₦airaland Forum

Estharfabian:
Clothing is not a significant factor in sexual Violence.

Sexual aggressors Would still Commit the dreaded act irrespective Of How short Your skirt is. or how much cleavage Your tank top reveals.

Yes, we get that. Buh......

....truth be told, we can't just decide to wear Booty revealing clothes At 12 Mid9t, walking alone...With A mark on Our forehead screaming "YOU CAN'T RAPE ME EVEN IF I WALK AROUND NAKÈD" that's plain stupidity!

It's testing fate.
Although no one deserves rápe. there are ways to prevent it.

I Can't just leave my Phone in the library, bank or someplace Open and Not expect to have it get stolen. Of course It would get stolen. but then again, I could've prevented it. yes, The thief shouldn't have taken it. its not their business where i left it. Buh, honestly, I could've prevented it from getting stolen by Putting it in my purse, bag or something..
At the end, I'm the victim. the one who lost A phone.

Why?
because I was careless, ignorant and somewhat nonchalant.

Wearing provocative clothes doesn't mean You deserve to be rapèd, but it makes one more vulnerable. hence, fuelling the Evil, Causing the Rapist to Rápe.

ShiroSan:
but if I seize the phone, she will start sulking. I don't want to come off as bad belle.

KingEbukasBlog:
Errr ... I am not going to purport myself as incredulous - and my belief in the miracle does not affect you in anyway . Its my belief not yours

KingEbukasBlog:
I did observe changes in the hand and I watched the video with an open mind . Thank God for the miracle

SweetOlive:
I believe this. Glory to God

Dojupyo:
Which kind talk be this
I no follow you, talk rubbish.. E be like sey you leave your brain for sleep..
Abi, Egbon

Dojupyo:
Same here o. Me come dey wonder when He die and who kill am..
Like sey e possible.. God na the creator of the whole universe, still seated on His Throne, whose footstool is on earth..

Op, I take God beg you, edit that heading sharp sharp

folksync:
They should rehabilitate all his followers. They are potential terrorists.

Pharaoh9:
Did the people he burnt complain to you? they accepted it and God knows why it happened,


God is Great


they should leave the man of God alone

Rich4god:
If all these funds where invested in agriculture and human development, the world would have been better than what it is now.... No different between human and wild animals... Destruction always in our mind.

kunlesufyan:
Funny how humans will settle down and spend millions on devices that would take lives in multiple folds..to even think someone tot of blowing up the moon ..wetin moon do you?

Explorers:
Testing a Hydrogen Bomb in Space.

In 1962, having given up on trying to blow up the moon, American scientists wanted to see what would happen if a nuclear bomb was exploded in space. In an operation codenamed Operation Starfish Prime, a powerful hydrogen bomb was launched in the nose of a Thor rocket to detonate some 250 miles above the Pacific Ocean. The test wasn’t without its controversy and brought forth protests across the globe. However, yhe Honolulu Advertiser was rather more upbeat with its cheerful headline “Nuclear Blast Tonight May be Dazzling; Good View Likely.” The device detonated in space at 11pm Honolulu time, on July 9th. Once again the explosion turned out to be more powerful than had been expected. The night sky was lit up by the blast and glowed in blue, red and green. An electromagnetic pulse knocked out electrical services up to 1500 kilometres away, disrupted telephone service, set off burglar alarms, and damaged satellites.

johnydon22:
The thing is an agnostic do not subscribe to any creationism not even a personal one... they maintain the actuality of God(s) are unknown either in principle or in facts.

So once one invokes a creationism theory to explain causality it leans away from plain agnosticism but could rather be termed Agnostic Theism or agnostic deism.

I am an Agnostic Atheist. Agnostic in the sense that i am also of the opinion that the actuality of any God(s) is unknown, unproven and cannot be substantiated and in the same sense an Atheist because i disbelieve all the claims around or the cases where such assumption is invoked as a placeholder for scientific ignorance

johnydon22:
You are rather a more of a Deist not agnostic

johnydon22:
Of course .. For One to be Agnostic one would need to first disbelieve all the God(s) around before agreeing to the undecidability of those claims, that position makes one atheist.

You will see someone who believes in no God but still wouldn't like to be called atheist. . .

People need not address themselves as atheists or so if they find the label hard but it doesn't change the fact.

I am an agnostic atheist and i never leave the "atheist" part when saying that..

Think more likely people are atheists even when they don't yet agree with it or realize it yet.

cruzita:
and he was feeling on top of the world not knowing he was the only one viewing his own pics