₦airaland Forum

Kobojunkie:
There is however everything wrong with wealth and riches collected from God's flock in the name of God - God never allowed for such neither did he command anyone to do so. And so those who use such funds do not do this in His name.

Oga what evidence do you have to prove that he collects money from his flock and used them personally? Why are you JW people so myopic and judgmental?

crafteck:
Just like i said, you select what he did and what he didnt do probably according to your mood...

I don't get you.

crafteck:
Funny guy... So the supreme destroyed 999,so the supreme is the reason for everything including sin abi you choose which hes responsive for as you wish.

God does not sin. Like I said, He's supreme and sovereign, so we can't judge Him by our standards because His standards are infinitely higher than ours. Mind you, I never said He was the one who caused the destruction.

crafteck:
Shut up and stop the confusion, its about the topographical gradient, volcanic flow like flood will will have more effects on areas that it has more ease of flow.... ... Also take temprature, abrasive force, pressure into play... Its simply luck.. Hence if you decide the power of god protected one house in a thousand, you should not forget to say same god smothered the 999 remaining.

God is supreme and sovereign over all things.

If He decided to let other properties get destroyed and leave just that one house, He had a purpose for that and there's nothing you and I can do about it.

MrBrownJay1:
pure coincidence and luck.... lol. some brainwashed fool is already putting it as god's work. i guess all the other houses where the devil's homes abi?!

Everything (over 350 properties) in the path of that eruption was destroyed, and the house was PERFECTLY okay, UNTOUCHED and you say it's a coincidence? You do not have any proof of that. It won't cost you anything to say ”I don't know why”

xorojinxx:
In as much as, so many reasonable points has been made here, I'm of the conclusion that, no matter what Chelsea does or would do, people will always hate the club.

You see, the level of hate some fans have against Chelsea has gone beyond football.

Even in the Champions League victory, most commentaries was about the mistakes Guardiola made and not the right calls Tuchel made.

I praise Chelsea fans who go into arguments with some guys because, as a Chelsea fan you cannot convince non-supporters.

Should Chelsea lose tomorrow, you will see virtually the whole place filled with joy and celebration.

But if Chelsea should win, you will begin to hear how Tuchel went to Boeing to buy five (5) airplanes to block the net, or how they somehow reduced Chelsea's goal post.

All in all, one of three things must happen tomorrow... A Win, draw or loss.

Leave those frustrated people jare. Like I always say, success is always sweeter when most people look down on you.

MrColdsweat:
This is not about winning games. It is about the football system. Tuchel without the low-block is average. We saw that at psg and dortmund. The moment he began to use the low-block, he won the champions league.

The question is this, is he special for using the most dangerous defensive weapon in football?

Absolutely not. Even a di matteo conquered europe with it.
A
Praising Tuchel is like praising a man for using a gun to win a knife fight.

As a chelsea fan, Asides the low-block and the counter attacks, what other repeatable acts do you see in tuchels system?

At least man utd fans know that they overload the left side and switch to greenwood on the right.
With Liverpool, Arnold, Salah and Elliot create triangles on the right side so that arnold can create chances.

Tell me, asides the low-block, what other repeated patterns do you see chelsea do?

Guardiola is suffering not because chelsea or Tuchel is good but because the low block is impregnable.

Everybody struggles against the low block.

Tuchel does not use a low block technique. The players don't sit deep and expect the other team to attack them and then depend on counters. The only game that was employed was against Liverpool, and you wouldn't expect the team not to do that with a red card against a deadly Liverpool team.

This Chelsea team I've been watching recently is not a typical low block team, they just know how to sustain pressure and restore balance to a high-octane game. Can you compare this Chelsea team to Simeone's Atletico Madrid and Chelsea under Mourinho and Di Matteo. Do you even know what you're saying at all?

Just because the defenders don't play a high line like Liverpool doesn't make Chelsea a low block team. Tuchel has drilled this Chelsea team to defend well when attacked, and when they possess the ball, they create chances. You think football is all about fancy passing and being more possessive of the ball?

Tuchel is a flexible coach, he knows when his team should defend and when they should attack, and that has worked for him in Chelsea, the game against Spurs last week speaks volume, a single substitution changed the course of the game totally. If Guardiola likes, he should employ Ederson as a midfielder, it doesn't change the fact that Tuchel has overcome him thrice and forced him to change tactics which eventually didn't work.

Forget low block or high block, if a coach can come up on top thrice against another coach in a season, it simply exposes a flaw in the loser coach's tactics, nothing more. I wonder the excuse you'll give again if Chelsea wins tomorrow!

Dazall:
Kante, Kovacic and Jorginho did not start those games you mentioned together in the first half. Who uses his 3 best midfielders to start a game against a team like city.

When they get tired in the second half who do you bring in. Barkley, Rlc, Saul?

Against spurs Tuchel brought Kante in the second half so what's your point.

Starting the 3 midfielders together will only exposed the team in the second half of the game.

You're right, but don't undermine Tuchel's tactical prowess. James is known for his versatility as a wing back, full back and defensive midfielder.

If Chelsea manages to grab the lead and City (expectedly) builds up the pressure, Tuchel can deploy James as a defensive midfielder, taking off either Jorginho or Kovacic, if Kante doesn't get injured.

Mind you, Kante had just returned from an injury, that's why he didn't start that game.

Na China and Australia cause this one so o.

Mtcheew! disguised reverse psychology.

Is this the new trend now? Holding up placards to appeal to the public for assistance.

MrColdsweat:
My criteria is not success but the artistic nature of their football systems. Tuchel had neymar and mbappe and couldn't make psg a world class elite team.

How do you define an elite team? Isn't it by their results on the pitch? Before you get the results, then there must be a certain level of artistry demonstrated on the pitch.

Tuchel took PSG to their first ever UCL final and managed to lose 1-0 to a Bayern team that thumped Barcelona 8-2. Why didn't Guardiola beat Tuchel when it mattered the most, in a UCL final? Wasn't he artistic enough? A coach who forced your so called genius coach to change tactics twice and failed, is someone you call a boy, and you compare him with Sarri, Pioli, Graham Potter and others?

You say you're not on about results, but you're the one who talked about records. You're contradicting yourself, you see why I say you're just a Chelsea hater? You can't come to terms with the fact that Chelsea has been one of the dominant teams in England for a while now. You can't say these things if Tuchel wasn't a Chelsea manager, I'm very sure about that.

MrColdsweat:
you saw their records where guardiola won him at the bundesliga but your tiny little, warped mind decided to make it about chelsea.

I'm not responsible for your inability to comprehend simple grammar.

When was the last time a team other than Bayern won the Bundesliga? Tuchel managed Mainz and Borussia Dortmund, and you expected him to come on top against a star-studded Bayern team?

As a matter of fact, those records are not entirely bad for a team with lesser talent. He was hammered in Mainz, but when he moved to Dortmund, Guardiola only beat him once. Any coach can handle that Bayern team and win the league every season, so don't bring that record here. What is the record now that Tuchel has a much better team than what he had at Mainz and Dortmund?

I'll say it again, your hatred for Chelsea has caused you to judge this matter poorly. The sentiments are written all over your comments. Sorry ass hater.

MrColdsweat:
Silly comparison.

Guardiola is miles ahead of tuchel

Yet Tuchel defeated him three times in the same season, rendering him clueless tactically.

Your analyses are always filled with sentiments when it comes to Chelsea.

Guardiola had more quality players when they faced each other three times last season but Tuchel came out on top in all occasions, including a UCL final. Yet you say Guardiola is miles ahead? You're just a sorry ass Chelsea hater.

Chingykay77:
He needs Mount on the pitch

Mount has been a shadow of himself this season. It won't be fair to keep Kovacic who has been arguably our best player this season, on the bench. He played without Mount in the second half on Sunday and the pattern worked fine.

caracas:
Oga there's nothing special about this Chelsea team , they've just been lucky so far.
Of all the games they've played this season they were second best ....but have been lucky enough to scratch through wins.

Another excuse from a pained Chelsea hater. I hope you're not a frustrated Arsenal, or Man United fan?

chikason22:
The beginning of Chelsea's fall starts tomorrow. All the hype will soon crumble.
Bookmark this .
This is not bad belle but it's what it is. You guys won't beat City tomorrow.

I don save this page and I go put am for reminder. We go talk at around 2:30 pm tomorrow.

Dazall:
The bolded is the reason you can never be a successful football manager

Oh! I guess Tuchel is a failure for using that formation against Spurs in the second half and winning the game 3-0.

If you don't know anything about how something works, then don't say anything or just ask questions. You didn't ask why I think using those three together should work, and you didn't state why you think it won't work. Yet, you decided to make a hasty conclusion about my coaching ability.

Are you aware that Tuchel also used those three together towards the end of the second half in the UCL final and we defended really well and created some chances? .

Silentgroper:
Can aziplicueta play on d left? Does alonso play lwf?.

abi na d formation u dey use for p.s

It's actually a 3-5-2 formation, with Azpilicueta and Alonso maintaining their RWB and LWB positions respectively.

That formation enables Alonso to push forward more, and Kovacic to function more widely and cover up for Alonso when he's caught out of position sometimes. It's an all-attack and quick-retrieval formation. It was used against Spurs in the second half last Sunday.

g4gerald:
I wud prefer dis team wen chelsea is already winning d game to keep possession, d squad looks more defensive cos jojinho nd kovasic are not attacking minded, mount shud be up there wit werner nd lukaku till they score then we can revert to ur suggestion

On the contrary, Kovacic is an attack-minded midfielder, unlike Jorginho. He (Kovacic) is a beast when given the opportunity to roam free around that left hand side area.

If you watched the Spurs game, it was goalless at half time and Mount didn't do much in the first half, the game was lacking creativity. When Kante was introduced in the second half, we were constantly on the front foot and Kovacic and Alonso were doing wonders down that left hand side.

Fortunately, it paid off and we got two goals early in the second half, and created lots of chances until the third goal came in. When Werner got in, Spurs became confused and terrorised further. So with that formation, we're more offensive, because Kante and Kovacic bring their versatility and pace, to ensure fluidity in the attack. So I think that formation would guarantee more goals, since we'll be playing with two strikers.

PacAmaru:
I thought you were gonna talk about smoking.
Smoekin is the hardest addiction to leave others are too cheap bro

I been battling smoekin for 1year now,I've smoked since 2013 till now,if I can stop smoking,it will be a miracle for me and I will be grateful to Allah

You can't say this when you haven't been addicted to everything one can be addicted to.

dontrulee:
Abeg, leave me with my addiction. I'll fall in love with my demons

At some point, you'll want out. You'll wish you were warned harder.

imam07:
nomse6. All those shot from d mid field,long distance free kick goals,and magnificent nodding nah rely goals? You don't know what u are saying. How old are u? I guest u just started following soccer.

Ancestor, wise one!

I hail o!

Hahaha!
In other words, “we nor send you. You're OYO”

Brandonx:
I’ve said it before there’s nothing wrong in filming sexual moments with your spouse especially if it’s a distant relationship.
It benefits outweighed the disadvantages so madam Kemi should keep quiet �

What are the benefits of that?

saphiere:
I've been a victim.

You've been a “victim”?

Did they force you to do it?

Ajax just scam Chelsea and United anyhow.

See how these two adults, especially this agbaya of a man, are publicly shaming themselves and their families.

O ma se o.

saphiere:
This man is a trouble maker. Always posting about his family whenever Tonto Dikeh is emotionally down. Should anything happen to Tonto, we know who to hold.

Did he tag her when he posted those pictures? He should not post pictures in peace again because his ex has refused to live a drama-free life? I wonder what really goes on in that head of yours. Sometimes, I feel you're some kinda bot.

Great100000:
You be baddest and Tuchel na baddest too, how can you even introduce Werner again after u don put Kante...

I'd like to see that again on Saturday, and next Wednesday against Juve. Now wey them nor dey in form, make we use am take revenge for the 3-0 wey them give us for 2013.

jondabeloved:
kante, j5 and kovacic in one match

It happened against Spurs in the second half of last Sunday's game, we all know how that ended. The terror became worse when Werner got into the game.

DrSamOnowu87:
change ke no be only change na transform. They can only change their jersey & not d pattern especially with Ole as d coach.

Honestly, Man United only needed a good goalscorer in that game. They created all the chances, but no one was there to convert it. They would have won that game if they had someone who can score goals.

3-5-2

Mendy
Christensen
Silva
Rudiger
Azpilicueta/James
Kante
Jorginho
Kovacic
Alonso
Werner
Lukaku

If Tuchel uses this formation and team against city on Saturday, there's no way Chelsea isn't winning that game, sentiments aside.