Jayriginal's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Jayriginal's Profile › Jayriginal's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 (of 97 pages)
OLAADEGBU: OLAADEGBU:I dont believe you are a christian. OLAADEGBU:I told you to drop the analogy. Its a bad one. OLAADEGBU:No, it does not mean I believe in intelligent design and even if I did, you would still have to prove your god which is the task you have assigned yourself on this thread. I'm waiting. Enough of the "toing" and "froing" |
ramalot Thanks for contributing. It is an academic exercise really. The aim is to see if we can construct the most realistic religion. ramalot:The purpose is not to divide but to create a plausible religion. ramalot:I assure its a purely academic exercise at this stage. Maybe if fully developed, we could turn it into a money making venture (why should these Pastors get rich alone).^^ Just kidding though (or am I ?). |
Kay 17:Once defined, that god is dead. mazaje:I agree with you fully Mazaje. None of the known gods are real. I'm no deist either but I at least allow for the slight possibility. |
mkmyers45:This is just an academic exercise. I wish to pick minds here. I am not for one suggesting that this supposed religion is true. Im really trying to see if a hypothetical religion that allows for belief in god can be constructed. In doing so I am taking facts of existence, particularly the non intervention of supernatural deities and trying to incorporate it into a religion. My OP has more details if you care to read it again. Remember the title is "A Religion Under Construction". Its an academic exercise really. |
^^ Thanks. For you see, for every god I have read about or once believed, I believe not, and no more. Do I say there is absolutely no god ? No I dont. There may be one but we dont know about it. Curiously the moment you define your god, you kill it. Mostly the theistic ones anyway, I dont think that holds true for the deistic concept of god. |
DeepSight Thinking a bit further about your post, I believe you are saying that since we know that we arent going to command the attention of this god, we should just be awesome. Life is already awesome on "Awesometopia" and in order to reach towards something close to that standard, we should start by being awesome. Am I interpreting you correctly ? If I am, then consider human nature. It is often more profitable to be selfish, wicked, brutal etc than to be "awesome". A lot of people respond to the punishment-reward model. They are more likely to be awesome if we tell them that being awesome will attract a visitation and reward by the "Most Awesome" the unnameable one. As for punishment, we dont have to threaten them with a hell or anything like it (which would flatly contradict the theory that he is not interested in us) though I see an easy way to work hell in. We could simply promise a much better life by being awesome. In other words dont you think people will respond positively and deny their base human nature more enthusiastically if they felt there was something in it for them ? |
mkmyers45:We are humans. If we are going to refer to it inevitably some kind of name will come up even if its "the un-nameable one". I understand your point though. I just think its easier for humans to have some kind of tangible way to deal with a concept. You may have a spiritual leaning without a formalized name, but I bet you, as soon as it gets really big, it will expand beyond boundaries you thought possible. A name will be one of the first things and I cant help but notice how you used a name to give me an idea of your line of thought. Good input though. Deep Sight:Well, fine. But will this awesomeness be enough to attract its attention to us with all the attendant benefits to our planet. In other words are we being awesome (to one another) in order to attract the god of Awesometopia to us or we are being good for goodness sake. Remember the theory here is that we are in existence by its power, but it cares only about its direct creation "Awesometopia" and it lets us be as we are while it is active in the affairs of "Awesometopia". Appreciate your input. |
^ absence of belief is not the same as believing the opposite. One can choose not to believe without aligning to the opposite. Anyway, maybe we can discuss this some other time. As far as I'm concerned there is only atheism. Pure, militant, new, evangelical (Enigma's best friends), shoe wearing, negative, positive, chess playing (etc) atheists are only attempts to label and categorize atheism and often lead discussions astray. |
Deep Sight:All the dictionaries and encyclopedias will not change the fact that atheism is a lack of belief in god(s). Among those that lack belief in gods are those that assert that there is no god, those that do not believe in a particular god or gods that they have heard about and those that are not committed without some form of positive evidence for a deity. As it is, you and Olaadegbu and many others hear atheism and think the person holds that there is no deity. It is not so. Its better to ask first instead of concluding from the onset. Also, you left out other parts of the definition Atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities. [s]In a narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities.[/s] Most inclusively, atheism is simply the absence of belief that any deities exist.I happen to disagree with the struck out part. Atheists simply hold different extremes of non belief. |
In general, suppose I postulate a theory of a god that created the world, but then what he really was interested in was a planet so awesome yet distant that it would take several lifetimes to comprehend/realize its glory (thus making it incomprehensible to the living). Suppose this god really was interested in this awesome planet and that the resulting universe (as we know it today) was a natural but not intended purpose of this god (like how cleaning your room by sweeping it, throws dust around). Now suppose it (being god) knew that earth and all would occur, but was more interested in "Awesometopia" (its real purpose) would that satisfy everybody ? In the above, we have a creator, who created (Awesometopia) with particular and unintended purposes (earth, planets and any form of life we may hereafter discover). This takes care of the theists. We also have a creator god who created the world and does not interfere in its affairs. This should satisfy the deists. I am stumped as to what would satisfy the atheists (honestly). In fact, I'm pretty much sure they are required to reject every supernatural notion unless it can be proven. Happily I can say that much like other gods known to man, this god can not be proven. If an atheist asks for proof of our god, we simply ask him to disprove our god. I think the deists get the best deal out of this proposed theory. Anyway, this is but a rough sketch and I'm going to need input from a lot of people. First of all, the name "Awesometopia" may not be the best but it was the best I could do at the moment. We need a name for the deity as well. What will his followers be called ? ETC Again, since he is not interested in the earth or in anything apart from the planet he purposely created, is there any point in worshiping him ? Just musings. Who knows what will happen if we develop this religion ? A lot of mumbo jumbo must be thrown in too as that is the only way certain folks will consider it. All theologians,philosophers, deists, wise men, etc are welcome to make input. |
Deep Sight:Oh no I dont. We've touched this issue before, you and I. You even attempted to classify me as an agnostic, which I said I am not. Your position as well as Olaadegbu's and shockingly, a great many others stems from a misconception of what it is to be an atheist. Put simply, an atheist is one who does not believe in god(s). Even if you were to insist that I am an agnostic, it still makes me an atheist because agnostics do not believe in god. Do not confuse me as saying that agnosticism and atheism are interchangeable. If I say a donkey is an animal, I am not at the same time saying that an animal is a donkey. An atheist is one who does not believe in god An agnostic does not believe in god. Therefore, an agnostic is an atheist To assert that there is no god is what will "possibly" require the kind of knowledge that you harp on. EDIT you will need perfect knowledge of every possible dimension in reality and be so omniscient regarding them as to assert that there is no[b] originating creator[/b] being anywhere in existence.Ok I just noted the bold. That really is outside the scope of this thread here. If you have followed the discussion, Olaadegbu is trying to prove his biblical god and not a generic creator. He is being specific. I'm familiar with your ideas, but I'd like to focus on Olaadegbu's god for the purpose of this thread. |
OLAADEGBU:If I have time, I will. Its buried deeply in the plethora of posts he churns out daily. OLAADEGBU:You cant wish atheism away. OLAADEGBU:I'm pretty sure I didnt say that. OLAADEGBU:Dont flatter yourself. OLAADEGBU: ![]() OLAADEGBU:He still didnt become a christian. Need I remind you that your task is to prove your biblical god and not "intelligence". OLAADEGBU:On the contrary, the "agreement" was not needed. You were just using it as an excuse and you dont have that anymore. Please make with the arguments. |
Martian:ROFLMFAO ![]() Good looking bro ! |
For Ola, since he likes pictures so much.
|
OLAADEGBU:Well he has. He posts too much. I really dont want to have to dig through his posts to go find it. OLAADEGBU:You are labouring under an assumption here. You have a notion of what it means to be an atheist, but that notion is wrong. I do not need absolute knowledge of the universe to be an atheist. OLAADEGBU:Faith in a marriage is not the same as faith in god. I mentioned that before. You must not be reading what I wrote. For one thing, the woman actually exists. For another she has a name. Did she give me a false name ? There is a possibility of that but there are ways to prove her identity. This is a really bad analogy please drop it. You cannot prove the existence of your god. OLAADEGBU:You had me at "commitment". ![]() OLAADEGBU:As is your god (the only idol you worship). One idol, all idols. Seriously ! OLAADEGBU:Sure I saw the clip and I pointed out that he didnt become a christian. I have warned you about this but it seems I have to resign myself to the fact that you are actually going to attempt to use DNA as evidence for your god. OLAADEGBU:This is truly mind boggling. I thought it was implied. Anyway I agree to your terms and conditions. Maybe you should send a notary over. No excuses Ola, lets have your evidence. The ball is in your court. ![]() |
mazaje:I swear to "god". |
Dawkins publicly spanked ? I think not. The Christian goes on for over 9 minutes (the entire video is 10minutes 44 seconds) and then the clip is edited and ends with "I believe you have faith in your wife, is there evidence for that" and "atheism is a faith" (or was it religion he said). Dawkins is talking about faith and evidence, then the christian asks a really silly question asking for Dawkins evidence of faith in his wife. THEY ARE NOT THE SAME THING. And then saying atheism is a faith. There are questions sometimes so silly (and unexpected by virtue of their sheer idiocy) that will leave you speechless. Anyway, its a common christian tactic. Cant expect anything better. Oh and Flew didnt become a christian. I guess it needs to be pointed out. |
OLAADEGBU:Let me quote myself here. jayriginal:You need to let go of your pre conceived notions of atheism. Very soon like Frosbel used to, you will advocate killing of atheists. OLAADEGBU:No I do not need to be able to answer such questions. They have no bearing on my lack of belief. For you, not being able to answer such questions is a an itch that must be scratched with god did it. Its good enough for you and therefore, others must accept it too. Not so. I have no fairy tales or myths, neither do I need one. OLAADEGBU:Whats this ? You make a statement and I show you it can be applied to you. Is that a "sin" ? OLAADEGBU:Im not interested in this. I want you to establish your boisterous claim. OLAADEGBU:Well you should. It would even your chances. OLAADEGBU:As you believe you believe. OLAADEGBU:Like I said earlier (its too far down for me to quote), I can provide a basic explanation of DNA. I can even get sufficiently advanced information from the internet. I am not interested. The DNA proves itself not god. Why do you persist with the charade? I dont need science to stop believing in your god or any of the other man made gods. Why is DNA evidence for your god and not allah ? If this is your proof, it is an utter fail. OLAADEGBU:Cold feet ke ? Have I not been begging you for about three pages to prove your case ? It would seem that you cannot do away with assumptions because without them you really have nothing to say. Get on with the proof. Feel free to discuss your theory of sin caused mutations with someone else. I will not engage you on that on this thread. I just want you to make good your boast. |
texazzpete:I know you know that this is not a PDP problem. It has been the way of government to agree and withhold implementation. |
OLAADEGBU:The problem is that "god" is not an objective, rational or logical concept. Also, you really do not understand the "atheists' position". You are burdened with the wrong idea of what it means to be an atheist. OLAADEGBU:These so called foundational questions have no bearing on my lack of belief in "god". I couldnt care less about evolution or big b@ng theories. They are not the reason I stopped believing. I simply hold them as more plausible than all the creation myths put together. I've posed this question before but since you are yoruba (apparently) I might as well ask you why you reject the story that Obatala (?) came with a chain and a chicken and a snail shell of sand. I believe you know the rest of the story. How come you reject that one but accept an equally (possibly more) ridiculous version of some disembodied voice speaking things into existence and creating things from clay ![]() OLAADEGBU:You didnt ask one. You made an assertion and I took the liberty of customizing it for you. OLAADEGBU:Yup, like you asserting that blue eyes are caused by a curse. The bible is mans word about god. So also is the Quran and all the so called holy books. OLAADEGBU:You are entitled to your opinions. Just to make sure the goal posts are not deftly shifted, I'll quote you again OLAADEGBU:_____________ OLAADEGBU:A clever statement but I wont let you get away with it. We might also say if there were no Harry Potter, there would be no books and movies about him. I dont believe in Allah neither do you, so concerning Islam for instance, you are atheist (maybe a-allah). Therefore by applying your logic, Allah exists cos you dont believe in him. Also all the other gods you dont believe in now exist by virtue of your unbelief in them. Nice one Ola, you have now "unbelieved" these gods into existence and they are now angry with you for your rejection of them. OLAADEGBU:Aha! Anticipated earlier. See below. jayriginal:You presume to know how I think, which is why you have laboured strenuously under the illusion that you can prove that I believe or know god. If you would shed your assumptions, you would find that you have undertaken the impossible. It would seem you already know that, as Ive been asking you for quite a while to get on with it and you have been pussyfooting. Neither semantic gymnastics nor linguistic acrobatics will be of any use to you in your quest. Sophistry wont help either. |
OLAADEGBU:You might as well say that since 1+1 = 2, you have proven to me the existence of your god. When I say it doesn't, you can have recourse to your above statement. Personally, I dont think you believe in god anyway. OLAADEGBU:Actually the fact that you dont believe in God, but you don't believe that you dont believe in God exposes your inconsistency. OLAADEGBU:Generally, "christians" are strongly motivated to believe in the biblical God out of the circumstances of their birth, fear of the unknown, relentless indoctrination and over active imaginations amongst others. OLAADEGBU:There are numerous gods. Your god is outnumbered and powerless. You are the one taking the risk. Quit repeating this ! OLAADEGBU:You obviously have no clue. You may continue to cherish your illusions. Your god is imaginary and exists only in your mind. Its that simple. OLAADEGBU:Well then make your objective proof and let the "holy spirit" do his thing. This is getting old. Besides, even if you dont save my "soul" there is the possibility that you might mislead someone else reading this thread into believing in your god. Its a win win for you. |
Deep Sight: ![]() |
OLAADEGBU:Go ahead and prove your claim that I know god exists. OLAADEGBU:NO! I choose to speak about what I know. OLAADEGBU:I'm sure I havent given that impression anywhere on this thread or on Nairaland. Even if that was the case, Im better of believing in every other god and excluding yours. The odds are favourable to me that way. You on the other hand are in great danger. OLAADEGBU:In ignoring the other gods and singling only one out, you are taking the bigger risk. In fact at least with Russian roulette, the element of chance is present. You have simply put a fully loaded gun to your head. OLAADEGBU:Wrong again. Look bro, stop shirking your responsibility. Make with the proof already. |
@manmustwac and lasinoh, its really an experience to pass through turbulence with Nigerians. First time I experienced it, I simply held on to my seat. Come and hear my compatriots screaming and "cabashing". All I could think of was the pilot and how he must have nerves of steel flying Nigerians on a constant basis. When we were up in the air, I looked down and nodded to myself. Simply I was thinking what are the chances of surviving a crash. Needless to say, I didnt rate the chances to highly. Therefore when the turbulence started, I wasnt bothered a bit. I simply held on to my seat. Screaming Jesus has no effect whatsoever. mazaje:I've had a gun pulled on me twice. The first time, I was with my girlfriend and they hit me over the head with the gun and threatened to kill me. Then they made us lie face down on the floor. I whispered to my girlfriend not to put her head on the floor (in case they want to step on our heads) but to rest her head face down on her arms. Now apart from a cut on the head, we didnt suffer any further injuries. Meanwhile, in one of the rooms nearby, a christian was praying and speaking in tongues (he turned out to be from christ embassy). He started out praying softly, gradually increasing in volume and tempo until with a great shout, he charged out of his room and chased the thieves out of the compound. This is all real, and for the sake of brevity, I've left out a lot of details. He chased the thieves out of the compound armed with only the imaginary power of God. Sometimes these things happen and would seem to vindicate the religious minded but there are a number of other explanations I can offer as alternatives. Now I was in Lagos on the 3rd of February and I met an old friend who told me he had started going to church once again. He was robbed (it was even reported here on Nairaland. I believe it made the front page. He said the robbers made them all lie down and they beat him up. Then one of them asked him where he was from and he replied he was Ibo. The robber then spoke Ibo to him and he replied. They left him alone and beat the guy lying down next to him and then shot him in the head. My friend reports that all his childhood prayers came back to him in a flash and that he was expecting to die next. Having not died, he is now a church goer these days. Everybody is different. The same experience would provoke different reactions in different people. I just thought I should share with the house. |
I dont think there is. I would simply call it extreme sensitivity. I used to have a really mild form of it relating to music. I would unconsciously associate certain music with certain colours. I do think its an ability that as you said, everyone has or has had to one extent or the other. However, I cant see anything spiritual about it. |
mrmayor:I cast no aspersions on his morals whatsoever. I already made it clear that I meant no offence and I hope non was taken. My problem with DeepSight and where I complain of his "arrogance" is when he says certain things like he is the sole custodian of knowledge. Should a "christian" do that, it wont strike me as unusual. DeepSight does not strike me as a tolerant person (from reading his posts). Sometimes I read his posts and feel there is barely concealed contempt therein. Of course these are just my impressions and they do not stem from this thread alone. On the positive side, DeepSight is not to be counted as one of the foul mouthed personalities here. Also, I have seen some humour in his posts which I always count as a good thing. All being said and done, I'd like to lay this matter to rest. No need to derail the thread any further and certainly no need to court controversy. Its my opinion and I may be wrong, but I mean no offense. I just mean to criticize fairly and help him improve (if thats possible). |
Deep Sight:I did. If you didnt get my point, Im content to leave it at that. No offence intended. |
OLAADEGBU:Two pages and you are still going round in circles. You are the one who offered to prove to me. I have called you out. I have been waiting for you to start with your proof. Do your job and dont worry about anything else. OLAADEGBU:I believe I mentioned that its not within my field. Whereas I could probably give a laymans answer to your question, for the purpose of this discussion, I choose not to. There is also a mountain of material that can be found online, but I choose not to use these because I really do not see how essential it is to this discussion. In the end, you will probably try to impress on me the complexity of DNA and then link it to your god. This will fail as I've been hinting you. OLAADEGBU:Are you trying to bait me ? I know enough to know that your god as he is described and worshiped is a man made invention. OLAADEGBU:Ok. At least we have gotten this one straight. Nobody is going to judge me or even you. But I wager that if theres a judgement day, it will be more likely that it is one of the many thousand gods you have rejected, rather than your own. As I have mentioned before, the odds are highly against you and your god. OLAADEGBU:You should know better than to ask that question. |
InesQor: ![]() |
DeepSight, sometimes you amaze me. I'd like to know how much you know about the Benin moat. That in itself is a staggering achievement for a civilization without modern tools, yet I've never heard allusions to "aliens". Deep Sight:Many of your posts reek arrogance and I'm not trying to be mean. If the christians would acknowledge that their bible and god are man made and not divine, the attack of the opposition would be blunted somewhat. When someone claims his scripture is divinely inspired and therefore error free, you do not expect cheap mistakes to be made. I would think that the "god" who made the world and wrote a book should know the difference between stars and meteorites. Also, please avoid the thinking that the ancients were stupid people. We have stood on their knowledge to expand. I think you need to learn some humility. Take my post in good faith, I dont mean any offence. |
OLAADEGBU:Classic bro. Pure genius!!! Sin causes mutation, death, disease and what not. Sorry I've been away. I will try and address our issues. OLAADEGBU:Ok, I'll indulge you once more and no more. Dawkins forgot temporarily and was able to recall the 21 word title eventually. He said "oh God" which is a habit of speech. Only this morning, I was washing my car and playing Christian music. I played the entire "Fighting temptations" sound track and "the gospel according to jazz by Kirk Whallum. It would be absolutely silly to use that as proof against me because I'll be damned if I let religion come in between me and my music. Pretty much the same way me listening to music dedicated to the devil is meaningless. If I like the song, I will play it and no apologies. Dawkins said oh God. p.or.n stars say "oh my Zap.i.ng God". Kini big deal ? You should stop looking for cheap points. OLAADEGBU:I've heard a lot. I beg to be spared the repetition. I'm willing to consider new material but I doubt if you have any. OLAADEGBU:Apparently you do not get the irony here. Its immaterial what I do once you have "proven" your case. Do so asap. If I knew god existed, I would be a christian still. OLAADEGBU:Maybe so. I'm not convinced yet. Calling it a strawman doesnt make it so. Lets not debate the point. I hope my response above is satisfactory to you. OLAADEGBU:I know what DNA is. Science is not my field. Just because I cannot conclusively answer this question does not prove your god theory. It simply means I do not know. There are more knowledgeable individuals on nairaland who can provide more satisfactory answers on this issue than your holy book can. Again, I'm hoping that this is not how you intend to prove your case. Its an epic fail from conception. OLAADEGBU:A minor issue here. Saying one thing, meaning another. Its ok. I'll just say here that theres no attempt. You should learn to come to terms with the fact that some people can actually see through the cr.ap out there. As an aside, I know a christian who told me she understands where I'm coming from and she has her questions and doubts, but she chooses to believe. Infact, once I showed her a picture of the rapture (people floating up to heaven) and I asked her what she thought. She said it looked ridiculous. Get out of your small world and look around. OLAADEGBU:Like I said earlier, if I knew it existed, we wouldnt be having this conversation. I do notice an escape route you seem to be giving yourself though. I thought we were talking about your own god (of the bible) and not a generic "creator god". Do you want to prove the god you worship or merely that a god created this world ? I'm not bothered either way, but lets know what/who we are dealing with here. OLAADEGBU:Before then, you will bow to Sango's Great White Bolts of Lightning. |
Joagbaje:This is false. Both genealogies are traced back to Jesus. One lineage goes from David to Solomon, another goes from David to Nathan. In fact one of my favourite christian jokes is to ask a christian "after David, which of his sons is in the lineage of Jesus". Most say Solomon but it doesnt matter. I always prove them wrong with the bible. In fact, last year on nairaland, I showed that both lineages are from David and not one from David, one from Mary as Joagbaje wants us to believe. Its a common error, but not one I expect Joagbaje (our religious poster of the year) to make. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 (of 97 pages)
(why should these Pastors get rich alone).


