who and who godx wanted to put in his epl11.

Ronaldo's best 3yrs for Man utd in epl, was more outstanding than Schole's 19yrs. If Ronaldo won't make it, 60% of names people dropped shouldn't make it.

Now i could see the likes of expert and afrodoc changing positions after your post, after they had called hardeycute names for defending Ronaldo. '2face' people.

I told you already if you can't name the Ronaldo exploits in the league that gives him a spot forget about it.

Expert17:
To make it easy for you

Keane and Viera are defensive midfielders.

Lampard attacking midfielder

Scholes Central midfielder...... ( @45 years old, he will start at Chelsea right now)

so no need to compare them.

Vieira was not a defensive midfielder.

Swissh:
Who the F*cuk is Roy Keane compared to Vieira.

I was surprised the amount of people putting Keane over Vieira.

airmark:
I asked of your epl team first bro. You answered with a question. Let's see if all your players did better than Ronaldo when they played in epl.

The discussion is not about my epl team. If you can't make an argument for Ronaldo using his exploits in the league on why he should get a spot then forget about it.

airmark:
Just telling you that if Ronaldo doesn't deserve it, 60% of those you may pick, may not deserve it.

Who are in your epl best 11 ever?

What league exploits give ronaldo a spot in an epl all time 11?

airmark:
What spectacular things did Scholes do as a central midfielder in 19yrs, to deserve it?

If Ronaldo didn't do anything, Scholes should not near the bench of epl all time 11.

My post has nothing to do with Scholes.

Ibime:
I believe he is the first and only player to win WPOTY while playing in EPL. That deserves a spot.

Winning WPOTY is inconsequential. Using league exploits Ronaldo did not perform anything to be included in an epl all time 11.

PDPGuy:
What is your all-time premier league 11?

Ronaldo has no business in an all time premier league 11?