₦airaland Forum

Kingcalls:
While messi has 0 goals in 4 games

He has only played three games, and he came on late into the game in his first. Besides, it's just the beginning of the season, how can you judge a matter from the beginning when you don't even know the end yet? This is coming from someone who belittled another person's IQ.

Kingcalls:
Man u doing good b4 he arrived ...then y hv man u fans been calling for oles sack b4 Ronaldo joined?? Deluded minions

Rather ...psg doing good b4 messis arrival

PSG doing good before Messi's arrival? Remind me which team won the ligue 1 title last season again.

Karleb:
Your usage of FACT gave you out.

We don't use that here. We don't also call theories guess work because they are called theories for a reason.

A theory can become wrong only when you have new set of discoveries that wasn't available when the theory was earlier theorized. Most modifications to wrong theories are like taking the present theories to another level.

Take for example; there was a time atomic theory stated that atom is an indivisible particle of an element. But, modern atomic theory states that an atom can be broken into proton, neutron and electron.

I understand you bro. Like I said, I was referring to a hypothesis.

A theory is only accepted to be correct based on the availability of information and materials to support a hypothesis at that time.

Karleb:
I'm guessing you never studied chemistry, physics or biology at any level.

If you did, you wouldn't be making this line of argument.

I was actually talking about a hypothesis, not theory. Sorry, both concepts get twisted to me sometimes.

And no, I didn't “never” study those subjects you mentioned. How could a single misconception make you arrive at such conclusion?

Karleb:
Maybe you are not talking about scientific theories. When new knowledge about a subject matter arises, theories can be modified if they are found wanting.

Baba, theory is not a guess o. Where did you hear that?

You cannot believe in a theory.

If a theory is not a guess, then why does it lead to experiments? Why isn't it called a fact? You can't try to prove something that is already proven, can you? And if it's already proven, then it's a fact.

Karleb:
You don't believe in theories.

Whether you believe it, care about it or not, it's there staring at you.

...and yes, our universe is expanding. You might not be able to understand it if you don't have basic knowledge of physics and that's okay too.

I think you're talking about facts. Not all theories are correct, that's why it is called a scientific guess.

So you either believe or don't believe in a theory, because those are the factors that determine its viability.

I hope this thread hits front page. It's interesting to see a thread as educative as this here. We rarely see threads about applied sciences moved to the front page.

Lalasticlala, please do justice to this. Thanks!

A001:
Lols. You don craze

That guy craze nor be here.

Kobojunkie:
God did not send anyone out to protest in His name. You might think He is saying the truth but what that man does, by invoking the name of God in this, is insult God and suggesting that the lies he spews is of God and His teachings and commandments to us.

This is why I said you've set out to cause disunity in Christianity. Where there's little or no fault, you'll make sure you pay close attention just to ridicule pastors or at least those who claim to be. Someone is protesting for a good cause, you left the main message and focused on something else. Doesn't this reveal your intentions here?

slawormiir:
Damnnn niggar
Isoright...

I pity gullible followers of these god of men

You're actually the one who should be pitied, with your impetuous lifestyle you keep displaying here with pride.

My hatred for Man United can't reduce my respect for this guy.

Tickles001:
A very strange scientist indeed. With a lot of brain stretching theories.

He also theorized that space can be bent.
Like it's possible to bend the space between two distinct points, to bring the two points closer to each other.

Take for example. We could bend the space between Lagos and California, that people in these two cities could literally see each other and even trek across.

And has a hand in exotic matter.

Lol I wonder the rationale behind the space bending theory. What does ”space bending” mean literally?

MrColdsweat:
When was the last time you finished ahead of liverpool on the epl table?

Why are you changing the topic now?

Since the last time Chelsea finished above Liverpool on the table, how many times has Liverpool won the epl? Just once. At the end of the day, the same goal is achieved -- UCL spot, so what's the point?

MrColdsweat:
Buy pen and note book for your classes next weekend.
We will teach you DEF 101: Effective and conservative defending via the high line and the offside trap.


This city that raped you today to the extent that you couldn't fire a single shot, they will park the bus at anfield.

See you next week.

Hahaha! Belle dey sweet me for laugh wey I wan laugh that day.

DEF 101, and them still collect 4 for house with their DEF 101. Guy nor kee me with laugh abeg.

MrColdsweat:
Go and check our head to head against city. No team has troubled city in the past 5 years like liverpool.

No team guardiola fear most like liverpool. Since guardiola came to city in 2016, he won his first match at anfield this year.

Aguero did not score at anfield his entire period at city.

We did not do this by parking the bus.

Parking the bus is for cowards.

And you've been getting whooped recently.

Play your high line football against this city side next week, and we'll see the result.

By the time them hit una on counter with those fast attackers, una eyes go clear.

MrColdsweat:
Bros. Liverpool does not sit deep under klopp.

We will rather come out, play attacking football and lose honorably than park the bus like cowards.

Sitting deep is for cowards.

Don't use that one to console yourself.

Losing 5-0, 4-0 and 4-1 isn't honourable. Again, I'll say this to you. Chelsea doesn't sit deep always. At least we're admitting that Man city is a much better playing team than ours, so it's better to avoid humiliations.

At the end of the day, the result counts. If you play a high line and end up losing, then the other team is obviously better. Make una sha play the highline beat them the same 5-0 make I see.

You played a high line against Brentford and conceded 3. Try that against this City side and collect double.

MrColdsweat:
In 2017, liverpool won city 3 consecutive times. And yes, we pressed Hugh against city all those times, everytime.

God forbid liverpool park bus against city, small boys of yesterday.

Only small teams in the champions park the bus.

In epl, Chelsea is the only team that parks the bus Every Time.

Na so una still press high some seasons ago wey una collect 5-0. Two seasons ago, una still chop 4-0. Last season, una collect 4-1 for house. What does it profit your team to play massive attack against City and still get rapes? Una nor wan humble una selves and them still dey teach una lessons repeatedly.

MrColdsweat:
That's quality football man. The best teams try to outscore each other.

Brentford has taught you how to play football. You don't just block your post with 8players praying for counter, hoping your opponents make mistake.

That's hospital football mehn.

Like for full 90 mins, zero shot on target, zero shot off target....

Disgraceful from Chelsea.

Admittedly, Tuchel got his tactics wrong today. Obviously, Pep was smarter. Chelsea got into the game at some point in the second half, but it was too late. Why didn't City score more goals even after Chelsea started attacking?

If we had attacked them right from the start, the scoreline would have been different. Compare this game with the UCL final and you'll see the difference, so Tuchel definitely got it wrong today.

But it's better than coming out and trying to play against a better team and ending up being whooped at your own backyard. Play this way against city next week and your team will be walloped like a championship side.

crazygod:
Point of correction. Liverpool fans don't make noise like Chelsea. As for Chelsea, they have been disturbing the social media since last week about flogging Pep again.

We have the bragging rights, yes because we beat them thrice in a spin. Tell me whoelse has done that against Pep. Y'all were expecting a 3 to 4-nil scoreline abi? You guys should press high next week please and collect another 4-1, I nor fit wait to laugh abeg.

MrColdsweat:
We will teach you how to play city like big boys.

When we play city, we constantly attack and squeeze goals out of them.

Unlike Chelsea wey park bus, still no fit come fire one single shot....

You must learn good football by force.

Like you constantly attacked and squeezed goals out of them and collected 4-1 at Anfield abi? Hahaha! Dey there dey deceive yourself o. You guys should play like this next week, I need something to laugh about abeg.

crazygod:
The defense has let us down today. 1/10

Man city dey wait for una next week. Them dey beat Chelsea, belle dey sweet una. Oya beat Brentford make una go three points clear, una nor fit. These Liverpool fans una don dey too talk. If Chelsea nor win EPL this season, na Man city still get am.

As a Chelsea fan, this is a consolation for our defeat against City. Aston Villa oyeee!

MrColdsweat:
Can you see how chelsea sit deep against city waiting for counter?

If Tuchel is superior to guardiola, why would he sit deep?

Take away the low block Tuchel is bang average

Match never finish na. Did you watch the Spurs vs Chelsea game last week? Tuchel used the first half to study the game. He didn't attack much in the first half, but in the second half, Chelsea tore them apart. I hope you know how it ended? Nor dey rush dey type, nor be by initial gragra, let's see how the second half goes first.

cybertron88:
Dem no get striker but Dem they score 5 goals against Liepzig. When city jam well organized team na dat time una go remember say Dem no get striker. Is it not d same team they used in strolling to winning d league last season. Aguero was injured most part of d season.

Na 6 goals them score sef. Them score 6 goals against Leipzig, con go play goalless draw against Southampton. Them just waste goals that night lol.

ScrillyGOAT:
You should have seen Chelsea fans ranting about the defensive midfield trio of Kante, Jorginho and Kovacic. The hell they promised us is what City's midfield is showing them how to go about it.

You either didn't watch Spurs vs Chelsea or you're just being hateful. Calm down and wait for second half.

Benwallt:
Tuche is studying mancity. Second would be a different ball game

Leave those haters, let them keep making noise. Them think say na by initial gragra.

crazygod:
Exactly. Their strength is their keeper and defense. City has managed to shut their midfield. City midfield is way superior to Chelsea

Make sure you watch second half.

Alejandrah:
Formation don't win you games.
Chelsea will be chasing the game like headless chickens....Then
Pep being Pep will over think and lose the game.
But I hope not!

If formation doesn't win you games, then what does?

Almost exactly the formation and team I predicted yesterday. Let's win this one boys.

I hope you guys are watching the pre-match analysis and seeing the difference between Tuchel and Lampard against Man city? Tuchel's philosophy is top notch, man marking at its peak.

Kobojunkie:
1. I already told you that I belong to no sects or churches or cults.

2. Again, Jesus Christ made it clear that no man is to fleece his sheep in his name. Anyman who makes his living out of the earnings of God's sheep is one those God declared Himself against in Ezekiel 34 vs 1 - 16 and again in John 10 vs 1 - 16

If you can't make sense of what is stated in those passages by Almighty God Himself, then there is no point to this, is there?

The question is, how do you know this pastor is fleecing his sheep? What is the relationship between those bible passages and the original post of this thread?

Kobojunkie:
Denominationalism? I am afraid you are not making sense to me at all since I don't belong to any of your churches to begin with.

Jesus Christ made it clear that no man is to fleece his sheep in his name. Anyman who makes his living out of the earnings of God's sheep is one those God declared Himself against in Ezekiel 34 vs 1 - 16 and again in John 10 vs 1 - 16

Your JW sect is a denomination on its own. You lot think you know it all and thus any Christian whose understanding doesn't align with yours is seen as an enemy to the faith. You people think you're the only ones getting it right. Keep deceiving yourself with that adulterated bible version you read.

So what proof do you have that the pastor in this context is fleecing his sheep? How much do you know about him? I'm not an advocate of prosperity messages, but the word of God doesn't say a pastor can't be wealthy. If you don't have evidence, don't lay blind claims.

Kobojunkie:
Does he have another job other than the church he runs?

I don't know, I don't know much about his personal affairs but that is not enough reason for me to lay such serious allegations against him regarding church funds. You are driven by denominationalism and that isn't godly. You better search your heart, it's not by quoting Bible verses out of context here and there.