Goodenoch's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Goodenoch's Profile › Goodenoch's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 (of 21 pages)
jesmond3945:Yes your equity will increase over time as you pay off the loan every month and (hopefully) the value of the house increases as well. It just (generally) takes more time with a new build. |
Zahra29:You can keep banging this drum as long as you like, and I know you will because it's a convenient distraction from the absurdity of your original claim that Badenough was referring to Boko Haram only in her statement. I did see the reports you cited. Clearly, some studies have said BH is driven by ethnicity, but most that I have seen acknowledge that it is religious primarily, and that tracks with what they've been saying and how they've operated since the beginnings in the Shekau days to the current JAS, IS-WA composition. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Brookings-Analysis-Paper_Alex-Thurston_Final_Web.pdf https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2015/01/boko-haram-glance/ https://www.usip.org/publications/2014/06/why-do-youth-join-boko-haram https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/10698/#:~:text=The%20results%20indicated%20that%20BH,mosques%20and%20Islamic%20teaching%20centers. https://www.uscirf.gov/sites/default/files/resources/Final%20Nigeria%20Factsheet%20%20August%2019,2013.pdf Point is, there are studies and reports for both viewpoints but it's immaterial to my point above so again, believe what you will. 👍🏿 |
Zahra29:My last post about this, only for the record. I didn't lie. I was mistaken that there was no ethnic dimension to their attacks but it doesn't change the fact that their primary motivation isn't ethnic. Either way, it's tangential to the issue of whether Boko Haram could possibly have been what Badenough was referring to. It isn't, as I and others have explained. It simply doesn't add up. If you ask 100 Nigerians, no one will say she meant just Boko Haram were her ethnic enemies. Even from a grammar standpoint thy interpretation doesn't make sense. It's extremely clear that she me at Northerners in general. You can choose to believe whatever you it or take what you hear from the office as the honest truth. Na you sabi. I don taya abeg. |
Goke7:Ignorance and eagerness to buy into any and every negative stereotype about Nigerians, a la Badenough. |
jesmond3945:New builds typically drop in value for a while after completion (like how a new car depreciates substantially once you drive it off the lot), and if the deposit is too low the buyers my be in negative equity for some time (up to a few years in some cases). Negative equity means the price at which the property will be sold at in the event of default won't cover the money owed to the lender, and it also drastically reduces the incentive to continue paying the mortgage in some cases. Those (among other factors) increase the risk of the loan, which in turn increases the interest rates, to account for that risk. |
Zahra29:I see your fondness for strawman arguments is alive and well. Nobody ever said the bolded. As to your other comment about me having righteous indignation about each one of her comments, it it just my indignation though? You should ask yourself why there has been so.much backlash against her comments (and not just the ones about Nigeria) even in the UK. It may be that all of those comments are perfectly fine (as you believe and have said) and everyone who has questioned them is unreasonable, or that she frequently says nonsense that people are rightfully indignant about. Good thing is that she's now in a much bigger spotlight so I'm confident time will make clear which one it is. |
Zahra29:There's a huge difference between critique from someone who identifies as Nigerian and has served the country despite all the difficulties. It is clear to all that it's from a desire to influence make change, and that's a marked difference from Badenoch who has publicly disclaimed Nigeria and ONLY references it in disparaging terms to prop up her "good, not-like-them immigrant" image. NOI has a huge, supportive following among Nigerians and her book has been publicized in Nigeria and by Nigerians (look up reviews of the book and discussions about it on social media). She did go on a tour of sorts as well, and has delivered speeches about the book in several fora (including interviews with Nigerian top media platforms) over the years. Search YouTube for those. To say very few Nigerians know of the book, is frankly ignorant. |
Goke7:See this comment from Sunday Igboho, leader of the 'Yoruba Nation' insurgency: https://www.nairaland.com/8294082/it-high-time-president-bola Zahra, while you seem to find all of this funny and have been saying that Goke7's points about the danger of these 'offhand' comments are far-fetched and emotional, hopefully, the above will give you at least an inkling into why people may be alarmed. Obviously we know it isn't her responsibility how anyone uses her comments to further their own agenda, but the 'underlying issues' are very sensitive and require a lot more tact than she's displaying. |
Zahra29:😄 Feel free to contact her. Her statement was extremely clear enough already, for me. ETA: Another reason why I know that's what she meant is that she has previously made another comment that had the same fake equivalence of Northern Nigeria = Islamism = Terrorism. I can't find it now unfortunately (did a quick search Google has been overrun with posts about her most recent comments). What's certain though is that your thesis about how she meant Boko Haram is a nonstarter because BH is not an ethnic group and has never targeted people based on ethnicity so couldn't possibly be her "ethnic enemies" even in the widest interpretation of her comments. |
Thegamingorca:You are right.. |
Zahra29:Ma binu. I have seen the error of my ways - what you said makes perfect sense. When Badenough said she doesn't identify as Nigerian and doesn't like being lumped together with her ethnic enemies, Boko Haram is the ethnicity she meant because obviously the BokoHaramish ethnic group occupy all Northern Nigeria, and so when people call her Nigerian it automatically carries a conotation that she's part of Boko Haram and an Islamist. It is clear now. You are right. |
AgentXxx:Lol. You saw that too. It was a ridiculous, if unsurprising, analysis. Someone explicitly spoke about the 'people from the North' as her ethnic enemies, saying she didn't want to be lumped together with them as Nigerian, and you're saying it's Boko Haram she meant. Is Boko Haram an ethnic group? Has anybody ever lumped Kemi together with Boko Haram on the basis of her being Nigerian? Abeg nauuuu 😂 😂 😂 😂 Anyway, my people say someone pretending to sleep is always the hardest to wake so I'm resting my case here. |
The UK army is actively advertising to recruit from Commonwealth countries. Same as UK universities are still doing fairs in Abuja and NHS Trusts are actively poaching doctors and nurses from hospitals in India, Nigeria etc. Okay ó. Tomorrow now, Badenough, Farage and Co will start castigating Commonwealth soldiers saying they're the reason why there are not enough bedspaces in the barracks and the rifles are not going round anymore. |
Zahra29:https://archive.is/zu9EG |
Zahra29:On a different note - What do you think about Kemi's comments about how Northern Nigerians are her ethnic enemies? Just curious ó. Not asking you to hold brief for her but just interested in seeing what you think about a potential UK prime minister thinking in terms of ethnic enmity about half of Nigeria, based on her decade or so of experience living there. Does it concern you that she might have such bigoted views about UK ethnic groups or do you think that it's only Nigerians she sees in such reductive terms? |
Jamesclooney:It's not very politically correct but my view is that the over-democratization of democracy is part of the problem. Back in the day, you'd make or break your career as a politician on the strength of your professional and political background as you rose through the ranks of public service and within your party, reasoned policy positions delivered in settings where they'd be thoroughly scrutinized and debated etc. Today it boils down to who can deliver the best soundbites that'll go viral on Instagram, Twitter or TikTok, to be amplified by "influencers" to their hordes of followers who lack critical thinking abilities (no fault of theirs - there's little opportunity to develop those nowadays with how social media algorithms reinforce ideological echo chambers). |
Zahra29:Everything you've said above boils down to "some people oppose some deportation flights because some deportations are unfair because some people become overstayers by error or due to no fault of their own". Okay.... Very interesting and very obvious, but so what? It's not news that there are edge cases that fall outside of the "most" I used in my post. The point remains that it's false to make it seem as if people here (and immigrants generally) are opposed to immigration law enforcement or the changing of policies to restrict entry in the perceived national interest. In fact the most popular view here recently has been that if the UK government wants to change the laws to ban any category of immigrants or even stop immigration totally, they should go ahead and do it. Now that they've banned dependents for students and some care workers, have you seen Nigerians carry placards to protest that or suing the government to say they must admit dependents? People for whom bringing dependents is a priority simply stopped coming to study or work in those roles and the government and everyone is happy, àbí? |
New day and I'm still in shock that Badenough thinks Northerners are her "ethnic enemies".. I wonder how that person who wanted her to be their daughter's role model will rationalize that bigoted view to the young child while also teaching her not to judge people based on their ethnic origins. |
Zahra29:Nobody's distracted. People can walk and chew gum, you know. It's possible to call out Badenough's hypocrisy while also calling out the government and NPF's failures, and that's what most people do. On deportation flights, you seem to be under the impression that most people would oppose them if they knew, and I'm not sure why. At least on this page; nobody has ever said (to my knowledge - happy to be corrected) the UK shouldn't deport people who are due for deportation having violated the terms of their stay and exhausted their legal options just as with any other legal proceedings. I'm not sure why you keep making it seem as if people are saying the UK shouldn't have immigration laws and should let everyone in with no restrictions. |
Atk1nson:Yup. I was in Bristol recently and it was the first time I heard about the Bristol Bus Boycott. Reading through, I was struck by the role played by Bill Smith, a “black” fellow who wrote against those campaigning for minorities to be employed, saying they were asking too much and things were alright as they were - at the behest of his paymasters, of course. It happens in every single issue around civil rights, race relations, etc. There are always those willing to play that role. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol_Bus_Boycott |
Peerielass:That’s for correcting that mistake - both terms are so interchangeable though so I suspect I’ll make the same mistake again the future 😉 |
Zahra29:Not 'the truth'. His opinion and anecdotes, which were then generalized to cover Nigerian visa applicants as a bloc. Mind you - that's what he said on Twitter (or was it whatsapp and I saw screenshots - I can't remember) - that the BBC misrepresented him and cut his interview to paint a narrative. The truth can only be gotten from official/credible statistics/evidence - do you have any? I remember you saying the other day that a self-reported survey with tens of thousands of respondents wasn't reliable as a source of data so I'm surprised you'd consider one person's anecdotes 'the truth.' It's like if someone gave an interview that generalized about how British people going to Cambodia and other South-East Asian countries were largely going there for sex tourism (including child abuse), I'm sure that wouldn't be considered the truth just based on the interview, despite the multitude of anecdotes that support it, going back decades. |
Jamesclooney:You know, I completely missed the bit about lunch breaks. It's crazy, to be honest. Lunch breaks are for wimps; maternity pay is too much.... where does it stop with this Badenough woman? |
Jamesclooney:This woman really is crazy. It's good that it's becoming clear to everyone though. Imagine being so out of touch that you'd lump all of 'people from northern Nigeria' together, as being a haven for Boko Haram islamism. Apart from the sheer ethnic, religious and cultural variety in the North, the people up there have been the greatest victims of terrorism yet she's making it seem all of them are terrorists. Also, I'm shocked that she's still thinking in terms of "ethnic enemies" as her reason for not wanting to be linked with Northerners. It's crazy. What about Scots, English, and the Irish? Wouldn't it be insane to hear Keir Starmer talk about how he considers the Irish his ethnic enemies because of The Troubles? The interesting sub-theme though, is that it gives an indication of the depth of ethnic crisis in the country, that someone as educated and exposed as she is still thinks like that, especially despite how briefly she stayed in the country. You can imagine how it is for people who go through their entire lives in the country. It highlights the huge difficulty that Nigeria still faces as a result of the British colonial government's arbitrary map-drawing and constitution-writing (AKA "underlying issues" , which arguably still plays a huge role today in the country's political (and developmental) gridlock. But that's a discussion for another day. This is the original interview for anyone who wants to read it: https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/i-will-die-protecting-this-country-kemi-badenoch-on-where-she-plans-to-take-the-tories (https://archive.is/Buggu), particularly for those who'll say they can't find a source for what she said, and for those who'll outright lie and declare emphatically that she has been misquoted without even checking the source themselves. |
Lexusgs430:I agree they should let her be. I find the whole attâche thing nauseating. NIDCOM and that woman at the head of it are shameless and they’re making us all look bad. I don’t know of any Nigerian that went about telling people oh do you know the new Conservative Party leader is a Nigerian? There are Nigerians in the top echelons of many global and national institutions - she’s not the highest profile and will not be the last. My issue with her is that if you want to disclaim Nigeria feel free to do it and do it entirely, not that every time you open your mouth about Nigeria it’s to say something that paints Nigerians in bad light. If you don’t want to be good PR for Nigeria, then don’t be bad PR either. Àbí ? Saying that, I recognize that it's her lived experience to express as she sees fit, so she can carry on, and we will also continue calling out her hypocrisy. |
Zahra29:She “says it like it is”… Unless it’s the greatest social crisis of the decade in which people are being mobbed in the streets, in which case she has nothing to say…or heinous comments by a top Tory donor, in which case she only says mealy-mouthed platitudes before rushing to diminish the seriousness of the situation. Indeed. |
Efftyy:What’s the total deposit? How long did you stay there? Did they tell you what needs cleaning or fixing? Do you have photos and videos of how the place looked when you moved in and how it looks when you left? Is it in the same condition? Sounds to me like they’re trying to cheat you. Reality is that there’s an expected amount of wear and tear that occurs in every rented property and that increases the longer you stayed there. The fact that they did not tell you what needs fixing or cleaning upfront before asking for 100 is suspicious, and will likely count against them if you dispute it with the deposit scheme. Either way, it depends on how much the 100 means to you and if it’s worth the time and effort it may take to prove your case. If I were in your shoes, I would dispute it as a matter of principle (read: stubbornness) even though the sum isn’t substantial. I’ve never had a penny deducted from my deposits in the two places I rented because I was very deliberate about caring for the places and deep-cleaning them when moving (first time by ourselves and second one by paying for a professional post-tenancy clean). If the landlords had attempted to take anything, I’d have happily disputed it and supplied all the evidence. |
ehizario2012:Medical doctors. The bill has a lot more detail if you want to know more: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/bills/cbill/59-01/0012/240012.pdf |
babajeje123:Congratulations! 🎊 |
Zahra29:I didn't say there are no people with other concerns outside of religious reasons. I even expressed mine. I said how 'most' of the criticism appears to me based on much of the commentary I have seen. Not sure how you inferred narrow-mindedness from that but mo ti gbọ́, mo ti gbà 🙌🏿. |
Zahra29:You haven't read the bills (both the Falconer one and the Leadbeater one that passed) or the reports around them. Here's the report - https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-10123/CBP-10123.pdf If you read it, you'll see that the bills were written specifically to address the issues you've raised. There's no mention of suffering in the bill that passed, and it specifically excludes mental illness and disability. It doesn't follow that because Netherlands and wherever else allow a different set of criteria, then the UK will automatically do the same eventually. Countries have very different rules on various similarly sensitive issues. On Canada, again if you read the bill or the report you'll see that the flaw of ambiguity in the Canadian law was addressed directly by specifying a timeline and also mandating the consideration of alternatives by the reviewing doctors. This follows the model in some US states that has never been successfully challenged (and mandatorily expanded) in court. And before you say that the ECtHR is more likely to expand it to prevent discrimination, the court has actually recently indicated (Daniel Karsai) that it recognizes the difference between systems based on suffering and terminal illness. It's not a fallacy to consider that the UK might seek to do whatever, but it's a fallacy to make it seem as if an expansion is a certain or even likely consequence. And nobody ever said people shouldn't seek to prevent such expansions. Just as some people will be campaigning to expand it, those opposed should also campaign. Afterall, 'this is the UK' - home of democracy. Similarly, the argument that it's 'open to abuse' is just false. The possibility of abuse exists in every law and policy, but the safeguards in the bill are demonstrably quite solid. To be clear, I'm not saying there's no cause for concern with the bill or the practice. There are areas I would like to see strenghtened - particularly about the right of clinicians to refuse to participate on the basis of their conscience. Ultimately though, it appears to me that most of the hand-wringing about the bill is by people who have objections based on their own morality (usually derived from religion) and are willing to deprive others of their agency to satisfy their own beliefs (Not saying this is you in particular). |
Zahra29:On what basis do you think the bridge is a lot closer? The differences between people who are terminally ill with <6 months to live and those who have very painful conditions in general has been clear from the beginning but the supporters of the bill chose the specific places to set the conditions. Every law and policy has cases that don't fit into it but don't quite do so, and thus aren't eligible for whatever it is. That has never been a valid argument not to implement a law. Similarly, the fact that a law can be amended (following all the usual parliamentary and other approval processes) to broaden its scope is a poor argument against it. Otherwise, no law would pass because depending on how active your imagination is, you can think up various ways in which every single law can be extended abusively. That's why the slippery slope argument is a fallacy - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope I'm not strongly for or against the law, but it appears to me that it's very well drafted with several strict conditions ranging from time delays to medical opinions (two independent ones) and even a high court decision on each specific case. It's never going to be an easy thing, in its current form. That is where the critique ought to be. |


, which arguably still plays a huge role today in the country's political (and developmental) gridlock. But that's a discussion for another day.