₦airaland Forum

sukkot:
https://www.nairaland.com/3586134/2.5million-crowd-marching-against-trump

like i told ya, trump will not be president. keep watching and observe lol

Gracious007:
Chai. This is an all-time low. Only a person whose brain has been compromised would do such. Indeed religion has devastating effects on the brain.

Gracious007:
Wait a minute. Are you sure of what you are saying?

DeepSight:
Lol, the same "without evidence" refrain. Just how blind to the evidence presented can you choose to be.
My friend: just take a good hard look at the palms of your very hands.
Good evening.

DeepSight:
I am truly at a loss sir.
I don't understand what you are saying.

When looking at a created thing, one can see attributes of its creator therein. In simple terms, where one looks at a computer once can discern not just that it was intelligently put together, but that its creator clearly has a need for storage and retrieval of information, for processing documents and programs and the like. Even a bicycle discloses that it has a creator and also discloses attributes of its creator - such as that the creator most likely has a need for movement, and most likely has two legs and two hands.

I don't understand how you can look at a fully formed being, starting as it does from the union of sperm and egg, developing in the wombs into a form with fit-for-purpose body parts: parts intricately designed to aid consciousness and active conscious experience of the world - all of the organs of the Body from the astonishing feat called a brain, to the mind-blowing things called eyes: to the ears, mouth, tongue - The heart, Lungs, Liver, digestive and reproductive systems, nervous and sensory systems: and the fact that therein lives and dwells a mind - of ideas, thoughts, emotions and self conscious will: and say to yourself that this does not of itself disclose a creator or creators who have set that process in movement with very definite intentions for conscious experiencing.

This is why I point to you as evidence of the creator and I can only be befuddled if you do not recognize that the wonder of your existence: in mind, body and spirit: is staggering evidence of the creator or creators.

But, as it happens, you are actually able to look at the totality of your self and declare: "no evidence!"
It can only be that you have a most dim and most low perception of your own being as a creature. You must regard yourself as something lower than an amoeba.

Ol boy, its benumbing.

DeepSight:
You said that there is no evidence or reality for God.
I say that you are the evidence and you are the reality that proves its existence.

Unless you are not real . . . .

Pidgin2:
Hahaha most atheists have issues with self esteem they need to be noticed so desperately it's seems more like paranoia to me

CoolUsername:
They are to chicken to speak up now, as expected.

DeepSight:
Sir Bizzle, Lord of the Way.
Are you saying you are not real?

sonofluc1fer:

Na so ya weekend wan start?

UyiIredia:
Yet he says anyone can wrap their heads around an eternal being.

KingEbukasBlog:
I'm saying that God could be 5 , 6 , 100 , 100 000 consubstantial hypostases existing as one being . But as a christian , I accept that God is 3 consubstantial hypostases by faith .

And I said I can't explain it you perfectly considering how you struggle to understand even the simplest explanations

And stop making idiotic comments if you can't grasp these simple explanations . Geez

KingEbukasBlog:
Yup



This is complex , I can't explain it perfectly . But I can give you a clue . God is not a three dimensional being for you to assume more than one eternal being . And God exists as three consubstantial hypostases (one being ) from a Christian perspective . And I accept this by faith .

From our three dimensional world ,we can say God exists as three persons . I don't know how that looks like in heaven (God's realm ) . And I don't know how angels look like in heaven, I can't even decipher that . Everything was explained to us using anthropomorphism . And when they appear in our three dimensional world , they take three dimensional forms . And we call this a theophany .



Death is a necessity in the material world . We are finite beings - limited and susceptible to change . We live and die because we are finite .

God is immutable - changeless . Death is a kind of change thus logically God as an immutable being cannot die .

benzics:
That sciencewatch is worse o, maybe the guy has some kind of brain tumor, oh religion is actually the tumor.. When ever I see his name, I just scroll past his post..

randomperson:
Seriously, there are some weird people in this section... MrPresident, sciencewatch, felixomor...

felixomor:
Since u have a good eye for rubbish,
I am surprised u didnt spot the one i was replying.

Ur rubbish detector is selective.

KingEbukasBlog:
Only things they are created or caused to exist that you can ask where they came from not an eternal being .

KingEbukasBlog:
Please explain how 2 and 3 are contradictory

An eternal being did not create itself

felixomor:
Nah.
That study is false.
Afheism kills the brain.
Thats why Zuckerberg had to come out and reject it fast.
Otherwise, facebook may have been affected.

KingEbukasBlog:
1. Infinite regress is an impossibility

2. Something can't create itself or come from nothing uncaused or without deterministic conditions

3. You are left with an eternal independent (non-contingent ) immaterial mind

Simple

DeepSight:
There is no single living human being who finds meaning in the physical and material alone.

Richirich713:
I never said u need one, u said "Of course- it is foolish to limited minds.", which is what I find highly odd since no pro philosopher of religion takes this objection seriously. Ur comment implies that only people with limited minds will find the question foolish, which is a very bigoted comment take make.



Sure, but if u going to write a book addressing philosophical arguments for God u will need more than just "basic" knowledge of philosophy, otherwise u just going to make tons of mistakes like dawkins did.

Richirich713:
Actually it's foolish to anyone who has a PhD in philosophy and is competent in philosophy of religion. Richard dawkins for example has neither of those things, which pretty much explains why this question is usually asked by laymen online atheists since his fans tend to think he knows wat he's talking but in reality he aint got a clue