₦airaland Forum

bemeruca:
Remove racism from this. Any time you go for an interview or take a call from an interviewer, they make you feel you are getting the job and you are doing well even if you are not.

That's always true in the Western world. I have worked in the UK, Nigeria, and now the US.

They are always giving positive vibes so don't be confident of getting a job after an interview. Maybe there is someone better

Stfu, you don't work in the US and have never been to the US.
And from all accounts here you left the UK because you couldn't get papers.
You have 0 idea what networking is like in the US, esp when you have friends who run shit.

The mods should ban you for this lying. I'm sure you're seeding these lies to run a scam.

raumdeuter:
Occam razor
Option 3 - The easier explanation. There was someone who was a better fit and knew more than your friend whose resume was submitted.

When 10 elite people contest for 1 spot, 9 of them will lose it. It doesnt make them bad its just that someone was better
Why am I not playing for Lakers, or Cowboys or an Olympian or working at NASA?? because there are people better than me!! SIMPLE!!!


But perpetual victims will never get that. It has to be some grand conspiracy against them. That is why you will always remain a failure and anyone who thinks like you

Except there was a bigger issue regarding him and his company and accusations of racism. He was concerned the board would let him go.
So, he asked a couple of other black friends to sit on the board. One turned him down because he thought the allegations may have merit.

The applicant was super tight. Would be taking a substantial pay cut to work there. But it may be the case that there was other candidates but it may also be the case that our friend has a blind spot when it comes to race. I think both perspectives may have merit. I just think it is fair to evaluate both first.

My friend grew up around racism when he was young. His dad was racist. He's open about it. He is the only white guy in this crew.

The problem is that you as a Black man in the US, see racism as impossible with all the evidence around you. It speaks to a greater issue with you.

bemeruca:
Let's assume your lies are true.

So people get hired by there resume alone not by the interview/ performance?
Nigger shutup

When a close friend who also sits on the board of your company brings you a resume, you think that resume is tight and that person does a good interview, you really really consider hiring that person.
But, I know the person, and he has a tendency to hype things because he wants to be endearing, so he may have hyped the resume because we are all friends.
So,there is an element of truth and fairness in what you say. What is fair. Is it fair to get a job based on connections. Haven't white people been doing that forever? I don't know, I just wanted to add context for my friend to consider before causing drama in our group chat.

But, you will never know as you're a broke ass.

raumdeuter:
You are a known and confirmed reetard so its not surprising that you attract others of your ilk
In the chat you showed, you were the first person to ask Was the new hire white? What has that got to do with why smeone failed to make it in an interview? So the only reason you didnt get the job was because you competed against a white guy? That mentality will ensure you remain a failure for life. millions of Africans living in US are doing great despite their color, name and sex but you have already given yourself an excuse. Why did you bother to attend the interview when you knew you were black?


Every job you get in America you likely beat other races to it even if its a cleaner or factory worker job. The job you got, did you not beat other white people and other races to it? So why is it that its the race question that came to your mind?

I have done better than a large percentage of people in this country despite my Africanness, Blackness, African first middle and last name

Yet you are your victim echo chambers are always whining. That is why I am certain you are a failure, winners dont whine.

Recap because you're an idiot and facts don't seem to enter your head. These are obvious clips from a larger chat.
My boy hit me up to get my opinion on a mutual friend who he thought was racist.
He recommended someone (who was black) for a position. Didn't tell our friend he was black and you couldn't tell from his resume (whote sounding name as we talked about earlier).
My white friend (a really really good friend) who is the CEO and President was super excited, said his resume was dope and interview went well but didn't hire him after the interview, even though he makes the final decisions.

So, what would some reasonable questions be in ascertaining racist intent?
1.) Was the guy really tight and a good fit for the org?
2.) Was the person he hired instead white and not black?

My boy who I'm chatting with sits on a number of boards and even the board of our white friend's organization. Very successful. He is not Mr. everything is racist. And he thinks I'm even less so than he is.
So, again, figure out your insecurities that make you think you are less deserving of being treated equally than everyone else.

raumdeuter:
Yet you have made the claims of racism and sexism more than anyone here. Yet you live in a so called Blue city/State. I have never met anyone who I felt was racist or sexist to me, you find them daily everytime even when you are alone with yourself and playing with yourself you find your right hand racist to your left

Those are signs of psych issues

You have evolved into a morron, what you should challenge is the doctor who refused to institutionalize you

And there is that failure in logic again.
I'm going to do this for you because I think it's important for you to recognize how much of a coon you are.
My African friend thinks I don't call things racist because I'm African. But, I do it to be as fair as possible.
So, when I do say something is racist, it's because I've gamed out the alternatives.
Yet you somehow see me as someone who always sees racism everywhere.

You should see a counselor and figure out why you hate yourself the way you do and don't think you are worthy of being treated fairly.

raumdeuter:
It's always you that racism and sexism happens to. Everything wrong with America always happen to you. Maybe there is something about you that stands you out as retarded and tells people that you are a failure at first sight

You were the same fool who has never been a woman for 1 second arguing with biological females that they are experiencing sexism in the ways their names are called even when they told you it's not

I am sure you have experienced racism this morning already, you experience racism in your sleep in Lagos, you experience sexism in your bathroom

Just go and knock yourself out

Most people think I'm the last person to call something racist or sexist. I generally find those can be excuses and need real evidence. So when I do say it, people usually open up. I had a convo with a good friend last night who thought another mutual friend was racist for not hiring someone. I told him, I'm not sure, maybe their might be other factors, other candidate had better qualifications.

I like being evolved, challenging norms and archetypes and growing. You should try it.

raumdeuter:
You that believe you should vote someone because she has the same color and talking about emotions?

Every day you keep plunging new depths of extreme foolishness

Economy is the biggest concern in this election cycle. Obama a real Harvard graduate admitted yesterday admitted that the economy has not been good in the last 4yrs but you the serial failure is telling us everyone including Obama doesn't know what they are saying

Another Intellectualy dishonest diatribe.
I'm confidant you had a third tier education because only someone with such an education could write the logically deficient shit you write every time you write a post.
I am also confident you are mischaracterizing what Obama said as is common in the Intellectual Dishonest way you argue.
The truth is I think you're a fVking idiot. Too proud to want to learn and too stupid to know what he doesn't know.

It's no wonder you and Bemeruca sit around talking to each other. Weak men need the constant affirmation of other weak men.

raumdeuter:
Obama is a better candidate than Hilary Biden and that reflects on his polls with black people

Kamala is on a different level of bad, which explains why she's struggling with Black men. On levels lower than what a white woman Hillary, a white man Biden and a Black man got

If Kamala is struggling it has nothing to do with her sex or color, she is just a bad candidate

We know you are retarded so it's no surprise that you can't reason properly

Yeah, because racism and sexism don't exist.
I volunteered for the Hillary campaign and saw the sexism first hand while in North Carolina. It was so shocking to me it left an immense impression.

You spend quite a bunch of time writing nonsensical illiterate sounding posts here. Spend some time reading and the stuff you write may sound more intelligent.
I'm not sure why anyone would prefer to sound as illiterate as you do here daily.

raumdeuter:
Take this graph and go show it to people on the streets who are complaining about their economic realities

Yes, emotions always Trump facts.
That's why you are a black man voting for a racist party and I'm not.
You live in your emotions.

I showed you economic data showing that because of wage increase, prices are as affordable. You do your Captain Intellectual Dishonesty thing.

It's like someone from the 80's waking up now saying, wow bread used to be 25 cents, it's so unaffordable. Prices increase. The quesiton is have wages increase to offset them. The economic data says they have.

raumdeuter:
88% of black people including Black men supported Hillary Clinton

Abi Hillary no be woman

This is a really silly post as most of your posts are.
You just throw out a number as it means something because it is looks high.
What was this number as in relation to Obama? It was lower, Obama has 93% support.
And what is this number in relation to Kamala. It will most likely be lower as Kamala will have more Black woman support.
And what does the overall support of Black people have to do with Black men and sexism?
Your post is illiterate.

Obrigardo:
When every local teamsters and unions you can ever think of has endorsed her?

Oh look, it's maga cultists again with their INTERNAL DATA. Lol

All you maga cultists know of is polling polling polling lol, none of you are actually living in reality.

He has some horrendous political takes.

raumdeuter:
Trump's surrogate are the American people feeling the pinch of the brutal economy. He doesn't need one elite who does not know the price of groceries to tell the people about the economic struggles of the past 3yrs

Trump ruled for 4yrs that's their evidence of work done which they can compare with the last 3yrs. When was the last time Biden Obama or Clintkn went to a store to buy milk like ordinary Americans

In Nigeria as you are complaining about economy wait make Buhari GEJ and Obasanjo tell you it's actually good and the inflation plus bad govt is just your imagination

You write some of the most illiterate sounding posts. Whether it be economic illiteracy, political illiteracy or just legal illiteracy. You're just illiterate.

Groceries are more affordable now than in 2019. So why are prices still such a hot-button issue?
For more than two years now, higher prices have been pinching consumers’ wallets and testing their patience — but there’s at least one part of their monthly budget that has more breathing room these days: For the average U.S. worker, it now takes fewer hours of work to afford a week’s worth of groceries than it did five years ago, in August 2019.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/groceries-are-more-affordable-now-than-in-2019-so-why-are-people-still-so-mad-about-prices-74b5a6db

AmazonTopaz:
There is no intent of genocide. They are not getting killed because of any of the criterion that constitutes a genocide.

I have never seen it in history where a genocided group keep growing their population and at the same time continue to start wars they cannot win. I have never seen a genocided group reject peace but want war.

They are dying because that is what unfortunately happens in a war.

Israel is not targeting Palestinians because they intend to end their race, religion and nationality if they are doing so they are doing a very poor job at it. They would even start with the Palestinians living in Israel. We should use our heads please. Has Israel committed war crimes, yes I can agree but genocide is not one of them.

As to the criterion to genocide, IMAliyu2 wrote some good posts on that.
And I'll add that the UN believes that there are "reasonable grounds" to believe Israel is committing genocide.

But I'll take it from a different perspective.
What do you think Israel's long term objectives are?
And how does basically flattening Gaza fit into it?
In fact, what they are doing makes a 2 state solution even harder to accomplish. How can Israel can have a 2 state solution with a people after all that destruction and death? People have lost, mothers, fathers, siblings and children.
What are the goals of the settlers?

I think at a point we have to believe what some of Israeli politicians are saying and doing?
Look at some of the rhetoric
-Netanyahu brought up the Amalekites when referring to Palestine. He said You must remember what Amalek has done to you. The Amalekites were basically wiped out
-Their Defense minister said they were "fighting human animals".
-The Deputy Knesset speaker said on twitter their goal was "erasing the Gaza Strip from the face of the earth"
-Their Heritage Minister Amichay Eliyahu said they should drop a Nuclear Bomb on Gaza that there “no uninvolved civilians”

And lastly, just look at a map of Israel. Does it not look obvious what they are doing esp. in Gaza?

I miss Obama.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/-HLLxJciWlE

bemeruca:
hahahahahahahahaha
see what I made you post
we saw your censored pic in a submissive position with a white man who took you out for a date.
about good looking? if looking gay is good looking okay.

You made me write that post trashing you. You are a regular savant.
An idiot savant that is, with an expertise in dumbfuxery.
Well done!

I think you enjoy being a punching bag.
Any attention for you is good attention. Abi?

Pax,
Your fada.

bemeruca:
I trolled you to the point you created a new moniker claiming to have all the things I mocked you with. Like your kids, etc...
that was so funny. so the Bleep were you so ashamed of yourself in a faceless forum?

Motherfucka you've seen my pictures. I'm a good looking dude who takes care of my body, drives fast expensive cars, dresses well, travels the world and can (and occasionally do) bed a ton of bad, fVcking gorgeous women.

But, you think I'd rather have 4 kids I don't have custody of with a woman, well let's say (to be nice) I wouldn't touch blindfolded who still left you, while pretending to live in the US? You a stupid idiot.
Yeah, you're definitely living that good life. Lol. Cheers. Lol.

I punked your insecure self so badly, you had to lie and are still lying about living in the US. The loser puffed out his chest and posted pictures of a run down motel in Canada with a Canadian bus stop in the picture, saying they're pictures of his friends house where he slept on the couch his first night in the US. Even your lying cover story sounds loserish.
What an insecure loserish person you are.

Those are #facts.
Now, if you feel the need to constantly make up "lies" to troll someone, to feel better than that person, maybe it's time for a little reevaluation of yourself. The fact you spend so much energy lying about me.. makes me laugh inside. I'm your fada.

bemeruca:
You are right, I would have come up with a new moniker if I were to act like you and still got exposed.
You are the known loser here. maybe I am a loser for trolling you. I agree if that's the case. trolling is bad

Yes, you've trolled me so much, you've exposed yourself for the account hacking, hypocritical baby momma having, lying about living in the US, degenerate that you are.
You're really winning. Bravo.

Trump rejects Fox News invite to debate Harris in late October
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/fox-news-proposes-dates-possible-second-trump-harris-debate-2024-10-09/

Bwahahahah.
I guess he was scared of Fox News fact checking him as well.
Lol.

AmazonTopaz:
Just because it is unfortunate that thousands of people are dying in a war that they started doesn't automatically mean that it is a genocide.

Words have meaning and these pro-Palestine idiots disturbing my mentions on Twitter should leave me alone.

One very important proof of genocide is intent. Something that these people have failed to successfully make a case that Israel intends to kill them because of their race/ethnicity, nationality or religion.

It is intentional, the goal is to destroy as much and instill as much fear as they can so they can claim more land and control the area.
And they have a window to do it now when they feel Biden can't say much because of the election.
I called this action in Lebanon months ago. It's no suprise it's happening less than 30 days before the election.
The goal is to drag the US into a war with Iran, something Netanyahu has been calling for since Iraq (he was part of the reason we fought that war).
You don't have to believe me, there has been some good reporting as to what US diplomats say privately. Even Biden believes Israel is doing this to help Trump win. There has been a lot of private concern and fear in Biden's administration about what is going on.
Look at what Macron did this week, saying countries should stop giving Israel weapons. Imagine an ally saying that.

Here's one article on it.

Special Report: Emails show early US concerns over Gaza offensive, risk of Israeli war crimes

WASHINGTON, Oct 4 (Reuters) - As Israel pounded northern Gaza with air strikes last October and ordered the evacuation of more than a million Palestinians from the area, a senior Pentagon official delivered a blunt warning to the White House.
The mass evacuation would be a humanitarian disaster and could violate international law, leading to war crime charges against Israel, Dana Stroul, then the deputy assistant secretary of defense for the Middle East, wrote in an Oct. 13 email to senior aides to President Joe Biden. Stroul was relaying an assessment by the International Committee of the Red Cross that had left her “chilled to the bone,” she wrote.
“The U.S.’s lack of response on the humanitarian conditions for Palestinians is not only ineffective and counterproductive, but we are also being accused of being complicit to potential war crimes by remaining silent on Israel’s actions against civilians,” Russo wrote.
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/emails-show-early-us-con

bemeruca:
your hypocrisy is what is radiating. Nobody can insult me on this forum
Ijebos, Budaatum have all tried. so stop crying that is petty. you are a man.

Being shameless is not a value.
Anybody else would have disappeared by now and tried to come back with a new name.
For some reason you seem dedicated to not only this thread but to being the Loser you are on this thread.

I couldn't imagine my whole existence being proven a lie like yours has been and going as if it's no big deal.

bemeruca:
You were crying when someone said your idea was ridiculous. You cried that they insulted you to the point Xavier5 has to apologize to you. Now you are calling someone useless 🤣🤣🤣

You people will not kill me with laugh here. Basilico he called you useless but almost died someone said he is saying ridiculous things.

I think every rational person understood what he was saying.
Most people don't like confrontational caustic discussions. And so would like to keep discussions civil.
People like you and Basilico prefer otherwise because you're quite vacuous.
You have set your tone, and so you reap what you have sewn.

basilico:
Ijebos. I'll revisit soon about corrupt DC judges and prosecutors jack Smith et al . Especially Judge Beryl Howell. I think she is the worst.
Worse than judge Chutkan.

Judge Beryl Howell ruled Giuliani liable for defamation because he didn't provide all electronic evidence to Freeman and Moss, the two Georgia mother and daughter couple caught counting ballots multiple times. They were demanding all his electronic devices too . She ruled him liable and case went to jury trial to determine how much was enough to bankrupt Giuliani.

Interesting. Judge Engoron after going through Letitia James filing had already decided Trump was in violation of NY laws , trial was for him to determine how much $$$ was enough to bankrupt Trump

As a Harvard Ivy league graduate you should be asking yourself why the democrats expend every minute of the day attempting to stop him via TV, radio, newspapers, courts and of late bullets which they call shrapnel from teleprompters. That is, if you really really went to Harvard.

You don't need to revisit. A lot, if not all of the stuff you write is overly conspiratorial and lacking in basic facts.
Which then requires me to school you on the thing you posted. Just like with your last post re: Jack Smith.
It's rather valueless to me.

MTG caught Biden

basilico:
Thanks it's a 60 day rule not 90.
This judge is obviously biased allowing Jack Smith to do 166 page doc filing. Then unseal it.
She has jailed J6ers after sharply rebuking them She has been known to wonder out loudly why Trump is not on the dock ( not exact words). If she later rules that jack is illegally appointed it would be after damaging Trump politically.
You have judge and prosecutor bending rules to affect a campaign.

Was bored earlier in the day, I read your first first posts here circa 2017 where you adviced someone to read from several source's before declaring their stand, you seem to have abandoned that. I'm also curious why you disappointed for 3'years after using your handle around 10/20 times;

Jack Smith was biased because he violated a 60 day that's not a written rule even though he didn't have a choice in filing the brief as the Judge told him to.
So you move on to the Judge who is now biased because she asked Jack Smith to write the brief and he wrote a long one because that is exactly what the Supreme Court asked the Judge to do when they remanded the case.

You may want to consider that all this bias you're seeing is through your own biased eyes.

Yes, you should read multiple sources or start by just reading the articles you post. Like you should have done with this topic. Will make you smarter.
You wanted to find dirt on me so went back to read my old posts. Unfortunately for you, I am now who I was then.

basilico:
He broke the cardinal 90 day DOJ rule after expressing his greatest desire to have his sham trial before election.

You didn't find that cardinal 90 day rule did you? Lol.

1). The article referenced a 60 day rule. But there is no official 60 day rule or even 90 day rule. It is a norm or practice not codified anywhere in writing in any DOJ manual. The practice is that 60 days before an election you can't indict or do specific investigative steps. The reason is not to allow politics to play a role. An example would be a corrupt DOJ indicting a candidate or announcing they had opened an investigation 10 days before an election. There is no way for the candidate to clear their name in that time. So that indictment/announcement would hang over their head whether it was true or not. Exactly what happened to Hillary Clinton.

2.) What separates this matter even more and makes that "60 day rule" more moot is that this case has been brought and is in front of a Judge. The DOJ no longer makes the decisions as to the timing of briefings. The Judge does. The Judge set the time for this brief. Jack Smith had to oblige.

The author of that op-ed was being somewhat disingenuous. Though if you had bothered to read it before posting it, you would have noticed he did say the 60 day deadline was not an actual written rule.

budaatum:
Why would you assume he paid $2 a month to read what he wouldn't understand?

Basilico, show me your uproar when James Comey made an announcement on Clinton email probe 2 weeks before election.

I still believe if not for that she'd have beaten dump.

Lol.

I'm sure he didn't read it. Actually very sure he didn't read it. He thinks it's a 90 day rule. The article says it's a 60 day rule.
He's probably scrambling for a gift link now.

Wait. Where did you see $2 a month? I think I'm getting cheated. I just checked my sub.
It's $4 for month for the 1st year. It's $25 a month after that. They gave me a deal to stay after I was going to cancel because of their nonsense articles the last year, to I think $12 a month. Should have done that much much earlier. But if you saw it for cheaper, going to call them now.

basilico:
He broke the cardinal 90 day DOJ rule after expressing his greatest desire to have his sham trial before election.

Quote the rule that he broke.

basilico:

Kamala can be heard telling an aide (who is feeding her questions) that it's a "live broadcast" before immediately asking the question.

She's a total fraud. pic.twitter.com/jWQteg20Ep

— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) October 9, 2024

The worst candidate ever

You spend all day posting this drivel.
Assuming that she is really getting questions to ask from her aides, so what?

What the fux do you think aides do?
Or did you think Presidents and VP's were masters in everything and anything with exponential knowledge on every matter under the sun?
I expect my leaders to hire the best aides.
I expect those aides to give those leaders the best questions, answers and insights.
I expect that leader to listen to those aides so they can be as prepared, competent and get as much expertise and knowledge as possible and necessary.

You're a world class dumbass.

basilico:
Ijebos. NYT. Op ed literally calls Jack Smith is an asshole

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/09/opinion/jack-smith-trump-biden.html

Since I assume you've read it, why don't you list 2 things where you are in agreement with the author that makes Jack Smith an asshole.

IjeBos:
Lol. I mean to the US.
In this scenario there are people who may need aid who may not get it because of the disinformation Musk is spreading.

Biden should speak out. Not only would it be good governing (making sure people know what resources are available) it would be good politics. Showing Trump to be a liar about something as serious as a disaster.

Called it.
Biden just addressed the Hurricane and some of this disinformation.
He still should have done it in a primetime address and linked it to talking to folks in Florida about leaving.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-2bQpNOkBs

bemeruca:
more propaganda for the desperate

You think you would know some things about what propaganda is and isn't.

How's that friend's couch at the house that you stayed, on what you say was your first night in the US, that turns out was a picture of not a house but a motel and wasn't in the US but Canada?

At the height of Covid when Abbot Covid Testing machines were in short supply so people couldn't get Covid tests and people probably died because of it, Trump sent machines to Putin for his personal use.
Russia, probably laughing at the US, confirmed that today.
Trump is a POS.
America First Right?

https://www.politico.eu/article/kremlin-confirms-donald-trump-covid-test-vladimir-putin-president-russia-us-abbott-point/