₦airaland Forum

Courz:
Worshipper of Lucifer!! Follower of the New world Order, Shut up your mouth. Delusional Idiot! Counter these pictures below. Nothing concern with wetin anybody talk. Proof is my concern. Counter these Pictures and the video below let me see you stammer like a fool! Maggot infested Brain like Mad MaxInDHouse!!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrEYHATLdxY

This dimwitted LOON,
Cut & join stills NOT genuine is good enough for your infantile delusional symptoms.
Courz Continue your thrashy GIBBERISH.

Courz:
Shut up your mouth Janosky. Delusional Idiot! Counter these pictures below. Nothing concern with wetin anybody talk. Proof is my concern. Counter these Pictures and the video below let me see you stammer like a fool! Maggot infested Brain like Mad MaxInDHouse!!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrEYHATLdxY

Try and counter the above like someone with a working Brain!

Courz:
Shut up your mouth Delusional Fool! Come and counter these pictures below! Follower of Lucifer! You dey fear? Come and counter what is easily researchable! You think other Christians are just like you Worshippers of Lucifer that also worship Watchtower? Idiot!!

Courz gets high on Cross and Crown symbols of Christendom, the guy done dey kolo tayy tayyy!

This screenshot and information of "the Cross and Crown" is genuine evidence nobody can stop Courz Oteneaaron from stupidity and delusion.

Courz:
You see why you are a worshipper of Lucifer? Lies full your mouth! Why didn't you post the Pyramid with the cross and crown? You think you can deceive people that know how to research?

Ordeh 4 Life

Google "Royal diadem" and see all the symbols of Freemason there, the moniker of your friend
you deceived. .

Somebody a woman preacher on NL,had correctly disprove your claim about Russell's tombstone and you have seen the actual tombstone screenshot here.
Continue your delusion and stay off my mention.

RoyalDiadems:
Yeah, even Muslims do the same. They disallow questions. Students can't challenge the imams on any topic as we do in the churches.
You know, during Bible studies, you could challenge the teacher if you think he erred. But just as you said about the JWs, you cannot even question a teaching in an Islamic class. These indeed are cults.
.

Royal LYING diadems
Your fellow 3 deities pastopreneur from the pulpit, sacked 40 pastors of Christendom in his business center and you challenged him?
Your Trinity mentors banned a popular priest from his Adoration business and you have challenged them?

Do you want more examples of your fraudulent claims?

RoyalDiadems:
An organization that mentions Jesus but refuses to be identified as Christians and also worships in kingdom halls instead of churches clearly declares itself as not being a member of the body of Christ

RoyalDiadems:
Truly, it isn't a church of God. When they say kingdom Hall, they actually know the kingdom they're referring to.

RoyalDiadems:
It's obvious from your blabberings that what the OP said is true.

The symbols are JW symbols. The rings are JW rings. Russel was indeed a Mason. Since you cannot prove these to be lies or propaganda, then, they're true.

Royal delusional Diadem
Cross & Crown symbols ( both symbols of Freemason) are in the Diadem you adopted as Your moniker.
Cross is in your Church, your house& even in your Office,JWs have none !!
Yet you are deceiving yourself throwing empty tantrums.

Tueh !!!!!

RoyalDiadems:
If I were you, I would do like the Berean church and examine everything to see if I have been deceived. After my findings, I'll make a decision.

Your FALSE claim on this thread is based on whose delusional finding?
Royal delusional diadem

RoyalDiadems:
You can't teach me the Bible. Comparing Jesus' accusations to this freemason allegations is a gross error.

RoyalDiadems:
Show us your symbols, let's see the rings of your leaders. Who was Russel? Which church did he come out from? Who was his spiritual mentor? What is the shape of his tomb? These are things that could declare the facts as they are. But you chose not to discuss them because they're very incriminating.

This is absolutely delusional,Mr diadem deceiving himself.

Have you seen any symbols in any kingdom Hall or on the wrists or fingers of any JW?

Oga, charity begins at home.
Go & commence your query from your Pastorpreneurs who wear multiple rings on their fingers with various symbols.

Mr Russel's tomb has no symbols,Oga STOP your foolishness.

RoyalDiadems:
My brother, this would not work.

Prove that everything the OP said are lies.

Oteneaaron:
Till now, I still haven't found concrete archeological proof of the existence of Jesus, and after studying the Gospels, I still couldn't understand why there were so many contradictions

Courz:
I understand you. At the end of the day, it is essential that a belief in something must come naturally.

Start from 2 Thessalonians 2 vs 1 to 12. A Google search will help because there are many sources. But I have found that Google censors certain information and we already know why. So, I use DuckDuckGo Browser instead.

The Great Delusion involves the great falling away of people which will happen when the Antichrist comes. All of it is also tied to a certain invasion that will occur in the future which is also tied to the New World Order.

"Till now he still haven't found concrete archeological proof of the existence of Jesus."

"At the end of the day,his beliefs in atheism came naturally"

Make una see the same person, Courzd Oteneaaron understand himself.
OLAADEGBU and Royal Diadem, are atheists Antichrists?

Did your beliefs in Christ your Godhead deities come naturally to you?
Evildoers, clowns deceiving themselves.

RoyalDiadems:
You're now attacking the OP instead of exposing his supposed lies.

Don't you have any evidence against him? If that's the case, then you're the deluded lot.

RoyalDiadems:
Janosky, come and show us that these things are lies. Bring out your evidences with sound reasonings against these things.

OLAADEGBU:
How about starting to debunk all the facts courz has been posting here about JWs?

RoyalDiadems:
Generally, Christian theologists classify JWs, Adventists, Mormons, etc as cultists but except for the Mormons, I usually see them as heretics. Mormons are confirmed cultists, no doubt but reading this about JWs is very shocking.

No wonder, they themselves never refer to themselves as Christians.

Satan is doing a very excellent job as the "Deceiver of the whole world."

Emusan:
Whenever it suits this lying liar, Luke 16:22-23 is figurative but here see him using the same Luke 16:22-23 as real event

According to your mumu claim does Lazarus live inside father Abraham?

Ordeh you are too dull

Emusan:
Is it not you and your organization that do change the scripture especially a place like Luke 16?;

Continue deceiving yourself, Mr LIENUS

Emusan:
But there was racism and other atrocities among them when Jesus chooses them bah and the same people who are racists then are now part of Jesus heavenly ruling

Ordeh !
Jesus chose Peter.What was Peter doing at Galatians 2:11-14?
Una go come social media deh run una mouth like dysentery

MaxInDHouse:
Holy Spirit is not a person but the active force God uses to accomplish His purposes God later allowed Jesus to possess the force as well so Jesus can send out this force to accomplish his father's purpose!

It is not a person!
I repeat "The Holy Spirit is not a person!

Emusan:
That is your Holy Spirit is a robot.
Yet The Holy spirit TOLD you

What a good student of English

Anyways, when I finally expose your lying mouth then you'll know you're among those false preachers who made lies in the name of God.

Romans 8:16,26 KJV " the spirit itself bears witness"
Emusan where did your KJV Bible refer to Jesus as itself?
Emusan where did your KJV Bible refer to the Father as itself?

In 3 screenshots,
1)Mr Oripelaye spoke to a newspaper,is that newspaper a person with ears to hear and mouth to respond to Mr Oripelaye?

2)
The Parliament Report said that... is the Parliament Report a person?
Does that mean the Parliament Report has mouth to speak ?

3)
The newspaper seen a court document, does that newspaper have eyes to see?

Horlufemi , your Fellow Trinity deities Worshipper said you should not Worship holy spirit.

Trinity GIBBERISH of Emperor Constantine deceiving billions of gullible sheeples

johnw47:
God's Word has always existed in God

God bought His Word out of Himself to be a seperate Person

Did John W come out of his parents to be a separate person?

God is the Source of "the Word" made a separate being.
This guy knows the Bible truth but Trinity GIBBERISH holds him captive.
Make una read the screenshot of John W in October 2021.

johnw47:
God's Word/Son cannot be an angelic being unless God Himself is a angel

johnw47:
God/Creator
angels/created

God is not a created angel so his Son from Himself cannot be a angel

angels and humans are called son's of God
but angels are created from nothing except the Word of God
adam was made from the dust of the earth

johnw47:
the Word is neither created from nothing or made from dust but is from God


so called jw's keep saying Jesus is michael but don't try to give proof, or their secret knowledge when challenged by someone who is able to express well biblical knowledge, such as immaculatesense and others.

immaculatesense:
Dear Janosky
I can't be making repetition...just go read my comments...u will av full understanding...and u can just use bossom to mean just bossom friend,bossom closeness ,beside...check the etymology of the word and how it is bn used in the passage...if i say the food in my bossom...do I mean food close to me or beside me?...it means the food in my belly,inside me...
So u can't retrict the meaning to merely closeness...check the etymology,compare with other scriptures like when[b] Jesus said I am in the Father and the Father in me...does he mean I am beside the Father and the Father is beside me[/b]...then u can't objectively decide which synonym fits bossom between "in the Father " and "beside the Father"...

Hoping u will be objective in ur decision...but it's a difficult choice u alone can take

John 17:21, the disciples are in us (in Jesus & in the Father).
Verse 22: the disciples be one as Jesus & the Father are one.
Whatever you believe is oneness of Jesus and the Father is also oneness of the disciples.
Verse 23: Jesus (i) in them (the disciples) and you (the Father) in me"- Jesus and the Father are in the disciples.

Oga, according to your claim based on John 17:21-23, Jesus and the Father are living in the bosom of the disciples.


John 17:21-23 & John 14:20, Jesus Christ says your claim is faulty.

Acts 2:33 concludes the matter.

immaculatesense:
Dear MaxinDHouse
You are half way correct...u would av bn more correct if u had used bossom of God instead of beside God...it distorted the meaning.

immaculatesense:
And the meaning of Philippians 2:6 is also distorted by meaning.
[6]Though he was God,
    he did not think of equality with God
    as something to cling to.

immaculatesense:
Now,here is the meaning of John 1:1,18 and Philippians 2:6
Before the incarnation of the man Jesus...he was know as the Word of God...the question is,if he is the Word of God ..where does he reside? That was wat John 1:20 answered...He lived in the bossom of God.

immaculatesense:
Another question is can u separate a man from his word?

immaculatesense:
That is wat John 1:1 answered by saying "he was God".

immaculatesense:
Another question is why was passed tense used "WAS God"?...that is what John 1:14 and Philippians 2:6-7 gave an answer to...for the first time...the word became flesh John 1:14 and took on a lowly form by being born of and by human being Philippians 2:7...He was for the first time separated from the Father in whom he reside and let go of being in God or equal to God .

immaculatesense:
The last question is "was Jesus equal with God i.e the Father"?...Here is wat the equality means...let me first quote out the verse then explain
Philippians 2:6
[6]Though he was God,
    he did not think of equality with God
    as something to cling to.

"Though he was God,"
Like I explained above the past tense...was God but now human

"He did not think of equality with God as something to cling to"

udoh2k:
I don't know what's your meaning of trinity.

But I have seen in the Bible where:

The Word of God is called God. Capital G.
The Spirit of God is called God. Capital G.
And God Himself is called God. Capital G.

And yet only one God.

Meaning the Word of His mouth is a living 'Being'.

The Spirit in Him is a living 'Being'.

See 1John5:7

Emusan:
The word is God!

Greek 1510 "WAS" without definite article at John 10:33, Acts 28:6, Acts 12:22, "was a god".
Four scriptural evidences & examples & more which your fellow Trinitarians agreed.

Wayo Trinitarian dubiously put "is" wey no deh him Bible at John 1:1

Emusan:
John pictures that with the story of Adam and Eve in the garden.

Let me give you small Bible study on that.

Firstly, The first COUPLE lived alone in the Garden. The two are to be viewed as ONE
>>>Gen 2:24 - In the garden, two persons, the man and the woman, "became one flesh"

Emusan:
>>>Gen 5:1-2
"God created man" (singular)
"He made him" (singular)
"Named them man" (singular)
Yet it says:
"He created THEM male and female" (plural)
"He blessed THEM" (plural)
"and Named THEM" (plural)
"They were created" (plural)

NOTE: The name EVE wasn't given to the woman not until after the fall, so both Male and the female were collectively called MAN.

Genesis 5:1 references only Adam.
Genesis 5:2,"so both Male and the female were collectively called MAN"
Yes !
Did God ever tell Emusan that Adam and Eve is one being?
Why do you claim that 2 entities, Jesus & his Father is one being?
Did God collectively call his son & himself by one name as he called Adam and Eve "Man"?
No !
Oga, your fake analogy goes to the dustbin.

Emusan:
Secondly, Gen 1:26-27
"Let us make man" (singular)
"God created man" (singular)
"He created him" (singular)

In contrast the same text also says:
"....let them rule" (plural)
"Male and female he created THEM" (plural)

Genesis 1:26 "Let us make man" references only Adam.
Why?
Genesis 1:27, "And God went on to create the man (Adam),in God's image He created him (Adam).

Genesis 2:20-21 Eve was an afterthought.
"The man" Adam, did you see it?

Emusan:
Lastly, Jesus refers to the first couple and after stating "they were one flesh" adds "they are no longer two"

In line of this, would it be wise to say: In the garden was the woman, the woman was with the man and the woman was A MAN?

Intellectual mind knows this is a wrong rendition because it will put the woman as A MALE which will be confused as the FIRST MALE.

So the best way to understand that even though both the male and the female were both collectively called "MAN" "them" e.t.c is to render it as: In the garden was the woman, the woman was with the man and the woman was MAN

Here intellectual mind knows that the woman was addressed as MAN per her NATURE.

So John 1:1 shows two separate persons with one NATURE (God).

Do you understand?

Bible study 101

PastorAIO:
Actually I got it mixed up. He was talking about recreational drugs, igbo etc, and someone else brought in medicinal drugs. He said smoking igbo and other drugs was invited evil spirits and it leads sorcery. The guy was a recovered addict. Someone else extended what he was saying to all drugs.

Jokerman:
1. So Archangel Michael is the King of Kings and Lord of Lords? (REV 19:6)

2. So Archangel Michael is the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end?
.

Jokerman:
3. Michael is the highest of the angels - an order of created beings. He is one of the angels, he is not the Creator of the angels as the Bible says that Jesus is.
for by Him all things in heaven and on earth were created, things visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or powers - all things have been created through Him and for Him (Colossians 1:16)
.

Jokerman:
4. Michael is obviously not the Lord. He could not rebuke the Devil on his own, but rather called upon the Lord to rebuke him. But when the archangel Michael contended with the Devil and disputed about the body of Moses, he did not dare to bring a condemnation of slander against him, but said, "The Lord rebuke you!" (Jude 1: 9).
.

Jokerman:
5
However, Jesus has no such problem with the Devil - He personally rebuked him, since He is the Lord. Then Jesus said to him, "Away with you, Satan! For it is written, 'You shall worship the LORD your God, and Him only you shall serve.' " Then the Devil left Him, and behold, angels came and began to minister to Him (Matthew 4:10,11).

Jokerman:
6. Jesus christ is the word of God, made flesh. Michael is one of the angel. Paul describes the voice Jesus would use when coming back.... as an archangel... explains that he's coming back with a powerful voice

.

Jokerman:
The Bible explicitly teaches that Jesus is superior to all the angels, including the archangels.

Jokerman:
Hebrews 1:4–6 says Jesus has: “become as much superior to angels as the name he has obtained is more excellent than theirs. For to what angel did God ever say, “Thou art my Son, today I have begotten thee”? Or again, “I will be to him a father, and he shall be to me a son”? And again, when he brings the first-born into the world, he says, “Let all God’s angels worship him.”

Angels don’t worship other angels; they worship only God.

”

Jokerman:
▪︎ After Jesus’ calmed the storm on the Sea of Galilee, Matthew 14:33 tells us, “Those in the boat worshiped him, saying, ‘Truly you are the Son of God.’” In the Old Testament, only God possessed power over the weather and the sea.
.”

John 17:7 & John 15:15, Jesus Christ acted on the Instructions from God.
Jesus Christis teaching you to understand the truth @ John 15:15 & 17:7.
Homage/obeisance/bow down is the proper word at Matthew 14:33, Catholic New Jerusalem Bible.
The Catholic Pope a Trinitarian,do not agree with your version of Matthew 14:33.
You know as the Yoruba's bow down , that is the meaning and context of that verse

Jokerman:
Biblical scholar Moran Hooker points out that even though the disciples ask, “Who then is this, that even wind and sea obey him?” (Mark 4:41), to the reader of the Gospel “the answer to their question is obvious. It is God who made the sea, and God alone who controls it (Ps. 89:. The authority with which Jesus acts is that of God himself.”

johnw47:
lost blasphemer false jw mad max

you can make excuses til doom's day, they won't save you

when christians talk about the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit
they are of course talking about the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit of the bible

and fraud jw janosky was having a ball calling Father Son and Holy Spirit
things like: "the ole demon ghost" and "the three dog heads" etc.etc.
and you and other false jw's copied him in blaspheming, even giving likes to janosky's blasphemy's

fool yourself oh lost one with your long epistle
you certainly don't fool me

Mat 12:31 Therefore I say unto you, Every sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men; but the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit shall not be forgiven.

1Jn 5:16 If any man see his brother sin a sin which is not unto death, he shall ask, and he shall give him life for them that sin not unto death. There is a sin unto death: I do not say that he shall pray for it.

Rev_20:15  And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.

This JohnW fraud typing GIBBERISH, what is the topic of this thread causing you sifia pains?

Why must you always sound like a broken record?

elated177:
El Elohe Yahshrael!

Daniel 10:21 but first I will tell you what is written in the Book of Truth. (No one supports me against them except Michael, your prince.

Some people use the Scripture above to support their claim that Michael is also Yahushua the Messiah. They fail to acknowledge the portion below:

Revelation 10: 13 But the prince of the Persian kingdom resisted me twenty-one days. Then Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, because I was detained there with the king of Persia.

Michael was referred to as one of the chief princes. It means, therefore, that there are/were other chief princes.


Yahushua the Messiah is the Word of YHVH Almighty, the Father. There is none like him. He has no equal among everything created by the Father.

El Elohe Yahshrael! Hallelu YAH!

Jokerman:
Only a confused JW will equate Angel Michael to the Lord Jesus Christ

Maynman:
Just stating, if that’s your argument for Micheal is Jesus then bwahahahah, your masters in watchtower didn’t teach you well.

immaculatesense:
Dear Janosky
U should not be clever by half...u know that Jude 1:9 was not from Zach 3:2...
Because Jude made reference to Moses and Zachariah was to Jeshua.
Thoughit could av bn Michael and I could av bn another angel in such capacity and do not be surprised wen an Angel use "I the Lord"...it is a delegated statement as in Exodus 3 and Genesis 18

MaxInDHouse:
According to Jude 9 only Michael is the ARCHANGEL but some interpreters confused the word FOREMOST for ARCHANGEL:

Daniel 10:13

But the prince of the royal realm of Persia stood in opposition to me for 21 days. But then Miʹcha·el, one of the foremost princes, came to help me; and I remained there beside the kings of Persia! ~ NWT

But the prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me one and twenty days: but, lo, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me; and I remained there with the kings of Persia! ~ Holy Bible

But the prince of the Persian kingdom resisted me twenty-one days. Then Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, because I was detained there with the king of Persia! ~ NIV

The prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me twenty-one days; but Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, so I left him there with the prince of the kingdom of Persia! ~ RSV

So it was misinterpretation, there's just one ARCHANGEL but many angels after Michael became princes in heaven!

immaculatesense:
Dear Janosky
I understand ur enthusiasm...the trinitarian issue u raised those I belong to a section that believes it but I personally do not because I cannot be clearly beyond reasonable doubt be affirmed.
If u had read my current reply to @MaximDHouse...I addressed it...if u notice me I av bn on nairaland since 2015 and most times I come in as guest without logging in because I don't just talk on any issue...I read,respect opinions and them give a reply if am interested.
In that comment,it is extensive the correlation between Daniel 12 and Revelation 10...
The last trumpet sounds,voice of an archangel,the son of man descend does not mean that it is the same person that blow the last trumpet was the same archangel that speak and was the same son of man that descend...wen u read Revelation 9,10 and 11...u will understand Daniel 12...and the role that were played...
Read my last comment to @MaximDHouse